Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 3/2006

01.03.2006 | Chest

The influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on observer performance for the detection of nodular lesions on chest radiographs

verfasst von: H. Usami, M. Ikeda, T. Ishigakil, H. Fukushima, K. Shimamoto

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To access the influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on the detectability of nodular lesions depicted on chest radiographs by comparing them with a high-resolution cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor.

Material and methods

Ten radiologists interpreted 247 soft-copy images on LCD monitors with pixel arrays of 1,024×1,280, 1,200×1,600, 1,536×2,048 and 2,048×2,560, and a CRT monitor with a pixel array of 2,048×2,560, and were asked to indicate their individual confidence levels regarding the presence of a nodule. These images were chest radiographs with and without a lung nodule from the “Standard Digital Image Database” created by the Japanese Society of Radiological Technology. The luminance distributions of all monitors were adjusted to the same, and the ambient illumination was 200 lux. Observer performance was analyzed in terms of the receiver-operating characteristics.

Results

No significant statistical differences in nodule detection performance were found among the four LCD monitors and the CRT monitor.

Conclusion

The nodule detection performance on the LCD monitors with a spatial resolution higher than a matrix size of 1,024×1,280 was found to be equivalent to that on the high-resolution CRT monitor.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Iwano S, Ishigaki T, Shimamoto K et al (2001) Detection of subtle pulmonary disease on CR chest images: monochromatic CRT monitor vs color CRT monitor. Eur Radiol 11:59–64CrossRefPubMed Iwano S, Ishigaki T, Shimamoto K et al (2001) Detection of subtle pulmonary disease on CR chest images: monochromatic CRT monitor vs color CRT monitor. Eur Radiol 11:59–64CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hertzberg BS, Kliewer MA, Paulson EK et al (1999) PACS in sonography: accuracy of interpretation using film compared with monitor display. Picture archiving and communication systems. Am J Roentgenol 173:1175–1179 Hertzberg BS, Kliewer MA, Paulson EK et al (1999) PACS in sonography: accuracy of interpretation using film compared with monitor display. Picture archiving and communication systems. Am J Roentgenol 173:1175–1179
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishigaki T, Endo T, Ikeda M et al (1996) Subtle pulmonary disease: detection with computed radiography versus conventional chest radiography. Radiology 201:51–60PubMed Ishigaki T, Endo T, Ikeda M et al (1996) Subtle pulmonary disease: detection with computed radiography versus conventional chest radiography. Radiology 201:51–60PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson AJ (1995) Filmless musculoskeletal radiology: why is it taking so long? Am J Roentgenol 165:105–107 Wilson AJ (1995) Filmless musculoskeletal radiology: why is it taking so long? Am J Roentgenol 165:105–107
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Razavi M, Sayre JW, Taira RK et al (1992) Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K ( 2K soft-copy images. Am J Roentgenol 158:443–448 Razavi M, Sayre JW, Taira RK et al (1992) Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K ( 2K soft-copy images. Am J Roentgenol 158:443–448
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Straub WH, Gur D, Good WF et al (1991) Primary CT diagnosis of abdominal masses in a PACS environment. Radiology 178:739–743PubMed Straub WH, Gur D, Good WF et al (1991) Primary CT diagnosis of abdominal masses in a PACS environment. Radiology 178:739–743PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Slasky BS, Gur D, Good WF et al (1990) Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images. Radiology 174:775–780PubMed Slasky BS, Gur D, Good WF et al (1990) Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images. Radiology 174:775–780PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Foley WD, Jacobson DR, Taylor AJ et al (1990) Display of CT studies on a two-screen electronic workstation versus a film panel alternator: sensitivity and efficiency among radiologists. Radiology 174:769–773PubMed Foley WD, Jacobson DR, Taylor AJ et al (1990) Display of CT studies on a two-screen electronic workstation versus a film panel alternator: sensitivity and efficiency among radiologists. Radiology 174:769–773PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayrapetian A, Aberle DR, Huang HK et al (1989) Comparison of 2,048-line digital display formats and conventional radiographs: an ROC study. Am J Roentgenol 152:1113–1118 Hayrapetian A, Aberle DR, Huang HK et al (1989) Comparison of 2,048-line digital display formats and conventional radiographs: an ROC study. Am J Roentgenol 152:1113–1118
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodman LR, Foley WD, Wilson CR, Rimm AA, Lawson TL (1986) Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with film digital radiography system. Radiology 158:27–33PubMed Goodman LR, Foley WD, Wilson CR, Rimm AA, Lawson TL (1986) Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with film digital radiography system. Radiology 158:27–33PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Flynn MJ, Kanicki J, Badano A, Eyler WR (1999) High-fidelity electronic display of digital radiographs. RadioGraphics 19:1653–1669PubMed Flynn MJ, Kanicki J, Badano A, Eyler WR (1999) High-fidelity electronic display of digital radiographs. RadioGraphics 19:1653–1669PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim AY, Cho KS, Song KS, Kim JH, Kim JG, Ha HK (2001) Urinary calculi on computed radiography: comparison of observer performance with hard-copy versus soft-copy images on different viewer systems. Am J Roentgenol 177:331–335 Kim AY, Cho KS, Song KS, Kim JH, Kim JG, Ha HK (2001) Urinary calculi on computed radiography: comparison of observer performance with hard-copy versus soft-copy images on different viewer systems. Am J Roentgenol 177:331–335
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Samei E, Seibert JA, Andriole K et al (2004) AAPM/RSNA Tutorial on equipment selection: PACS equipment overview: general guidelines for purchasing and acceptance testing of PACS equipment. RadioGraphics 24:313–334PubMedCrossRef Samei E, Seibert JA, Andriole K et al (2004) AAPM/RSNA Tutorial on equipment selection: PACS equipment overview: general guidelines for purchasing and acceptance testing of PACS equipment. RadioGraphics 24:313–334PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Harisinghani MG, Blake MA, Saksena M et al (2004) Importance and effects of altered workplace ergonomics in modern radiology suites. RadioGraphics 24:615–627PubMedCrossRef Harisinghani MG, Blake MA, Saksena M et al (2004) Importance and effects of altered workplace ergonomics in modern radiology suites. RadioGraphics 24:615–627PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Badano A (2004) AAPM/RSNA Tutorial on equipment selection: PACS equipment overview: display systems. RadioGraphics 24:879–889PubMedCrossRef Badano A (2004) AAPM/RSNA Tutorial on equipment selection: PACS equipment overview: display systems. RadioGraphics 24:879–889PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Scharitzer M, Prokop M, Weber M, Fuchsjager M, Oschatz E, Schaefer-Prokop C (2005) Detectability of catheters on bedside chest radiographs: comparison between liquid crystal display and high-resolution cathode-ray tube monitors. Radiology 234:611–616PubMedCrossRef Scharitzer M, Prokop M, Weber M, Fuchsjager M, Oschatz E, Schaefer-Prokop C (2005) Detectability of catheters on bedside chest radiographs: comparison between liquid crystal display and high-resolution cathode-ray tube monitors. Radiology 234:611–616PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Langer S, Bartholmai B, Fetterly K et al (2004) SCAR R&D Symposium 2003: comparing the efficacy of 5-MP CRT versus 3-MP LCD in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease. J Digit Imaging 17:149–157CrossRefPubMed Langer S, Bartholmai B, Fetterly K et al (2004) SCAR R&D Symposium 2003: comparing the efficacy of 5-MP CRT versus 3-MP LCD in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease. J Digit Imaging 17:149–157CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Partan G, Mayrhofer R, Urban M, Wassipaul M, Pichler L, Hruby W (2003) Diagnostic performance of liquid crystal and cathode-ray-tube monitors in brain computed tomography. Eur Radiol 13:2397–2401PubMedCrossRef Partan G, Mayrhofer R, Urban M, Wassipaul M, Pichler L, Hruby W (2003) Diagnostic performance of liquid crystal and cathode-ray-tube monitors in brain computed tomography. Eur Radiol 13:2397–2401PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Shiraishi J, Katsuragawa S, Ikezoe J et al (2000) Development of a digital image database for chest radiographs with and without a lung nodule: receiver operating characteristic analysis of radiologists' detection of pulmonary nodules. Am J Roentgenol 174:71–74 Shiraishi J, Katsuragawa S, Ikezoe J et al (2000) Development of a digital image database for chest radiographs with and without a lung nodule: receiver operating characteristic analysis of radiologists' detection of pulmonary nodules. Am J Roentgenol 174:71–74
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kobayashi T, Xu XW, MacMahon H, Metz CE, Doi K (1996) Effect of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists' performance in detection of lung nodules on radiographs. Radiology 199:843–848PubMed Kobayashi T, Xu XW, MacMahon H, Metz CE, Doi K (1996) Effect of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists' performance in detection of lung nodules on radiographs. Radiology 199:843–848PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Itoh Y, Ishigaki T, Sakuma S et al (1992) Influence of CRT workstation on observer's performance. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 37:253–258PubMedCrossRef Itoh Y, Ishigaki T, Sakuma S et al (1992) Influence of CRT workstation on observer's performance. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 37:253–258PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Metz CE, Herman BA, Shen JH (1998) Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. Stat Med 17:1033–1053PubMedCrossRef Metz CE, Herman BA, Shen JH (1998) Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. Stat Med 17:1033–1053PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE (1992) Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 27:723–731PubMedCrossRef Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE (1992) Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 27:723–731PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Roe CA, Metz CE (1997) Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method for statistical analysis of multireader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic data: validation with computer simulation. Acad Radiol 4:298–303CrossRefPubMed Roe CA, Metz CE (1997) Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method for statistical analysis of multireader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic data: validation with computer simulation. Acad Radiol 4:298–303CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2001) Computer-assisted research design and analysis. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, UK Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2001) Computer-assisted research design and analysis. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, UK
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hochberg Y, Tamhane AC (1987) Multiple comparison procedures. John Wiley & Sons, New York Hochberg Y, Tamhane AC (1987) Multiple comparison procedures. John Wiley & Sons, New York
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sund P, Båth M, Kheddache S, Månsson LG (2004) Comparison of visual grading analysis and determination of detective quantum efficiency for evaluating system performance in digital chest radiography. Eur Radiol 14:48–58CrossRefPubMed Sund P, Båth M, Kheddache S, Månsson LG (2004) Comparison of visual grading analysis and determination of detective quantum efficiency for evaluating system performance in digital chest radiography. Eur Radiol 14:48–58CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on observer performance for the detection of nodular lesions on chest radiographs
verfasst von
H. Usami
M. Ikeda
T. Ishigakil
H. Fukushima
K. Shimamoto
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2006
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2006
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-0030-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2006

European Radiology 3/2006 Zur Ausgabe

Letter to the Editor

Author’s reply

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.