Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 1/2006

01.01.2006 | Pediatric

Bowel magnetic resonance imaging of pediatric patients with oral mannitol

MRI compared to endoscopy and intestinal ultrasound

verfasst von: Arne S. Borthne, Michael Abdelnoor, Jarle Rugtveit, Göri Perminow, Tor Reiseter, Nils-Einar Kløw

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in pediatric patients with clinical suspicion of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) by comparing MRI and ultrasound (US) to endoscopy, the gold standard. A median volume of 300 ml of mannitol in a 4.5% watery solution were ingested by 43 children prior to examination. The 53 MRI examinations were compared with 20 endoscopies and 41 US of the terminal ileum. The outcomes were MRI quality; pathologic findings; level of adverse events; and concordance between endoscopy, MRI, and US estimated by kappa statistics. The ileum and terminal ileum were very good or excellently imaged in approximately 80% of cases. Wall thickening and enhancement were most frequent in the terminal ileum. MRI compared with endoscopy had a sensitivity of 81.8% [95% confidence interval (CI)], specificity of 100%, diagnostic accuracy of 90%, and kappa value of 0.80 (95% CI), indicating a good degree of concordance. A similar degree of concordance was achieved between US and endoscopy. In spite of the frequent adverse reactions, such as diarrhea and nausea, half of the patients were prepared to repeat the examination. The results of MRI are concordant with endoscopy and US of the terminal ileum.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Laghi A, Borrelli O, Paolantonio P et al (2003) Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the terminal ileum in children with Crohn’s disease. Gut 52:393–397PubMedCrossRef Laghi A, Borrelli O, Paolantonio P et al (2003) Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the terminal ileum in children with Crohn’s disease. Gut 52:393–397PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Present DH (2002) Serologic tests are not helpful in managing inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 8:227–229PubMedCrossRef Present DH (2002) Serologic tests are not helpful in managing inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 8:227–229PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Maccioni F, Viscido A, Broglia L et al (2000) Evaluation of Crohn’s disease activity with magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging 25:219–228PubMedCrossRef Maccioni F, Viscido A, Broglia L et al (2000) Evaluation of Crohn’s disease activity with magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging 25:219–228PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Darbari A, Sena L, Argani P, Oliva-Hemker M, Thompson R, Cuffari C (2004) Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. A useful radiological tool in diagnosing pediatric IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis 10:67–72PubMedCrossRef Darbari A, Sena L, Argani P, Oliva-Hemker M, Thompson R, Cuffari C (2004) Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. A useful radiological tool in diagnosing pediatric IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis 10:67–72PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ha AS, Levine MS, Rubesin SE, Laufer I, Herlinger H (2003) Radiographic examination of the small bowel: survey of practice patterns in the United States. Radiology 231:407–411 Ha AS, Levine MS, Rubesin SE, Laufer I, Herlinger H (2003) Radiographic examination of the small bowel: survey of practice patterns in the United States. Radiology 231:407–411
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Low RN, Francis IR, Politoske D, Bennett M (2000) Crohn’s disease evaluation: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and single-phase helical CT scanning. J Magn Reson Imaging 11:127–135PubMedCrossRef Low RN, Francis IR, Politoske D, Bennett M (2000) Crohn’s disease evaluation: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and single-phase helical CT scanning. J Magn Reson Imaging 11:127–135PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Schreyer A, Seiz J, Feuerbach S, Rogler G, Herfarth H (2004) Modern imaging using computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) AU1. Inflamm Bowel Dis 10:45–54PubMedCrossRef Schreyer A, Seiz J, Feuerbach S, Rogler G, Herfarth H (2004) Modern imaging using computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) AU1. Inflamm Bowel Dis 10:45–54PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Parente F, Greco S, Molteni M, Anderloni A, Maconi G, Porro GB (2004) Modern imaging of Crohn’s disease using bowel ultrasound. Inflamm Bowel Dis 10:452–461PubMedCrossRef Parente F, Greco S, Molteni M, Anderloni A, Maconi G, Porro GB (2004) Modern imaging of Crohn’s disease using bowel ultrasound. Inflamm Bowel Dis 10:452–461PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Miao YM, Koh D-M, Amin Z et al (2002) Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging assessment of active bowel segments in Crohn’s disease. Clin Radiol 57:913–918PubMedCrossRef Miao YM, Koh D-M, Amin Z et al (2002) Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging assessment of active bowel segments in Crohn’s disease. Clin Radiol 57:913–918PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Maccioni F, Viscido A, Marini M, Caprilli R (2002) MRI evaluation of Crohn’s disease of the small and large bowel with the use of negative superparamagnetic oral contrast agents. Abdom Imaging 27:384–393PubMedCrossRef Maccioni F, Viscido A, Marini M, Caprilli R (2002) MRI evaluation of Crohn’s disease of the small and large bowel with the use of negative superparamagnetic oral contrast agents. Abdom Imaging 27:384–393PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rieber A, Nüssle K, Reinshagen M, Brambs H-J, Gabelmann A (2002) MRI of the abdomen with positive oral contrast agents for the diagnosis of inflammatory small bowel disease. Abdom Imaging 27:394–399PubMedCrossRef Rieber A, Nüssle K, Reinshagen M, Brambs H-J, Gabelmann A (2002) MRI of the abdomen with positive oral contrast agents for the diagnosis of inflammatory small bowel disease. Abdom Imaging 27:394–399PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Wagner EH (1996) In: Clinical epidemiology. The essentials, 3rd edn. Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 48–49 Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Wagner EH (1996) In: Clinical epidemiology. The essentials, 3rd edn. Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 48–49
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman DG (1996) Practical statistics for medical research, Chapman & Hall, London, pp 404 Altman DG (1996) Practical statistics for medical research, Chapman & Hall, London, pp 404
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Maris T (2000) MR imaging of the small bowel with a true-FISP sequence after enteroclysis with water solution. Invest Radiol 35:707–711PubMedCrossRef Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Maris T (2000) MR imaging of the small bowel with a true-FISP sequence after enteroclysis with water solution. Invest Radiol 35:707–711PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rieber A, Aschoff A, Nüssle K et al (2000) MRI in the diagnosis of small bowel disease: use of positive and negative oral contrast media in combination with enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 1377–1382 Rieber A, Aschoff A, Nüssle K et al (2000) MRI in the diagnosis of small bowel disease: use of positive and negative oral contrast media in combination with enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 1377–1382
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Masselli G, Brizi GM, Parrella A, Minordi LM, Vecchioli A, Marano P (2004) Crohn disease: magnetic resonance enteroclysis. Abdom Imaging 29:326–334PubMedCrossRef Masselli G, Brizi GM, Parrella A, Minordi LM, Vecchioli A, Marano P (2004) Crohn disease: magnetic resonance enteroclysis. Abdom Imaging 29:326–334PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Schunk K, Kern A, Oberholzer K et al (2000) Hydro-MRI in Crohn’s disease: appraisal of disease activity. Invest Radiol 35:431–437PubMedCrossRef Schunk K, Kern A, Oberholzer K et al (2000) Hydro-MRI in Crohn’s disease: appraisal of disease activity. Invest Radiol 35:431–437PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ajaj W, Goehde SC, Schneemann H, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF, Lauenstein TC (2004) Oral contrast agents for small bowel MRI: comparison of different additives to optimize bowel distension. Eur Radiol 14:458–464PubMedCrossRef Ajaj W, Goehde SC, Schneemann H, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF, Lauenstein TC (2004) Oral contrast agents for small bowel MRI: comparison of different additives to optimize bowel distension. Eur Radiol 14:458–464PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Narin B, Ajaj W, Gohde S et al (2004) Combined small and large bowel MR imaging in patients with Crohn’s disease: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 14:1535–1542PubMedCrossRef Narin B, Ajaj W, Gohde S et al (2004) Combined small and large bowel MR imaging in patients with Crohn’s disease: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 14:1535–1542PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Borthne AS, Dormagen JB, Gjesdal KI, Storaas T, Lygren I, Geitung JT (2003) Bowel MR imaging with oral Gastrografin: an experimental study with healthy volunteers. Eur Radiol 13:100–106PubMed Borthne AS, Dormagen JB, Gjesdal KI, Storaas T, Lygren I, Geitung JT (2003) Bowel MR imaging with oral Gastrografin: an experimental study with healthy volunteers. Eur Radiol 13:100–106PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Borthne AS, Abdelnoor M, Hellund JC et al (2005) MR imaging of the small bowel with increasing concentrations of an oral osmotic agent. Eur Radiol 15:666–671PubMedCrossRef Borthne AS, Abdelnoor M, Hellund JC et al (2005) MR imaging of the small bowel with increasing concentrations of an oral osmotic agent. Eur Radiol 15:666–671PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Schunk K (2002) Small bowel magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory bowel disease. Top Magn Reson Imaging 13:409–425PubMedCrossRef Schunk K (2002) Small bowel magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory bowel disease. Top Magn Reson Imaging 13:409–425PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Bigard M, Gaucher P, Lasalle C (1979) Fatal colonic explosion during colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 77:1307–1310PubMed Bigard M, Gaucher P, Lasalle C (1979) Fatal colonic explosion during colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 77:1307–1310PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Bowel magnetic resonance imaging of pediatric patients with oral mannitol
MRI compared to endoscopy and intestinal ultrasound
verfasst von
Arne S. Borthne
Michael Abdelnoor
Jarle Rugtveit
Göri Perminow
Tor Reiseter
Nils-Einar Kløw
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2006
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2006
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2793-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2006

European Radiology 1/2006 Zur Ausgabe

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.