Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Pain and Headache Reports
Erschienen in: Current Pain and Headache Reports 10/2018

01.10.2018 | Psychological and Behavioral Aspects of Headache and Pain (D Buse, Section Editor)

Digital Technology and Mobile Health in Behavioral Migraine Therapy: a Narrative Review

verfasst von: Anker Stubberud, Mattias Linde

Erschienen in: Current Pain and Headache Reports | Ausgabe 10/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This article reviews the recent research and development of electronic health (eHealth) and, in particular, mobile health (mHealth) strategies to deliver behavioral treatment for migraine. Prospects for future development and research of mobile health in migraine are suggested.

Recent Findings

Advances in digital technology and mobile technology have led to an era where electronic and mobile approaches are applied to several aspects of healthcare. Electronic behavioral interventions for migraine seem to be acceptable and feasible, but efficacy measures are uncertain. Clinical trials on mHealth-based classical behavioral therapies, such as relaxation, biofeedback, and cognitive behavioral therapy are missing in the literature. Within mHealth, headache diaries are the most researched and scientifically developed. Still, there is a gap between commercially available apps and scientifically validated and developed apps.

Summary

Digital technology and mobile health has not yet lived out its potential in behavioral migraine therapy. Application of proper usability and functionality designs towards the right market, together with appraisal of medical and technological recommendations, may facilitate rapid development of eHealth and mHealth, while also establishing scientific evidence.
Literatur
1.
2.
Vos T, Allen C, Arora M, Barber RM, Bhutta ZA, Brown A, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1545–602.CrossRef
3.
4.
Kay M, Santos J, Takane M. mHealth: new horizons for health through mobile technologies. World Health Organ. 2011;3:66–71.
5.
6.
Stubberud A, Varkey E, McCrory DC, Pedersen SA, Linde M. Biofeedback as prophylaxis for pediatric migraine: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2016;138(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0675.
7.
8.
9.
Zhu Q, Liu C, Holroyd KA, editors. From a traditional behavioral management program to an m-health app: lessons learned in developing m-health apps for existing health care programs. Software Engineering in Health Care (SEHC), 2012 4th International Workshop on; 2012: IEEE.
10.
11.
Labrique AB, Vasudevan L, Kochi E, Fabricant R, Mehl G. mHealth innovations as health system strengthening tools: 12 common applications and a visual framework. Global Health: Sci Pract. 2013;1(2):160–71.
12.
Harris P, Loveman E, Clegg A, Easton S, Berry N. Systematic review of cognitive behavioural therapy for the management of headaches and migraines in adults. Br J Pain. 2015;9(4):213–24.CrossRef
13.
Tomlinson M, Solomon W, Singh Y, Doherty T, Chopra M, Ijumba P, et al. The use of mobile phones as a data collection tool: a report from a household survey in South Africa. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009;9(1):51.CrossRef
14.
Ebner H, Schreier G. Medication adherence and monitoring. Developing Drug Products in an Aging Society. Springer; 2016. p. 659–74.
15.
Lenhart A, Madden M, Duggan M, Cortesi S, Gasser U. Teens and technology 2013. Pew Internet & American Life Project and Harvard’s Berkman. 2013.
16.
17.
de la Vega R, Miró J. mHealth: a strategic field without a solid scientific soul. a systematic review of pain-related apps. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e101312.CrossRef
18.
Lalloo C, Jibb LA, Rivera J, Agarwal A, Stinson JN. “There’sa pain app for that”: review of patient-targeted smartphone applications for pain management. Clin J Pain. 2015;31(6):557–63.CrossRef
19.
Huckvale K, Morrison C, Ouyang J, Ghaghda A, Car J. The evolution of mobile apps for asthma: an updated systematic assessment of content and tools. BMC Med. 2015;13(1):58.CrossRef
20.
Neubeck L, Lowres N, Benjamin EJ, Freedman SB, Coorey G, Redfern J. The mobile revolution—using smartphone apps to prevent cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12(6):350–60.CrossRef
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
Mosadeghi-Nik M, Askari MS, Fatehi F. Mobile health (mHealth) for headache disorders: a review of the evidence base. J Telemed Telecare. 2016;22(8):472–7.CrossRef
26.
27.
28.
29.
Park J-W, Chu MK, Kim J-M, Park S-G, Cho S-J. Analysis of trigger factors in episodic migraineurs using a smartphone headache diary applications. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0149577.CrossRef
30.
Lipton RB, Pavlovic JM, Haut SR, Grosberg BM, Buse DC. Methodological issues in studying trigger factors and premonitory features of migraine. Headache. 2014;54(10):1661–9.CrossRef
31.
• Pagán J, Zapater M, Ayala JL. Power transmission and workload balancing policies in eHealth mobile cloud computing scenarios. Futur Gener Comput Syst. 2018;78:587–601. This engineering oriented paper describes a very exciting research field in which migraine prediction based on sensor technology could be achieved. CrossRef
32.
Müller KI, Alstadhaug KB, Bekkelund SI. Acceptability, feasibility, and cost of telemedicine for nonacute headaches: a randomized study comparing video and traditional consultations. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(5).
33.
• Müller KI, Alstadhaug KB, Bekkelund SI. A randomized trial of telemedicine efficacy and safety for nonacute headaches. Neurology. 2017;89(2):153–62. This randomized controlled trial describes the efficient use of an acceptable, feasible, and cost-saving telemedicine consultation for headache sufferers. CrossRef
34.
BinDhim NF, Hawkey A, Trevena L. A systematic review of quality assessment methods for smartphone health apps. Telemed e-Health. 2015;21(2):97–104.CrossRef
35.
McKay FH, Cheng C, Wright A, Shill J, Stephens H, Uccellini M. Evaluating mobile phone applications for health behaviour change: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2016:1357633X16673538.
36.
Grundy QH, Wang Z, Bero LA. Challenges in assessing mobile health app quality: a systematic review of prevalent and innovative methods. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(6):1051–9.CrossRef
37.
Eysenbach G, Group C-E. CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4).
38.
Chatzipavlou IA, Christoforidou SA, Vlachopoulou M. A recommended guideline for the development of mHealth Apps. mHealth. 2016;2(5).
39.
Jibb LA, Cafazzo JA, Nathan PC, Seto E, Stevens BJ, Nguyen C et al. Development of a mHealth real-time pain self-management app for adolescents with cancer: an iterative usability testing study. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 2017: 1043454217697022.
40.
41.
Stinson JN, Lalloo C, Harris L, Isaac L, Campbell F, Brown S, et al. iCanCope with Pain™: user-centred design of a web-and mobile-based self-management program for youth with chronic pain based on identified health care needs. Pain Res Manag. 2014;19(5):257–65.CrossRef
42.
Cafazzo JA, Casselman M, Hamming N, Katzman DK, Palmert MR. Design of an mHealth app for the self-management of adolescent type 1 diabetes: a pilot study. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(3):e70.CrossRef
43.
Jacobs MA, Graham AL. Iterative development and evaluation methods of mHealth behavior change interventions. Curr Opini Psychol. 2016;9:33–7.CrossRef
44.
45.
Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Zelenko O, Tjondronegoro D, Mani M. Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(1):e27.CrossRef
46.
Druce KL, McBeth J, van der Veer SN, Selby DA, Vidgen B, Georgatzis K et al. Recruitment and ongoing engagement in a UK smartphone study examining the association between weather and pain: cohort study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5(11).
47.
Bot BM, Suver C, Neto EC, Kellen M, Klein A, Bare C, et al. The mPower study, Parkinson disease mobile data collected using ResearchKit. Sci Data. 2016;3:160011.CrossRef
48.
49.
50.
Misra S, Lewis TL, Aungst TD. Medical application use and the need for further research and assessment for clinical practice: creation and integration of standards for best practice to alleviate poor application design. JAMA dermatology. 2013;149(6):661–2.CrossRef
51.
Yetisen AK, Martinez-Hurtado J, da Cruz VF, Simsekler ME, Akram MS, Lowe CR. The regulation of mobile medical applications. Lab Chip. 2014;14(5):833–40.CrossRef
52.
53.
54.
55.
Charani E, Castro-Sánchez E, Moore LS, Holmes A. Do smartphone applications in healthcare require a governance and legal framework? It depends on the application! BMC Med. 2014;12(1):29.CrossRef
56.
Stubberud A, Omland PM, Tronvik E, Olsen A, Sand T, Linde M. Wireless surface electromyography and skin temperature sensors for biofeedback treatment of headache: validation study with stationary control equipment. JMIR Biomed Eng. 2018;3(1):e1.CrossRef
57.
Rogers MA, Lemmen K, Kramer R, Mann J, Chopra V. Internet-delivered health interventions that work: systematic review of meta-analyses and evaluation of website availability. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(3).
58.
Guerrero Peral A, Ruiz Pinero M, Miralles J, editors. “MyMigraines” community: improving communication between migraine patient and neurologist. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY; 2015: WILEY-BLACKWELL 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA.
59.
Bates DW, Saria S, Ohno-Machado L, Shah A, Escobar G. Big data in health care: using analytics to identify and manage high-risk and high-cost patients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(7):1123–31.CrossRef
60.
Islam SR, Kwak D, Kabir MH, Hossain M, Kwak K-S. The internet of things for health care: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Access. 2015;3:678–708.CrossRef
61.
Farahani B, Firouzi F, Chang V, Badaroglu M, Constant N, Mankodiya K. Towards fog-driven IoT eHealth: promises and challenges of IoT in medicine and healthcare. Futur Gener Comput Syst. 2018;78:659–76.CrossRef
62.
Firouzi F, Rahmani AM, Mankodiya K, Badaroglu M, Merrett G, Wong P et al. Internet-of-Things and big data for smarter healthcare: from device to architecture, applications and analytics. Elsevier; 2018.
63.
64.
Nascimento TD, DosSantos MF, Danciu T, DeBoer M, van Holsbeeck H, Lucas SR et al. Real-time sharing and expression of migraine headache suffering on Twitter: a cross-sectional infodemiology study. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(4).
65.
Lantéri-Minet M. What do patients want from their acute migraine therapy? Eur Neurol. 2005;53(Suppl. 1):3–9.CrossRef
66.
Huttunen H-L, Halonen R, Koskimäki H. Wishes for wearables from patients with migraine. 2017.
Metadaten
Titel
Digital Technology and Mobile Health in Behavioral Migraine Therapy: a Narrative Review
verfasst von
Anker Stubberud
Mattias Linde
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Pain and Headache Reports / Ausgabe 10/2018
Print ISSN: 1531-3433
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-3081
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-018-0718-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2018

Current Pain and Headache Reports 10/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Episodic Migraine (S Nahas, Section Editor)

Exploding Head Syndrome: a Review

Anesthetic Techniques in Pain Management (D Wang, Section Editor)

A Contemporary Perspective on the Management of Post-Craniotomy Headache and Pain

Imaging (L Mecthler, Section Editor)

The Role of Imaging in the Management of Cystic Formations of the Mobile Spine (CYFMOS)

Concussion and Head Injury (A Finkel, Section Editor)

Imaging Post-Traumatic Headache

Uncommon and/or Unusual Headaches and Syndromes (J Ailani, Section Editor)

Bath-Related Headache

Concussion and Head Injury (A Finkel, Section Editor)

Strides Toward Better Understanding of Post-Traumatic Headache Pathophysiology Using Animal Models

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

25.04.2024 Allergien und Intoleranzreaktionen Nachrichten

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren
Bildnachweise