Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
Erschienen in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 10/2017

11.05.2017 | Clinical Investigation

Pediatric Percutaneous Osteoid Osteoma Ablation: Cone-Beam CT with Fluoroscopic Overlay Versus Conventional CT Guidance

verfasst von: Brandon C. Perry, Eric J. Monroe, Tyler McKay, Kalpana M. Kanal, Giridhar Shivaram

Erschienen in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Ausgabe 10/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare technical success, clinical success, complications, radiation dose, and total room utilization time for osteoid osteoma thermal (radiofrequency or microwave) ablation using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with two-axis fluoroscopic navigational overlay versus conventional computed tomography (CT) guidance.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective review was performed to identify all osteoid osteoma ablations performed over a 5.5-year period at a single tertiary care pediatric hospital. Twenty-five ablations (15 radiofrequency and 10 microwave) in 23 patients undergoing fluoroscopic CBCT-guided osteoid osteoma ablation were compared to 35 ablations (35 radiofrequency) in 32 patients undergoing ablation via conventional CT guidance. Dose area product and dose length product were recorded for CBCT and conventional CT, respectively, and converted to effective doses. Technical success, clinical success (cessation of pain and medication use 1 month after ablation), complications, radiation dose, and total room utilization time were compared.

Results

All procedures were technically successful. Twenty-two of 25 (88.0%) CBCT and 31 of 35 (88.6%) conventional CT-guided ablations achieved immediate clinical success. There were two minor complications in each group and no major complications. Mean effective radiation dose was significantly lower for CBCT compared to CT guidance (0.12 vs. 0.39 mSv, p = 0.02). Mean total room utilization time for CBCT was longer (133.5 vs. 97.5 min, p = 0.0001).

Conclusions

Fluoroscopic CBCT guidance for percutaneous osteoid osteoma ablation yields similar technical and clinical success, reduced radiation dose, and increased total room utilization time compared to conventional CT guidance.
Literatur
1.
Earhart J, Wellman D, Donaldson J, et al. Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of osteoid osteoma: results and complications. Pediatr Radiol. 2013;43(7):814–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Rehnitz C, Sprengel SD, Lehner B, et al. CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma: clinical success and long-term follow up in 77 patients. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(11):3426–34.CrossRefPubMed
3.
de Palma L, Candelari R, Antico E, et al. Treatment of osteoid osteoma with CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency thermoablation. Orthopedics. 2013;36(5):e581–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Whitmore MJ, Hawkins CM, Prologo JD, et al. Cryoablation of osteoid osteoma in the pediatric and adolescent population. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(2):232–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Etienne A, Waynberger E, Druon J. Interstitial laser photocoagulation for the treatment of osteoid osteoma: Retrospective study on 35 cases. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013;94:300–10.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Tselikas L, Joskin J, Roquet F, et al. Percutaneous bone biopsies: comparison between flat-panel cone-beam CT and CT-scan guidance. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38(1):167–76.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Busser WM, Hoogeveen YL, Veth RP, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteomas with use of real-time needle guidance for accurate needle placement: a pilot study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011;34(1):180–3.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Abi-Jaoudeh N, Venkatesan AM, Van der Sterren W, et al. Clinical experience with cone-beam CT navigation for tumor ablation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26(2):214–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Cazzato RL, Battistuzzi JB, Catena V, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) versus CT in lung ablation procedure: which is faster? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38(5):1231–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
McKay T, Ingraham CR, Johnson GE, et al. Cone-beam CT with fluoroscopic overlay versus conventional ct guidance for percutaneous abdominopelvic abscess drain placement. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(1):52–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Carrafiello G, Ierardi AM, Duka E, et al. Usefulness of cone-beam computed tomography and automatic vessel detection software in emergency transarterial embolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016;39(4):530–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Floridi C, Radaelli A, Abi-Jaoudeh N, et al. C-arm cone-beam computed tomography in interventional oncology: technical aspects and clinical applications. Radiol Med. 2014;119(7):521–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
14.
Bapst B, Lagadec M, Breguet R, et al. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the field of interventional oncology of the liver. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016;39(1):8–20.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Orth RC, Wallace MJ, Kuo MD. C-arm cone-beam CT: general principles and technical considerations for use in interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19(6):814–20.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Orth RC, Wallace MJ, Kuo MD, et al. Technology assessment committee of the society of interventional radiology C-arm cone-beam CT: general principles and technical considerations for use in interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19(6):814–20.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Castellano IA, McNeill JG, Thorp NC, Dance DR, Raphael MJ. Assessment of organ radiation doses and associated risk for digital bifemoral arteriography. Br J Radiol. 1995;68(809):502–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
McParland BJ. A study of patient radiation doses in interventional radiological procedures. Br J Radiol. 1998;71(842):175–85.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Saltybaeva N, Jafari ME, Hupfer M, Kalender WA. Estimates of effective dose for CT scans of the lower extremities. Radiology. 2014;273(1):153–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. National Council on Radiation Protection report no. 160. Bethesda, Md: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 2009.
21.
Johnson C, Martin-Carreras T, Rabinowitz D. Pediatric interventional radiology and dose-reduction techniques. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2014;35(4):409–14.CrossRefPubMed
22.
International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2–4):49–50.
23.
Cheng EY, Naranje SM, Ritenour ER. Radiation dosimetry of intraoperative cone-beam compared with conventional CT for radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(9):735–42.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Biswas D, Bible JE, Bohan M, et al. Radiation exposure from musculoskeletal computerized tomographic scans. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(8):1882–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Koivisto J, Kiljunen T, Wolff J, Kortesniemi M. Assessment of effective radiation dose of an extremity CBCT, MSCT and conventional X ray for knee area using MOSFET dosemeters. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2013;157(4):515–24.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zbijewski W, De Jean P, Prakash P, et al. A dedicated cone-beam CT system for musculoskeletal extremities imaging: design, optimization, and initial performance characterization. Med Phys. 2011;38(8):4700–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Braak SJ, vanStrijen MJ, van Es HW, et al. Effective dose during needle interventions: cone-beam CT guidance compared with conventional CT guidance. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22:455–61.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Bai M, LiuB MuH, et al. The comparison of radiation dose between C-arm flat-detector CT (DynaCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT):a phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:3577–80.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Kwok YM, Irani FG, Tay KH, et al. Effective dose estimates for cone beam computed tomography in interventional radiology. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(11):3197–204.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Pediatric Percutaneous Osteoid Osteoma Ablation: Cone-Beam CT with Fluoroscopic Overlay Versus Conventional CT Guidance
verfasst von
Brandon C. Perry
Eric J. Monroe
Tyler McKay
Kalpana M. Kanal
Giridhar Shivaram
Publikationsdatum
11.05.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Ausgabe 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1685-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2017

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 10/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Technical Note

Double Balloon-Assisted Coil Embolization (BACE) Combined with Proximal and Distal Balloon Inflation for Short Abdominal Arterial Segments: Comparison with Single BACE

Case Report

Aortic Aneurysm Rupture After Urokinase Treatment for Acute Limb Ischemia in Two Patients After EVAR

Letter to the Editor

Reply to the Letter: “Direct Transarterial Embolization with N-Butyl-2-Cyanoacrylate Should be the Choice of Treatment for Spontaneous Hematomas in Patients on Anticoagulation Treatment”

CIRSE Standards of Practice Guidelines

CIRSE Guidelines on Percutaneous Needle Biopsy (PNB)

Editorial

The Digital Revolution and Its Impact on Interventional Radiology

Technical Note

Prophylactic Temporary Occlusion of the Cystic Artery Using a Fibered Detachable Coil During 90Y Radioembolization

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise