Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 10/2010

01.10.2010 | Breast

Does digital mammography in a decentralized breast cancer screening program lead to screening performance parameters comparable with film-screen mammography?

verfasst von: Chantal Van Ongeval, Andre Van Steen, Gretel Vande Putte, Federica Zanca, Hilde Bosmans, Guy Marchal, Erik Van Limbergen

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 10/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate if the screening performance parameters of digital mammography (DM) in a decentralized screening organization were comparable with film-screen mammography (FSM).

Methods:

A nationwide screening program was launched in 2001, and since 2005 screening with DM has been allowed. Firstly, the parameters of the three regional screening units (RSUs) that first switched to DM (11,355 women) were compared with the FSM period of the same three RSUs (23,325 women). Secondly, they were compared with the results of the whole central breast unit (CBU).

Results:

The recall rate (RR) of the DM group in the initial round was 2.64% [2.40% for FSM (p = 0.43)] and in the subsequent round 1.20% [1.58% for FSM (p = 0.03)]. The cancer detection rate (CDR) was 0.59% for DM and 0.64% for FSM (p = 0.56). The percentage of ductal carcinoma in situ was 0.07% for DM and 0.16% for FSM (p = 0.02). The positive predictive value was high in the subsequent rounds (DM 48.00%, FSM 45.93%) and lower in the initial round (DM 24.05%, FSM 24.86%). Compared with the results of the whole CBU, DM showed no significant difference.

Conclusion:

DM can be introduced in a decentralized screening organization with a high CDR without increasing the RR.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D’Orsi CJ et al (2001) Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology 218:873–880PubMed Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D’Orsi CJ et al (2001) Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology 218:873–880PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Skaane P, Young K, Skjennald A (2003) Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading—Oslo I study. Radiology 229:877–884CrossRefPubMed Skaane P, Young K, Skjennald A (2003) Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading—Oslo I study. Radiology 229:877–884CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Skaane P, Skjennald A (2004) Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program—the Oslo II study. Radiology 232:197–204CrossRefPubMed Skaane P, Skjennald A (2004) Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program—the Oslo II study. Radiology 232:197–204CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E et al (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773–1783CrossRefPubMed Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E et al (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773–1783CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Vinnicombe S, Pereira P, McCormack F et al (2009) Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK Breast Screening Program and Systematic review of published data. Radiology 251:347–358CrossRefPubMed Vinnicombe S, Pereira P, McCormack F et al (2009) Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK Breast Screening Program and Systematic review of published data. Radiology 251:347–358CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Vigeland E, Klaasen H, Klingen TA, Hofvind S, Skaane P (2008) Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study. Eur Radiol 18:183–191CrossRefPubMed Vigeland E, Klaasen H, Klingen TA, Hofvind S, Skaane P (2008) Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study. Eur Radiol 18:183–191CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Karssemeijer N, Bluekens AM, Beijerinck D, Deurenberg JJ, Beekman M, Visser R, van Engen R, Bartels-Kortland A, Broeders MJ (2009) Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. Radiology 253:353–358CrossRefPubMed Karssemeijer N, Bluekens AM, Beijerinck D, Deurenberg JJ, Beekman M, Visser R, van Engen R, Bartels-Kortland A, Broeders MJ (2009) Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. Radiology 253:353–358CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Del Turco MR, Mantellini P, Ciatto S et al (2007) Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:860–866CrossRefPubMed Del Turco MR, Mantellini P, Ciatto S et al (2007) Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:860–866CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat van Engen R, Young KC, Bosmans H, Thijssen M (2005) The European protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of mammography screening. Part B: digital mammography. In the Fourth Edition of the European Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening. Available at www.euref.org van Engen R, Young KC, Bosmans H, Thijssen M (2005) The European protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of mammography screening. Part B: digital mammography. In the Fourth Edition of the European Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening. Available at www.​euref.​org
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Thierens H, Bosmans H, Buls N, De Hauwere A, Bacher K, Jacobs J, Clerinx P (2009) Typetesting of physical characteristics of digital mammography systems for screening within the Flemish breast cancer screening programme. Eur J Radiol 70:539–548CrossRefPubMed Thierens H, Bosmans H, Buls N, De Hauwere A, Bacher K, Jacobs J, Clerinx P (2009) Typetesting of physical characteristics of digital mammography systems for screening within the Flemish breast cancer screening programme. Eur J Radiol 70:539–548CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bosmans H, Carton AK, Rogge F, Zanca F, Jacobs J, Van Ongeval C, Nijs K, Van Steen A, Marchal G (2005) Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview. Radiat Prot Dosim 117:120–130CrossRef Bosmans H, Carton AK, Rogge F, Zanca F, Jacobs J, Van Ongeval C, Nijs K, Van Steen A, Marchal G (2005) Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview. Radiat Prot Dosim 117:120–130CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Ongeval C, Van Steen A, Bosmans H (2008) Teaching syllabus for radiological aspects of breast cancer screening with digital mammography. Radiat Prot Dosim 129:191–194CrossRef Van Ongeval C, Van Steen A, Bosmans H (2008) Teaching syllabus for radiological aspects of breast cancer screening with digital mammography. Radiat Prot Dosim 129:191–194CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Young KC, Alsager A, Oduko JM et al (2008) Evaluation of software in reading images of the CDMAM test object to assess digital mammography systems. Proc SPIE 6913:69131C–11 Young KC, Alsager A, Oduko JM et al (2008) Evaluation of software in reading images of the CDMAM test object to assess digital mammography systems. Proc SPIE 6913:69131C–11
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs J, Rogge F, Kotre J, Marchal G, Bosmans H (2007) Preliminary validation of a new variable pattern for daily quality assurance of medical image display devices. Med Phys 34:2744–2758CrossRefPubMed Jacobs J, Rogge F, Kotre J, Marchal G, Bosmans H (2007) Preliminary validation of a new variable pattern for daily quality assurance of medical image display devices. Med Phys 34:2744–2758CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kellen E, Vande Putte G, Van Steen A, Cloes E, Lousbergh D, Buntinx F, Van Limbergen E (2008) Interval cancers in the beginning years of the breast cancer screening programme in the Belgian province of Limburg. Acta Clin Belg 63:179–184PubMed Kellen E, Vande Putte G, Van Steen A, Cloes E, Lousbergh D, Buntinx F, Van Limbergen E (2008) Interval cancers in the beginning years of the breast cancer screening programme in the Belgian province of Limburg. Acta Clin Belg 63:179–184PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L (2008) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition—summary document. Ann Oncol 19:614–622CrossRefPubMed Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L (2008) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition—summary document. Ann Oncol 19:614–622CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabar L, Vitak B, TonyChen HH, Yen MF, Duffy SW, Smith RA (2001) Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 91:1724–1731CrossRefPubMed Tabar L, Vitak B, TonyChen HH, Yen MF, Duffy SW, Smith RA (2001) Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 91:1724–1731CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Skaane P (2009) Digital mammography in European population-based screening programs. In:Bick U, Diekmann F (eds) Digital mammography. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 155–176 Skaane P (2009) Digital mammography in European population-based screening programs. In:Bick U, Diekmann F (eds) Digital mammography. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 155–176
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Verbeek ALM, Broeders MJM (2003) Evaluation of The Netherlands breast cancer screening programme. Ann Oncol 14:1203–1205CrossRefPubMed Verbeek ALM, Broeders MJM (2003) Evaluation of The Netherlands breast cancer screening programme. Ann Oncol 14:1203–1205CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Otten JD, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JH, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J, Verbeek AL, de Koning HJ, Holland R (2005) Effect of recall rate of earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(10):748–754CrossRefPubMed Otten JD, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JH, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J, Verbeek AL, de Koning HJ, Holland R (2005) Effect of recall rate of earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(10):748–754CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Does digital mammography in a decentralized breast cancer screening program lead to screening performance parameters comparable with film-screen mammography?
verfasst von
Chantal Van Ongeval
Andre Van Steen
Gretel Vande Putte
Federica Zanca
Hilde Bosmans
Guy Marchal
Erik Van Limbergen
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 10/2010
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1807-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2010

European Radiology 10/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.