Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 1/2015

01.01.2015 | Oncology

Assessing probability of malignancy in solid solitary pulmonary nodules with a new Bayesian calculator: improving diagnostic accuracy by means of expanded and updated features

verfasst von: G. A. Soardi, Simone Perandini, M. Motton, S. Montemezzi

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

A crucial point in the work-up of a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) is to accurately characterise the lesion on the basis of imaging and clinical data available. We introduce a new Bayesian calculator as a tool to assess and grade SPN risk of malignancy.

Methods

A set of 343 consecutive biopsy or interval proven SPNs was used to develop a calculator to predict SPN probability of malignancy. The model was validated on the study population in a “round-robin” fashion and compared with results obtained from current models described in literature.

Results

In our case series, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.893 for the proposed model and 0.795 for its best competitor, which was the Gurney calculator. Using observational thresholds of 5 % and 10 % our model returned fewer false-negative results, while showing constant superiority in avoiding false-positive results for each surgical threshold tested. The main downside of the proposed calculator was a slightly higher proportion of indeterminate SPNs.

Conclusions

We believe the proposed model to be an important update of current Bayesian analysis of SPNs, and to allow for better discrimination between malignancies and benign entities on the basis of clinical and imaging data.

Key Points

• Bayesian analysis can help characterise solitary pulmonary nodules
• Volume doubling time (VDT) is a good predictor of malignancy
• A VDT of between 25 and 400 days is highly suggestive of malignancy
• Nodule size, enhancement, morphology and VDT are the best predictors of malignancy
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM (2010) Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 127:2893–2917PubMedCrossRef Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM (2010) Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 127:2893–2917PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lillington GA, Caskey CI (1993) Evaluation and management of solitary and multiple pulmonary nodules. Clin Chest Med 14:111–119PubMed Lillington GA, Caskey CI (1993) Evaluation and management of solitary and multiple pulmonary nodules. Clin Chest Med 14:111–119PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI (2000) Small solitary pulmonary nodules. Radiol Clin N Am 38:471–478PubMedCrossRef Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI (2000) Small solitary pulmonary nodules. Radiol Clin N Am 38:471–478PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat McWilliams A, Tammemagi MC, Mayo JR, Roberts H, Liu G, Soghrati K et al (2013) Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N Engl J Med 369:910–919PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef McWilliams A, Tammemagi MC, Mayo JR, Roberts H, Liu G, Soghrati K et al (2013) Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N Engl J Med 369:910–919PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Schultz EM, Sanders GD, Trotter PR, Patz EF Jr, Silvestri GA, Owens DK et al (2008) Validation of two models to estimate the probability of malignancy in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules. Thorax 63:335–341PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Schultz EM, Sanders GD, Trotter PR, Patz EF Jr, Silvestri GA, Owens DK et al (2008) Validation of two models to estimate the probability of malignancy in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules. Thorax 63:335–341PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gould MK, Ananth L, Barnett PG (2007) A clinical model to estimate the pretest probability of lung cancer in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules. Chest 131:383–388PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Gould MK, Ananth L, Barnett PG (2007) A clinical model to estimate the pretest probability of lung cancer in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules. Chest 131:383–388PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuki Y, Nakamura K, Watanabe H, Aoki T, Nakata H, Katsuragawa S et al (2002) Usefulness of an artificial neural network for differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary nodules on high-resolution CT: evaluation with receiver operating characteristic analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:657–663PubMedCrossRef Matsuki Y, Nakamura K, Watanabe H, Aoki T, Nakata H, Katsuragawa S et al (2002) Usefulness of an artificial neural network for differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary nodules on high-resolution CT: evaluation with receiver operating characteristic analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:657–663PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Swensen SJ, Silverstein MD, Ilstrup DM, Schleck CD, Edell ES (1997) The probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules—application to small radiologically indeterminate nodules. Arch Intern Med 157:849–855PubMedCrossRef Swensen SJ, Silverstein MD, Ilstrup DM, Schleck CD, Edell ES (1997) The probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules—application to small radiologically indeterminate nodules. Arch Intern Med 157:849–855PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cronin P, Dwamena BA, Kelly AM, Bernstein SJ, Carlos RC (2008) Solitary pulmonary nodules and masses: a meta-analysis of the diagnostic utility of alternative imaging tests. Eur Radiol 18:1840–1856PubMedCrossRef Cronin P, Dwamena BA, Kelly AM, Bernstein SJ, Carlos RC (2008) Solitary pulmonary nodules and masses: a meta-analysis of the diagnostic utility of alternative imaging tests. Eur Radiol 18:1840–1856PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurney JW, Lyddon DM, McKay JA (1993) Determining the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with Bayesian analysis. Part II. Application. Radiology 186:415–422PubMedCrossRef Gurney JW, Lyddon DM, McKay JA (1993) Determining the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with Bayesian analysis. Part II. Application. Radiology 186:415–422PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurney JW (1993) Determining the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with Bayesian analysis. Part I. Theory. Radiology 186:405–413PubMedCrossRef Gurney JW (1993) Determining the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with Bayesian analysis. Part I. Theory. Radiology 186:405–413PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ashby D, Smith AF (2000) Evidence-based medicine as Bayesian decision-making. Stat Med 19:3291–3305PubMedCrossRef Ashby D, Smith AF (2000) Evidence-based medicine as Bayesian decision-making. Stat Med 19:3291–3305PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang PJ (1989) Bayesian analysis revisited: a radiologist’s survival guide. AJR Am J Roentgenol 152:721–727PubMedCrossRef Chang PJ (1989) Bayesian analysis revisited: a radiologist’s survival guide. AJR Am J Roentgenol 152:721–727PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Blomberg LC, Ruiz DDA (2013) Evaluating the influence of missing data on classification algorithms in data mining applications. Paper presented at SBSI 2013: Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas de Informação, João Pessoa, 22–24 May, 2013 Blomberg LC, Ruiz DDA (2013) Evaluating the influence of missing data on classification algorithms in data mining applications. Paper presented at SBSI 2013: Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas de Informação, João Pessoa, 22–24 May, 2013
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cummings SR, Lillington GA, Richard RJ (1986) Estimating the probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules. A Bayesian approach. Am Rev Respir Dis 134:449–452PubMed Cummings SR, Lillington GA, Richard RJ (1986) Estimating the probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules. A Bayesian approach. Am Rev Respir Dis 134:449–452PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Gould MK, Fletcher J, Iannettoni MD, Lynch WR, Midthun DE, Naidich DP et al (2007) Evaluation of patients with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer?: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, 2nd edn. Chest 132(3 Suppl):108S–130SPubMedCrossRef Gould MK, Fletcher J, Iannettoni MD, Lynch WR, Midthun DE, Naidich DP et al (2007) Evaluation of patients with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer?: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, 2nd edn. Chest 132(3 Suppl):108S–130SPubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Davies B, Ghosh S, Hopkinson D, Vaughan R, Rocco G (2005) Solitary pulmonary nodules: pathological outcome of 150 consecutively resected lesions. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 4:18–20PubMedCrossRef Davies B, Ghosh S, Hopkinson D, Vaughan R, Rocco G (2005) Solitary pulmonary nodules: pathological outcome of 150 consecutively resected lesions. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 4:18–20PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Herder GJ, van Tinteren H, Golding RP, Kostense PJ, Comans EF, Smit EF et al (2005) Clinical prediction model to characterize pulmonary nodules. Chest 128:2490–2496PubMedCrossRef Herder GJ, van Tinteren H, Golding RP, Kostense PJ, Comans EF, Smit EF et al (2005) Clinical prediction model to characterize pulmonary nodules. Chest 128:2490–2496PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Müller NL, Remy J (2008) Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology 246:697–722PubMedCrossRef Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Müller NL, Remy J (2008) Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology 246:697–722PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, Herold CJ, Jett JR, Naidich DP et al (2005) Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 237:395–400PubMedCrossRef MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, Herold CJ, Jett JR, Naidich DP et al (2005) Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 237:395–400PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hunink M, Glasziou P, Siegel J, Weeks J, Pliskin J, Elstein A et al (2001) Decision making in health and medicine. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Hunink M, Glasziou P, Siegel J, Weeks J, Pliskin J, Elstein A et al (2001) Decision making in health and medicine. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Renooij S, Van Der Gaag LC (2008) Evidence and scenario sensitivities in naive Bayesian classifiers. Int J Approx Reason 49:398–416CrossRef Renooij S, Van Der Gaag LC (2008) Evidence and scenario sensitivities in naive Bayesian classifiers. Int J Approx Reason 49:398–416CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Assessing probability of malignancy in solid solitary pulmonary nodules with a new Bayesian calculator: improving diagnostic accuracy by means of expanded and updated features
verfasst von
G. A. Soardi
Simone Perandini
M. Motton
S. Montemezzi
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3396-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

European Radiology 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.