nach oben

Intensive Care Medicine

Erschienen in:

27.05.2020 | Editorial

Focus on better care and ethics: Are medical ethics lagging behind the development of new medical technologies?

verfasst von: Sharon Einav, Otavio T. Ranzani

Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine | Ausgabe 8/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Technologies fall into two broad categories: evolutionary and revolutionary [1]. Evolutionary technologies develop slowly and are more common. Revolutionary technologies occur sporadically and have the potential to alter medical care entirely. Mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal life support and liver and renal replacement therapy were revolutionary when they were first introduced. These technologies have rapidly pervaded the practice of intensive care and are currently considered mainstream intensive care treatments. However, the fact that these technologies have become mostly evolutionary in the last decades does not mean we have addressed the ethical dilemmas created by their use. …

Iserson KV, Chiasson PM (2002) The ethics of applying new medical technologies. Semin Laparosc Surg 9:222–229CrossRef

Wilson ME, Mittal A, Karki B, Dobler CC, Wahab A, Curtis JR, Erwin PJ, Majzoub AM, Montori VM, Gajic O, Murad MH (2020) Do-not-intubate orders in patients with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 46:36–45CrossRef

Fernando SM, McIsaac DI, Rochwerg B, Bagshaw SM, Muscedere J, Munshi L, Ferguson ND, Seely AJE, Cook DJ, Dave C, Tanuseputro P, Kyeremanteng K (2019) Frailty and invasive mechanical ventilation: association with outcomes, extubation failure, and tracheostomy. Intensive Care Med 45:1742–1752CrossRef

Karagiannidis C, Brodie D, Strassmann S, Stoelben E, Philipp A, Bein T, Muller T, Windisch W (2016) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: evolving epidemiology and mortality. Intensive Care Med 42:889–896CrossRef

Schmidt M, Combes A, Shekar K (2019) ECMO for immunosuppressed patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: drawing a line in the sand. Intensive Care Med 45:1140–1142CrossRef

Yu HY, Wang CH, Chi NH, Huang SC, Chou HW, Chou NK, Chen YS (2019) Effect of interplay between age and low-flow duration on neurologic outcomes of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Intensive Care Med 45:44–54CrossRef

Abrams D, Pham T, Burns KEA, Combes A, Curtis JR, Mueller T, Prager KM, Serra A, Slutsky AS, Brodie D, Schmidt M, International ECMO Network (ECMONet) (2019) Practice patterns and ethical considerations in the management of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients: an international survey. Crit Care Med 47:1346–1355CrossRef

Alshamsi F, Alshammari K, Belley-Cote E, Dionne J, Albrahim T, Albudoor B, Ismail M, Al-Judaibi B, Baw B, Subramanian RM, Steadman R, Galusca D, Huang DT, Nanchal R, Al Quraini M, Yuan Y, Alhazzani W, GUIDE Group (2020) Extracorporeal liver support in patients with liver failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Intensive Care Med 46(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05783-y CrossRefPubMed

Navva PK, Venkata Sreepada S, Shivanand Nayak K (2015) Present status of renal replacement therapy in Asian countries. Blood Purif 40:280–287CrossRef

10.

Joannidis M, Forni LG, Klein SJ, Honore PM, Kashani K, Ostermann M, Prowle J, Bagshaw SM, Cantaluppi V, Darmon M, Ding X, Fuhrmann V, Hoste E, Husain-Syed F, Lubnow M, Maggiorini M, Meersch M, Murray PT, Ricci Z, Singbartl K, Staudinger T, Welte T, Ronco C, Kellum JA (2020) Lung-kidney interactions in critically ill patients: consensus report of the Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) 21 Workgroup. Intensive Care Med 46(4):654–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05869-7 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Abrams D, Grasselli G, Schmidt M, Mueller T, Brodie D (2020) ECLS-associated infections in adults: what we know and what we don’t yet know. Intensive Care Med 46(2):182–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05847-z CrossRefPubMed

12.

Denny KJ, Kumar A, Timsit JF, Laupland KB (2020) Extra-cardiac endovascular infections in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med 46(2):173–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05855-z CrossRefPubMed

13.

Vrselja Z, Daniele SG, Silbereis J, Talpo F, Morozov YM, Sousa AMM, Tanaka BS, Skarica M, Pletikos M, Kaur N, Zhuang ZW, Liu Z, Alkawadri R, Sinusas AJ, Latham SR, Waxman SG, Sestan N (2019) Restoration of brain circulation and cellular functions hours post-mortem. Nature 568:336–343CrossRef

14.

Bodet-Contentin L, Gadrez P, Ehrmann S (2018) Eye-tracking and speech-generating technology to improve communication with intubated intensive care unit patients: initial experience. Intensive Care Med 44:676–677CrossRef

15.

Edelman BJ, Meng J, Suma D, Zurn C, Nagarajan E, Baxter BS, Cline CC, He B (2019) Noninvasive neuroimaging enhances continuous neural tracking for robotic device control. Sci Robot. 4(31):eaaw6844. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aaw6844 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Anumanchipalli GK, Chartier J, Chang EF (2019) Speech synthesis from neural decoding of spoken sentences. Nature 568:493–498CrossRef

17.

Sprung CL, Ricou B, Hartog CS, Maia P, Mentzelopoulos SD, Weiss M, Levin PD, Galarza L, de la Guardia V, Schefold JC, Baras M, Joynt GM, Bülow HH, Nakos G, Cerny V, Marsch S, Girbes AR, Ingels C, Miskolci O, Ledoux D, Mullick S, Bocci MG, Gjedsted J, Estébanez B, Nates JL, Lesieur O, Sreedharan R, Giannini AM, Fuciños LC, Danbury CM, Michalsen A, Soliman IW, Estella A, Avidan A (2019) Changes in end-of-life practices in European intensive care units from 1999 to 2016. JAMA 2:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.14608 CrossRef

18.

Alhazzani W, Moller MH, Belley-Cote E, Citerio G (2019) Intensive care medicine rapid practice guidelines (ICM-RPG): paving the road of the future. Intensive Care Med 45:1639–1641CrossRef

19.

Lee HW, Park Y, Jang EJ, Lee YJ (2019) Intensive care unit length of stay is reduced by protocolized family support intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 45:1072–1081CrossRef

Titel: Focus on better care and ethics: Are medical ethics lagging behind the development of new medical technologies?
verfasst von: Sharon Einav
Otavio T. Ranzani
Publikationsdatum: 27.05.2020
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine / Ausgabe 8/2020
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06112-4

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren

Springer Medizin

Focus on better care and ethics: Are medical ethics lagging behind the development of new medical technologies?

Excerpt

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

Update AINS

Springer Medizin

Excerpt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2020

Clinical phenotypes of critically ill COVID-19 patients

Might the surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines be less confusing? Authors’ reply

Ten things we learned about COVID-19

Macroscopic amoxicillin crystalluria

Frailty index predicts poor outcome in COVID-19 patients

Admission chest CT score predicts 5-day outcome in patients with COVID-19

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

Update AINS