Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 3/2011

01.03.2011 | Breast

High-risk lesions diagnosed at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: can underestimation be predicted?

verfasst von: Pavel Crystal, Arifa Sadaf, Karina Bukhanov, David McCready, Frances O’Malley, Thomas H. Helbich

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the frequency of diagnosis of high-risk lesions at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (MRgVABB) and to determine whether underestimation may be predicted.

Methods

Retrospective review of the medical records of 161 patients who underwent MRgVABB was performed. The underestimation rate was defined as an upgrade of a high-risk lesion at MRgVABB to malignancy at surgery. Clinical data, MRI features of the biopsied lesions, and histological diagnosis of cases with and those without underestimation were compared.

Results

Of 161 MRgVABB, histology revealed 31 (19%) high-risk lesions. Of 26 excised high-risk lesions, 13 (50%) were upgraded to malignancy. The underestimation rates of lobular neoplasia, atypical apocrine metaplasia, atypical ductal hyperplasia, and flat epithelial atypia were 50% (4/8), 100% (5/5), 50% (3/6) and 50% (1/2) respectively. There was no underestimation in the cases of benign papilloma without atypia (0/3), and radial scar (0/2). No statistically significant differences (p > 0.1) between the cases with and those without underestimation were seen in patient age, indications for breast MRI, size of lesion on MRI, morphological and kinetic features of biopsied lesions.

Conclusions

Imaging and clinical features cannot be used reliably to predict underestimation at MRgVABB. All high-risk lesions diagnosed at MRgVABB require surgical excision.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD, Morris E, Pisano E, Schnall M, Sener S, Smith RA, Warner E, Yaffe M, Andrews KS, Russell CA (2007) American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57:75–89, Erratum in: CA Cancer J Clin 57:185CrossRefPubMed Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD, Morris E, Pisano E, Schnall M, Sener S, Smith RA, Warner E, Yaffe M, Andrews KS, Russell CA (2007) American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57:75–89, Erratum in: CA Cancer J Clin 57:185CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller JC, Rafferty EA, Specht MC, Thrall JH, Lee SI (2008) When is breast magnetic resonance imaging recommended for cancer detection? J Am Coll Radiol 5:224–226CrossRefPubMed Miller JC, Rafferty EA, Specht MC, Thrall JH, Lee SI (2008) When is breast magnetic resonance imaging recommended for cancer detection? J Am Coll Radiol 5:224–226CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Granader EJ, Dwamena B, Carlos RC (2008) MRI and mammography surveillance of women at increased risk for breast cancer: recommendations using an evidence-based approach. Acad Radiol 15:1590–1595CrossRefPubMed Granader EJ, Dwamena B, Carlos RC (2008) MRI and mammography surveillance of women at increased risk for breast cancer: recommendations using an evidence-based approach. Acad Radiol 15:1590–1595CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, Wardelmann E, Leutner CC, Koenig R, Kuhn W, Schild HH (2007) MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 370:485–492CrossRefPubMed Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, Wardelmann E, Leutner CC, Koenig R, Kuhn W, Schild HH (2007) MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 370:485–492CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Riedl CC, Ponhold L, Flöry D, Weber M, Kroiss R, Wagner T, Fuchsjäger M, Helbich TH (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 13:6144–6152CrossRefPubMed Riedl CC, Ponhold L, Flöry D, Weber M, Kroiss R, Wagner T, Fuchsjäger M, Helbich TH (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 13:6144–6152CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberman L, Bracero N, Morris E, Thornton C, Dershaw DD (2005) MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial clinical experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:183–193PubMed Liberman L, Bracero N, Morris E, Thornton C, Dershaw DD (2005) MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial clinical experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:183–193PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehman CD, Deperi ER, Peacock S, McDonough MD, Demartini WB, Shook J (2005) Clinical experience with MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1782–1787PubMed Lehman CD, Deperi ER, Peacock S, McDonough MD, Demartini WB, Shook J (2005) Clinical experience with MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1782–1787PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Floery D, Helbich TH (2006) MRI-Guided percutaneous biopsy of breast lesions: materials, techniques, success rates, and management in patients with suspected radiologic-pathologic mismatch. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14:411–425CrossRefPubMed Floery D, Helbich TH (2006) MRI-Guided percutaneous biopsy of breast lesions: materials, techniques, success rates, and management in patients with suspected radiologic-pathologic mismatch. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14:411–425CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Orel SG, Rosen M, Mies C, Schnall MD (2006) MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience. Radiology 238:54–61CrossRefPubMed Orel SG, Rosen M, Mies C, Schnall MD (2006) MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience. Radiology 238:54–61CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, Sittek H, Casselman J, Anderson I, Taourel P (2006) Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer 106:982–990CrossRefPubMed Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, Sittek H, Casselman J, Anderson I, Taourel P (2006) Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer 106:982–990CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Han BK, Schnall MD, Orel SG, Rosen M (2008) Outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1798–1804CrossRefPubMed Han BK, Schnall MD, Orel SG, Rosen M (2008) Outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1798–1804CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman P, Enis S, Pinyard J (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: an initial experience in a community hospital. Can Assoc Radiol J 60:196–200CrossRefPubMed Friedman P, Enis S, Pinyard J (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: an initial experience in a community hospital. Can Assoc Radiol J 60:196–200CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N, Ciatto S, Bilous M, Vezzosi V, Bianchi S (2007) Borderline breast core needle histology: predictive values for malignancy in lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3). Br J Cancer 96:1253–1257CrossRefPubMed Houssami N, Ciatto S, Bilous M, Vezzosi V, Bianchi S (2007) Borderline breast core needle histology: predictive values for malignancy in lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3). Br J Cancer 96:1253–1257CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberman L (2000) Centennial dissertation. Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: state of the art at the millennium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1191–1199PubMed Liberman L (2000) Centennial dissertation. Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: state of the art at the millennium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1191–1199PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sewell CW (2004) Pathology of high-risk breast lesions and ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiol Clin North Am 42:821–830CrossRefPubMed Sewell CW (2004) Pathology of high-risk breast lesions and ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiol Clin North Am 42:821–830CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Wallis M, Tardivon A, Helbich T, Schreer I (2007) Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures. Eur Radiol 17:581–588CrossRefPubMed Wallis M, Tardivon A, Helbich T, Schreer I (2007) Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures. Eur Radiol 17:581–588CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Costa A, Zanini V (2008) Precancerous lesions of the breast. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 5:700–704CrossRefPubMed Costa A, Zanini V (2008) Precancerous lesions of the breast. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 5:700–704CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson NB, Collins LC (2009) Update on percutaneous needle biopsy of nonmalignant breast lesions. Adv Anat Pathol 16:183–195CrossRefPubMed Johnson NB, Collins LC (2009) Update on percutaneous needle biopsy of nonmalignant breast lesions. Adv Anat Pathol 16:183–195CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Chivukula M, Bhargava R, Tseng G, Dabbs DJ (2009) Clinicopathologic implications of “flat epithelial atypia” in core needle biopsy specimens of the breast. Am J Clin Pathol 131:802–808CrossRefPubMed Chivukula M, Bhargava R, Tseng G, Dabbs DJ (2009) Clinicopathologic implications of “flat epithelial atypia” in core needle biopsy specimens of the breast. Am J Clin Pathol 131:802–808CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberman L (2000) Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 38:791–807CrossRefPubMed Liberman L (2000) Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 38:791–807CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs TW, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ (2002) Nonmalignant lesions in breast core needle biopsies: to excise or not to excise? Am J Surg Pathol 26:1095–1110CrossRefPubMed Jacobs TW, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ (2002) Nonmalignant lesions in breast core needle biopsies: to excise or not to excise? Am J Surg Pathol 26:1095–1110CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lawton TJ, Georgian-Smith D (2009) Excision of high-risk breast lesions on needle biopsy: is there a standard of core? AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:W268CrossRefPubMed Lawton TJ, Georgian-Smith D (2009) Excision of high-risk breast lesions on needle biopsy: is there a standard of core? AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:W268CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackman RJ, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM (2002) Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision? Radiology 224:548–554CrossRefPubMed Jackman RJ, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM (2002) Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision? Radiology 224:548–554CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Schueller G, Jaromi S, Ponhold L, Fuchsjaeger M, Memarsadeghi M, Rudas M, Weber M, Liberman L, Helbich TH (2008) US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases. Radiology 248:406–413CrossRefPubMed Schueller G, Jaromi S, Ponhold L, Fuchsjaeger M, Memarsadeghi M, Rudas M, Weber M, Liberman L, Helbich TH (2008) US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases. Radiology 248:406–413CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Oh KK (2008) Sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: a review of 2, 420 cases with long-term follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:202–207CrossRefPubMed Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Oh KK (2008) Sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: a review of 2, 420 cases with long-term follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:202–207CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Jang M, Cho N, Moon WK, Park JS, Seong MH, Park IA (2008) Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1347–1351CrossRefPubMed Jang M, Cho N, Moon WK, Park JS, Seong MH, Park IA (2008) Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1347–1351CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Eby PR, Ochsner JE, DeMartini WB, Allison KH, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2009) Frequency and upgrade rates of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: 9-versus 11-gauge. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:229–234CrossRefPubMed Eby PR, Ochsner JE, DeMartini WB, Allison KH, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2009) Frequency and upgrade rates of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: 9-versus 11-gauge. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:229–234CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ (2009) Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast mass. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1135–1141CrossRefPubMed Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ (2009) Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast mass. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1135–1141CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberman L, Holland AE, Marjan D, Murray MP, Bartella L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Wynn RT (2007) Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:684–690CrossRefPubMed Liberman L, Holland AE, Marjan D, Murray MP, Bartella L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Wynn RT (2007) Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:684–690CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADS: magnetic resonance imaging. In: ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast imaging atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003 American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADS: magnetic resonance imaging. In: ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast imaging atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Noroozian M, Gombos EC, Chikarmane S, Georgian-Smith D, Raza S, Denison CM, Frost EP, Birdwell RL (2010) Factors that impact the duration of MRI-guided core needle biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:W150–W157CrossRefPubMed Noroozian M, Gombos EC, Chikarmane S, Georgian-Smith D, Raza S, Denison CM, Frost EP, Birdwell RL (2010) Factors that impact the duration of MRI-guided core needle biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:W150–W157CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Malhaire C, El Khoury C, Thibault F, Athanasiou A, Petrow P, Ollivier L, Tardivon A (2010) Vacuum-assisted biopsies under MR guidance: results of 72 procedures. Eur Radiol 20:1554–1562CrossRefPubMed Malhaire C, El Khoury C, Thibault F, Athanasiou A, Petrow P, Ollivier L, Tardivon A (2010) Vacuum-assisted biopsies under MR guidance: results of 72 procedures. Eur Radiol 20:1554–1562CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen MA (2004) Cancer upgrades at excisional biopsy after diagnosis of atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ at core needle biopsy: some reasons why. Radiology 231:617–621CrossRefPubMed Cohen MA (2004) Cancer upgrades at excisional biopsy after diagnosis of atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ at core needle biopsy: some reasons why. Radiology 231:617–621CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Brem RF, Lechner MC, Jackman RJ, Rapelyea JA, Evans WP, Philpotts LE, Hargreaves J, Wasden S (2008) Lobular neoplasia at percutaneous breast biopsy: variables associated with carcinoma at surgical excision. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:637–641CrossRefPubMed Brem RF, Lechner MC, Jackman RJ, Rapelyea JA, Evans WP, Philpotts LE, Hargreaves J, Wasden S (2008) Lobular neoplasia at percutaneous breast biopsy: variables associated with carcinoma at surgical excision. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:637–641CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberman L, Mason G, Morris EA, Dershaw DD (2006) Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:426–430CrossRefPubMed Liberman L, Mason G, Morris EA, Dershaw DD (2006) Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:426–430CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Gutierrez RL, Demartini WB, Eby P, Kurland BF, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2009) Clinical indication and patient age predict likelihood of malignancy in suspicious breast MRI lesions. Acad Radiol 16:1281–1285CrossRefPubMed Gutierrez RL, Demartini WB, Eby P, Kurland BF, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2009) Clinical indication and patient age predict likelihood of malignancy in suspicious breast MRI lesions. Acad Radiol 16:1281–1285CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N, Ciatto S, Ellis I, Ambrogetti D (2007) Underestimation of malignancy of breast core-needle biopsy: concepts and precise overall and category-specific estimates. Cancer 109:487–495CrossRefPubMed Houssami N, Ciatto S, Ellis I, Ambrogetti D (2007) Underestimation of malignancy of breast core-needle biopsy: concepts and precise overall and category-specific estimates. Cancer 109:487–495CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Malley FP, Mohsin SK, Badve S, Bose S, Collins LC, Ennis M, Kleer CG, Pinder SE, Schnitt SJ (2006) Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia of the breast. Mod Pathol 19:172–179CrossRefPubMed O’Malley FP, Mohsin SK, Badve S, Bose S, Collins LC, Ennis M, Kleer CG, Pinder SE, Schnitt SJ (2006) Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia of the breast. Mod Pathol 19:172–179CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
High-risk lesions diagnosed at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: can underestimation be predicted?
verfasst von
Pavel Crystal
Arifa Sadaf
Karina Bukhanov
David McCready
Frances O’Malley
Thomas H. Helbich
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1949-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

European Radiology 3/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.