Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 4/2021

11.02.2021 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Assessing the quality of decision-making for planned oocyte cryopreservation

verfasst von: Samantha Yee, Carly V. Goodman, Vivian Fu, Nechama J. Lipton, Michal Dviri, Jordana Mashiach, Clifford L. Librach

Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This survey study aims to examine the quality of planned oocyte cryopreservation (POC) decision-making in the domains of decision change, decision difficulty, decision regret and informed choice.

Methods

Of the 224 women who completed at least one POC cycle between 2012 and 2018 at a Canadian academic IVF centre, 198 were reachable by email for anonymous survey participation.

Results

Ninety-eight questionnaires were returned (response rate 49.5%). Of these, 86 fully completed questionnaires were analyzed for this study. Eighty-eight percent of respondents stated that it was a ‘good decision’ to cryopreserve oocytes, in retrospect. Despite this, 31% found the decision-making process to be ‘difficult’. Three in five (61%) would have made ‘exactly the same’ decision without any change, yet slightly over a third (35%) would have made a ‘similar’ decision, but with option-related changes and process-related changes. A negative correlation between ‘decision regret’ and ‘informed choice’ was found (p < .005). Those who stated that they would have made exactly the ‘same’ POC decision were found to have a significantly higher ‘informed choice’ score compared to others who would have made a ‘similar’ or ‘completely different’ decision, in retrospect (p < .001). Respondents with lesser ‘decision regret’ were significantly more likely to appraise their decision as a well-informed choice (p < .001).

Conclusions

Our findings show that high-quality POC decision-making is accompanied by the perception of being able to make an informed choice, which can be achieved by providing patients with adequate information and individualized counselling to help patients set realistic expectations of cycle outcomes.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mertes H, Pennings G. Elective oocyte cryopreservation: who should pay? Hum Reprod. 2012;27:9–13.PubMedCrossRef Mertes H, Pennings G. Elective oocyte cryopreservation: who should pay? Hum Reprod. 2012;27:9–13.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Shkedi-Rafid S, Hashiloni-Dolev Y. Egg freezing for age-related fertility decline: preventive medicine or a further medicalization of reproduction? Analyzing the new Israeli policy. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:291–4.PubMedCrossRef Shkedi-Rafid S, Hashiloni-Dolev Y. Egg freezing for age-related fertility decline: preventive medicine or a further medicalization of reproduction? Analyzing the new Israeli policy. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:291–4.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org, Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Planned oocyte cryopreservation for women seeking to preserve future reproductive potential: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2018;110:1022–8.CrossRef Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org, Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Planned oocyte cryopreservation for women seeking to preserve future reproductive potential: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2018;110:1022–8.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Saumet J, Petropanagos A, Buzaglo K, McMahon E, Warraich G, Mahutte N. No. 356-Egg freezing for age-related fertility decline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018;40:356–68.PubMedCrossRef Saumet J, Petropanagos A, Buzaglo K, McMahon E, Warraich G, Mahutte N. No. 356-Egg freezing for age-related fertility decline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018;40:356–68.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lew R, Foo J, Kroon B, Boothroyd C, Chapman M, Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence (ACCEPT) group. ANZSREI consensus statement on elective oocyte cryopreservation. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;59:616–26.PubMedCrossRef Lew R, Foo J, Kroon B, Boothroyd C, Chapman M, Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence (ACCEPT) group. ANZSREI consensus statement on elective oocyte cryopreservation. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;59:616–26.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law, Dondorp W, de Wert G, Pennings G, Shenfield F, Devroey P, et al. Oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility loss. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1231–7.CrossRef ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law, Dondorp W, de Wert G, Pennings G, Shenfield F, Devroey P, et al. Oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility loss. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1231–7.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Stoop D, Nekkebroeck J, Devroey P. A survey on the intentions and attitudes towards oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons among women of reproductive age. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:655–61.PubMedCrossRef Stoop D, Nekkebroeck J, Devroey P. A survey on the intentions and attitudes towards oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons among women of reproductive age. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:655–61.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Daniluk JC, Koert E. Fertility awareness online: the efficacy of a fertility education website in increasing knowledge and changing fertility beliefs. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:353–63.PubMedCrossRef Daniluk JC, Koert E. Fertility awareness online: the efficacy of a fertility education website in increasing knowledge and changing fertility beliefs. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:353–63.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lallemant C, Vassard D, Nyboe Andersen A, Schmidt L, Macklon N. Medical and social egg freezing: internet-based survey of knowledge and attitudes among women in Denmark and the UK. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:1402–10.PubMedCrossRef Lallemant C, Vassard D, Nyboe Andersen A, Schmidt L, Macklon N. Medical and social egg freezing: internet-based survey of knowledge and attitudes among women in Denmark and the UK. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:1402–10.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wennberg AL, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Milsom I, Brännström M. Attitudes towards new assisted reproductive technologies in Sweden: a survey in women 30-39 years of age. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:38–44.PubMedCrossRef Wennberg AL, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Milsom I, Brännström M. Attitudes towards new assisted reproductive technologies in Sweden: a survey in women 30-39 years of age. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:38–44.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis EI, Missmer SA, Farland LV, Ginsburg ES. Public support in the United States for elective oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:1183–9.PubMedCrossRef Lewis EI, Missmer SA, Farland LV, Ginsburg ES. Public support in the United States for elective oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:1183–9.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Milman LW, Senapati S, Sammel MD, Cameron KD, Gracia C. Assessing reproductive choices of women and the likelihood of oocyte cryopreservation in the era of elective oocyte freezing. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:1214–1222.e3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Milman LW, Senapati S, Sammel MD, Cameron KD, Gracia C. Assessing reproductive choices of women and the likelihood of oocyte cryopreservation in the era of elective oocyte freezing. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:1214–1222.e3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan SQ, Tan AW, Lau MS, Tan HH, Nadarajah S. Social oocyte freezing: a survey among Singaporean female medical students. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40:1345–52.PubMedCrossRef Tan SQ, Tan AW, Lau MS, Tan HH, Nadarajah S. Social oocyte freezing: a survey among Singaporean female medical students. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40:1345–52.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Esfandiari N, Litzky J, Sayler J, Zagadailov P, George K, DeMars L. Egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology residents. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2019;17:16-x.CrossRef Esfandiari N, Litzky J, Sayler J, Zagadailov P, George K, DeMars L. Egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology residents. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2019;17:16-x.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikhena-Abel DE, Confino R, Shah NJ, Lawson AK, Klock SC, Robins JC, et al. Is employer coverage of elective egg freezing coercive?: a survey of medical students’ knowledge, intentions, and attitudes towards elective egg freezing and employer coverage. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34:1035–41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ikhena-Abel DE, Confino R, Shah NJ, Lawson AK, Klock SC, Robins JC, et al. Is employer coverage of elective egg freezing coercive?: a survey of medical students’ knowledge, intentions, and attitudes towards elective egg freezing and employer coverage. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34:1035–41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wafi A, Nekkebroeck J, Blockeel C, De Munck N, Tournaye H, De Vos M. A follow-up survey on the reproductive intentions and experiences of women undergoing planned oocyte cryopreservation. Reprod BioMed Online. 2020;40:207–14.PubMedCrossRef Wafi A, Nekkebroeck J, Blockeel C, De Munck N, Tournaye H, De Vos M. A follow-up survey on the reproductive intentions and experiences of women undergoing planned oocyte cryopreservation. Reprod BioMed Online. 2020;40:207–14.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Pritchard N, Kirkman M, Hammarberg K, McBain J, Agresta F, Bayly C, et al. Characteristics and circumstances of women in Australia who cryopreserved their oocytes for non-medical indications. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2017;35:108–18.PubMedCrossRef Pritchard N, Kirkman M, Hammarberg K, McBain J, Agresta F, Bayly C, et al. Characteristics and circumstances of women in Australia who cryopreserved their oocytes for non-medical indications. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2017;35:108–18.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodes-Wertz B, Druckenmiller S, Smith M, Noyes N. What do reproductive-age women who undergo oocyte cryopreservation think about the process as a means to preserve fertility? Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1343–9.PubMedCrossRef Hodes-Wertz B, Druckenmiller S, Smith M, Noyes N. What do reproductive-age women who undergo oocyte cryopreservation think about the process as a means to preserve fertility? Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1343–9.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Baldwin K, Culley L, Hudson N, Mitchell H. Running out of time: exploring women’s motivations for social egg freezing. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;40:166–73.PubMedCrossRef Baldwin K, Culley L, Hudson N, Mitchell H. Running out of time: exploring women’s motivations for social egg freezing. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;40:166–73.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Platts S, Trigg B, Bracewell-Milnes T, Jones BP, Saso S, Parikh J, et al. Exploring women’s attitudes, knowledge, and intentions to use oocyte freezing for non-medical reasons: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;00:1–11. Platts S, Trigg B, Bracewell-Milnes T, Jones BP, Saso S, Parikh J, et al. Exploring women’s attitudes, knowledge, and intentions to use oocyte freezing for non-medical reasons: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;00:1–11.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat de Groot M, Dancet E, Repping S, Goddijn M, Stoop D, van der Veen F, et al. Perceptions of oocyte banking from women intending to circumvent age-related fertility decline. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:1396–401.PubMedCrossRef de Groot M, Dancet E, Repping S, Goddijn M, Stoop D, van der Veen F, et al. Perceptions of oocyte banking from women intending to circumvent age-related fertility decline. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:1396–401.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kılıç A, Göçmen İ. Fate, morals and rational calculations: freezing eggs for non-medical reasons in Turkey. Soc Sci Med. 2018;203:19–27.PubMedCrossRef Kılıç A, Göçmen İ. Fate, morals and rational calculations: freezing eggs for non-medical reasons in Turkey. Soc Sci Med. 2018;203:19–27.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Stoop D, Maes E, Polyzos NP, Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Nekkebroeck J. Does oocyte banking for anticipated gamete exhaustion influence future relational and reproductive choices? A follow-up of bankers and non-bankers. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:338–44.PubMedCrossRef Stoop D, Maes E, Polyzos NP, Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Nekkebroeck J. Does oocyte banking for anticipated gamete exhaustion influence future relational and reproductive choices? A follow-up of bankers and non-bankers. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:338–44.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones BP, Kasaven L, L’Heveder A, Jalmbrant M, Green J, Makki M, et al. Perceptions, outcomes, and regret following social egg freezing in the UK; a cross-sectional survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99:324–32.PubMedCrossRef Jones BP, Kasaven L, L’Heveder A, Jalmbrant M, Green J, Makki M, et al. Perceptions, outcomes, and regret following social egg freezing in the UK; a cross-sectional survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99:324–32.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Greenwood EA, Pasch LA, Hastie J, Cedars MI, Huddleston HG. To freeze or not to freeze: decision regret and satisfaction following elective oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2018;109:1097–1104.e1.PubMedCrossRef Greenwood EA, Pasch LA, Hastie J, Cedars MI, Huddleston HG. To freeze or not to freeze: decision regret and satisfaction following elective oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2018;109:1097–1104.e1.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson A, Ronnekleiv-Kelly SM, Pawlik TM. Regret in surgical decision making: a systematic review of patient and physician perspectives. World J Surg. 2017;41:1454–65.PubMedCrossRef Wilson A, Ronnekleiv-Kelly SM, Pawlik TM. Regret in surgical decision making: a systematic review of patient and physician perspectives. World J Surg. 2017;41:1454–65.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Arslanian-Engoren C, Scott LD. Clinical decision regret among critical care nurses: a qualitative analysis. Heart Lung. 2014;43:416–9.PubMedCrossRef Arslanian-Engoren C, Scott LD. Clinical decision regret among critical care nurses: a qualitative analysis. Heart Lung. 2014;43:416–9.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilovich T, Medvec VH. The experience of regret: what, when, and why. Psychol Rev. 1995;102:379–95.PubMedCrossRef Gilovich T, Medvec VH. The experience of regret: what, when, and why. Psychol Rev. 1995;102:379–95.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Martinez KA, Li Y, Resnicow K, Graff JJ, Hamilton AS, Hawley ST. Decision regret following treatment for localized breast cancer: is regret stable over time? Med Decis Mak. 2015;35:446–57.CrossRef Martinez KA, Li Y, Resnicow K, Graff JJ, Hamilton AS, Hawley ST. Decision regret following treatment for localized breast cancer: is regret stable over time? Med Decis Mak. 2015;35:446–57.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Brehaut JC, O’Connor AM, Wood TJ, Hack TF, Siminoff L, Gordon E, et al. Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Mak. 2003;23:281–92.CrossRef Brehaut JC, O’Connor AM, Wood TJ, Hack TF, Siminoff L, Gordon E, et al. Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Mak. 2003;23:281–92.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Joseph-Williams N, Edwards A, Elwyn G. The importance and complexity of regret in the measurement of ‘good’ decisions: a systematic review and a content analysis of existing assessment instruments. Health Expect. 2011;14:59–83.PubMedCrossRef Joseph-Williams N, Edwards A, Elwyn G. The importance and complexity of regret in the measurement of ‘good’ decisions: a systematic review and a content analysis of existing assessment instruments. Health Expect. 2011;14:59–83.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Stalmeier PF, Roosmalen MS, Verhoef LC, Hoekstra-Weebers JE, Oosterwijk JC, Moog U, et al. The decision evaluation scales. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57:286–93.PubMedCrossRef Stalmeier PF, Roosmalen MS, Verhoef LC, Hoekstra-Weebers JE, Oosterwijk JC, Moog U, et al. The decision evaluation scales. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57:286–93.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Chapman AL, Hadfield M, Chapman CJ. Qualitative research in healthcare: an introduction to grounded theory using thematic analysis. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2015;45:201–5.PubMedCrossRef Chapman AL, Hadfield M, Chapman CJ. Qualitative research in healthcare: an introduction to grounded theory using thematic analysis. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2015;45:201–5.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15:398–405.PubMedCrossRef Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15:398–405.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Inhorn MC, Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Westphal LM, Doyle J, Gleicher N, Meirow D, et al. Patient-centered elective egg freezing: a binational qualitative study of best practices for women’s quality of care. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36:1081–90.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Inhorn MC, Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Westphal LM, Doyle J, Gleicher N, Meirow D, et al. Patient-centered elective egg freezing: a binational qualitative study of best practices for women’s quality of care. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36:1081–90.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Carroll K, Kroløkke C. Freezing for love: enacting ‘responsible’ reproductive citizenship through egg freezing. Cult Health Sex. 2018;20:992–1005.PubMedCrossRef Carroll K, Kroløkke C. Freezing for love: enacting ‘responsible’ reproductive citizenship through egg freezing. Cult Health Sex. 2018;20:992–1005.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown E, Patrick M. Time, anticipation, and the life course: egg freezing as temporarily disentangling romance and reproduction. Am Sociol Rev. 2018;83(5):959–82.CrossRef Brown E, Patrick M. Time, anticipation, and the life course: egg freezing as temporarily disentangling romance and reproduction. Am Sociol Rev. 2018;83(5):959–82.CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Inhorn MC, Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Birger J, Westphal LM, Doyle J, Gleicher N, et al. Elective egg freezing and its underlying socio-demography: a binational analysis with global implications. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16:70-z.CrossRef Inhorn MC, Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Birger J, Westphal LM, Doyle J, Gleicher N, et al. Elective egg freezing and its underlying socio-demography: a binational analysis with global implications. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16:70-z.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Rees CE, Bath PA. The information needs and source preferences of women with breast cancer and their family members: a review of the literature published between 1988 and 1998. J Adv Nurs. 2000;31:833–41.PubMedCrossRef Rees CE, Bath PA. The information needs and source preferences of women with breast cancer and their family members: a review of the literature published between 1988 and 1998. J Adv Nurs. 2000;31:833–41.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Griggs JJ, Sorbero ME, Mallinger JB, Quinn M, Waterman M, Brooks B, et al. Vitality, mental health, and satisfaction with information after breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66:58–66.PubMedCrossRef Griggs JJ, Sorbero ME, Mallinger JB, Quinn M, Waterman M, Brooks B, et al. Vitality, mental health, and satisfaction with information after breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66:58–66.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Becerra Pérez MM, Menear M, Brehaut JC, Légaré F. Extent and predictors of decision regret about health care decisions: a systematic review. Med Decis Mak. 2016;36:777–90.CrossRef Becerra Pérez MM, Menear M, Brehaut JC, Légaré F. Extent and predictors of decision regret about health care decisions: a systematic review. Med Decis Mak. 2016;36:777–90.CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Holmes-Rovner M, Kroll J, Schmitt N, Rovner DR, Breer ML, Rothert ML, et al. Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the satisfaction with decision scale. Med Decis Mak. 1996;16:58–64.CrossRef Holmes-Rovner M, Kroll J, Schmitt N, Rovner DR, Breer ML, Rothert ML, et al. Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the satisfaction with decision scale. Med Decis Mak. 1996;16:58–64.CrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Martinelli L, Busatta L, Galvagni L, Piciocchi C. Social egg freezing: a reproductive chance or smoke and mirrors? Croat Med J. 2015;56:387–91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Martinelli L, Busatta L, Galvagni L, Piciocchi C. Social egg freezing: a reproductive chance or smoke and mirrors? Croat Med J. 2015;56:387–91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiavari L, Gandini S, Feroce I, Guerrieri-Gonzaga A, Russell-Edu W, Bonanni B, et al. Difficult choices for young patients with cancer: the supportive role of decisional counseling. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23:3555–62.PubMedCrossRef Chiavari L, Gandini S, Feroce I, Guerrieri-Gonzaga A, Russell-Edu W, Bonanni B, et al. Difficult choices for young patients with cancer: the supportive role of decisional counseling. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23:3555–62.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Nekkebroeck J, Stoop D, Devroey P. O-036 a preliminary profile of women opting for oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:I15–I6. Nekkebroeck J, Stoop D, Devroey P. O-036 a preliminary profile of women opting for oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:I15–I6.
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones B, Rajamanoharan A, Kasaven L, Jalmbrant M, Green J, Mahmoud M, et al. The novel use of fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) treatment subscale to assess treatment acceptability in social egg freezing. Hum Fertil. 2020:1–9. Jones B, Rajamanoharan A, Kasaven L, Jalmbrant M, Green J, Mahmoud M, et al. The novel use of fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) treatment subscale to assess treatment acceptability in social egg freezing. Hum Fertil. 2020:1–9.
Metadaten
Titel
Assessing the quality of decision-making for planned oocyte cryopreservation
verfasst von
Samantha Yee
Carly V. Goodman
Vivian Fu
Nechama J. Lipton
Michal Dviri
Jordana Mashiach
Clifford L. Librach
Publikationsdatum
11.02.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02103-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 4/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Mehr Brustkrebs, aber weniger andere gynäkologische Tumoren mit Levonorgestrel-IUS

04.06.2024 Levonorgestrel Nachrichten

Unter Frauen, die ein Levonorgestrel-freisetzendes intrauterines System (IUS) verwenden, ist die Brustkrebsrate um 13% erhöht. Dafür kommt es deutlich seltener zu Endometrium-, Zervix- und Ovarialkarzinomen.

Prämenstruelle Beschwerden mit Suizidrisiko assoziiert

04.06.2024 Suizidalität Nachrichten

Manche Frauen, die regelmäßig psychische und körperliche Symptome vor ihrer Menstruation erleben, haben ein deutlich erhöhtes Suizidrisiko. Jüngere Frauen sind besonders gefährdet.

Alter der Mutter beeinflusst Risiko für kongenitale Anomalie

28.05.2024 Kinder- und Jugendgynäkologie Nachrichten

Welchen Einfluss das Alter ihrer Mutter auf das Risiko hat, dass Kinder mit nicht chromosomal bedingter Malformation zur Welt kommen, hat eine ungarische Studie untersucht. Sie zeigt: Nicht nur fortgeschrittenes Alter ist riskant.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.