Introduction
Mutations in
leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (
LRRK2) are the most frequent cause of autosomal dominant and sporadic cases of Parkinson’s disease (PD) [
12,
51,
60,
78]. The functions of LRRK2 are still largely unknown (reviewed in [
6]), but aberrations in its kinase activity are thought to lead to pathogenesis [
3,
9,
21,
31,
33,
67,
74]. Affected carriers of
LRRK2 mutations are generally clinically indistinguishable from individuals with idiopathic PD and primarily present with Lewy body pathology [
3,
19,
26,
61], but neuropathology is pleomorphic and often includes hyperphosphorylated tau protein inclusions [
10,
17,
18,
43,
55,
58,
61,
71,
75].
Tau is a soluble protein that binds tubulin to promote microtubule (MT) assembly and support neuronal function (reviewed in [
47]). While normal tau function is regulated by phosphorylation, certain phospho-epitopes are considered pathogenic [
22] in tauopathies—neurodegenerative diseases that are characterized by the aggregation of hyperphosphorylated tau (reviewed in [
68]). Tauopathies include Alzheimer’s disease (AD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), Pick’s disease (PiD), and frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome-17 with mutations in the tau gene (FTDP-17
t), but tau inclusions are often observed in PD brains as well (reviewed in [
32]). Furthermore, tau is also present in Lewy bodies in familial and sporadic PD [
14,
30]. Although FTDP-17
t can result from mutations in the gene encoding tau [
28,
54,
69], the cause of most tauopathies remains unknown. Given this, identifying tau kinases and determining their involvement in tau pathogenesis are vital to therapeutic targeting of tauopathies.
The appearance of hyperphosphorylated, aggregated tau in the brain of some individuals with
LRRK2 mutations (reviewed in [
56]) has led to the suggestion that LRRK2 may be a novel kinase for tau. Several studies, which demonstrated altered tau phosphorylation in transgenic mice expressing mutant LRRK2, support this hypothesis [
40,
41,
46]. In addition, recent in vitro and cell culture studies suggest that LRRK2 may phosphorylate tau [
35,
71]. If LRRK2 is a novel tau kinase, it is possible that it may phosphorylate novel tau epitopes; however, published studies have focused on a subset of the phospho-epitopes that are frequently associated with human tauopathies. Furthermore, an interaction between LRRK2 and tau has not been directly demonstrated in vivo and it is unclear if such an interaction could influence tau pathologies.
In the current report, we demonstrate that LRRK2 directly phosphorylates tau in vitro and use mass spectrometry (MS) to identify specific tau epitopes that are targets of LRRK2 in vitro. We demonstrate that LRRK2 preferentially phosphorylates tau at T149 and to a lesser extent T153—epitopes that have been largely unexplored by the tau field. We show these epitopes to be hyperphosphorylated in a range of human tauopathies and in individuals with the G2109S LRRK2 mutation using our novel antibodies. Finally, we demonstrate that human wild-type LRRK2 expression in a mouse model of tauopathy enhances tau aggregation and tau hyperphosphorylation—critical features of human tauopathy.
Materials and methods
Recombinant forms of GST-LRRK2 (970–2,527) were purchased from Invitrogen. Full-length G2019S LRRK2 was cloned into the mammalian expression vector pDEST27, expressed in HEK 293T cells and purified as previously described [
8]. The human full-length tau cDNA cloned into the bacterial expression vector pRK172 was kindly provided by Dr. Michel Goedert. Recombinant full-length 0N3R tau and fragments thereof were expressed in
E. coli BL21 and purified as previously described [
27]. Tau mutations (E342V, P301L, P301S, and R406W) were introduced through site directed mutagenesis and verified by DNA sequencing. The mammalian expression plasmid pEF-DEST51 with the full-length wild-type (WT) (with or without a stop codon) or G2019S (with or without a stop codon) LRRK2 cDNAs to generate plasmids expressing full-length untagged LRRK2 (pEF-DEST51-LRRK2, referred to as LRRK2) or full-length LRRK2 with a C-terminal V5-tagged (pEF-DEST51-LRRK2-V5, referred to as LRRK2-V5) were previously described [
72]. Synthetic tau peptides TAU-A (KKAKGADGKTKIATPRGAAPPGQK) and TAU-B (REPKKVAVVRTPPKSPSSAKSRL) corresponding to residues 82–105 and 163–185, respectively, in 0N3R tau, as well as threonine to alanine specific mutants were synthesized and purified on reverse phase HPLC by GenScript USA Inc. These peptide sequences correspond to residues 140–163 and 221–243, respectively in 2N4R tau. Recombinant myelin basic protein (MBP) was purchased from Millipore.
Antibodies
Anti-LRRK2 rabbit polyclonal antibody (1182) was previously described [
72]. MJFF-4 (c81-8) was obtained from the Michael J. Fox Foundation. Anti-pT149 and anti-pT153 tau specific antibodies were made as a service by GenScript USA Inc. Briefly, rabbits were immunized with the pT149 peptide (DGKpTKIATPRGAAC) or pT153 peptide (DGKTKIApTPRGAAC), affinity purified with the same peptide, and negatively absorbed against the non-phosphorylated peptide (DGKTKIATPRGAAC). We used polyclonal tau antibodies E1 (specific for amino acids 19–33 of human tau) [
11], pT205 (Abcam), pT212 (Anaspec), pS214 (Invitrogen) [
70], 17025 anti-tau (provided by Dr. Virginia Lee, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA); and monoclonal tau antibodies CP13 (specific for pS202 in tau), PHF1 (specific for pS396/S404 in tau), and MC1 [pre-PHF conformational epitope (7–9 and 326–330)] (provided by Dr. Peter Davies, The Einstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA), AT8 (specific for pS199/pS202/pT205 in tau), AT100 (specific for pT212/S214 in tau), and AT270 (specific for pT181 in tau) (Innogenetics, Fisher Scientific). Other monoclonal antibodies used were anti-V5 (Invitrogen) and anti-GAPDH (Biodesign).
LRRK2 kinase assays
Unless otherwise noted, kinase assays were set up in a total volume of 25 μl with 25 nM recombinant GST–LRRK2 (970–2,527) in 50 mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.5), 0.1 mM EGTA, 10 mM MgCl2 and 0.2 mM [γ-32P] ATP (4 Ci/mmol) in the presence of 10 μM of tau or MBP substrate, unless otherwise noted. After incubation for 60 min at 30 °C, reactions were terminated by applying to individual 2.5 cm-diameter disks of P-81 phosphocellulose filter paper (Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, NH) that were immediately immersed in 75 mM phosphoric acid. After extensive washing with 75 mM phosphoric acid, P-81 filters were rinsed with acetone and allowed to air dry. Filters were immersed in Cytoscint liquid scintillation cocktail (Fisher Scientific) and 32P radioactivity on each filter was measured by liquid scintillation using an LS6500 counter (Beckman Coulter). K
m and V
max parameters were calculated using Graph-Pad Prism v5.02 (GraphPad Software).
For phosphorylation analysis of recombinant tau proteins with LRRK2, reactions were stopped with the addition of SDS-sample buffer and heating to 100 °C for 5 min. Samples were resolved onto SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and incorporation of phosphate was determined by autoradiography and/or immunoblotting with phospho-specific antibodies.
Mass spectrometry
As described above, 10 μM of 0N3R tau was subjected to overnight in vitro phosphorylation by either G2019S LRRK2 or the kinase dead (KD) LRRK2 mutant D1994K. Samples were resolved onto SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and then excised and washed in 50 % acetonitrile and water [
5]. To maximize sequence coverage, three equivalently loaded and excised gel bands of 0N3R tau were separately digested with trypsin, chymotrypsin or GluC. Mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of modified 0N3R tau was performed as a service by the Harvard Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Resource Laboratory (Cambridge, MA, USA). Peptide sequence analysis of each digestion mixture was performed by microcapillary reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with nanoelectrospray tandem mass spectrometry (μLC–MS/MS) on an LTQ-Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA). The Orbitrap repetitively surveyed an
m/
z range from 395 to 1,600, while data-dependent MS/MS spectra on the twenty most abundant ions in each survey scan were acquired in the linear ion trap. MS/MS spectra were acquired with relative collision energy of 30 %, 2.5-Da isolation width, and recurring ions dynamically excluded for 60 s. Preliminary sequencing of peptides was facilitated with the SEQUEST algorithm [
15] with a 30 ppm mass tolerance against the human subset of the Uniprot Knowledgebase supplemented with a database of common laboratory contaminants, concatenated to a reverse decoy database. Using a custom version of Proteomics Browser Suite (PBS v.2.7, ThermoFisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) peptide-spectrum matches (PSMs) were accepted with mass error <2.5 ppm and score thresholds to attain an estimated false discovery rate of ~1 %. Data-sets for all digest results were combined in silico, culled of minor contaminant PSMs, and re-searched with SEQUEST algorithm against the 0N3R tau sequence without taking into account enzyme specificity and with differential modifications of phosphorylated tyrosine, serine, and threonine residues. The discovery of phosphopeptides and subsequent manual confirmation of their MS/MS spectra were facilitated using in-house versions of programs MuQuest, GraphMod, and FuzzyIons (PBS, ThermoFisher Scientific).
Enzyme-linked immuno sorbent assay (ELISA) to assess antibody specificity
Recombinant C-terminal fragment of human 3R tau [C′ Tau] corresponding to amino acids 244–441 minus amino acids 275–305 that would be present in 2N4R tau human tau was phosphorylated with recombinant glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK-3β) (New England BioLabs Inc, Ipswich, MA, USA) (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT, 200 μM ATP, 1 mg/ml tau and 20,000 units enzyme in 50 μl) for 1 h at 30 °C. Controls included similar reactions without the kinase. 100 ng of each synthetic peptide or 500 ng of tau recombinant protein diluted in 100 μl of water was absorbed per well of 96-well EIA/RIA Corning plates (Corning, NY, USA). The plates were extensively washed with PBS and blocked with PBS/5 % fetal bovine serum (FBS). Primary antibodies as indicated were diluted in PBS/5 % FBS and incubated on the plates. After extensive washes with PBS, plates were incubated with either anti-mouse antibody conjugated to HRP or anti-rabbit antibody conjugated to HRP diluted in PBS/5 % FBS. Plates were again extensively washed with PBS and reactions were carried out with 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMS) reagents (KPL, Gaithersburg, NY, USA). The reactions were terminated by adding 0.2 M HCl and optical density was measured at OD450 using a Multiskan Plus plate reader (ThermoFisher). Experiments were performed in quadruplicate.
Cell culture
HEK 293T cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified medium with high glucose (4.5 g/l) supplemented with 10 % FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 U/ml streptomycin, and 2 mM l-glutamine. Cells were plated onto 6-well plates and transfected at approximately 30 % confluence using Lipofectamine 2000 according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Cells were maintained for 48 h after transfection. Cells were harvested and lysed in 3 % SDS/50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 6.8 and heated to 100 °C for 5 min. Protein concentration was determined using BCA protein assay reagent and BSA as the standard (Pierce, Fisher Scientific). Experiments were performed in duplicate.
Mice
Mice were housed and treated in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. All animal procedures were approved and conducted in accordance with the Mayo Clinic Institutional Animal Care and Use committee and the University of Florida Institutional Animal Care and Use committee. Mice were maintained in a pathogen-free facility on a 12 h light/dark cycle with water and food provided ad libitum.
The parental Tau
P301L responder line and parental tTA activator line were generated and maintained on an FVB and 129/S6 background, respectively, as previously described [
65]. Bigenic rTg4510 mice have forebrain-focused expression of P301L transgenic tau. The parental bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)-LRRK2 mice, maintained on an FVB background, contain the entire human
LRRK2 gene including regulatory sequences and LRRK2 expression is driven by the human
LRRK2 promoter, as previously described [
46]. Mice from the Tau
P301L responder line were crossed with mice from the BAC-LRRK2 mouse line for one generation to obtain LRRK2.Tau
P301L responder mice on an FVB background. LRRK2.Tau
P301L responder mice were then crossed with mice from the tTA activator line to obtain the resultant F1 LRRK2/Tau
P301L mice on a 50 % FVB, 50 % 129S background, the same as the original rTg4510 mouse model [
65]. All mice in this study were harvested at 5.5 months of age when mature cortical tangles and hippocampal neurodegeneration are detectable in Tau
P301L only animals. We harvested 10 mice per group, half male and half female, for the four genotypes of interest (non-transgenic, LRRK2, Tau
P301L, and LRRK2/Tau
P301L). One male LRRK2/Tau
P301L mouse did not overexpress LRRK2 (as determined by western blotting) and was excluded from all studies. The sarkosyl-preparation (see protocol below) of one female Tau
P301L mouse had extremely high tau aggregation via western blotting and was identified by Grubb’s analysis to be an outlier. As this may have been a tissue preparation error, all western blot data from this mouse were excluded from the final results.
Tissue harvest and preparation
All mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation to maintain the brain biochemistry by avoiding anesthesia-induced tau changes. Brains were quickly removed, cut down the midline, and one brain half was drop fixed in 10 % formalin for 24 h for immunohistochemical analysis and the other brain half was immediately homogenized to preserve the LRRK2 protein. Brains were homogenized in 6 volumes of homogenate buffer [50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 274 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 % protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma), 1 % phosphatase inhibitor cocktails I and II (Sigma), and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF)]. For LRRK2 analysis, homogenates were centrifuged at 150,000×
g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were collected and protein concentration was determined using BCA protein assay reagent and BSA as the standard. For tau analysis, the brain homogenate was diluted to 10 volumes using Tris-buffered saline and subjected to sarkosyl fractionation as previously described [
65]. Specifically, 200 μl of 10× homogenate was centrifuged at 150,000×
g for 15 min at 4 °C and the supernatant, which contains soluble tau species, was collected and protein concentration was determined as described above. Pellets were homogenized in 3 volumes (600 μl) of Buffer B [10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4), 0.8 M NaCl, 10 % Sucrose, 1 mM EGTA and 1 mM PMSF] and centrifuged at 150,000×
g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were collected and incubated with 1 % sarkosyl (Sigma) for 1 h at 37 °C, followed by centrifugation at 150,000×
g for 30 min at 4 °C to obtain a sarkosyl-soluble supernatant and sarkosyl-insoluble pellet. The sarkosyl-insoluble pellet, which contains the biochemical equivalent of neurofibrillary tangles, was re-suspended in 20 μl TE buffer [10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA].
Western blot analysis
For in vitro and cell culture experiments, equal amounts of protein samples were loaded and resolved by SDS-PAGE, followed by electrophoretic transfer onto nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) with 5 % non-fat milk powder, and incubated overnight with 1182 LRRK2-specific antibody [
72], anti-V5 antibody (Invitrogen), or anti-tau antibody (17025) in TBS/5 % non-fat milk powder. Membranes were also incubated overnight with pT149 or pT153 tau specific antibodies in TBS/5 % BSA. Each incubation was followed by goat anti-mouse conjugated horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (Amersham Biosciences) or goat anti-rabbit HRP (Cell Signaling Technology), and immunoreactivity was detected using chemiluminescent reagent (NEN) followed by exposure on X-ray film.
For analysis of LRRK2 protein in mouse brain tissue, 50 μg of protein was diluted in NuPAGE LDS-sample buffer with NuPAGE reducing agent (Invitrogen), boiled for 3 min at 95 °C, loaded onto 26-well 3–8 % Tris–Acetate gels (Invitrogen), separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred in NuPAGE transfer buffer (Invitrogen) to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Fisher Scientific). Membranes were blocked for 1 h at room temperature in 5 % non-fat milk powder in TBS with 0.1 % Triton X-100 (TBS-T) and then incubated overnight in primary antibody diluted in 5 % non-fat milk powder in TBS-T at 4 °C. For tau protein analysis from mouse brain, 5 μg of the soluble fraction or 3 μl of the sarkosyl-insoluble fraction was diluted in Novex Tris–glycine SDS-sample buffer (Invitrogen) with β-mercaptoethanol, heat denatured at 95 °C for 5 min, loaded onto 26-well 10 % Tris–glycine gels (Invitrogen), separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred in CAPS transfer buffer (Sigma) to PVDF membranes. Membranes were blocked in TBS-T with 5 % non-fat milk powder and incubated overnight with antibody in TBS-T/5 % non-fat milk powder, except for pT149 and pT153 tau antibodies, which were in TBS-T/5 % BSA. All membranes were washed 3 times in TBS-T, incubated with either goat anti-mouse HRP or goat anti-rabbit HRP secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch) for 1 h at room temperature and washed again 3 times in TBS-T. Membranes were developed using Western Lightning Plus (Perkin Elmer) and imaged using a FluorChem E System (ProteinSimple). The relative levels of immunoreactivity were determined by densitometry using the software AlphaView SA (ProteinSimple).
Immunohistochemistry
Fixed mouse brains were paraffin embedded and cut into 5 μm sagittal sections. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed on at least two brain sections from each mouse to align all brains to approximately 1.3 mm lateral to the midline using a mouse brain atlas [
52]. Immunohistochemistry with the Dako Universal Autostainer with DAKO Envision + HRP system (Dako) was performed with the following antibodies: pT149 tau, pT153 tau, AT8, AT270, CP13, and MC1. Stained slides were digitally scanned using a ScanScope XT scanner and were analyzed using ImageScope version 11.2.0.780 software (Aperio). Positive pixel count algorithms were created to measure the staining density of the secondary antibody, specifically chromogen 3,3′ diaminobenzidine. The cortex of each animal was traced and analyzed using these algorithms and the burden was expressed as a percentage of immunostained pixels to total area. Sections that had tears or other artifacts were not included in the analysis.
Human tissue
Paraffin embedded sections were processed for immunohistochemistry as above for mice from 3R + 4R tauopathy (5 AD—average age: 90 ± 6 years; 4 women; median Braak NFT Stage: VI; 2 with concurrent diffuse cortical Lewy bodies), 4R tauopathy (4 PSP and 1 CBD—average age: 77 ± 7 years; 4 women; median Braak NFT Stage: III), 3R tauopathy (2 PiD—average age: 68 ± 6 years; 1 woman; median Braak NFT Stage: III), and mutant LRRK2 carriers (4 G2019S—average age: 76 ± 5 years; 2 women; Braak NFT Stage: 0–V). Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin.
Statistical analysis
Grubb’s analysis was used to identify outliers in the western blot analysis of sarkosyl-insoluble tau. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error mean unless otherwise noted. Analysis of two groups was performed with an unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test while analysis of multiple groups was analyzed by one-way ANOVA and post hoc Bonferroni multiple comparisons test (α = 0.05). Western blot and immunohistochemical data from male and female TauP301L and LRRK2/TauP301L mice were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with genotype and sex as independent variables. All analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 6.00 software (GraphPad Software) and in all cases, P ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Discussion
In the current study, we combined in vitro, cell culture, and novel transgenic studies to demonstrate that tau is a substrate of LRRK2 and that this interaction promotes tauopathy. We found that recombinant WT and mutant LRRK2 directly phosphorylates tau in kinase assays. As shown previously for other LRRK2 substrates, G2019S LRRK2 yields the greatest levels of tau phosphorylation [
9,
21,
31,
74]. Our subsequent in vitro studies used G2019S LRRK2 to obtain the highest levels of substrate phosphorylation, thereby reducing the chance that LRRK2-directed phosphorylation of tau would be inadvertently missed. Using MS analysis, we uncovered the tau epitopes that were potentially targeted by LRRK2 phosphorylation. To reduce false positives, MS analysis was performed in parallel with reactions utilizing KD LRRK2, and we further validated subsequent hits using LRRK2 kinase reactions coupled with site directed mutagenesis at identified sites of phosphorylation to block LRRK2 activity. Surprisingly, we identified tau T149 and T153 as a preferential target and a secondary target, respectively, of LRRK2-directed phosphorylation. Although much of our studies focused on mutant LRRK2, we sought to determine if tau could be a substrate of LRRK2 in vivo by generating novel transgenic mice, which expressed human WT LRRK2 and mutant tau. WT LRRK2 mice alone do not develop tau abnormalities and the tau abnormalities observed in mutant LRRK2 mice are modest [
40,
41,
46]. For our LRRK2/Tau
P301L model, we combined a WT LRRK2 BAC line [
46] with a Tau
P301L (rTg4510) model [
65]. The rTg4510 model represents a well-characterized model, providing a “primed system” in which we could determine if human LRRK2 phosphorylates tau in vivo and if this could influence the development of tauopathy. We demonstrated that human WT LRRK2 expression in a mouse model of tauopathy enhances tau aggregation and tau hyperphosphorylation—critical features of human tauopathy.
Having identified T149 and T153 on tau as primary targets of direct G2019S LRRK2 phosphorylation in vitro, we then sought to determine the relevance of these sites to human tauopathy. One study has reported that T149 tau is phosphorylated by recombinant CK1δ and GSK-3β kinases [
23]; however, phosphorylation of T149 has not been studied in vivo or associated with disease. Phosphorylation of T153 has been described in vitro and in cell culture [
23,
29,
66] and one study shows that phospho-T153 (pT153) antibody labels neurofibrillary tangles in AD brain [
2]. It is still unknown to what extent phosphorylation of T153 is associated with other tauopathies. We created antibodies specific for tau phosphorylated at T149 and at T153, respectively (see “
Materials and methods”). We then confirmed their specificity in vitro and in cell culture and demonstrated the presence of these phospho-epitopes in neuronal and glial lesions of 3R tauopathies (PiD), 4R tauopathies (PSP) and 3R + 4R tauopathies (AD) and in G2019S-LRRK2 carriers (PD). There was also immunoreactivity in a subset of Lewy bodies, similar to the pattern we previously noted with other antibodies to phospho-tau [
30]. T149 and T153 are largely unexplored tau epitopes, but it is of interest that they flank a rare variant in tau, A152T, that may be a risk factor for tauopathies such as PSP [
7,
34,
36]. LRRK2 is not known to play a role in tauopathies beyond its involvement in PD, but it is possible that rare genetic variants in LRRK2, including those that confer risk to PD [
16,
60,
62] or have yet to be uncovered, could play a role in tauopathies. The pT149 and pT153 immunostaining in these diverse cases of human tauopathy suggests that further studies on the role of LRRK2 in these disorders could be informative.
No changes to tau levels or phosphorylation were observed in the soluble fraction of LRRK2/Tau
P301L mice compared to Tau
P301L mice. Initial analysis of the insoluble fraction revealed increased phosphorylation of all epitopes examined in LRRK2/Tau
P301L mice. This was not surprising, however, as there was approximately three times more tau in the insoluble fraction of LRRK2/Tau
P301L mice. To account for the significant difference of insoluble tau in Tau
P301L only and LRRK2/Tau
P301L mice, it was necessary to adjust the phospho-tau levels to the total amount of insoluble tau present to fully assess if there were specific phosphorylation changes associated with LRRK2 overexpression. We found that co-expression of LRRK2 in Tau
P301L mice selectively increased insoluble tau phosphorylation at sites identified in vitro as being directly phosphorylated by LRRK2, T149 and T153, as well as the T205 and S199/S202/T205 epitopes. Interestingly, our in vitro results were performed in the context of soluble tau; whereas, the elevated phosphorylation in the mice in the presence of LRRK2 was only in insoluble tau. These data suggest that LRRK2-associated phosphorylation may be able to trigger the shift of soluble tau into the insoluble fraction. Davies et al. [
13] have isolated a substantial amount of LRRK2 in the insoluble protein fraction using a Triton and SDS preparation and demonstrated that LRRK2 is not exclusively soluble in WT rodents or in humans. This could support a potential interaction of LRRK2 and tau in LRRK2/Tau
P301L mice as tau switches from its highly soluble (normal) state to the insoluble protein that is found in tauopathy. Alternatively, filamentous tau may be a better substrate for LRRK2 compared to the soluble tau. Neuropathological analysis revealed increased tau burden using antibodies for tau phosphorylated at T149, T153, S202, and pS199/S202/T205, largely replicating what we observed in our biochemical analysis. By both biochemical and histological analyses enhanced phosphorylation was detected by the AT8 antibody that recognizes a triple epitope (pS199/S202/S205). It is possible that these findings are due to increased phosphorylation at S202 or T205 that was observed with antibodies that specifically detect those singular epitopes.
Our in vitro and in vivo findings support that T149 tau is the primary target of direct LRRK2 phosphorylation and suggests that T153 may be a secondary target. Our MS studies identified T205 as a potential LRRK2 phosphorylation site which was not validated in our subsequent in vitro work utilizing synthetic peptides for this region; therefore, the increased phosphorylation of insoluble tau at T205 and the combined S199/S202/T205 epitope, recognized by the AT8 antibody, may indicate an indirect mechanism by which LRRK2 increases phosphorylation of these specific tau epitopes in vivo. Alternatively, phosphorylation of T205 may require unique modeling of secondary and tertiary structure, and therefore be a better substrate for LRRK2 in vivo than it is in vitro. In addition, microtubules or other co-factors may act as scaffold to bring tau and LRRK2 together, allowing LRRK2 to phosphorylate tau at additional epitopes [
35]. LRRK2 might also directly phosphorylate other tau kinases and enhance their ability to target tau [
49,
76], including AKT, GSK-3β, and members of the MAPK family, which have been implicated downstream of LRRK2 activity [
4,
20,
42,
44,
53,
57]. In addition, LRRK2 phosphorylation of its main target epitopes (i.e., T149) may have the ability to enhance phosphorylation of additional epitopes by other tau kinases; such cooperation has been noted with other phospho-tau epitopes [
45,
77]. Further experiments examining the interaction between LRRK2-associated tau phosphorylation and tau phosphorylation by known tau kinases are required to test this.
For proteins that are highly phosphorylated, such as tau, it is common to find redundancy of phosphorylation of a given residue by multiple kinases. For example, S202 tau has been shown to be phosphorylated by at least 8 different kinases, including CK1 (reviewed in [
37]). CK1δ has also been shown to phosphorylate T149 tau in vitro [
23] and interestingly, both CK1δ and LRRK2 have been shown to phosphorylate the disease-related α-synuclein protein at S129 [
50,
57]. Given this, it would not be surprising if both kinases could phosphorylate tau at the same epitope. In
Drosophila, LRRK2 has been proposed to increase tau phosphorylation at T212 in a GSK-3β dependent manner [
42]. In our LRRK2/Tau
P301L mice, we did not detect increased phosphorylation of tau at T212 nor at S396/S404, a second epitope phosphorylated by GSK-3β [
38], indicating that LRRK2 expression in Tau
P301L mice did not ubiquitously increase phosphorylation of tau epitopes targeted by GSK-3β (reviewed in [
24]). Surprisingly, we observed a significant decrease in phosphorylation of insoluble tau at T181 in the LRRK2/Tau
P301L compared to Tau
P301L mice. Kawakami et al. [
35] previously reported that LRRK2 did not promote phosphorylation of tau S199/S202/T205 in vitro and instead increased phosphorylation of T181 in cell culture and in vitro, a modification of tau that required the interaction with microtubules. Ujiie et al. [
71] reported that LRRK2 modestly enhanced T181 phosphorylation in cell culture. The discrepancy between our findings and these reports may arise from differences between constructs or reaction design. Furthermore, the LRRK2/Tau
P301L mice express mutant tau, which has reduced tubulin binding [
25,
27], potentially decreasing our ability to uncover tubulin-dependent LRRK2 phosphorylation of tau.
The evolution of toxic tau is a complex event, with no consensus on the biochemical switch from soluble to insoluble tau or functional to dysfunctional species. Our neuropathological analysis of LRRK2/Tau
P301L mice compared to Tau
P301L mice revealed elevated immunostaining with the MC1 antibody, which detects tau in an abnormal, disease-relevant conformation [
73], agreeing with our biochemical findings of increased 64 kDa sarkosyl-insoluble tau. Although our in vitro results suggest that the increase in tauopathy in the LRRK2/Tau
P301L mice is likely derived from the kinase function of LRRK2, it is possible that in vivo LRRK2 also promotes the aggregation of tau into the insoluble fraction by indirect cellular mechanisms. Other functions such as its regulation of autophagy have been assigned to LRRK2, which may contribute to our in vivo observations. In addition, some findings suggest that LRRK2-mediated tau phosphorylation can inhibit microtubule binding [
35], which could also promote tau aggregation. Further studies will be required to determine the relative contribution of these alternative mechanisms on tau aggregation.
In some cases, we detected an influence of sex as well as genotype on neuropathological and biochemical outcomes in our mouse studies when assessed by two-way ANOVA. Neither transgenic tau nor LRRK2 expression was influenced by sex; therefore, these differences are not easily explained, but they are interesting and could be physiologically important. Curiously, the age-associated cumulative incidence of LRRK2 G2019S PD in Tunisia is gender specific—the median age of onset of female carriers being 5 years younger (in preparation, Matthew J. Farrer). In our lab, we have observed a non-significant trend that female rTg4510 mice have steeper exponential phase of tau pathology than male rTg4510 mice between ~4 and 6 months of age (personal communication, Jada Lewis). This inherent difference may be amplified by LRRK2 influence on tau pathology.
Our data, in aggregate, demonstrate that LRRK2 directly phosphorylates tau at T149 and T153 in vitro and the ability of LRRK2 to phosphorylate tau at these sites may underlie its ability to promote tauopathy in our novel mouse model. Our current in vivo studies are the first of their kind and provide compelling evidence that LRRK2 and tau interact in a disease-relevant manner. Further, the presence of phosphorylation at tau T149 and T153 in a variety of tau pathologies suggests that LRRK2 genetic studies in human tauopathies may be warranted.