Skip to main content
Erschienen in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 6/2009

01.11.2009 | Clinical Investigation

Immediate and 30-Day Clinical Outcome of Patients Treated with the TwinOne Cerebral Protection System: Multicenter Experience in 217 Cases

verfasst von: Jacques Theron, Carlo Venturi, Juergen Reul, Zoran Milosevic, Leopoldo Guimaraens, Remy Beaujeux, Patrick Courtheoux, Francesco Bedogni, Hugo Cuellar

Erschienen in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Ausgabe 6/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

There are several cerebral protection devices used for carotid artery stenting (CAS). All of them require manipulation and exchange of two separate materials (cerebral protection device + dilatation balloon), making the procedure longer and posing possible complications such as vasospasm and embolism. The new system described here is an evolution of the cerebral protection concept and allows temporary occlusion of the distal internal carotid during CAS procedures with both materials in one device. We present our experience using this new device. Between January 2007 and March 2008, consecutive patients sent for CAS (symptomatic, with stenosis ≥50%, or asymptomatic, with stenosis ≥70%) were treated using TwinOne as a cerebral protection system. All patients were treated using the “simplified” CAS technique, limiting cerebral protection to the poststenting angioplasty phase. Two hundred nine patients have been treated at our institutions; eight underwent bilateral CAS, for a total of 217 CAS procedures performed using the TwinOne for cerebral protection. There have been four periprocedural (within 3 h of procedure) cases of complications (1.8%): three disabling strokes (one in-stent thrombosis, one presumed clotting, one ipsilateral stroke with uncertain root cause) and one transient ischemic attack attributable to heart failure. There have been two in-hospital complications (0.92%): one disabling stroke of unclear origin and one contralateral transient ischemic attack. No additional adverse event has been reported at 30 days after the CAS procedure. In conclusion, this cerebral protection system is simple to use, allows a quick intervention and short occlusion time, and has a low rate of complications.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Theron J, Cosgrove R, Melanson D, Ethier R (1986) Embolization with temporary balloon occlusion of the internal carotid or vertebral arteries. Neuroradiology 28:246–253CrossRefPubMed Theron J, Cosgrove R, Melanson D, Ethier R (1986) Embolization with temporary balloon occlusion of the internal carotid or vertebral arteries. Neuroradiology 28:246–253CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Theron J, Raymond J, Casasco A, Courtheoux F (1987) Percutaneous angioplasty of atherosclerotic and postsurgical stenosis of carotid arteries. Am J Neuroradiol 8:495–500PubMed Theron J, Raymond J, Casasco A, Courtheoux F (1987) Percutaneous angioplasty of atherosclerotic and postsurgical stenosis of carotid arteries. Am J Neuroradiol 8:495–500PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Theron JG, Payelle GG, Coskun O, Huet HF, Guimaraens L (1996) Carotid artery stenosis: treatment with protected balloon angioplasty and stent placement. Radiology 201:627–636PubMed Theron JG, Payelle GG, Coskun O, Huet HF, Guimaraens L (1996) Carotid artery stenosis: treatment with protected balloon angioplasty and stent placement. Radiology 201:627–636PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohki T, Roubin GS, Veith FJ, Iyer SS, Brady E (1999) Efficacy of a filter device in the prevention of embolic events during carotid angioplasty and stenting: an ex vivo analysis. J Vasc Surg 30:1034–1044CrossRefPubMed Ohki T, Roubin GS, Veith FJ, Iyer SS, Brady E (1999) Efficacy of a filter device in the prevention of embolic events during carotid angioplasty and stenting: an ex vivo analysis. J Vasc Surg 30:1034–1044CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Veith FJ, Amor M, Ohki T et al (2001) Current status of carotid bifurcation angioplasty and stenting based on a consensus of opinion leaders. J Vasc Surg 33:S111–S116CrossRefPubMed Veith FJ, Amor M, Ohki T et al (2001) Current status of carotid bifurcation angioplasty and stenting based on a consensus of opinion leaders. J Vasc Surg 33:S111–S116CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Boltuch J, Sabeti S, Amighi J et al (2005) Procedure-related complications and early neurological adverse events of unprotected and protected carotid stenting: temporal trends in a consecutive patient series. J Endovasc Ther 12:538–547CrossRefPubMed Boltuch J, Sabeti S, Amighi J et al (2005) Procedure-related complications and early neurological adverse events of unprotected and protected carotid stenting: temporal trends in a consecutive patient series. J Endovasc Ther 12:538–547CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fanelli F, Bezzi M, Boatta E, Passariello R (2006) Techniques in cerebral protection. Eur J Radiol 60:26–36CrossRefPubMed Fanelli F, Bezzi M, Boatta E, Passariello R (2006) Techniques in cerebral protection. Eur J Radiol 60:26–36CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Henry M, Polydorou A, Klonaris C, Henry I, Polydorou AD, Hugel M (2007) Carotid angioplasty and stenting under protection. State of the art. Minerva Cardioangiol 55:19–56PubMed Henry M, Polydorou A, Klonaris C, Henry I, Polydorou AD, Hugel M (2007) Carotid angioplasty and stenting under protection. State of the art. Minerva Cardioangiol 55:19–56PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schonholz CJ, Uflacker R, Mendaro E et al (2005) Techniques for carotid artery stenting under cerebral protection. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 46:201–217 Schonholz CJ, Uflacker R, Mendaro E et al (2005) Techniques for carotid artery stenting under cerebral protection. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 46:201–217
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Theron J, Courtheoux P, Alachkar F, Bouvard G, Maiza D (1990) New triple coaxial catheter system for carotid angioplasty with cerebral protection. Am J Neuroradiol 11:869–874 discussion 875–867PubMed Theron J, Courtheoux P, Alachkar F, Bouvard G, Maiza D (1990) New triple coaxial catheter system for carotid angioplasty with cerebral protection. Am J Neuroradiol 11:869–874 discussion 875–867PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Theron JG, Guimaraens LJ, Casasco AE, Courtheoux PG, Beaujeux RL, Rufenacht DA, Coskun O, Sola MT, Constans JM, Martin JB (2003) “Protected” Wallstenting of atheromatous stenoses at the carotid bifurcation. Interv Neuroradiol 9:99–126 Theron JG, Guimaraens LJ, Casasco AE, Courtheoux PG, Beaujeux RL, Rufenacht DA, Coskun O, Sola MT, Constans JM, Martin JB (2003) “Protected” Wallstenting of atheromatous stenoses at the carotid bifurcation. Interv Neuroradiol 9:99–126
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wholey MH, Al-Mubarek N, Wholey MH (2003) Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 60:259–266CrossRefPubMed Wholey MH, Al-Mubarek N, Wholey MH (2003) Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 60:259–266CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kastrup A, Groschel K, Krapf H, Brehm BR, Dichgans J, Schulz JB (2003) Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices: a systematic review of the literature. Stroke 34:813–819CrossRefPubMed Kastrup A, Groschel K, Krapf H, Brehm BR, Dichgans J, Schulz JB (2003) Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices: a systematic review of the literature. Stroke 34:813–819CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Barbato JE, Dillavou E, Horowitz MB et al (2008) A randomized trial of carotid artery stenting with and without cerebral protection. J Vasc Surg 47:760–765CrossRefPubMed Barbato JE, Dillavou E, Horowitz MB et al (2008) A randomized trial of carotid artery stenting with and without cerebral protection. J Vasc Surg 47:760–765CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hauth EA, Drescher R, Jansen C et al (2006) Complications and follow-up after unprotected carotid artery stenting. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 29:511–518CrossRef Hauth EA, Drescher R, Jansen C et al (2006) Complications and follow-up after unprotected carotid artery stenting. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 29:511–518CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kastrup A, Nagele T, Groschel K et al (2006) Incidence of new brain lesions after carotid stenting with and without cerebral protection. Stroke 37:2312–2316CrossRefPubMed Kastrup A, Nagele T, Groschel K et al (2006) Incidence of new brain lesions after carotid stenting with and without cerebral protection. Stroke 37:2312–2316CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Maynar M, Baldi S, Rostagno R et al (2007) Carotid stenting without use of balloon angioplasty and distal protection devices: preliminary experience in 100 cases. Am J Neuroradiol 28:1378–1383CrossRefPubMed Maynar M, Baldi S, Rostagno R et al (2007) Carotid stenting without use of balloon angioplasty and distal protection devices: preliminary experience in 100 cases. Am J Neuroradiol 28:1378–1383CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell JE, Bates MC, Elmore M (2007) Endovascular rescue of a fused monorail balloon and cerebral protection device. J Endovasc Ther 14:600–604CrossRefPubMed Campbell JE, Bates MC, Elmore M (2007) Endovascular rescue of a fused monorail balloon and cerebral protection device. J Endovasc Ther 14:600–604CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Powell RJ, Alessi C, Nolan B et al (2006) Comparison of embolization protection device-specific technical difficulties during carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 44:56–61CrossRefPubMed Powell RJ, Alessi C, Nolan B et al (2006) Comparison of embolization protection device-specific technical difficulties during carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 44:56–61CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsutsumi M, Kazekawa K, Onizuka M et al (2007) Spasm induced by protection balloon during carotid artery stenting. Radiat Med 25:335–338CrossRefPubMed Tsutsumi M, Kazekawa K, Onizuka M et al (2007) Spasm induced by protection balloon during carotid artery stenting. Radiat Med 25:335–338CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Eskandari MK, Najjar SF, Matsumura JS, Kibbe MR, Morasch MD (2007) Technical limitations of carotid filter embolic protection devices. Ann Vasc Surg 21:403–407CrossRefPubMed Eskandari MK, Najjar SF, Matsumura JS, Kibbe MR, Morasch MD (2007) Technical limitations of carotid filter embolic protection devices. Ann Vasc Surg 21:403–407CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin JB, Pache JC, Treggiari-Venzi M et al (2001) Role of the distal balloon protection technique in the prevention of cerebral embolic events during carotid stent placement. Stroke 32:479–484PubMed Martin JB, Pache JC, Treggiari-Venzi M et al (2001) Role of the distal balloon protection technique in the prevention of cerebral embolic events during carotid stent placement. Stroke 32:479–484PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Muller-Hulsbeck S, Stolzmann P, Liess C et al (2005) Vessel wall damage caused by cerebral protection devices: ex vivo evaluation in porcine carotid arteries. Radiology 235:454–460CrossRefPubMed Muller-Hulsbeck S, Stolzmann P, Liess C et al (2005) Vessel wall damage caused by cerebral protection devices: ex vivo evaluation in porcine carotid arteries. Radiology 235:454–460CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Castriota FMR, Liso A, Oshola K, Ricci E, Balestra G, Cremonesi A (2004) Cerebral protection: can only the poststenting dilatation phase be protected? In: Henry O et al (eds) Angioplasty and stenting of the carotid and supra-aortic trunks. Martin Dunitz, London, pp 381–390 Castriota FMR, Liso A, Oshola K, Ricci E, Balestra G, Cremonesi A (2004) Cerebral protection: can only the poststenting dilatation phase be protected? In: Henry O et al (eds) Angioplasty and stenting of the carotid and supra-aortic trunks. Martin Dunitz, London, pp 381–390
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin PH, Zhou W, Guerrero MA et al (2006) Carotid artery stenting with distal protection using the carotid wallstent and filterwire neuroprotection: single-center experience of 380 cases with midterm outcomes. Vascular 14:237–244CrossRefPubMed Lin PH, Zhou W, Guerrero MA et al (2006) Carotid artery stenting with distal protection using the carotid wallstent and filterwire neuroprotection: single-center experience of 380 cases with midterm outcomes. Vascular 14:237–244CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat De Borst GJ, Hellings WE, Ackerstaff RG, Moll FL (2006) Intrapatient comparison of restenosis between carotid artery angioplasty with stenting and carotid endarterectomy. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 47:49–54 De Borst GJ, Hellings WE, Ackerstaff RG, Moll FL (2006) Intrapatient comparison of restenosis between carotid artery angioplasty with stenting and carotid endarterectomy. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 47:49–54
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Schonholz CJ, Uflacker R, Parodi JC, Hannegan C, Selby B (2006) Is there evidence that cerebral protection is beneficial? Clinical data. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 47:137–141 Schonholz CJ, Uflacker R, Parodi JC, Hannegan C, Selby B (2006) Is there evidence that cerebral protection is beneficial? Clinical data. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 47:137–141
Metadaten
Titel
Immediate and 30-Day Clinical Outcome of Patients Treated with the TwinOne Cerebral Protection System: Multicenter Experience in 217 Cases
verfasst von
Jacques Theron
Carlo Venturi
Juergen Reul
Zoran Milosevic
Leopoldo Guimaraens
Remy Beaujeux
Patrick Courtheoux
Francesco Bedogni
Hugo Cuellar
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Ausgabe 6/2009
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9686-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2009

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 6/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.