Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 2/2019

26.11.2018 | Ideas and Innovations

Estimation of implant size based on mammograms in immediate breast reconstruction

verfasst von: Yan Yu Tan, Howard Chu, Mihir Chandarana, Sadaf Jafferbhoy, Sankaran Narayanan, Sekhar Marla, Soni Soumian

Erschienen in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Implant size selection is a critical component of preoperative planning for immediate breast reconstruction. This paper introduces a novel formula, based on preoperative mammograms, for estimating implant volume in patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 115 consecutive patients with immediate breast reconstruction following skin or nipple sparing mastectomy was performed. A calculated implant size was obtained using the formula, calculated implant size (ml) = π × height (cm) × [base width (cm) − 3]. The calculations were performed independently by two surgeons and based on the ipsilateral preoperative mammogram. The calculated implant size was compared with the actual implant size used during the surgery and results were analysed.

Results

The mean calculated and actual implant sizes were 376.03 ml and 324.49 ml, respectively. There was no difference found between calculated and actual implant sizes (t = − 1.704, p = 0.090), and there was a strong positive correlation between calculated and actual implant sizes (r = 0.7748, p < 0.00001). Further analysis revealed greater accuracy of the formula in patients with an estimated implant size of less than 350 ml, and a tendency to overestimate implant size in breasts with an estimated volume of more than 350 ml.

Conclusions

The mammography-based formula is a simple and practical method to estimate implant size preoperatively. Ultimately, implant selection for the best possible cosmetic outcome is a multifactorial process, of which breast volume is one consideration. This formula can serve as a useful adjunct for preoperative assessment.
Level of Evidence: Level III, diagnostic study.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams WP Jr, McKee D (2016) Matching the implant to the breast: a systematic review of implant size selection systems for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 138:987–994CrossRefPubMed Adams WP Jr, McKee D (2016) Matching the implant to the breast: a systematic review of implant size selection systems for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 138:987–994CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Pöhlmann STL, Harkness E, Taylor CJ, Gandhi A, Astley SM (2017) Preoperative implant selection for unilateral breast reconstruction using 3D imaging with the Microsoft Kinect sensor. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 70:1059–1067CrossRefPubMed Pöhlmann STL, Harkness E, Taylor CJ, Gandhi A, Astley SM (2017) Preoperative implant selection for unilateral breast reconstruction using 3D imaging with the Microsoft Kinect sensor. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 70:1059–1067CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Roostaeian J, Adams WP Jr (2014) Three-dimensional imaging for breast augmentation: is this technology providing accurate simulations? Aesthet Surg J 34:857–875CrossRefPubMed Roostaeian J, Adams WP Jr (2014) Three-dimensional imaging for breast augmentation: is this technology providing accurate simulations? Aesthet Surg J 34:857–875CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lejour M (1997) Evaluation of fat in breast tissue removed by vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:386–393CrossRefPubMed Lejour M (1997) Evaluation of fat in breast tissue removed by vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:386–393CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Aslan G, Terzioglu A, Tuncali D, Bingul F (2003) Breast reduction: weight versus volume. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:339–340CrossRefPubMed Aslan G, Terzioglu A, Tuncali D, Bingul F (2003) Breast reduction: weight versus volume. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:339–340CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith DJ Jr, Palin WE Jr, Katch VL, Bennett JE (1986) Breast volume and anthropomorphic measurements: Normal values. Plast Reconstr Surg 78:331–335CrossRefPubMed Smith DJ Jr, Palin WE Jr, Katch VL, Bennett JE (1986) Breast volume and anthropomorphic measurements: Normal values. Plast Reconstr Surg 78:331–335CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Grossman AJ, Rounder LA (1980) A simple means for accurate breast volume determination. Plast Reconstr Surg 66:851–852CrossRefPubMed Grossman AJ, Rounder LA (1980) A simple means for accurate breast volume determination. Plast Reconstr Surg 66:851–852CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat El-Oteify M, Megeed HA, Ahmed B, El-Shazly M (2006) Assessment of the breast volume by a new simple formula. Indian J Plast Surg 39(1):13–16CrossRef El-Oteify M, Megeed HA, Ahmed B, El-Shazly M (2006) Assessment of the breast volume by a new simple formula. Indian J Plast Surg 39(1):13–16CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bouman FG (1970) Volumetric measurement of the human breast and breast tissue before and during mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 23:263–264CrossRefPubMed Bouman FG (1970) Volumetric measurement of the human breast and breast tissue before and during mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 23:263–264CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, Geng JZ, Klatsky S, Mansonn P (2002) Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:58–70CrossRefPubMed Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, Geng JZ, Klatsky S, Mansonn P (2002) Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:58–70CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang JB, Small KH, Choi M, Karp NS (2015) Three-dime plastic surgery: practical applications and beyond. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:1295–1304CrossRefPubMed Chang JB, Small KH, Choi M, Karp NS (2015) Three-dime plastic surgery: practical applications and beyond. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:1295–1304CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tzou CH, Artner NM, Pona I et al (2014) Comparison of threedimensional surface-imaging systems. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67:489–497CrossRefPubMed Tzou CH, Artner NM, Pona I et al (2014) Comparison of threedimensional surface-imaging systems. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67:489–497CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu C, Luan J, Mu L, Ji K (2010) The role of three-dimensional scanning technique in evaluation of breast asymmetry in breast augmentation: a 100-case study. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:2125–2132CrossRefPubMed Liu C, Luan J, Mu L, Ji K (2010) The role of three-dimensional scanning technique in evaluation of breast asymmetry in breast augmentation: a 100-case study. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:2125–2132CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Donfrancesco A, Montemurro P, Hedén P (2013) Three-dimensional simulated images in breast augmentation surgery: an investigation of patients’ satisfaction and the correlation between prediction and actual outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:810–822CrossRefPubMed Donfrancesco A, Montemurro P, Hedén P (2013) Three-dimensional simulated images in breast augmentation surgery: an investigation of patients’ satisfaction and the correlation between prediction and actual outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:810–822CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Gladilin E, Gabrielova B, Montemurro P, Hedén P (2011) Customized planning of augmentation mammaplasty with silicon implants using three-dimensional optical body scans and biomechanical modeling of soft tissue outcome. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:494–501 Gladilin E, Gabrielova B, Montemurro P, Hedén P (2011) Customized planning of augmentation mammaplasty with silicon implants using three-dimensional optical body scans and biomechanical modeling of soft tissue outcome. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:494–501
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Stan C, Bratu T, Chioibas R, Mastacaneanu M, Gyebnar V (2009) The contribution of computerized system in selection of the implant for breast augmentation. Timisoara Med J 60:140–144 Stan C, Bratu T, Chioibas R, Mastacaneanu M, Gyebnar V (2009) The contribution of computerized system in selection of the implant for breast augmentation. Timisoara Med J 60:140–144
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Creasman CN, Mordaunt D, Liolios T, Chiu C, Gabriel A, Maxwell GP (2011) Four-dimensional breast imaging, part II: clinical implementation and validation of a computer imaging system for breast augmentation planning. Aesthet Surg J 31:925–938CrossRefPubMed Creasman CN, Mordaunt D, Liolios T, Chiu C, Gabriel A, Maxwell GP (2011) Four-dimensional breast imaging, part II: clinical implementation and validation of a computer imaging system for breast augmentation planning. Aesthet Surg J 31:925–938CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chavoin JP, André A, Bozonnet E, Teisseyre A, Arrue J, Moreno B, Gangloff D, Grolleau JL, Garrido I (2010) Mammary implant selection or chest implants fabrication with computer help. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 55:471–480CrossRefPubMed Chavoin JP, André A, Bozonnet E, Teisseyre A, Arrue J, Moreno B, Gangloff D, Grolleau JL, Garrido I (2010) Mammary implant selection or chest implants fabrication with computer help. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 55:471–480CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Georgiou CA, Ihrai T, Chamorey E, Flipo B, Chignon-Sicard B (2012) A formula for implant volume choice in breast reconstruction after nipple sparing mastectomy. Breast 21:781–782CrossRefPubMed Georgiou CA, Ihrai T, Chamorey E, Flipo B, Chignon-Sicard B (2012) A formula for implant volume choice in breast reconstruction after nipple sparing mastectomy. Breast 21:781–782CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Westreich M (1997) Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breast and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:468–479CrossRefPubMed Westreich M (1997) Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breast and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:468–479CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Garnsey C, Hollywood C, Henderson J, Johnson R, Gandhi A, Wilson M, Astley S (2013) Is it feasible to use an automated mammographic breast volume tool to aid breast reconstruction and implant selection? Eur J Surg Oncol 39(5):469CrossRef Garnsey C, Hollywood C, Henderson J, Johnson R, Gandhi A, Wilson M, Astley S (2013) Is it feasible to use an automated mammographic breast volume tool to aid breast reconstruction and implant selection? Eur J Surg Oncol 39(5):469CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Robertson SA, Rusby JE, Cutress RI (2014) Determinants of optimal mastectomy skin flap thickness. Br J Surg 101:899–911CrossRefPubMed Robertson SA, Rusby JE, Cutress RI (2014) Determinants of optimal mastectomy skin flap thickness. Br J Surg 101:899–911CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Radu M, Bordea C, Noditi A, Blidaru A (2018) Assessment of mastectomy skin flaps for immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. J Med Life 11(2):137–145PubMedPubMedCentral Radu M, Bordea C, Noditi A, Blidaru A (2018) Assessment of mastectomy skin flaps for immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. J Med Life 11(2):137–145PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Blondeel P, Hijjawi J, Depypere H, Roche N, Van Landuyt K (2009) Shaping the breast in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: an easy three-step principle. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:1–8CrossRef Blondeel P, Hijjawi J, Depypere H, Roche N, Van Landuyt K (2009) Shaping the breast in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: an easy three-step principle. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:1–8CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Estimation of implant size based on mammograms in immediate breast reconstruction
verfasst von
Yan Yu Tan
Howard Chu
Mihir Chandarana
Sadaf Jafferbhoy
Sankaran Narayanan
Sekhar Marla
Soni Soumian
Publikationsdatum
26.11.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-018-1473-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.