Anzeige
Erschienen in:
20.09.2022 | Original Article
Differences in isolated bacteria between perforated and non-perforated appendicitis: an analysis of 680 consecutive appendicectomies in a single institution
Erschienen in: Pediatric Surgery International | Ausgabe 12/2022
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Purpose
Escherichia coli and Bacteroides species are the most frequently detected species in ascites in perforated appendicitis and are generally sensitive to non-empiric cephalosporins like cefazolin or cefmetazole. However, monotherapy with such antibiotics is mostly insufficient for perforated appendicitis. To investigate this issue, this study aimed to compare bacterial floras in ascites culture between perforated and non-perforated appendicitis.
Methods
Ascites culture results in perforated and non-perforated appendicitis cases were analyzed using a departmental database. The duration of symptoms before surgery, pre-surgical white blood cell count, C-reactive protein value, postsurgical length of stay, length of antibiotic treatment, and the rate of using second-line antibiotics or complications were also compared.
Results
A total of 608 and 72 cases of non-perforated and perforated appendicitis were included. Escherichia coli and Bacteroides species were the dominant bacteria in both conditions. However, the total proportions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus anginosus group, and Enterococcus group were significantly higher in perforated appendicitis than in non-perforated appendicitis.
Conclusion
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus anginosus group, and Enterococcus group have better susceptibility to penicillin-based empiric antibiotics than cephalosporins. The abundance of these bacteria might explain why non-empiric cephalosporins are not effective in perforated appendicitis and the superiority of penicillin-based empiric antibiotics.