nach oben

Neurological Sciences

Erschienen in:

01.04.2013 | Review Article

Progress and prospects in neurorehabilitation: clinical applications of stem cells and brain–computer interface for spinal cord lesions

verfasst von: Mariana Gongora, Caroline Peressutti, Sergio Machado, Silmar Teixeira, Bruna Velasques, Pedro Ribeiro

Erschienen in: Neurological Sciences | Ausgabe 4/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a disease that affects millions of people worldwide, causing a temporary or permanent impairment of neuromotor functions. Mostly associated to traumatic lesions, but also to other forms of disease, the appropriate treatment is still unsure. In this review, several ongoing studies are presented that aim to provide methods of prevention that ensure quality of life, and rehabilitation trends to patients who suffer from this injury. Stem cell research, highlighted in this review, seeks to reduce damage caused to the tissue, as also provide spinal cord regeneration through the application of several types of stem cells. On the other hand, research using brain–computer interface (BCI) technology proposes the development of interfaces based on the interaction of neural networks with artificial tools to restore motor control and full mobility of the injured area. PubMed, MEDLINE and SciELO data basis analyses were performed to identify studies published from 2000 to date, which describe the link between SCI with stem cells and BCI technology.

The Center for Neuroprosthetics at the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), in Switzerland, and the Laboratory of Dr. Gordon Cheng at the Technical University of Munich in Germany are the houses of the European headquarters of the WAP and the Latin American headquarters, the Brazilian National Institute of Brain–Machine Interface located in Natal, Brazil [51].

Bazley FA, All AH, Thakor NV, Maybhate A (2011) Plasticity associated changes in cortical somatosensory evoked potentials following spinal cord injury in rats. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011:2005–2008PubMed

Musienko P, Heutschi J, Friedli L, Van den Brand R, Courtine G (2012) Multi-system neurorehabilitative strategies to restore motor functions following severe spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 235(1):100–109PubMedCrossRef

Sobani ZA, Quadri SA, Enam SA (2010) Stem cells for spinal cord regeneration: current status. Surg Neurol Int 1:93PubMedCrossRef

Gaspar MIFAS, Cliquet Junior A, Lima VMF, Abreu DCC (2008) Evaluation of ASIA and somatosensory evoked potential in individuals with paraplegia. Coluna 7(3):223–229

Barros Filho TEP, Oliveira RP, Tsanaclis AM, Barros EMK, Cristante AF, Palma RM et al (2002) An experimental model for the transplantation of fetal central nervous system cells to the injured spinal cord in rats. Rev Hosp Clín Fac Med S Paulo 57(6):257–264PubMedCrossRef

Narazaki DK, de Barros Filho TEP, de Oliveira CRGCM, Cristante AF, Iutaka AS, Marcon R, Oliveira RP (2006) Spinal Cord regeneration: the action of neurotrophin-3 in spinal cord injury in rats. Clinics 61(5):453–460PubMedCrossRef

Suminski AJ, Tkach DC, Hatsopoulos NG (2009) Exploiting multiple sensory modalities in brain–machine interfaces. Neural Netw 22:1224–1234PubMedCrossRef

Filli LB, Weinmann O, Schwab ME (2011) Motor deficits and recovery in rats with unilateral spinal cord hemisection mimic the Brown-Sequard syndrome. Brain 134(8):2261–2273PubMedCrossRef

Choi Kyeong Bo, Lee Choon Dae, Chung Dai-Jin, Lee Sang-Ho (2009) Cervical disc herniation as a cause of Brown-Séquard syndrome. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 46(5):505–510PubMedCrossRef

10.

Ghosh A, Sydekum E, Florent Haiss F, Peduzzi S, Zörner B, Schneider R, Baltes C, Rudin M et al (2009) Functional and anatomical reorganization of the sensory-motor cortex after incomplete spinal cord injury in adult rats. J Neurosci 29(39):12210–12219PubMedCrossRef

11.

Thuret S, Moon LDF, Gage FH (2006) Therapeutic interventions after spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Neurosci 7(8):628–643PubMedCrossRef

12.

Neves MA, Mello MP, Antonioli R, Freitas MRG (2007) Functional and clinical scales in management of individuals with traumatic injuries of spinal cord. Rev Neurosci 15(3):234–239

13.

Bydlowski SP, Debes AA, Duarte SA, Janz FL, Cavaglieri RC, Maselli LMF (2009) Células-tronco do líquido amniótico. Ver Brás Hematol Hemoter 31 suppl 11 (in Portuguese)

14.

Tewarie RSN, Hurtado A, Bartels RH, Grotenhuis A, Oudega M (2009) Stem cell-based therapies for spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 32(2):105–114

15.

Rossi SL, Keirstead HS (2009) Stem cells and spinal cord regeneration. Curr Opin Biotech 20:552–562PubMedCrossRef

16.

Jones R, Lebkowski J, McNiece I (2010) Stem Cells. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16(1 suppl):S115–S118PubMedCrossRef

17.

Bydlowski SP, Debes AA, Maselli LMF, Janz FL (2009) Características biológicas das células-tronco mesenquimais. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 31(1 suppl):25–35CrossRef

18.

Ichim TE, Solano F, Lara F, Paris E, Ugalde F, Rodriguez JP et al (2010) Feasibility of combination allogeneic stem cell therapy for spinal cord injury: a case report. Int Arch Med 11(3):30CrossRef

19.

Wright KT, Masri WE, Osman A, Chowdhury J, Johnson WEB (2011) Concise review: bone marrow for the treatment of spinal cord injury: mechanisms and clinical applications. Stem Cells 29:169–178PubMedCrossRef

20.

Wu S, Suzuki Y, Ejiri Y, Noda T, Bai H, Kitada M et al (2003) Bone marrow stromal cells enhance differentiation of cocultured neurosphere cells and promote regeneration of injured spinal cord. J Neurosci Res 72:343–351PubMedCrossRef

21.

Abdallah BM, Kassem M (2008) Human mesenchymal stem cells: from basic biology to clinical applications. Gene Ther 15(2):109–116PubMedCrossRef

22.

Zietlow R, Lane EL, Dunnett SB, Rosser AE (2008) Human stem cells for CNS repair. Cell Tissue Res 331:301–322PubMedCrossRef

23.

Gögel S, Gubernator M, Minger SL (2011) Progress and prospects: stem cells and neurological diseases. Gene Ther 18:1–6PubMedCrossRef

24.

Liverman CT, Altevogt M, Joy JE, Johnson RT (2005) Spinal cord injury: progress, promise, and priorities. The National Academies Press, Washington

25.

Zhang YW, Denham J, Thies RS (2000) Oligodendrocyte progenitor cells derived from human embryonic stem cells express neurotrophic factors. Stem Cells Dev 15:943–952CrossRef

26.

Glazova M, Pak ES, Moretto J, Hollis S, Brewer KL, Murashov AK (2009) Pre-differentiated embryonic stem cells promote neuronal regeneration by cross-coupling of BDNF and IL-6 signaling pathways in the host tissue. J Neurotrauma 26(7):1029–1042PubMedCrossRef

27.

Keirstead HS, Nistor G, Bernal G, Totoiu M, Cloutier F, Sharp K et al (2005) Human embryonic cell-derived oligodendrocyte progenitor cell transplants remyelinate and restore locomotion after spinal injury. J Neurosci 25:4694–4705PubMedCrossRef

28.

Nistor GI, Totoiu MO, Haque N, Carpenter MK, Keirstead H (2005) Human embryonic stem cells differentiate into oligodendrocytes in high purity and myelinate after spinal cord transplantation. Glia 49:385–396PubMedCrossRef

29.

Priest C, Davies A, Wirth E, Conta A, Polonskaya Y, Polonskowski J (2009) Preclinical development of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells derived from human embryonic stem cells for the treatment of spinal cord injury. Cell Transplant 18:231

30.

Rabinovich SS, Seledtsov VI, Poveschenko OV, Senuykov VV, Taraban VY, Yarochno VI et al (2003) Transplantation treatment of spinal cord injury patients. Biomed Pharmacother 57(9):428–433PubMedCrossRef

31.

Yan J, Xu L, Welsh AM, Hatfield G, Hazel T, Johe K et al (2007) Extensive neuronal differentiation of human neural stem cell grafts in adult rat spinal cord. PLoS Med. 4(2):e39PubMedCrossRef

32.

Salazar DL, Uchida N, Hamers FPT, Cummings BJ, Anderson AJ (2010) Human neural stem cells differentiate and promote locomotor recovery in an early chronic spinal cord injury NOD-scid mouse model. PLoS ONE 5(8):e12272PubMedCrossRef

33.

Féron F, Perry C, Cochrane J, Licina P, Nowitzke A, Urquhart S et al (2005) Autologous olfactory ensheathing cell transplantation in human spinal cord injury. Brain 128:2951–2960PubMedCrossRef

34.

Huang H, Chen L, Wang H, Xiu B, Li B, Wang R et al (2003) Influence of patients’ age on functional recovery after transplantation of olfactory ensheathing cells into injured spinal cord injury. Chin Med J 116(10):1488–1491PubMed

35.

Lima C, Escada P, Pratas-Vital J, Branco C, Arcangeli CA, Lazzeri G et al (2010) Olfactory mucosal autografts and rehabilitation for chronic traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24:10–22PubMedCrossRef

36.

Cizková D, Rosocha J, Vanicky I, Jergova S, Cizek M (2006) Transplants of human mesenchymal stem cells improve functional recovery after spinal cord injury in the rat. Cell Mol Neurobiol 26:1165–1178CrossRef

37.

Ankeny DP, McTigue DM, Jakeman LB (2004) Bone marrow transplants provide tissue protection and directional guidance for axons after contusive spinal cord injury in rats. Exp Neurol 190:17–31PubMedCrossRef

38.

Moviglia GA, Viña RF, Brizuela JA, Saslavsky J, Vrsalovic F, Varela G et al (2006) Combined protocol of cell therapy for chronic spinal cord injury. Report on the electrical and functional recovery of two patients. Cytotherapy 8(3):202–209PubMedCrossRef

39.

Lebedev MA, Tate AJ, Hanson TL, Li Z, O’Doherty JE, Winans JA et al (2011) Future developments in brain–machine interface research. Clinics 66(S1):25–32PubMedCrossRef

40.

JdR Millán, Rupp R, Müller-Putz GR, Murray-Smith R, Giugliemma C, Tangermann M et al (2010) Combining brain–computer interfaces and assistive technologies: state-of-the-art and challenges. Front Neurosci. 4:161

41.

Birbaumer N, Cohen LG (2007) Brain–computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis. J Physiol 579(3):621–636PubMedCrossRef

42.

Partil PG, Turner DA (2008) The development of brain–machine interface neuroprosthetic devices. Neurotherapeutic 5(1):137–146CrossRef

43.

Fagg AH, Hatsopoulos NG, de Lafuente V, Moxon KA, Nemati S, Rebesco JM et al (2007) Biomimetic brain machine interfaces for the control of movement. J Neurosci 27(44):11842–11846PubMedCrossRef

44.

Krepki R, Blankertz B, Curio G, Müller KR (2007) The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface (BBCI)—towards a new communication channel for online control in gaming applications. Multimed Tools Appl

45.

Kreilinger A, Kaiser V, Breitwieser C, Williamson J, Neuper C, Müller-Putz GR (2011) Switching between manual control and brain–computer interface using long term and short term quality measures. Front Neurosci 5:147PubMed

46.

Liao LD, Chen CY, Wang IJ, Chen SF, Li SY, Chen Bw et al (2012) Gaming control using a wearable and wireless EEG-based brain–computer interface device with novel dry foam-based sensors. J Neuroeng Rehabil 28(9):5CrossRef

47.

Doud AJ, Lucas JP, Pisansky MT, He B (2011) Continuous three-dimensional control of a virtual helicopter using a motor imagery based brain–computer interface. PLoS ONE 6(10):e26322PubMedCrossRef

48.

Andersen RA, Musallam S, Pesaran B (2004) Selecting the signals for a brain–machine interface. Curr Opin Neurobiol 14:720–726PubMedCrossRef

49.

Lebedev MA, Nicolelis MAL (2006) Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future. Trends Neurosci 29(9):536–546PubMedCrossRef

50.

Friehs GM, Zerris VA, Ojakangas CL, Fellows MR, Donoghue JP (2004) Brain–machine and brain–computer Interfaces. Stroke. 35[suppl I]:2702–2705

51.

Nicolelis M (2011) Muito além do nosso eu: a nossa neurociência que une cérebros e maquinas—e como ela pode mudar nossas vidas. São Paulo, Companhia das Letras (in portuguese)

52.

Mahmoudi B, Sanchez JC (2011) A symbiotic brain–machine interface through value-based decision making. PLoS ONE 6(3):e14760PubMedCrossRef

53.

Scherberger H (2009) Neural control of motor prostheses. Curr Opin Neurobiol 19:1–5CrossRef

54.

Wang W, Collinger JL, Perez MA, Tyler-Kabara EC, Cohen LG, Birbaumer N et al (2010) Neural interface technology for rehabilitation: exploiting and promoting neuroplasticity. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 21:157–178PubMedCrossRef

55.

Hatsopoulos NG, Donoghue JP (2009) The science of neural interface system. Annu Rev Neurosci 32:249–266PubMedCrossRef

56.

Suminski AJ, Tkach DC, Fagg AH, Hatsopoulos NG (2010) Incorporating feedback from multiple sensory modalities enhances brain–machine interface control. J Neurosci 30(50):16777–16787PubMedCrossRef

57.

Pfurtscheller G, Guger C, Müller G, Krausz G, Neuper C (2000) Brain oscillations control hand orthosis in a tetraplegic. Neurosci Lett 292:211–214PubMedCrossRef

58.

Pfurtscheller G, Müller GR, Pfurtscheller J, Gerner HJ, Rupp R (2003) Thought-control of functional electrical stimulation to restore hand grasp in a patient with tetraplegia. Neurosci Lett 351:33–36PubMedCrossRef

59.

Nicolelis MA, Lebedev MA (2009) Principles of neural ensemble physiology underlying the operation of brain–machine interfaces. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:530–540PubMedCrossRef

60.

O’Doherty JE, Lebedev MA, Hanson TL, Fitzsimmons NA, Nicolelis MA (2009) A brain–machine interface instructed by direct intracortical microstimulation. Front Integr Neurosci 3:20PubMed

61.

Hochberg LR, Serruya MD, Friehs GM, Mukand JA, Saleh M, Caplan AH, Branner A, Chen D, Penn RD, Donoghue JP (2006) Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature 442:164–171PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Progress and prospects in neurorehabilitation: clinical applications of stem cells and brain–computer interface for spinal cord lesions
verfasst von: Mariana Gongora
Caroline Peressutti
Sergio Machado
Silmar Teixeira
Bruna Velasques
Pedro Ribeiro
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2013
Verlag: Springer Milan
Erschienen in: Neurological Sciences / Ausgabe 4/2013
Print ISSN: 1590-1874
Elektronische ISSN: 1590-3478
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-012-1232-5

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Sozialer Aufstieg verringert Demenzgefahr

24.05.2024 Demenz Nachrichten

Ein hohes soziales Niveau ist mit die beste Versicherung gegen eine Demenz. Noch geringer ist das Demenzrisiko für Menschen, die sozial aufsteigen: Sie gewinnen fast zwei demenzfreie Lebensjahre. Umgekehrt steigt die Demenzgefahr beim sozialen Abstieg.

Hirnblutung unter DOAK und VKA ähnlich bedrohlich

17.05.2024 Direkte orale Antikoagulanzien Nachrichten

Kommt es zu einer nichttraumatischen Hirnblutung, spielt es keine große Rolle, ob die Betroffenen zuvor direkt wirksame orale Antikoagulanzien oder Marcumar bekommen haben: Die Prognose ist ähnlich schlecht.

Was nützt die Kraniektomie bei schwerer tiefer Hirnblutung?

17.05.2024 Hirnblutung Nachrichten

Eine Studie zum Nutzen der druckentlastenden Kraniektomie nach schwerer tiefer supratentorieller Hirnblutung deutet einen Nutzen der Operation an. Für überlebende Patienten ist das dennoch nur eine bedingt gute Nachricht.

Thrombektomie auch bei großen Infarkten von Vorteil

16.05.2024 Ischämischer Schlaganfall Nachrichten

Auch ein sehr ausgedehnter ischämischer Schlaganfall scheint an sich kein Grund zu sein, von einer mechanischen Thrombektomie abzusehen. Dafür spricht die LASTE-Studie, an der Patienten und Patientinnen mit einem ASPECTS von maximal 5 beteiligt waren.

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2013

Novel PANK2 gene mutations in two Chinese siblings with atypical pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration

Gait measures with a triaxial accelerometer among patients with neurological impairment

Dropped head syndrome in early-onset Parkinson disease treated with bilateral subthalamic stimulation: clinical, imaging, EMG, and biopsy findings

Toxoplasmosis and neuropsychiatric diseases: can serological studies establish a clear relationship?

Orthostatic hypotension, non-dipping and striatal dopamine in Parkinson disease