Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 7/2009

01.07.2009 | Oncology

Treatment response classification of liver metastatic disease evaluated on imaging. Are RECIST unidimensional measurements accurate?

verfasst von: Michael Mantatzis, Stylianos Kakolyris, Kyriakos Amarantidis, Anastasios Karayiannakis, Panos Prassopoulos

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 7/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of unidimensional measurements (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, RECIST) compared with volumetric measurements in patients with liver metastases undergoing chemotherapy. Forty-four patients with newly diagnosed liver lesions underwent three MRI examinations at treatment initiation, during chemotherapy, and immediately post-treatment. Measurements based on RECIST guidelines and volume calculations were performed on the “target” lesions (TLs). The two methods were in agreement in 64/77 of patients and 253/301 of individual lesions classification in response categories (“good” agreement, Cohen kappa = 0.735 and 0.741, respectively). In 16.88% of the comparisons the two methods stratified patients to a different response category; 27.6% of TLs did not follow the response category of the patient in whom lesions were located. The actual volume of TLs differs from the calculated volume of a sphere with the same diameter. Our study supports the use of volumetric techniques that may overcome certain disadvantages of unidimensional measurements.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hopper KD, Kasales CJ, Eggli KD et al (1996) The impact of 2D versus 3D quantitation of tumor bulk determination on current methods of assessing response to treatment. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20:930–937PubMedCrossRef Hopper KD, Kasales CJ, Eggli KD et al (1996) The impact of 2D versus 3D quantitation of tumor bulk determination on current methods of assessing response to treatment. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20:930–937PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Padhani AR, Ollivier L (2001) The RECIST (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors) criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists. Br J Radiol 74:983–986PubMed Padhani AR, Ollivier L (2001) The RECIST (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors) criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists. Br J Radiol 74:983–986PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Husband JE (1996) Monitoring tumour response. Eur Radiol 6:775–785PubMed Husband JE (1996) Monitoring tumour response. Eur Radiol 6:775–785PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat World Health Organization (1979) WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. WHO Publications Centre USA, Albany, NY World Health Organization (1979) WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. WHO Publications Centre USA, Albany, NY
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Prasad SR, Jhaveri KS, Saini S, Hahn PF, Halpern EF, Sumner JE (2002) CT tumor measurement for therapeutic response assessment: comparison of unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric techniques initial observations. Radiology 225:416–419PubMedCrossRef Prasad SR, Jhaveri KS, Saini S, Hahn PF, Halpern EF, Sumner JE (2002) CT tumor measurement for therapeutic response assessment: comparison of unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric techniques initial observations. Radiology 225:416–419PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tran LN, Brown MS, Goldin JG et al (2004) Comparison of treatment response classifications between unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric measurements of metastatic lung lesions on chest computed tomography. Acad Radiol 11:1355–1360. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2004.09.004 PubMedCrossRef Tran LN, Brown MS, Goldin JG et al (2004) Comparison of treatment response classifications between unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric measurements of metastatic lung lesions on chest computed tomography. Acad Radiol 11:1355–1360. doi:10.​1016/​j.​acra.​2004.​09.​004 PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Heussel CP, Meier S, Wittelsberger S, Gotte H, Mildenberger P, Kauczor HU (2007) Follow-up CT measurement of liver malignoma according to RECIST and WHO vs. volumetry. Rofo 179:958–964. doi:10.1055/s-2007-963171 PubMed Heussel CP, Meier S, Wittelsberger S, Gotte H, Mildenberger P, Kauczor HU (2007) Follow-up CT measurement of liver malignoma according to RECIST and WHO vs. volumetry. Rofo 179:958–964. doi:10.​1055/​s-2007-963171 PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall, London Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall, London
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Streiner DL, Norman GR (2003) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press, Oxford Streiner DL, Norman GR (2003) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press, Oxford
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A (1981) Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47:207–214PubMedCrossRef Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A (1981) Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47:207–214PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gehan EA, Tefft MC (2000) Will there be resistance to the RECIST (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors)? J Natl Cancer Inst 92:179–181PubMedCrossRef Gehan EA, Tefft MC (2000) Will there be resistance to the RECIST (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors)? J Natl Cancer Inst 92:179–181PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Mazonakis M, Damilakis J, Maris T, Prassopoulos P, Gourtsoyiannis N (2002) Comparison of two volumetric techniques for estimating liver volume using magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:557–563. doi:10.1002/jmri.10109 PubMedCrossRef Mazonakis M, Damilakis J, Maris T, Prassopoulos P, Gourtsoyiannis N (2002) Comparison of two volumetric techniques for estimating liver volume using magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:557–563. doi:10.​1002/​jmri.​10109 PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Keil S, Behrendt FF, Stanzel S et al (2008) Semi-automated measurement of hyperdense, hypodense and heterogeneous hepatic metastasis on standard MDCT slices. comparison of semi-automated and manual measurement of RECIST and WHO criteria. Eur Radiol 18:2456–2465. doi:10.1007/s00330-008-1050-6 PubMedCrossRef Keil S, Behrendt FF, Stanzel S et al (2008) Semi-automated measurement of hyperdense, hypodense and heterogeneous hepatic metastasis on standard MDCT slices. comparison of semi-automated and manual measurement of RECIST and WHO criteria. Eur Radiol 18:2456–2465. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-008-1050-6 PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Marten K, Auer F, Schmidt S, Kohl G, Rummeny EJ, Engelke C (2006) Inadequacy of manual measurements compared to automated CT volumetry in assessment of treatment response of pulmonary metastases using RECIST criteria. Eur Radiol 16:781–790. doi:10.1007/s00330-005-0036-x PubMedCrossRef Marten K, Auer F, Schmidt S, Kohl G, Rummeny EJ, Engelke C (2006) Inadequacy of manual measurements compared to automated CT volumetry in assessment of treatment response of pulmonary metastases using RECIST criteria. Eur Radiol 16:781–790. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-005-0036-x PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldie JH, Coldman AJ (1979) A mathematic model for relating the drug sensitivity of tumors to their spontaneous mutation rate. Cancer Treat Rep 63:1727–1733PubMed Goldie JH, Coldman AJ (1979) A mathematic model for relating the drug sensitivity of tumors to their spontaneous mutation rate. Cancer Treat Rep 63:1727–1733PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Marten K, Auer F, Schmidt S, Rummeny EJ, Engelke C (2007) Automated CT volumetry of pulmonary metastases: the effect of a reduced growth threshold and target lesion number on the reliability of therapy response assessment using RECIST criteria. Eur Radiol 17:2561–2571. doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0642-x PubMedCrossRef Marten K, Auer F, Schmidt S, Rummeny EJ, Engelke C (2007) Automated CT volumetry of pulmonary metastases: the effect of a reduced growth threshold and target lesion number on the reliability of therapy response assessment using RECIST criteria. Eur Radiol 17:2561–2571. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-007-0642-x PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Sohaib SA, Turner B, Hanson JA, Farquharson M, Oliver RT, Reznek RH (2000) CT assessment of tumour response to treatment: comparison of linear, cross-sectional and volumetric measures of tumour size. Br J Radiol 73:1178–1184PubMed Sohaib SA, Turner B, Hanson JA, Farquharson M, Oliver RT, Reznek RH (2000) CT assessment of tumour response to treatment: comparison of linear, cross-sectional and volumetric measures of tumour size. Br J Radiol 73:1178–1184PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurland J, Johnson RO (1966) Case for using only maximum diameter in measuring tumors. Cancer Chemother Rep 50:119–124PubMed Gurland J, Johnson RO (1966) Case for using only maximum diameter in measuring tumors. Cancer Chemother Rep 50:119–124PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamel IR, Bluemke DA (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: assessing response to treatment. Top Magn Reson Imaging 13:191–200PubMedCrossRef Kamel IR, Bluemke DA (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: assessing response to treatment. Top Magn Reson Imaging 13:191–200PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat del Frate C, Bazzocchi M, Mortele KJ et al (2002) Detection of liver metastases: comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced and ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging examinations. Radiology 225:766–772PubMedCrossRef del Frate C, Bazzocchi M, Mortele KJ et al (2002) Detection of liver metastases: comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced and ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging examinations. Radiology 225:766–772PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim YK, Ko SW, Hwang SB, Kim CS, Yu HC (2006) Detection and characterization of liver metastases: 16-slice multidetector computed tomography versus superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 16:1337–1345. doi:10.1007/s00330-005-0140-y PubMedCrossRef Kim YK, Ko SW, Hwang SB, Kim CS, Yu HC (2006) Detection and characterization of liver metastases: 16-slice multidetector computed tomography versus superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 16:1337–1345. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-005-0140-y PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanimoto A, Wakabayashi G, Shinmoto H, Nakatsuka S, Okuda S, Kuribayashi S (2005) Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging for focal hepatic lesions: a comparison with CT during arterioportography plus CT during hepatic arteriography. J Gastroenterol 40:371–380. doi:10.1007/s00535-005-1553-8 PubMedCrossRef Tanimoto A, Wakabayashi G, Shinmoto H, Nakatsuka S, Okuda S, Kuribayashi S (2005) Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging for focal hepatic lesions: a comparison with CT during arterioportography plus CT during hepatic arteriography. J Gastroenterol 40:371–380. doi:10.​1007/​s00535-005-1553-8 PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Kubaska S, Sahani DV, Saini S, Hahn PF, Halpern E (2001) Dual contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver with superparamagnetic iron oxide followed by gadolinium for lesion detection and characterization. Clin Radiol 56:410–415. doi:10.1053/crad.2000.0673 PubMedCrossRef Kubaska S, Sahani DV, Saini S, Hahn PF, Halpern E (2001) Dual contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver with superparamagnetic iron oxide followed by gadolinium for lesion detection and characterization. Clin Radiol 56:410–415. doi:10.​1053/​crad.​2000.​0673 PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim MJ, Kim JH, Chung JJ, Park MS, Lim JS, Oh YT (2003) Focal hepatic lesions: detection and characterization with combination gadolinium- and superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 228:719–726. doi:10.1148/radiol.2283020735 PubMedCrossRef Kim MJ, Kim JH, Chung JJ, Park MS, Lim JS, Oh YT (2003) Focal hepatic lesions: detection and characterization with combination gadolinium- and superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 228:719–726. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2283020735 PubMedCrossRef
34.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Blakeborough A, Ward J, Wilson D et al (1997) Hepatic lesion detection at MR imaging: a comparative study with four sequences. Radiology 203:759–765PubMed Blakeborough A, Ward J, Wilson D et al (1997) Hepatic lesion detection at MR imaging: a comparative study with four sequences. Radiology 203:759–765PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahama K, Amano Y, Hayashi H, Ishihara M, Kumazaki T (2003) Detection and characterization of focal liver lesions using superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between ferumoxides-enhanced T1-weighted imaging and delayed-phase gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. Abdom Imaging 28:525–530PubMedCrossRef Takahama K, Amano Y, Hayashi H, Ishihara M, Kumazaki T (2003) Detection and characterization of focal liver lesions using superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between ferumoxides-enhanced T1-weighted imaging and delayed-phase gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. Abdom Imaging 28:525–530PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Treatment response classification of liver metastatic disease evaluated on imaging. Are RECIST unidimensional measurements accurate?
verfasst von
Michael Mantatzis
Stylianos Kakolyris
Kyriakos Amarantidis
Anastasios Karayiannakis
Panos Prassopoulos
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 7/2009
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1327-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2009

European Radiology 7/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.