nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.05.2014 | Original Article

Differentiation of heroin and cocaine using dual-energy CT—an experimental study

verfasst von: Jochen Grimm, Ramona Wudy, Edvard Ziegeler, Stefan Wirth, Michael Uhl, Maximilian F. Reiser, Michael Scherr

Erschienen in: International Journal of Legal Medicine | Ausgabe 3/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate if heroin and cocaine can be distinguished using dual-energy CT.

Materials and methods

Twenty samples of heroin and cocaine at different concentrations and standardized compression (SC) were scanned in dual-energy mode on a newest generation Dual Energy 64-row MDCT scanner. CT number, spectral graphs, and dual-energy index (DEI) were evaluated. Results were prospectively tested on six original samples from a body packer. Wilcoxon’s test was used for statistical evaluation.

Results

Values are given as median and range. Under SC, the CT number of cocaine samples (−29.87 Hounsfield unit (HU) [−125.85; 16.16 HU]) was higher than the CT number of heroin samples (−184.37 HU [−199.81; −159.25 HU]; p < 0.01). Slope of spectral curves for cocaine was −2.36 HU/keV [−7.15; −0.67 HU/keV], and for heroin, 1.75 HU/keV [1.28; 2.5 HU/keV] (p < 0.01). DEI was 0.0352 [0.0081; 0.0528] for cocaine and significantly higher than for heroin samples (−0.0127 [−0.0097; −0.0159]; p < 0.001). While CT number was inconclusive, all six original packs were correctly classified after evaluation of the spectral curve and DEI. In contrast to the CT number, slope of the spectral curve and DEI were independent of concentration and compression.

Conclusion

The slope of the spectral curve and the DEI from dual-energy CT data can be used to distinguish heroin and cocaine in vitro; these results are independent of compression and concentration in the measured range.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2010) World drug report 2010 (United Nations Publication). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODOC), Vienna. (2010). Available via http://www.unodc.org/documents/wdr/WDR_2010/World_Drug_Report_2010_lo-res.pdf

Bulstrode N, Banks F, Shrotria S (2002) The outcome of drug smuggling by ‘body packers’—the British experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84(1):35–38PubMedCentralPubMed

Stewart A, Heaton ND, Hogbin B (1990) Body packing—a case report and review of the literature. Postgrad Med J 66(778):659–661PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Traub SJ, Hoffman RS, Nelson LS (2003) Body packing—the internal concealment of illicit drugs. N Engl J Med 349(26):2519–2526. doi:10.1056/NEJMra022719 PubMedCrossRef

Claffey M (2002) Stampede of drug mules at Kennedy: after 9/11 lull, heroin and ecstasy busts soar. New York Daily News, May 5, 2002, p 1

de Bakker JK, Nanayakkara PW, Geeraedts LM Jr, de Lange ES, Mackintosh MO, Bonjer HJ (2012) Body packers: a plea for conservative treatment. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 397(1):125–130. doi:10.1007/s00423-011-0846-z CrossRef

Silverberg D, Menes T, Kim U (2006) Surgery for “body packers”—a 15-year experience. World J Surg 30(4):541–546. doi:10.1007/s00268-005-0429-7 PubMedCrossRef

de Beer SA, Spiessens G, Mol W, Fa-Si-Oen PR (2008) Surgery for body packing in the Caribbean: a retrospective study of 70 patients. World J Surg 32(2):281–285. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9316-8, discussion 286–287PubMedCrossRef

Wackerle B, Rupp N, von Clarmann M, Kahn T, Heller H, Feuerbach S (1986) Detection of narcotic-containing packages in “body-packers” using imaging procedures. Studies in vitro and in vivo. Röfo 145(3):274–277. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1048932 PubMedCrossRef

10.

Schmidt S, Hugli O, Rizzo E, Lepori D, Gudinchet F, Yersin B, Schnyder P, Meuwly JY (2008) Detection of ingested cocaine-filled packets—diagnostic value of unenhanced CT. Eur J Radiol 67(1):133–138. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.07.017 PubMedCrossRef

11.

Hergan K, Kofler K, Oser W (2004) Drug smuggling by body packing: what radiologists should know about it. Eur Radiol 14(4):736–742. doi:10.1007/s00330-003-2091-5 PubMedCrossRef

12.

Schaper A, Hofmann R, Ebbecke M, Desel H, Langer C (2003) Cocaine-body-packing. Infrequent indication for laparotomy. Chirurg 74(7):626–631. doi:10.1007/s00104-002-0603-5 PubMedCrossRef

13.

Hutchins KD, Pierre-Louis PJ, Zaretski L, Williams AW, Lin RL, Natarajan GA (2000) Heroin body packing: three fatal cases of intestinal perforation. J Forensic Sci 45(1):42–47PubMed

14.

Yang RM, Li L, Feng J, Lai SS, Lin BQ, Yu T, Ye XH, Xu YK (2009) Heroin body packing: clearly discerning drug packets using CT. South Med J 102(5):470–475. doi:10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31819ecacc PubMedCrossRef

15.

Ziegeler EGJ, Wirth S, Uhl M, Reiser MF, Scherr M (2012) Computed tomography scout views vs. conventional radiography in body-packers—delineation of body-packs and radiation dose in a porcine model. Eur J Radiol. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.06.030 PubMed

16.

Flach PM, Ross SG, Ampanozi G, Ebert L, Germerott T, Hatch GM, Thali MJ, Patak MA (2012) “Drug mules” as a radiological challenge: sensitivity and specificity in identifying internal cocaine in body packers, body pushers and body stuffers by computed tomography, plain radiography and Lodox. Eur J Radiol 81(10):2518–2526. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.11.025 PubMedCrossRef

17.

Poletti PA, Canel L, Becker CD, Wolff H, Elger B, Lock E, Sarasin F, Bonfanti MS, Dupuis-Lozeron E, Perneger T, Platon A (2012) Screening of illegal intracorporeal containers (“body packing”): is abdominal radiography sufficiently accurate? A comparative study with low-dose CT. Radiology 265(3):772–779. doi:10.1148/radiol.12112767 PubMedCrossRef

18.

Brogdon BG, Vogel H, Algra PR (2010) Smuggling/border control. In: Brogdon’s forensic radiology, 2nd edn. CRC, pp 297–310. doi:10.1201/b10323-26

19.

Wetli CV, Mittlemann RE (1981) The “body packer syndrome”—toxicity following ingestion of illicit drugs packaged for transportation. J Forensic Sci 26(3):492–500PubMed

20.

Booker RJ, Smith JE, Rodger MP (2009) Packers, pushers and stuffers—managing patients with concealed drugs in UK emergency departments: a clinical and medicolegal review. Emerg Med J 26(5):316–320. doi:10.1136/emj.2008.057695 PubMedCrossRef

21.

Mandava N, Chang RS, Wang JH, Bertocchi M, Yrad J, Allamaneni S, Aboian E, Lall MH, Mariano R, Richards N (2011) Establishment of a definitive protocol for the diagnosis and management of body packers (drug mules). Emerg Med J 28(2):98–101. doi:10.1136/emj.2008.059717 PubMedCrossRef

22.

Goertemoeller S, Behrman A (2006) The risky business of body packers and body stuffers. J Emerg Nurs 32(6):541–544. doi:10.1016/j.jen.2006.07.014 PubMedCrossRef

23.

East JM (2005) Surgical complications of cocaine body-packing: a survey of Jamaican hospitals. West Indian Med J 54(1):38–41PubMedCrossRef

24.

Raben AM, Phoa SS, Busch OR, Schultz MJ (2005) Case report of a smuggler’s dinner: carrots and asparagus, or bolitas? Med Sci Monit 11(12):CS79–CS81PubMed

25.

Novelline R (ed) (1997) Squire’s fundamentals of radiology, 5th edn. Harvard University Press, Boston

26.

Maurer MH, Niehues SM, Schnapauff D, Grieser C, Rothe JH, Waldmuller D, Chopra SS, Hamm B, Denecke T (2011) Low-dose computed tomography to detect body-packing in an animal model. Eur J Radiol 78(2):302–306. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.09.004 PubMedCrossRef

27.

Pache G, Einhaus D, Bulla S, Baumann T, Langer M, Blanke P (2012) Low-dose computed tomography for the detection of cocaine body packs: clinical evaluation and legal issues. Röfo 184(2):122–129. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1281781 PubMedCrossRef

28.

Leschka S, Fornaro J, Laberke P, Blum S, Alkadhi H, Niederer I, Meile C, Hibbeln D, Hausmann R, Wildermuth S, Eisenhart D (2013) Differentiation of cocaine from heroine body packs by computed tomography: impact of different tube voltages and the dual-energy index. J Forensic Radiol Imaging 1(2):46–50. doi:10.1016/j.jofri.2013.03.041 CrossRef

29.

Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Boll DT, Paulson EK, Ho LM, Neville AM, Marin D, Gupta RT, Schindera ST (2010) Dual-energy multidetector CT: how does it work, what can it tell us, and when can we use it in abdominopelvic imaging? Radiographics 30(4):1037–1055. doi:10.1148/rg.304095175 PubMedCrossRef

30.

Hartman R, Kawashima A, Takahashi N, Silva A, Vrtiska T, Leng S, Fletcher J, McCollough C (2012) Applications of dual-energy CT in urologic imaging: an update. Radiol Clin N Am 50(2):191–205. doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2012.02.007, vPubMedCrossRef

31.

Johnson TR, Krauss B, Sedlmair M, Grasruck M, Bruder H, Morhard D, Fink C, Weckbach S, Lenhard M, Schmidt B, Flohr T, Reiser MF, Becker CR (2007) Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol 17(6):1510–1517. doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0517-6 PubMedCrossRef

32.

Manglaviti G, Tresoldi S, Guerrer CS, Di Leo G, Montanari E, Sardanelli F, Cornalba G (2011) In vivo evaluation of the chemical composition of urinary stones using dual-energy CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197(1):W76–W83. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.5217 PubMedCrossRef

33.

Mongan J, Rathnayake S, Fu Y, Wang R, Jones EF, Gao DW, Yeh BM (2012) In vivo differentiation of complementary contrast media at dual-energy CT. Radiology. doi:10.1148/radiol.12120692 PubMedCentralPubMed

34.

Ruder TD, Thali Y, Bolliger SA, Somaini-Mathier S, Thali MJ, Hatch GM, Schindera ST (2013) Material differentiation in forensic radiology with single-source dual-energy computed tomography. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 9(2):163–169. doi:10.1007/s12024-012-9398-y PubMedCrossRef

35.

Krauss B (2005) The dual-energy index. Siemens Healthcare AG, Siemens Medical 2005

Titel: Differentiation of heroin and cocaine using dual-energy CT—an experimental study
verfasst von: Jochen Grimm
Ramona Wudy
Edvard Ziegeler
Stefan Wirth
Michael Uhl
Maximilian F. Reiser
Michael Scherr
Publikationsdatum: 01.05.2014
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: International Journal of Legal Medicine / Ausgabe 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-9827
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-1596
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-0980-6

Springer Medizin

Differentiation of heroin and cocaine using dual-energy CT—an experimental study

Abstract

Objective

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Rechtsmedizin

Molekularpathologische Untersuchungen im Wandel der Zeit

Vergleichende Pathologie in der onkologischen Forschung

Gastrointestinale Stromatumoren

Personalisierte Medizin in der Onkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objective

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2014

Analysis of 15 autosomal STR loci from Mar del Plata and Bahia Blanca (Central Region of Argentina)

The analysis of temporal gene expression to estimate the age of forensically important blow fly pupae: results from three blind studies

Molecular pathology of brain matrix metalloproteases, claudin5, and aquaporins in forensic autopsy cases with special regard to methamphetamine intoxication

Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to kinship problems

The incidence of scarring on the dorsum of the hand

Application of six IrisPlex SNPs and comparison of two eye color prediction systems in diverse Eurasia populations

Neu im Fachgebiet Rechtsmedizin

Molekularpathologische Untersuchungen im Wandel der Zeit

Vergleichende Pathologie in der onkologischen Forschung

Gastrointestinale Stromatumoren

Personalisierte Medizin in der Onkologie