nach oben

Intensive Care Medicine

Erschienen in:

01.11.2007 | Brief Report

Automatic detection of ineffective triggering and double triggering during mechanical ventilation

verfasst von: Qestra Mulqueeny, Piero Ceriana, Annalisa Carlucci, Francesco Fanfulla, Monica Delmastro, Stefano Nava

Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine | Ausgabe 11/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

Imperfect patient–ventilator interaction is common during assisted ventilation, and the detection of clinically relevant mismatching requires visual monitoring of the ventilator screen. We have assessed the feasibility, sensitivity and specificity of an algorithm embedded in a ventilator system that is able to automatically detect the occurrence of ineffective triggering and double triggering in real time.

Design

Prospective study.

Setting

Respiratory intensive care unit.

Methods

Twenty patients undergoing pressure-support ventilation, either non-invasively (NIV, n = 10) or conventionally ventilated (n = 10), were studied.

Measurements

The detection of ineffective triggering and double triggering from the algorithm was compared by two operators with the “real” occurrence of the phenomena as assessed using the transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi).

Results

Seven of the 20 patients exhibited gross mismatching, while in the remaining patients patient–ventilator mismatching was artificially induced using a pressure control, with a low respiratory rate. Ineffective triggering and double triggering were identified by the operators in 507 and 19 of the 3343 analyzed breaths, respectively. False positives were significantly more frequent in the NIV group than with conventional ventilation. The algorithm had an overall sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 97%. Specificity was statistically higher in the conventional ventilated group than with NIV (99% vs. 95%, p < 0.05).

Conclusions

We have demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of a new algorithm to detect the occurrence of impaired patient–ventilator interaction during mechanical ventilation in real time. This software may help the clinician in the identification of this problem, which has been shown to have important clinical consequences.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Chao DC, Scheinhorn DJ, Stearn-Hassenpflug M (1997) Patient–ventilator trigger asynchrony in prolonged mechanical ventilation. Chest 112:1592–1599PubMed

Thille A, Rodriguez P, Cabello B, Lellouche F, Brochard L (2006) Patient–ventilator asynchrony during assisted mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 32:1515–1522PubMedCrossRef

Tobin MJ, Jubran A, Laghi F (2001) Patient–ventilator interaction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163:1059–1063PubMed

Parthasarathy S, Jubran A, Tobin MJ (2000) Assessment of neural inspiratory time in ventilator-supported patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:546–552PubMed

Beck J, Gottfried SB, Navalesi P, Skrobik Y, Comtois N, Rossini M, Sinderby (2001) Electrical activity of the diaphragm during pressure support ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164:419–424PubMed

Tokioka H,Tanaka T, Ishizu T, Fukushima T, Iwaki T, Nakamura Y, Kosogabe Y (2001) The effect of breath termination criterion on breathing patterns and the work of breathing during pressure support ventilation. Anesth Analg 92:161–165PubMedCrossRef

Georgopoulos D, Prinianakis G, Kondili E (2006) Bedside waveforms interpretation as a tool to identify patient–ventilator asynchronies. Intensive Care Med 32:34–47PubMedCrossRef

Baydur A, Behrakis PK, Zin WA (1982) A simple method for assessing the validity of the esophageal balloon technique. Am Rev Respir Dis 126:788–791PubMed

Appendini L, Patessio A, Zanaboni S, Carone M, Gukov B, Donner CF, Rossi A (1994) Physiologic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure and mask pressure support during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 149:1219–1222

10.

Tobin MJ, Van de Graaff WB (1994) Monitoring of lung mechanics and work of breathing. In: Tobin MJ (ed) Principles and practice of mechanical ventilation, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 967–1003

11.

Vitacca M, Bianchi L, Zanotti E, Vianello A, Barbano L, Porta R, Clini E (2004) Assessment of physiologic variables and subjective comfort under different levels of pressure support ventilation. Chest 126:851–859PubMedCrossRef

12.

Griner PF, Mayewski R J, Mushlin AI, Greenland P (1981) Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures: principles and applications. Ann Intern Med 94:553–600

13.

Nava S, Bruschi C, Rubini F, Palo A, Iotti G, Braschi A (1995) Respiratory response and inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation in COPD patients. Intensive Care Med 21:871–879PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Automatic detection of ineffective triggering and double triggering during mechanical ventilation
verfasst von: Qestra Mulqueeny
Piero Ceriana
Annalisa Carlucci
Francesco Fanfulla
Monica Delmastro
Stefano Nava
Publikationsdatum: 01.11.2007
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine / Ausgabe 11/2007
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0767-z

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren

Springer Medizin

Automatic detection of ineffective triggering and double triggering during mechanical ventilation