Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 8/2017

16.06.2017 | Hip Arthroplasty

Reconstruction of AAOS type III and IV acetabular defects with the Ganz reinforcement ring: high failure in pelvic discontinuity

verfasst von: Cynthia Hourscht, Mohammad K. Abdelnasser, Sufian S. Ahmad, Lukas Kraler, Marius J. Keel, Klaus A. Siebenrock, Frank M. Klenke

Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Ausgabe 8/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Large acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity represent complex problems in revision total hip arthroplasty. This study aimed to investigate whether reconstruction with the Ganz reinforcement ring would provide durable function in large acetabular defects.

Patients and methods

46 hips (45 patients, 19 male, 26 female, mean age 68 years) with AAOS type III and IV defects undergoing acetabular revision with the Ganz reinforcement ring were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 74 months (24–161 months). Fourteen patients died during follow-up. All surviving patients were available for clinical assessment and radiographic studies. Radiographs were evaluated for bone healing and component loosening. A Cox-regression model was performed to identify factors influencing survival of the Ganz-ring.

Results

In the group of AAOS III defects, 3 of 26 acetabular reconstructions failed, all due to aseptic loosening. In pelvic discontinuity (AAOS IV), 9 of 20 hips failed due to aseptic loosening (n = 4), deep infection (n = 3), and non-union of the pelvic ring (n = 2). With acetabular revision for any reason as an endpoint, the estimated Kaplan–Meier 5-year survival was 86% in type III defects and 57% in type IV defects, respectively. The presence of pelvic discontinuity was identified as the only independent predictive factor for failure of the Ganz ring acetabular reconstruction (AAOS III vs. IV, Hazard ratio: 0.217, 95%, Confidence interval: 0.054–0.880, p = 0.032).

Conclusion

The Ganz reinforcement ring remains a favorable implant for combined segmental and cavitary defects. However, defects with pelvic discontinuity demonstrate high failure rates. The indications should therefore be narrowed to acetabular defects not associated with pelvic discontinuity.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Abolghasemian M, Tangsataporn S, Sternheim A, Backstein D, Safir O, Gross AE (2013) Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss: a mid-term review. Bone Jt J 95-B(2):166–172CrossRef Abolghasemian M, Tangsataporn S, Sternheim A, Backstein D, Safir O, Gross AE (2013) Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss: a mid-term review. Bone Jt J 95-B(2):166–172CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Abolghasemian M, Sadeghi Naini M, Tangsataporn S, Lee P, Backstein D, Safir O et al (2014) Reconstruction of massive uncontained acetabular defects using allograft with cage or ring reinforcement: an assessment of the graft’s ability to restore bone stock and its impact on the outcome of re-revision. Bone Jt J 96-B(3):319–324CrossRef Abolghasemian M, Sadeghi Naini M, Tangsataporn S, Lee P, Backstein D, Safir O et al (2014) Reconstruction of massive uncontained acetabular defects using allograft with cage or ring reinforcement: an assessment of the graft’s ability to restore bone stock and its impact on the outcome of re-revision. Bone Jt J 96-B(3):319–324CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Abolghasemian M, Tangsaraporn S, Drexler M, Barbuto R, Backstein D, Safir O et al (2014) The challenge of pelvic discontinuity: cup-cage reconstruction does better than conventional cages in mid-term. Bone Jt J 96-B(2):195–200CrossRef Abolghasemian M, Tangsaraporn S, Drexler M, Barbuto R, Backstein D, Safir O et al (2014) The challenge of pelvic discontinuity: cup-cage reconstruction does better than conventional cages in mid-term. Bone Jt J 96-B(2):195–200CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Amenabar T, Rahman WA, Hetaimish BM, Kuzyk PR, Safir OA, Gross AE (2016) Promising mid-term results with a cup-cage construct for large acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(2):408–414CrossRef Amenabar T, Rahman WA, Hetaimish BM, Kuzyk PR, Safir OA, Gross AE (2016) Promising mid-term results with a cup-cage construct for large acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(2):408–414CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Berasi CC, Berend KR, Adams JB, Ruh EL, Lombardi AV Jr (2015) Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(2):528–535CrossRef Berasi CC, Berend KR, Adams JB, Ruh EL, Lombardi AV Jr (2015) Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(2):528–535CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Berry DJ, Muller ME (1992) Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency. J Bone Jt Surg Br 74(5):711–715CrossRef Berry DJ, Muller ME (1992) Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency. J Bone Jt Surg Br 74(5):711–715CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Berry DJ, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD, Cabanela ME (1999) Pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 81(12):1692–1702CrossRef Berry DJ, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD, Cabanela ME (1999) Pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 81(12):1692–1702CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown NM, Hellman M, Haughom BH, Shah RP, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG (2014) Acetabular distraction: an alternative approach to pelvic discontinuity in failed total hip replacement. Bone Jt J 96-B(11 Supple A):73–77CrossRef Brown NM, Hellman M, Haughom BH, Shah RP, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG (2014) Acetabular distraction: an alternative approach to pelvic discontinuity in failed total hip replacement. Bone Jt J 96-B(11 Supple A):73–77CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Christie MJ, Barrington SA, Brinson MF, Ruhling ME, DeBoer DK (2001) Bridging massive acetabular defects with the triflange cup: 2- to 9-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 393:216–227CrossRef Christie MJ, Barrington SA, Brinson MF, Ruhling ME, DeBoer DK (2001) Bridging massive acetabular defects with the triflange cup: 2- to 9-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 393:216–227CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Antonio JA, Capello WN, Borden LS, Bargar WL, Bierbaum BF, Boettcher WG et al (1989) Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 243:126–137 D’Antonio JA, Capello WN, Borden LS, Bargar WL, Bierbaum BF, Boettcher WG et al (1989) Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 243:126–137
11.
Zurück zum Zitat DeBoer DK, Christie MJ, Brinson MF, Morrison JC (2007) Revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89(4):835–840 DeBoer DK, Christie MJ, Brinson MF, Morrison JC (2007) Revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89(4):835–840
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Eggli S, Muller C, Ganz R (2002) Revision surgery in pelvic discontinuity: an analysis of seven patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 398:136–145CrossRef Eggli S, Muller C, Ganz R (2002) Revision surgery in pelvic discontinuity: an analysis of seven patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 398:136–145CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedrich MJ, Schmolders J, Michel RD, Randau TM, Wimmer MD, Kohlhof H et al (2014) Management of severe periacetabular bone loss combined with pelvic discontinuity in revision hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 38(12):2455–2461CrossRef Friedrich MJ, Schmolders J, Michel RD, Randau TM, Wimmer MD, Kohlhof H et al (2014) Management of severe periacetabular bone loss combined with pelvic discontinuity in revision hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 38(12):2455–2461CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerber A, Pisan M, Zurakowski D, Isler B (2003) Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85-A(12):2358–2364CrossRef Gerber A, Pisan M, Zurakowski D, Isler B (2003) Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85-A(12):2358–2364CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gill TJ, Sledge JB, Muller ME (1998) The Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty: indications, principles and long-term results. J Bone Jt Surg Br 80(6):946–953CrossRef Gill TJ, Sledge JB, Muller ME (1998) The Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty: indications, principles and long-term results. J Bone Jt Surg Br 80(6):946–953CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodman S, Saastamoinen H, Shasha N, Gross A (2004) Complications of ilioischial reconstruction rings in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 19(4):436–446CrossRef Goodman S, Saastamoinen H, Shasha N, Gross A (2004) Complications of ilioischial reconstruction rings in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 19(4):436–446CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Grappiolo G, Loppini M, Longo UG, Traverso F, Mazziotta G, Denaro V (2015) Trabecular metal augments for the management of Paprosky type III defects without pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplast 30(6):1024–1029CrossRef Grappiolo G, Loppini M, Longo UG, Traverso F, Mazziotta G, Denaro V (2015) Trabecular metal augments for the management of Paprosky type III defects without pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplast 30(6):1024–1029CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Issack PS, Nousiainen M, Beksac B, Helfet DL, Sculco TP, Buly RL (2009) Acetabular component revision in total hip arthroplasty. Part II: management of major bone loss and pelvic discontinuity. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 38(11):550–556 Issack PS, Nousiainen M, Beksac B, Helfet DL, Sculco TP, Buly RL (2009) Acetabular component revision in total hip arthroplasty. Part II: management of major bone loss and pelvic discontinuity. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 38(11):550–556
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kmiec K, Dorman T, Andrzej G, Synder M, Kozlowski P, Sibinski M (2015) Early results of revision acetabular cup using antiprotrusio reconstruction rings and allografts. Indian J Orthop 49(3):317–322CrossRef Kmiec K, Dorman T, Andrzej G, Synder M, Kozlowski P, Sibinski M (2015) Early results of revision acetabular cup using antiprotrusio reconstruction rings and allografts. Indian J Orthop 49(3):317–322CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kokubo Y, Oki H, Sugita D, Negoro K, Takeno K, Miyazaki T et al (2016) Long-term clinical outcome of acetabular cup revision surgery: comparison of cemented cups, cementless cups, and cemented cups with reinforcement devices. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26(4):407–413CrossRef Kokubo Y, Oki H, Sugita D, Negoro K, Takeno K, Miyazaki T et al (2016) Long-term clinical outcome of acetabular cup revision surgery: comparison of cemented cups, cementless cups, and cemented cups with reinforcement devices. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26(4):407–413CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kosashvili Y, Backstein D, Safir O, Lakstein D, Gross AE (2009) Acetabular revision using an anti-protrusion (ilio-ischial) cage and trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with pelvic discontinuity. J Bone Jt Surg Br 91(7):870–876CrossRef Kosashvili Y, Backstein D, Safir O, Lakstein D, Gross AE (2009) Acetabular revision using an anti-protrusion (ilio-ischial) cage and trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with pelvic discontinuity. J Bone Jt Surg Br 91(7):870–876CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Makinen TJ, Fichman SG, Watts E, Kuzyk PR, Safir OA, Gross AE (2016) The role of cages in the management of severe acetabular bone defects at revision arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 98-B(1 Suppl A):73–77CrossRef Makinen TJ, Fichman SG, Watts E, Kuzyk PR, Safir OA, Gross AE (2016) The role of cages in the management of severe acetabular bone defects at revision arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 98-B(1 Suppl A):73–77CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Philippe R, Gosselin O, Sedaghatian J, Dezaly C, Roche O, Sirveaux F et al (2012) Acetabular reconstruction using morselized allograft and a reinforcement ring for revision arthroplasty with Paprosky type II and III bone loss: survival analysis of 95 hips after 5 to 13 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(2):129–137CrossRef Philippe R, Gosselin O, Sedaghatian J, Dezaly C, Roche O, Sirveaux F et al (2012) Acetabular reconstruction using morselized allograft and a reinforcement ring for revision arthroplasty with Paprosky type II and III bone loss: survival analysis of 95 hips after 5 to 13 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(2):129–137CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Regis D, Sandri A, Bonetti I, Bortolami O, Bartolozzi P (2012) A minimum of 10-year follow-up of the Burch-Schneider cage and bulk allografts for the revision of pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty 27(6):1057–1063e1 Regis D, Sandri A, Bonetti I, Bortolami O, Bartolozzi P (2012) A minimum of 10-year follow-up of the Burch-Schneider cage and bulk allografts for the revision of pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty 27(6):1057–1063e1
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlegel UJ, Bitsch RG, Pritsch M, Clauss M, Mau H, Breusch SJ (2006) Mueller reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: outcome in 164 hips followed for 2-17 years. Acta Orthop 77(2):234–241CrossRef Schlegel UJ, Bitsch RG, Pritsch M, Clauss M, Mau H, Breusch SJ (2006) Mueller reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: outcome in 164 hips followed for 2-17 years. Acta Orthop 77(2):234–241CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlegel UJ, Bitsch RG, Pritsch M, Aldinger PR, Mau H, Breusch SJ (2008) Acetabular reinforcement rings in revision total hip arthroplasty: midterm results in 298 cases. Orthopade 37(9):904, 906–913 Schlegel UJ, Bitsch RG, Pritsch M, Aldinger PR, Mau H, Breusch SJ (2008) Acetabular reinforcement rings in revision total hip arthroplasty: midterm results in 298 cases. Orthopade 37(9):904, 906–913
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmolders J, Friedrich MJ, Michel RD, Randau TM, Wimmer MD, Strauss AC et al (2015) Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation. Int Orthop 39(4):623–630CrossRef Schmolders J, Friedrich MJ, Michel RD, Randau TM, Wimmer MD, Strauss AC et al (2015) Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation. Int Orthop 39(4):623–630CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Schreurs BW, Gardeniers JW, Slooff TJ (2001) Acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting: 20 years of experience. Instr Course Lect 50:221–228PubMed Schreurs BW, Gardeniers JW, Slooff TJ (2001) Acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting: 20 years of experience. Instr Course Lect 50:221–228PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheth NP, Melnic CM, Paprosky WG (2014) Acetabular distraction: an alternative for severe acetabular bone loss and chronic pelvic discontinuity. Bone Jt J 96-B(11 Supple A):36–42CrossRef Sheth NP, Melnic CM, Paprosky WG (2014) Acetabular distraction: an alternative for severe acetabular bone loss and chronic pelvic discontinuity. Bone Jt J 96-B(11 Supple A):36–42CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Siebenrock KA, Tannast M, Kim S, Morgenstern W, Ganz R (2005) Acetabular reconstruction using a roof reinforcement ring with hook for total hip arthroplasty in developmental dysplasia of the hip-osteoarthritis minimum 10-year follow-up results. J Arthroplast 20(4):492–498CrossRef Siebenrock KA, Tannast M, Kim S, Morgenstern W, Ganz R (2005) Acetabular reconstruction using a roof reinforcement ring with hook for total hip arthroplasty in developmental dysplasia of the hip-osteoarthritis minimum 10-year follow-up results. J Arthroplast 20(4):492–498CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegmeth A, Duncan CP, Masri BA, Kim WY, Garbuz DS (2009) Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(1):199–205CrossRef Siegmeth A, Duncan CP, Masri BA, Kim WY, Garbuz DS (2009) Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(1):199–205CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Sporer SM, Bottros JJ, Hulst JB, Kancherla VK, Moric M, Paprosky WG (2012) Acetabular distraction: an alternative for severe defects with chronic pelvic discontinuity? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(11):3156–3163CrossRef Sporer SM, Bottros JJ, Hulst JB, Kancherla VK, Moric M, Paprosky WG (2012) Acetabular distraction: an alternative for severe defects with chronic pelvic discontinuity? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(11):3156–3163CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Steno B, Kokavec M, Necas L (2015) Acetabular revision arthroplasty using trabecular titanium implants. Int Orthop 39(3):389–395CrossRef Steno B, Kokavec M, Necas L (2015) Acetabular revision arthroplasty using trabecular titanium implants. Int Orthop 39(3):389–395CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Taunton MJ, Fehring TK, Edwards P, Bernasek T, Holt GE, Christie MJ (2012) Pelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(2):428–434CrossRef Taunton MJ, Fehring TK, Edwards P, Bernasek T, Holt GE, Christie MJ (2012) Pelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(2):428–434CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Whitehouse MR, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Garbuz DS (2015) Continued good results with modular trabecular metal augments for acetabular defects in hip arthroplasty at 7 to 11 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(2):521–527CrossRef Whitehouse MR, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Garbuz DS (2015) Continued good results with modular trabecular metal augments for acetabular defects in hip arthroplasty at 7 to 11 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(2):521–527CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Reconstruction of AAOS type III and IV acetabular defects with the Ganz reinforcement ring: high failure in pelvic discontinuity
verfasst von
Cynthia Hourscht
Mohammad K. Abdelnasser
Sufian S. Ahmad
Lukas Kraler
Marius J. Keel
Klaus A. Siebenrock
Frank M. Klenke
Publikationsdatum
16.06.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Ausgabe 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2731-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2017

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 8/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Knie-TEP: Kein Vorteil durch antibiotikahaltigen Knochenzement

29.05.2024 Periprothetische Infektionen Nachrichten

Zur Zementierung einer Knie-TEP wird in Deutschland zu über 98% Knochenzement verwendet, der mit einem Antibiotikum beladen ist. Ob er wirklich besser ist als Zement ohne Antibiotikum, kann laut Registerdaten bezweifelt werden.

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.