Erschienen in:
13.02.2020 | Interventional Neuroradiology
Thrombectomy in acute vertebrobasilar occlusion: a single-centre experience
verfasst von:
Dong Hyuk Lee, Seung Hwan Kim, Hyungon Lee, Su Bin Kim, Dongah Lee, Young Jin Heo, Jin Wook Baek, Hye Jin Kim, Jung-Soo Kim, Jung Hyun Park, Hae Woong Jeong, Hae Yu Kim, Sung-Chul Jin
Erschienen in:
Neuroradiology
|
Ausgabe 6/2020
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Purpose
Acute vertebrobasilar occlusion (VBO) has a grave clinical course; however, thrombectomy in VBO patients has rarely been reported. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of thrombectomy in VBO patients.
Methods
From March 2010 to December 2017, 38 patients with 40 acute VBOs underwent thrombectomy at our hospital. Thrombectomy was performed using catheter aspiration (n = 11, 26.8%) or a stent retriever (n = 29, 70.7%).
Results
Good clinical outcomes (3-month modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 2 or lower) were achieved in 9 cases (22.5%), and successful recanalization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) grade of 2b or 3) was achieved in 35 cases (87.5%). Good clinical outcomes were significantly related to aetiologies other than atherosclerosis (p = 0.020) and lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores on admission (p = 0.025). The clinical and radiological outcomes did not differ significantly between catheter aspiration and stent retriever thrombectomy (p = 1.000 and p = 0.603, respectively); however, stent retriever thrombectomy had a shorter procedure time than catheter aspiration (59.7 ± 31.2 vs. 84.5 ± 35.1 min, p = 0.037).
Conclusion
In our series, good clinical outcomes were associated with a lower NIHSS score on admission and stroke aetiologies other than atherosclerosis. The two thrombectomy modalities showed similar clinical and radiological outcomes. However, stent retrievers seemed to allow more rapid recanalization than catheter aspiration in VBO.