Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
Erschienen in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 3/2013

01.06.2013 | Review/State of the Art

The Preclose Technique in Percutaneous Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis

verfasst von: Abdel Aziz A. Jaffan, Ethan A. Prince, Christopher O. Hampson, Timothy P. Murphy

Erschienen in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To establish the efficacy and safety of the preclose technique in total percutaneous endovascular aortic repair (PEVAR).

Methods

A systematic literature search of Medline database was conducted for series on PEVAR published between January 1999 and January 2012.

Results

Thirty-six articles comprising 2,257 patients and 3,606 arterial accesses were included. Anatomical criteria used to exclude patients from undergoing PEVAR were not uniform across all series. The technical success rate was 94 % per arterial access. Failure was unilateral in the majority (93 %) of the 133 failed PEVAR cases. The groin complication rate in PEVAR was 3.6 %; a minority (1.6 %) of these groin complications required open surgery. The groin complication rate in failed PEVAR cases converted to groin cutdown was 6.1 %. A significantly higher technical success rate was achieved when arterial access was performed via ultrasound guidance. Technical failure rate was significantly higher with larger sheath size (≥20F).

Conclusion

The preclose technique in PEVAR has a high technical success rate and a low groin complication rate. Technical success tends to increase with ultrasound-guided arterial access and decrease with larger access. When failure occurs, it is unilateral in the majority of cases, and conversion to surgical cutdown does not appear to increase the operative risk.
Literatur
1.
Volodos NL, Karpovich IP, Troyan VI et al (1991) Clinical experience of the use of self-fixing synthetic prostheses for remote endoprosthetics of the thoracic and the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries through the femoral artery and as intraoperative endprosthesis for aorta reconstruction. Vasa Suppl 33:93–95PubMed
2.
Hogg ME, Kibbe MR (2006) Percutaneous thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: techniques and outcomes. Vascular 14:270–281PubMedCrossRef
3.
Morasch MD (2005) Percutaneous thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg 19:585–589PubMedCrossRef
4.
Morasch MD (2006) Percutaneous techniques for aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 43(Suppl A):69A–72APubMedCrossRef
5.
Lönn L, Larzon T, Van Den Berg JC (2010) From puncture to closure of the common femoral artery in endovascular aortic repair. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 51:791–798
6.
Haas PC, Krajcer Z, Diethrich EB (1999) Closure of large percutaneous access sites using the Prostar XL percutaneous vascular surgery device. J Endovasc Surg 6:168–170PubMedCrossRef
7.
Quinn SF, Kim J (2004) Percutaneous femoral closure following stent-graft placement: use of the Perclose device. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 27:231–236PubMedCrossRef
8.
Traul DK, Clair DG, Gray B et al (2000) Percutaneous endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms: a feasibility study. J Vasc Surg 32:770–776PubMedCrossRef
9.
Starnes BW, Andersen CA, Ronsivalle JA et al (2006) Totally percutaneous aortic aneurysm repair: experience and prudence. J Vasc Surg 43:270–276PubMedCrossRef
10.
Teh LG, Sieunarine K, van Schie G et al (2001) Use of the percutaneous vascular surgery device for closure of femoral access sites during endovascular aneurysm repair: lessons from our experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 22:418–423PubMedCrossRef
11.
Howell M, Villareal R, Krajcer Z (2001) Percutaneous access and closure of femoral artery access sites associated with endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther 8:68–74PubMedCrossRef
12.
Rachel ES, Bergamini TM, Kinney EV et al (2002) Percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg 16:43–49PubMedCrossRef
13.
Quinn SF, Duke DJ, Baldwin SS et al (2002) Percutaneous placement of a low-profile stent-graft device for aortic dissections. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13:791–798PubMedCrossRef
14.
Howell M, Doughtery K, Strickman N, Krajcer Z (2002) Percutaneous repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms using the AneuRx stent graft and the percutaneous vascular surgery device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 55:281–287PubMedCrossRef
15.
Torsello GB, Kasprzak B, Klenk E et al (2003) Endovascular suture versus cutdown for endovascular aneurysm repair: a prospective randomized pilot study. J Vasc Surg 38:78–82PubMedCrossRef
16.
Börner G, Ivancev K, Sonesson B et al (2004) Percutaneous AAA repair: is it safe? J Endovasc Ther 11:621–626PubMedCrossRef
17.
Morasch MD, Kibbe MR, Evans ME et al (2004) Percutaneous repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 40:12–16PubMedCrossRef
18.
Peterson BG, Matsumara JS, Morasch MD et al (2005) Percutaneous endovascular repair of blunt thoracic aortic transection. J Trauma 59:1062–1065PubMedCrossRef
19.
Watelet J, Gallot JC, Thomas P et al (2006) Percutaneous repair of aortic aneurysms: a prospective study of suture-mediated closure devices. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 32:261–265PubMedCrossRef
20.
Kaufman JA, Song HK, Ham BB, Slater MS (2007) Traumatic thoracic aortic transection in small-diameter aortas: percutaneous endograft repair. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18:1429–1433PubMedCrossRef
21.
Dosluoglu HH, Cherr GS, Harris LM, Dryjski ML (2007) Total percutaneous endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms using Perclose ProGlide closure devices. J Endovasc Ther 14:184–188PubMedCrossRef
22.
Najjar SF, Mueller KH, Ujiki MB et al (2007) Percutaneous endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Arch Surg 142:1049–1052PubMedCrossRef
23.
Shim CY, Park SM, Ko YG et al (2008) Percutaneous closure of femoral artery access sites in endovascular stent-graft treatment of aortic disease. Int J Cardiol 130:251–254PubMedCrossRef
24.
Arthurs ZM, Starnes BW, Sohn VY et al (2008) Ultrasound-guided access improves rate of access-related complications for totally percutaneous aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg 22:736–741PubMedCrossRef
25.
Lee WA, Brown MP, Nelson PR et al (2008) Midterm outcomes of femoral arteries after percutaneous endovascular aortic repair using the Preclose technique. J Vasc Surg 47:919–923PubMedCrossRef
26.
McDonnell CO, Forlee MV, Dowdall JF et al (2008) Percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair leads to a reduction in wound complications. Ir J Med Sci 177:49–52PubMedCrossRef
27.
Jean-Baptiste E, Hassen-Khodja R, Haudebourg P et al (2008) Percutaneous closure devices for endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms: a prospective, non-randomized comparative study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 35:422–428PubMedCrossRef
28.
Heyer KS, Resnick SA, Matsumura JS et al (2009) Percutaneous Zenith endografting for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 23:167–171PubMedCrossRef
29.
Arslan B, Turba UC, Sabri S et al (2009) Current status of percutaneous endografting. Semin Intervent Rad 26:67–73CrossRef
30.
Smith ST, Timaran CH, Valentine RJ et al (2009) Percutaneous access for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: can selection criteria be expanded? Ann Vasc Surg 23:621–626PubMedCrossRef
31.
Grenon SM, Gagnon J, Hsiang YN, Chen JC (2009) Canadian experience with percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair: short-term outcomes. Can J Surg 52:E156–E160PubMed
32.
Jahnke T, Schäfer JP, Charalambous N et al (2009) Total percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair with the dual 6-F Perclose-AT preclosing technique: a case-control study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:1292–1298PubMedCrossRef
33.
Bent CL, Fotiadis N, Renfrew I et al (2009) Total percutaneous aortic repair: midterm outcomes. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32:449–454PubMedCrossRef
34.
Eisenack M, Umscheid T, Tessarek J et al (2009) Percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: a prospective evaluation of safety, efficiency, and risk factors. J Endovasc Ther 16:708–713PubMedCrossRef
35.
Tom CW, Krajcer Z (2010) Use of the Intuitrak® stent-graft delivery system. Tex Heart Inst J 37:331–333PubMed
36.
Krajcer Z, Gregoric I (2010) Totally percutaneous aortic aneurysm repair: methods and outcomes using the fully integrated IntuiTrak endovascular system. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 51:493–501
37.
Etezadi V, Katzen BT, Naiem A et al (2011) Percutaneous suture-mediated closure versus surgerical arteriotomy in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:142–147PubMedCrossRef
38.
Ni ZH, Luo JF, Huang WH et al (2011) Totally percutaneous thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the preclosing technique: a case-controlstudy. Chin Med J 124:851–855PubMed
39.
Krajcer Z, Nelson PR, Bianchi C et al (2011) Percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: methods and initial outcomes from the first prospective, multicenter trial. J Cardiovasc Surg 52:651–659
40.
Metcalfe MJ, Brownrigg JR, Black SA et al (2012) Unselected percutaneous access with large vessel closure for endovascular aortic surgery: experience and predictors of technical success. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 43:378–381PubMedCrossRef
41.
Oğuzkurt L, Gürel K, Eker E et al (2012) Utrasound-guided puncture of the femoral artery for total percutaneous aortic aneurysm repair. Diagn Interv Radiol 18:92–95PubMed
42.
Berland TL, Cayne NS, Veith FJ (2010) Access complications during endovascular aortic repair. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 51:43–52
43.
Malkawi AH, Hinchliffe RJ, Holt PJ et al (2010) Percutaneous access for endovascular aneurysm repair: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 39:676–682PubMedCrossRef
44.
Haulon S, Hassen Khodja R et al (2011) A systematic literature review of the efficacy and safety of the Prostar XL device for the closure of large femoral arterial access sites in patients undergoing percutaneous endovascular aortic procedures. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 41:201–213PubMedCrossRef
45.
Biancari F, D’Andrea V, Di Marco C et al (2010) Meta-analysis of randomized trials on the efficacy of vascular closure devices after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. Am Heart J 159:518–531PubMedCrossRef
46.
Georgiadis GS, Antoniou GA, Papaioakim M et al (2011) A meta-analysis of outcome after percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using different size sheaths or endograft delivery systems. J Endovasc Ther 18:445–459PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Preclose Technique in Percutaneous Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis
verfasst von
Abdel Aziz A. Jaffan
Ethan A. Prince
Christopher O. Hampson
Timothy P. Murphy
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-013-0593-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2013

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 3/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Technical Note

Safe Removal of an Encrusted Nephrostomy Tube Using a Vascular Sheath: A Technique Revisited

Clinical Investigation

Efficacy and Safety of Transarterial Radioembolization Versus Chemoembolization in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

CIRSE Standards of Practice Guidelines

Quality Improvement Guidelines for Transcatheter Embolization for Acute Gastrointestinal Nonvariceal Hemorrhage

Letter to the Editor

Criteria to Choose between Distal or Proximal Venous Port Device Insertion in HNC Patients

Review

Current Status of Interventional Radiology Treatment of Infrapopliteal Arterial Disease

Laboratory Investigation

Superselective Particle Embolization Enhances Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation: Effects of Particle Size and Sequence of Action

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise