Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 1/2017

05.04.2016 | Computed Tomography

CT dose survey in adults: what sample size for what precision?

verfasst von: Stephen Taylor, Alain Van Muylem, Nigel Howarth, Pierre Alain Gevenois, Denis Tack

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To determine variability of volume computed tomographic dose index (CTDIvol) and dose–length product (DLP) data, and propose a minimum sample size to achieve an expected precision.

Methods

CTDIvol and DLP values of 19,875 consecutive CT acquisitions of abdomen (7268), thorax (3805), lumbar spine (3161), cervical spine (1515) and head (4106) were collected in two centers. Their variabilities were investigated according to sample size (10 to 1000 acquisitions) and patient body weight categories (no weight selection, 67–73 kg and 60–80 kg). The 95 % confidence interval in percentage of their median (CI95/med) value was calculated for increasing sample sizes. We deduced the sample size that set a 95 % CI lower than 10 % of the median (CI95/med ≤ 10 %).

Results

Sample size ensuring CI95/med ≤ 10 %, ranged from 15 to 900 depending on the body region and the dose descriptor considered. In sample sizes recommended by regulatory authorities (i.e., from 10–20 patients), mean CTDIvol and DLP of one sample ranged from 0.50 to 2.00 times its actual value extracted from 2000 samples.

Conclusions

The sampling error in CTDIvol and DLP means is high in dose surveys based on small samples of patients. Sample size should be increased at least tenfold to decrease this variability.

Key Points

Variability of dose descriptors is high regardless of the body region.
Variability of dose descriptors depends on weight selection and the region scanned.
Larger samples would reduce sampling errors of radiation dose data in surveys.
Totally or partially disabling AEC reduces dose variability and increases patient dose.
Median values of dose descriptors depend on the body weight selection.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hricak H, Brenner DJ, Adelstein SJ et al (2011) Managing Radiation Use in Medical Imaging: A Multifaceted Challenge. Radiology 258:889–905CrossRefPubMed Hricak H, Brenner DJ, Adelstein SJ et al (2011) Managing Radiation Use in Medical Imaging: A Multifaceted Challenge. Radiology 258:889–905CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Shrimpton PC, Wall BF, Jones DG et al (1986) Doses to patients from routine diagnostic X-ray examinations in England. Br J Radiol 59:749–758CrossRefPubMed Shrimpton PC, Wall BF, Jones DG et al (1986) Doses to patients from routine diagnostic X-ray examinations in England. Br J Radiol 59:749–758CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79:968–980CrossRefPubMed Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79:968–980CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Jessen KA, Shrimpton PC, Geleijns J, Panzer W, Tosi G (1999) Dosimetry for optimisation of patient protection in computed tomography. Appl Radiat Isot 50:165–172CrossRefPubMed Jessen KA, Shrimpton PC, Geleijns J, Panzer W, Tosi G (1999) Dosimetry for optimisation of patient protection in computed tomography. Appl Radiat Isot 50:165–172CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Stamm G (2012) Collective radiation dose from MDCT. Critical review of survey studies. In: Tack D, Kalra MK, Gevenois PA (eds) Radiation dose from multidetector CT. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 209–229 Stamm G (2012) Collective radiation dose from MDCT. Critical review of survey studies. In: Tack D, Kalra MK, Gevenois PA (eds) Radiation dose from multidetector CT. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 209–229
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Tack D, Jahnen A, Kohler S et al (2014) Multidetector CT radiation dose optimisation in adults: short- and long-term effects of a clinical audit. Eur Radiol 24:169–175CrossRefPubMed Tack D, Jahnen A, Kohler S et al (2014) Multidetector CT radiation dose optimisation in adults: short- and long-term effects of a clinical audit. Eur Radiol 24:169–175CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sodickson A, Warden GI, Farkas CE et al (2012) Exposing Exposure: Automated Anatomy-specific CT Radiation Exposure Extraction for Quality Assurance and Radiation Monitoring. Radiology 264:397–405CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sodickson A, Warden GI, Farkas CE et al (2012) Exposing Exposure: Automated Anatomy-specific CT Radiation Exposure Extraction for Quality Assurance and Radiation Monitoring. Radiology 264:397–405CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 248:254–263CrossRefPubMed Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 248:254–263CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2011) Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. Task Group 204. College Park, Md: American Association of Physicists in Medicine. American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2011) Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. Task Group 204. College Park, Md: American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bankier AA, Kressel HY (2012) Through the Looking Glass revisited: the need for more meaning and less drama in the reporting of dose and dose reduction in CT. Radiology 265:4–8CrossRefPubMed Bankier AA, Kressel HY (2012) Through the Looking Glass revisited: the need for more meaning and less drama in the reporting of dose and dose reduction in CT. Radiology 265:4–8CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Christner JA, Braun NN, Jacobsen MC, Carter RE, Kofler JM, McCollough CH (2012) Size-specific Dose Estimates for Adult Patients at CT of the Torso. Radiology 265:841–847CrossRefPubMed Christner JA, Braun NN, Jacobsen MC, Carter RE, Kofler JM, McCollough CH (2012) Size-specific Dose Estimates for Adult Patients at CT of the Torso. Radiology 265:841–847CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart D, Shrimpton PC (1991) The significance of patient weight when comparing X-ray room performance against guideline levels of dose. Br J Radiol 64:771–772CrossRefPubMed Hart D, Shrimpton PC (1991) The significance of patient weight when comparing X-ray room performance against guideline levels of dose. Br J Radiol 64:771–772CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat D'Hondt A, Cornil A, Bohy P, De Maertelaer V, Gevenois PA, Tack D (2014) Tuning of automatic exposure control strength in lumbar spine CT. Br J Radiol 87:20130707CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral D'Hondt A, Cornil A, Bohy P, De Maertelaer V, Gevenois PA, Tack D (2014) Tuning of automatic exposure control strength in lumbar spine CT. Br J Radiol 87:20130707CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Brink JA, Morin RL (2012) Size-specific Dose Estimation for CT: How Should It Be Used and What Does It Mean? Radiology 265:666–668CrossRefPubMed Brink JA, Morin RL (2012) Size-specific Dose Estimation for CT: How Should It Be Used and What Does It Mean? Radiology 265:666–668CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
CT dose survey in adults: what sample size for what precision?
verfasst von
Stephen Taylor
Alain Van Muylem
Nigel Howarth
Pierre Alain Gevenois
Denis Tack
Publikationsdatum
05.04.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4333-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

European Radiology 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.