Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine 4/2021

Open Access 02.02.2021 | Correspondence

Double data and dubious conclusions, ‘Houston do we have a problem?’

verfasst von: J. L. Epker, A. J. Valkenburg, E. J. O. Kompanje

Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2021

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
Hinweise

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
With interest, as well as with some degree of concern, we read the article of Laserna et al. published in Intensive Care Medicine [1].
The subject outlined in this article is very important for adequate end-of-life care in the ICU and the efforts that have been made to write this review are significant. Nevertheless, we think that a methodological mistake has been made in this review and meta-analysis.
The authors include 13 original studies in their dataset; however, 2 of these studies as presented in Table 1 of their manuscript refer to congress abstracts [2, 3]. Abstracts are normally intended to report preliminary data. These abstracts were indeed only “work in progress”, submitted to be presented at the ESCIM meetings in Berlin 2011 and Lisbon 2012, respectively. The progress over time can be directly derived from the growing number of patients: 75 in the first abstract, 139 patients in the second abstract, and finally 241 patients in the publication in the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management [24]. In other words, 135 (60 + 75) patients are unfortunately duplicate, which makes the analysis potentially unreliable.
Table 1
Main effects of analgesics and sedatives
 
Sedation
Analgesia
Analgosedation
Anxiety reduction
Other effect
Morphine
 + 
 ± 
 
Fentanyl
 + 
 ± 
Sufentanil
 + 
 ± 
Remifentanil
 + 
 + 
 + 
 ± 
S-Ketamine
 + 
 + 
 + 
 
Clonidine
 + 
 ± 
 + 
Opioid enhancing
Dexmethomidine
 + 
 + 
 
Propofol
 + 
 ± 
Midazolam
 + 
 + 
Lorazepam
 + 
 + 
Another problem of the article is that it only focusses on pain and its treatment; however, the authors do mention in this context dosages of benzodiazepines and propofol, which are sedatives, definitely not analgesics.
The reason that the studies included do mention sedatives, is that pain is only one of the symptoms we treat as part of end-of-life care in the ICU. Fear, anxiety, distress, and dyspnea are other severe problems to deal with. Especially for these above-mentioned problems, the use of sedatives is essential; however, they should not be mistaken for or categorized with analgesics as the authors seem to do.
The effects of sedatives and analgesics are commonly confused in clinical practice. We, therefore, took the liberty of using this opportunity to present a concise overview of the main effects of some of the most commonly used drugs in these categories in Table 1. When caring for a terminally ill ICU patient, the indication for treatment must be clear; is it pain that requires address or anxiety? Or is sedation required, because pain or anxiety can no longer be effectively controlled? The intensivist should choose the medication based on this important information.
Lastly, the authors suggest that the dosages observed are "too high" in relation to those recommended in end-of-life guidelines.
However, as far as we know, the recommended doses of opioids and sedatives in end-of-life situations in the ICU are not based on clinical studies.
The only studies that provide evidence regarding the doses used for comfort care in the ICU are specifically the studies described in this article.
We, therefore, suggest that the article by Laserna et al. be seen as a first, and welcome, step in the development of an evidence-based guideline for treatment of pain and discomfort relief in end-of-life situations in the ICU and ideally, an additional study should be conducted, focusing on the use of sedatives and anxiolytics in this same context.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

They authors do not have any conflict of interest to declare.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

e.Med Innere Medizin

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Innere Medizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Innere Medizin, den Premium-Inhalten der internistischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten internistischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

e.Med Anästhesiologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Anästhesiologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes AINS, den Premium-Inhalten der AINS-Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten AINS-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Laserna A, Duran-Crane A, Lopez-Olivo MA et al (2020) Pain management during the withholding and withdrawal of life support in critically ill patients at the end-of-life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 46(9):1671–1682CrossRef Laserna A, Duran-Crane A, Lopez-Olivo MA et al (2020) Pain management during the withholding and withdrawal of life support in critically ill patients at the end-of-life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 46(9):1671–1682CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Epker JL, Bakker J, Kompanje EJO (2011) Withdrawing mechanical ventilation and vaso-active medication in Dutch non-academic ICU’s: a prospective study focused on sedative and opioid use, comfort of the patient, severity of illness and time till death. Intensive Care Med 37:S69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-011-2322-1CrossRef Epker JL, Bakker J, Kompanje EJO (2011) Withdrawing mechanical ventilation and vaso-active medication in Dutch non-academic ICU’s: a prospective study focused on sedative and opioid use, comfort of the patient, severity of illness and time till death. Intensive Care Med 37:S69. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00134-011-2322-1CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Epker JL, Bakker J, Lingsma HF, Kompanje EJ (2015) An observational study on a protocol for withdrawal of life-sustaining measures on two non-academic intensive care units in The Netherlands: few signs of distress, no suffering? J Pain Symptom Manage 50(5):676–684CrossRef Epker JL, Bakker J, Lingsma HF, Kompanje EJ (2015) An observational study on a protocol for withdrawal of life-sustaining measures on two non-academic intensive care units in The Netherlands: few signs of distress, no suffering? J Pain Symptom Manage 50(5):676–684CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Double data and dubious conclusions, ‘Houston do we have a problem?’
verfasst von
J. L. Epker
A. J. Valkenburg
E. J. O. Kompanje
Publikationsdatum
02.02.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Intensive Care Medicine / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06315-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Intensive Care Medicine 4/2021 Zur Ausgabe

From the Inside

ICU

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.