nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.04.2010 | Pediatric Brief Report

Chest compressions versus ventilation plus chest compressions in a pediatric asphyxial cardiac arrest animal model

verfasst von: Jose María Iglesias, Jesús López-Herce, Javier Urbano, Maria José Solana, Santiago Mencía, Jimena del Castillo

Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To compare the ventilation achieved with chest compressions (CC) or ventilation plus compressions (VC) in a pediatric animal model of cardiac arrest.

Design

Randomized experimental study.

Setting

Experimental department of a University Hospital.

Methods

Twelve infant pigs with asphyxial cardiac arrest. Sequential 3-min periods of VC and CC were performed for a total duration of 9 min. Tidal volume (TV), end-tidal CO₂ (EtCO₂), mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP), and peripheral, cerebral, and renal saturations were recorded and arterial and venous blood gases were analyzed.

Results

VC achieved a TV similar to the preset parameters on the ventilator, whilst the TV in CC was very low (P < 0.001). EtCO₂ with VC was significantly higher than with CC (14.0 vs. 3.9 mmHg, P < 0.05). Arterial pH was higher with VC than with CC (6.99 vs. 6.90 mmHg, P < 0.05). Arterial PCO₂ was lower with VC than with CC (62.1 vs. 97.0 mmHg, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the MAP; CVP; mPAP; peripheral, renal, and cerebral saturations; or lactate concentrations between the two techniques.

Conclusions

VC achieves better ventilation than CC during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and has no negative effect on the hemodynamic situation.

International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (2006) The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support. Pediatrics 117:e955–e977CrossRef

Sherman M (2007) The new American Heart Association cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines: should children and adults have to share? Curr Opin Pediatr 19:253–257CrossRefPubMed

Ewy GA, Zuercher M, Hilwig RW, Sanders AB, Berg RA, Otto CW, Hayes MM, Kern KB (2007) Improved neurological outcome with continuous chest compressions compared with 30:2 compressions-to-ventilations cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a realistic swine model of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 116:2525–2530CrossRefPubMed

Berg RA, Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Berg MD, Sanders AB, Otto CW, Ewy GA (1997) Assisted ventilation does not improve outcome in a porcine model of single-rescuer bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation 95:1635–1641PubMed

Berg RA, Kern KB, Sanders AB, Otto CW, Hilwig RW, Ewy GA (1993) Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation: is ventilation necessary? Circulation 88(4 Pt 1):1907–1915PubMed

Noc M, Weil MH, Tang W, Turner T, Fukui M (1995) Mechanical ventilation may not be essential for initial cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Chest 108:821–827CrossRefPubMed

Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Berg RA, Ewy GA (1998) Efficacy of chest compression-only BLS CPR in the presence of an occluded airway. Resuscitation 39:179–188CrossRefPubMed

Chandra NC, Gruben KG, Tsitlik JE, Brower R, Guerci AD, Halperin HH, Weisfeldt ML, Permutt S (1994) Observations of ventilation during resuscitation in a canine model. Circulation 90:3070–3075PubMed

SOS-KANTO Study Group (2007) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bystanders with chest compression only (SOS-KANTO): an observational study. Lancet 369:920–926CrossRef

10.

Iwami T, Kawamura T, Hiraide A, Berg RA, Hayashi Y, Nishiuchi T, Kajino K, Yonemoto N, Yukioka H, Sugimoto H, Kakuchi H, Sase K, Yokoyama H, Nonogi H (2007) Effectiveness of bystander-initiated cardiac-only resuscitation for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 116:2900–2907CrossRefPubMed

11.

Ong ME, Ng FS, Anushia P, Tham LP, Leong BS, Ong VY, Tiah L, Lim SH, Anantharaman V (2008) Comparison of chest compression only and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Singapore. Resuscitation 78:119–126CrossRefPubMed

12.

Berg RA, Hilwig RW, Kern KB, Babar I, Ewy GA (1999) Simulated mouth-to-mouth ventilation and chest compressions (bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation) improves outcome in a swine model of prehospital pediatric asphyxial cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 27:1893–1899CrossRefPubMed

13.

Berg RA, Hilwig RW, Kern KB, Ewy GA (2000) Bystander chest compressions and assisted ventilation independently improve outcome from piglet asphyxial pulseless cardiac arrest. Circulation 101:1743–1748PubMed

14.

Berg RA (2000) Role of mouth-to-mouth rescue breathing in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation for asphyxial cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 28(Suppl 11):193–195CrossRef

15.

Idris AH, Banner MJ, Wenzel V, Fuerst RS, Becker LB, Melker RJ (1994) Ventilation caused by external chest compression is unable to sustain effective gas exchange during CPR: a comparison with mechanical ventilation. Resuscitation 28:143–150CrossRefPubMed

16.

Deakin CD, O’Neill JF, Tabor T (2007) Does compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation generate adequate passive ventilation during cardiac arrest? Resuscitation 75:53–59CrossRefPubMed

17.

Bobrow BJ, Zuercher M, Ewy GA, Clark L, Chikani V, Donahue D, Sanders AB, Hilwig RW, Berg RA, Kern KB (2008) Gasping during cardiac arrest in humans is frequent and associated with improved survival. Circulation 118:2550–2554CrossRefPubMed

18.

Dorph E, Wik L, Stromme TA, Eriksen M, Steen PA (2004) Oxygen delivery and return of spontaneous circulation with ventilation: compression ratio 2:30 versus chest compressions only CPR in pigs. Resuscitation 60:309–318CrossRefPubMed

19.

Steen PA (2007) Does active rescuer ventilation have a place during basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Circulation 116:2514–2516CrossRefPubMed

20.

Lurie KG, Yannopoulos D, McKnite SH, Herman ML, Idris AH, Nadkarni VM, Tang W, Gabrielli A, Barnes TA, Metzger AK (2008) Comparison of a 10-breaths-per-minute versus a 2-breaths-per-minute strategy during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. Respir Care 53:862–870PubMed

Titel: Chest compressions versus ventilation plus chest compressions in a pediatric asphyxial cardiac arrest animal model
verfasst von: Jose María Iglesias
Jesús López-Herce
Javier Urbano
Maria José Solana
Santiago Mencía
Jimena del Castillo
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2010
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine / Ausgabe 4/2010
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-010-1777-9

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren

Springer Medizin

Chest compressions versus ventilation plus chest compressions in a pediatric asphyxial cardiac arrest animal model