Anzeige
Erschienen in:
25.09.2018 | Chest
Differentiating between malignant and benign solid solitary pulmonary lesions: are intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging superior to conventional diffusion-weighted imaging?
Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2019
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Objective
To quantitatively compare the diagnostic values of various diffusion parameters obtained from mono- and biexponential diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) models and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in differentiating between benign and malignant solitary pulmonary lesions (SPLs).
Methods
Multiple b-value DWIs and DKIs were performed in 89 patients with SPL by using a 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging unit. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of various b-value sets, true diffusivity (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), apparent diffusional kurtosis (Kapp), and kurtosis-corrected diffusion coefficient (Dapp) were calculated and compared between the malignant and benign groups using a Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed for all parameters.
Result
The ADC(0, 150) values of malignant tumors were lower than those of the benign group (p = 0.01). The ADC(0, 300), ADC(0, 500), ADC(0, 600), ADC(0, 800), ADC(0, 1000), ADCtotal, D, and Dapp of malignant tumors were significantly lower than those of benign lesions (all p < 0.001). D*, f, and Kapp showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups. ADCtotal showed the highest area under the curve (AUC = 0.862), followed by ADC(0, 800)(AUC = 0.844), ADC(0, 600)(AUC = 0.843), D(AUC = 0.834), ADC(0, 1000)(AUC = 0.834) and ADC(0, 500)(AUC = 0.824), Dapp(AUC = 0.796), and ADC(0, 300) (AUC = 0.773). However, the difference in diagnostic efficacy among these parameters was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).
Conclusion
Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and DKI-derived parameters have similar performance compared with conventional ADC in differentiating SPLs.
Key Points
• Mono- and biexponential DWI and DKI are feasible for differentiating SPLs.
• ADC
(0, ≥500)
has better performance than ADC
(0, <500)
in assessing SPLs.
• IVIM and DKI have similar performance compared with conventional DWI in differentiating SPLs.