To the editor,
Little is known on the role of local signs at the catheter exit site [1‐3]. Using a large cohort with high-quality data from four randomized-controlled trials we recently showed that local signs at insertion site (i.e., a composite endpoint including redness, pain, purulent and non-purulent discharge) were significantly associated with catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) [4]. However, a question remains open: Which factors may influence local signs regardless of CRBSI? To our knowledge, no data in the recent literature are available.
Anzeige
We therefore re-analyzed our large cohort with 6976 patients and 14,590 short-term catheters, and we used as a primary endpoint “ ≥ 1 local sign.” We used multivariable logistic regression in order to identify variables associated with ≥ 1 local sign. Logistic models were stratified for the different centers included in the analysis.
Importantly, patients over 75 years (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72–0.94, p = 0.0044), with high SOFA score (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.55–0.79, p < 0.001), immunosuppression (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59–0.88, p = 0.0014), catheter duration ≤ 7 days (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.27–0.34, p < 0.001), and jugular (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.49–0.80, p = 0.0001) or femoral (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64–0.90, p = 0.0012) sites significantly decreased the risk to develop local signs (Table 1) regardless of CRBSI. Clinicians should deserve particular attention to these specific populations of critically ill patients, who may decrease the risk of developing local signs. Among patients with CRBSI (n = 114), severely injured patients (i.e., with high SOFA score or under vasoactive medications), immunosuppressed patients and femoral catheters had fewer local signs (data not shown).
Table 1
Risk factors of having ≥ 1 local sign (multivariable logistic regression)
OR | 95% CI | p value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRBSI | 4.242 | 2.811 | 6.402 | < 0.0001 |
Male sex | 1.093 | 0.981 | 1.218 | 0.11 |
Age > 75 years* | 0.823 | 0.719 | 0.941 | 0.0044 |
SOFA score* | ||||
SOFA 12–14 | 0.777 | 0.665 | 0.908 | 0.0015 |
SOFA 9–11 | 0.852 | 0.742 | 0.977 | 0.022 |
SOFA > 14 | 0.660 | 0.552 | 0.790 | < 0.0001 |
Immunosuppression | 0.719 | 0.587 | 0.881 | 0.0014 |
Vasopressor at inclusion | 1.043 | 0.916 | 1.187 | 0.52 |
Catheter days ≤ 7 | 0.303 | 0.273 | 0.336 | < 0.0001 |
Catheter type, CVC (versus AC) | 1.057 | 0.875 | 1.277 | 0.57 |
Experience of the operator < 50 procedures | 0.945 | 0.842 | 1.062 | 0.34 |
Insertion site | ||||
Jugular | 0.623 | 0.488 | 0.796 | 0.0001 |
Subclavian | 1.018 | 0.801 | 1.292 | 0.89 |
Femoral | 0.755 | 0.637 | 0.895 | 0.0012 |
Vasopressor at insertion | 0.961 | 0.853 | 1.083 | 0.52 |
Antibiotic at insertion | 1.271 | 1.138 | 1.420 | < 0.0001 |
In our previous analysis, we found that local signs observed within the first 7 catheter-days are predictive for intravascular catheter infections [4]: We are convinced that especially in this subgroup clinicians should be aware of the frequent absence of local signs in elderly, severe, immunosuppressed patients, and jugular/femoral catheters in the decision-making process.
Interestingly, pathological temperature (body temperature ≥ 38.5 °C or ≤ 36.5 °C), catheter type, and severity of illness in the presence of local signs did not help clinician in predicting intravascular catheter infections [4]. In light of all these considerations, we summarized in Table 2 practical clinical implications that may help ICU specialists when dealing with local signs and suspicion of intravascular catheter infections.
Table 2
Practical clinical implications
Factors that independently decreased local signs at insertion site: | Older age Severe ill patients Immunosuppression Catheter maintenance ≤ 7 days Jugular and femoral sites |
Factors that decreased local signs in patients with CRBSI | Severe ill patients Immunosuppression Femoral site |
Factors influencing the management of catheter* | Redness, non-purulent discharge, and purulent discharge are significantly associated with CRBSI Local signs are absent in almost 60% of CRBSI Local signs observed within the first 7 days are highly predictive for intravascular catheter infections Pathological temperature (body temperature ≥ 38.5 °C or ≤ 36.5 °C), catheter type, and severity of illness in the presence of local signs do not help clinician in predicting intravascular catheter infections |
Anzeige
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All studies were approved by the national ethics committees.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors have disclosed that they do not have conflict of interest. JFT received fees for lectures to 3 M, MSD, Pfizer, and Biomerieux. JFT received research grants from Astellas, 3 M, MSD, and Pfizer. JFT participated to advisory boards of 3 M, MSD, Bayer Pharma, Nabriva, and Pfizer. OM received fees for lectures for 3 M and BD. OM received research grants from BD.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.