Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Italian Journal of Pediatrics 1/2021

Open Access 01.12.2021 | Research

Pediatric interregional healthcare mobility in Italy

verfasst von: Mario De Curtis, Francesco Bortolan, Davide Diliberto, Leonardo Villani

Erschienen in: Italian Journal of Pediatrics | Ausgabe 1/2021

Abstract

Background

The analysis of interregional healthcare mobility represents one of the main criteria for evaluating Regional Healthcare Systems, both in terms of its economic-financial relevance and the quality and satisfaction of the services provided. The aim of the study is to analyze healthcare mobility and its associated cost in Italy in 2019 for all children ≤ 14 years of age.

Methods

We collected data from the “Rapporto annuale sull’attività di ricovero ospedaliero – Dati SDO 2019” published by the Italian Ministry of Health. These data represent the tool for collecting information relating to all hospitalization services provided in accredited public and private hospitals present throughout the national territory. We collected data for all Italian regions and clustered them in two geographical areas: Center-North regions and South regions (including Sicily and Sardinia). We have analyzed the magnitude of the mobility of children among regions and in particular from the South to the Center-North and the relative cost of this interregional mobility.

Results

 The hospitalization rate of children residing in the South regions was higher than  that of children residing in the Center-North regions (13.9% vs 12.3%). Children residing in the South were more frequently treated in other regions than those living in the Center-North (11.9% vs 6.9%). Even considering the high complexity hospitalizations, children living in the South more frequently underwent treatment in other regions (21.3% vs 10.5% of the Center-North). The cost of passive mobility amounts to € 103.9 million for the South regions (15.1% of the total hospitalizations’ expenditure) and the 87.1% of this cost refers to the mobility to the hospitals of Center-North. The cost of healthcare migration from South regions to other South regions was much lower (12.9%, equal to € 13.4 million).

Conclusions

Healthcare mobility, while affecting all Italian regions, is particularly relevant in the South regions and indicates a lack of pediatric care, which should be strengthened by creating services that are currently not evenly distributed throughout the territory.
Hinweise

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
NHS
National Health Service
SSN
Servizio Sanitario Nazionale
LEA
Livelli Essenziali di Assistenza
ASL
Azienda Sanitaria Locale
AGENAS
AGEnzia NAzionale per i Servizi sanitari regionali
SDO
Scheda Dimissione Ospedaliera
DRG
Diagnosis Related Group
ISTAT
National Institute of Statistics

Background

In Italy, the National Health Service (NHS, Servizio Sanitario Nazionale – SSN) guarantees universal care. In particular, the Italian NHS is a “three layers” public universal healthcare system, free of charge at the point of care [1, 2]. At national level, the Ministry of Health defines the healthcare principles and priorities, through the identification of the core benefit package of services (Livelli Essenziali di Assistenza – LEA) guaranteed across the whole country, based on collective prevention and public health, primary care and hospital care [3, 4]. Moreover, the Ministry of Health allocates funds to the regions in order to provide healthcare services and it monitors the activities of the regions. Italian regions (19 regions and 2 Autonomous Provinces), indeed, are responsible for ensuring the organization and the delivery of services through their Regional Healthcare Systems, according to the LEA defined at national level [4]. At local level, the provision of services is ensured by a regional network of Local Health Units (Azienda Sanitaria Locale – ASL) and autonomous public and private hospitals. In this context, each citizen refers to the Regional Healthcare System in which he resides. However, citizens can decide whether to be assisted by thier Regional Healthcare System or in other regions, defining the concept of active and passive interregional mobility [5]. This concept represents, at the national level, a phenomenon of healthcare mobility already known at the international level [68]. In Italy, since there are 21 different healthcare systems, it is possible to observe, therefore, the same phenomenon, albeit in a national context. In particular, active mobility indicates the attraction index of a region and identifies the healthcare services offered to non-resident citizens, while passive mobility identifies the healthcare services provided to citizens outside the region of residence (also known as escape index) [9]. Therefore, the attraction index measures the capacity of a region to attract patients from other regions. It is calculated as the proportion between the number of  hospital discharges of non-resident patients in a region and the total number of hospitalizations carried out in that region. The escape index, on the contrary, quantifies the propensity of the patients to move away from their own region in order to take advantage of a healthcare service. It is calculated as the proportion between the number of hospital discharges of patients residing in a region and the total number of hospitalizations of residents in that region across the national territory. In both cases, foreign citizens and those of unknown nationality are excluded [9].
Factors such as effectiveness and efficiency of each Regional Healthcare Service, presence of Reference Centers for specific diseases, waiting lists, diagnostic services and availability of treatments, and perceived or real quality of assistance, might influence patients’ mobility [10].
Therefore, both the active and passive mobility are indicators that could be interpreted as a proxy measure of the quality (real or perceived) of the healthcare assistance provided in a region. In particular, a high index of escape may be due to deficiencies in the supply of care, while a high index of attraction may be due to a higher quality of healthcare assistance in a specific region [5, 9].
From an economic point of view, active mobility represents a credit item for the regions, while passive mobility represents a debt item; each year the region that provides the service is reimbursed by that of the citizen’s residence [11, 12].
The economic value of interregional healthcare mobility for the entire Italian population in 2018 (hospitalizations, outpatient specialists, basic medicine, territorial pharmaceuticals and direct administration of drugs and healthcare transport) was equal to a limited percentage (4.1%) of total healthcare expenditure (approximately € 113 billion). However, it has particular importance due to the impact on the financial balance (positive or negative) of regions (regions with a balance > € 100 million: Lombardy + € 750 million, Emilia-Romagna + € 327 million, Tuscany + € 144 million, Veneto + € 139 million; regions with balance < − € 200 million: Puglia - € 211 million, Sicily - € 223 million, Calabria - € 288 million, Campania - € 351 million) [5]. The analysis of healthcare mobility, therefore, represents one of the main performance indicators of Regional Healthcare Systems, both for its economic relevance and for the adequacy / satisfaction of the services provided [12].
While the data of healthcare mobility of the entire population are known [9], there is lack of evidence about both active and passive healthcare mobility of children ≤14 years old. In particular, since children living in the South regions are the most disadvantaged from an economic, educational and social point of view [13], we focused on the healthcare mobility from the South regions to the Center-North regions. In this context, the aim of the study is to analyze the healthcare mobility in 2019 in Italy for all children ≤ 14 years of age and its associated cost.

Methods

We collected data from the “Rapporto annuale sull’attività di ricovero ospedaliero – Dati SDO 2019” published by the Italian Ministry of Health in collaboration with AGENAS (AGEnzia NAzionale per i Servizi sanitari regionali) [9]. The report includes all the hospital discharge forms (Scheda Dimissione Ospedaliera – SDO), collecting information on all inpatient services provided in public and private accredited hospitals throughout the national territory. The hospitalization services provided in 2019 to patients 0–14 age at all accredited public and private structures in the country were considered and, at the same time, those identified as ‘highly complex’ by the “Interregional Agreement for the compensation of Health Mobility year 2019” [11].
Regions and Autonomous Provinces have been divided into two groups, according to their geographical location: Center-North regions (Piedmont, Valle d’Aosta, Lombardy, Bolzano, Trento, Veneto, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Liguria, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Umbria, Marche and Lazio) and South regions (Abruzzo, Molise, Campania, Puglia, Basilicata, Calabria, Sicily and Sardinia).
We evaluated the burden of the active and passive mobility for children ≤ 14 years of age, considering all the Diagnosis Related Group (DRG), including the high complexity DRG. In particular, for each region and macroarea we calculated the escape index on the total hospitalizations and the related costs.
Finally, we analyze the impact of the mobility of children between the different areas of Italy, focusing on the mobility from South regions to the Center-North. The children population in 2019 was obtained from the National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT) [14].

Results

In Italy, in 2019 there were 1,009,904 hospitalizations among the population ≤ 14 years old, of which 921,491 (91.2%) were within the region of residence. While homogeneous values are observed considering the volumes of hospitalization on the basis of resident population, with variations from a minimum value of 10.8% in Veneto to a maximum of 15.1% in Lazio, there are important differences between Center-North and South regions. In particular, a higher rate of hospitalization was observed among children of South regions (13.9% vs 12.3%). The mean per-capita cost of hospitalization in children of South and Center-North regions was € 252 and € 208, respectively.
Moreover, the escape index on the total hospitalizations varies enormously, from 4.2% in Lazio to 40.1% in Molise (Table 1). The overall expenditure for hospitalizations has been equal to approximately € 1.7 billion, of which € 193.6 million refer to passive mobility. Of this, more than 50% is sustained by the 8 regions of the South (€ 103.9 million). The mean escape index costs’ in the South regions is equal to 15.1%, almost double that of the Center-North (8.4%) (Table 2).
Table 1
Hospitalizations and escape index in Italy in the 0–14 population (2019)
Region
Population 0–14
Total hospitalizations
Hospitalization rate (%)
In-region hospitalizations
Out-region hospitalizations
Escape index (%)
North and Center
5,146,568
632,027
12.3
588,586
43,441
6.9
Piedmont
535,335
60,640
11.3
55,509
5131
8.5
Valle d’Aosta
16,475
1803
10.9
1356
447
24.8
Liguria
170,174
24,998
14.7
22,695
2303
9.2
Lombardy
1,362,146
162,115
11.9
154,320
7795
4.8
Trento
77,874
9030
11.6
7613
1417
15.7
Bolzano
83,353
10,243
12.3
9676
567
5.5
Veneto
646,974
69,553
10.8
64,546
5007
7.2
Friuli Venezia Giulia
145,473
16,064
11.0
14,824
1240
7.7
Emilia-Romagna
583,135
67,025
11.5
62,093
4932
7.4
Tuscany
457,615
57,279
12.5
54,537
2742
4.8
Umbria
108,760
13,512
12.4
10,066
3446
25.5
Marche
191,725
24,220
12.6
20,603
3617
14.9
Lazio
767,529
115,545
15.1
110,748
4797
4.2
South
2,725,319
377,877
13,9
332,905
44,972
11.9
Abruzzo
161,223
23,103
14.3
17,996
5107
22.1
Molise
34,355
4589
13.4
2747
1842
40.1
Campania
832,055
121,948
14.7
110,401
11,547
9.5
Puglia
520,560
71,312
13.7
63,539
7773
10.9
Basilicata
66,379
8873
13.4
6311
2562
28.9
Calabria
252,792
35,787
14.2
28,324
7463
20.9
Sicily
676,331
89,779
13.3
83,187
6592
7.3
Sardinia
181,624
22,486
12.4
20,400
2086
9.3
Italy
7,871,887
1,009,904
12.8
921,491
88,413
8.8
Table 2
Overall costs of hospitalizations and passive mobility costs in Italy (2019)
Region
Population 0–14
Total cost of hospitalizations (million of €)
In-region hospitalizations’ costs (million of €)
Out-region hospitalizations’ costs (million of €)
Costs of passive mobility/total costs (%)
North and Center
5,146,568
1070.6
980.9
89.7
8.4
Piedmont
535,335
120.5
110.3
10.2
8.5
Valle d’Aosta
16,475
3.5
2.3
1.2
34.3
Liguria
170,174
44.5
40.1
4.4
9.9
Lombardy
1,362,146
272.4
255.4
17.0
6.2
Trento
77,874
15.3
11.8
3.5
22.9
Bolzano
83,353
14.0
12.1
1.9
13.6
Veneto
646,974
126.0
116.3
9.7
7.7
Friuli Venezia Giulia
145,473
26.3
22.8
3.5
13.3
Emilia-Romagna
583,135
122.9
112.7
10.2
8.3
Tuscany
457,615
96.2
90.6
5.6
5.8
Umbria
108,760
24.5
18.3
6.2
25.3
Marche
191,725
41.2
33.4
7.8
18.9
Lazio
767,529
163.3
154.8
8.5
5.2
South
2,725,319
688.5
584.5
103.9
15.1
Abruzzo
161,223
39.5
29.1
10.4
26.3
Molise
34,355
7.4
4.0
3.4
45.9
Campania
832,055
211.8
186.3
25.5
12.0
Puglia
520,560
134.6
116.2
18.4
13.7
Basilicata
66,379
15.4
8.6
6.8
44.2
Calabria
252,792
63.8
46.7
17.1
26.8
Sicily
676,331
176.5
159.7
16.8
9.5
Sardinia
181,624
39.5
33.9
5.6
14.2
Italy
7,871,887
1759.2
1565.6
193.6
11.0
As shown in Table 3, analyzing the flows between regions, important differences are observed. In the Center-North, in fact, 43,441 hospitalizations were performed outside the region of residence (6.9% of the total). Of these, however, 37,884 (87.2%) are carried out in other regions of the Center-North, while 5557 (12.8%) are carried in the South regions. This mobility corresponds to an expenditure of € 89.7 million, of which € 80.7 million (90%) involve the mobility to Center-North.
Table 3
Passive mobility and related costs between geographical areas of Italy (2019)
Area of residence
Population 0–14
Total hospitalizations (% on the total population) and related costs (total and per-capita)
Out-region hospitalizations (%) and related costs
Passive mobility to regions of Center-North (%) and related costs
Passive mobility to regions of South (%) and related costs
Center-North
5,146,568
632,027 (12.3%)
43,441 (6.9%)
37,884 (87.2%)
5557 (12.8%)
  
€ 1070 million (€ 208 per-capita)
€ 89.7 million (8.4%)
€ 80.7 million (90%)
€ 9.0 million (10%)
South
2,725,319
377,877 (13.9%)
44,972 (11.9%)
38,462 (85.5%)
6510 (14.5%)
  
€ 688 million (€ 252 per-capita)
€ 103.9 million (15.1%)
€ 90.5 million (87.1%)
€ 13.4 million (12.9%)
On the contrary, in the South regions there were 44,972 out-region hospitalizations (equal to 11.9% of the total, a value almost double that of the Center-North), of which 38,462 (85.5%) are carried out in regions of the Center-North. Only 14.5% are carried out in other regions of the South (Table 3). This mobility corresponds to a total expenditure of € 103.9 million euros, of which 87.1% (€ 90.5 million) involves the mobility to Center-North.
The phenomenon is even more amplified considering “high complexity” hospitalizations (Table 4). Out of 16,673 hospitalizations in the Center-North, in fact, 1758 (10.5%) are carried out in other regions. Of these, 1673 (95.2%) are carried out in other regions of the Center-North, while 85 (4.8%) are carried in regions of the South. This mobility corresponds to a total expenditure of € 29.5 million, of which 93.6% involves the mobility to other regions of Center-North.
Table 4
Passive mobility and related costs between geographical areas of Italy for high complexity hospitalizations (2019)
Area of residence
Population 0–14
Total high complexity hospitalizations (% on the total population) and related costs (total and per-capita)
Out-region hospitalizations (%) and related costs
Passive mobility to regions of Center-North and related costs
Passive mobility to regions of South and related costs
Center-North
5,146,568
16,673 (3.3%)
1758 (10.5%)
1673 (95.2%)
85 (4,8%)
  
€ 302 million (€ 59 per-capita)
€ 29.5 million (9.7%)
€ 27.6 million (93.6%)
€ 1.9 million (6.4%)
South
2,725,319
9978 (3.7%)
2127 (21.3%)
1867 (87.8%)
260 (12.2%)
  
€ 186 million (€ 68 per-capita)
€ 36.6 million (19.7%)
€ 32.3 million (88.3%)
€ 4.3 million (11.7%)
On the contrary, in the South regions, out of 9978 high complexity hospitalizations, 2127 (21.3%) are carried out in other regions (more than double of the Center-North). Of these, 1867 (87.8%) are carried out in Center-North regions. This data corresponds to a mobilization of resources towards the regions of Center-North amounting to € 32.3 million, on a total cost for high complexity hospitalizations of € 186 million (17.4%).
From the above tables, partially summarized in Figs. 1 and 2, it can be seen that that escape index and associated costs are amplified when we limit the observation to high complexity hospitalizations only; a significant portion of the outflow to South regions is received by the facilities of the Lazio region.
In all regions and Autonomous Provinces, even those provided of specific mono-specialized pediatric facilities, it is evident a not negligible part of out-region mobility, which often approaches 10%. This phenomenon, at least in part due to the hyperspecialization of skills, leads patients to research the Centers according to their reputation or to the uniqueness of the healthcare assistance (i.e., diagnostic services and availability of treatments). Especially patients who need high complexity services show a general greater propensity to move outside region, as these performances are provided in a limited number of structures, with the need of significant resources and specialized skills.

Discussion

In this study we evaluated for the first time the escape index for children ≤ 14 years old across Italian regions. The number of hospitalizations and healthcare mobility from the region of residence to another are both important indicators to evaluate the adequacy of the regional healthcare service and proper healthcare planning.
Our study confirms the critical situation of pediatric care in some regions and especially in the South regions. In particular, children residing in the South regions compared with those residing in the Center-North are more frequently hospitalized and more frequently transferred to other regions for healthcare assistance. The magnitude of transfers from the South to the Center-North regions has a very high cost for some regions. In Calabria, for example, it exceeds a quarter of all expenditure for healthcare assistance. Moreover, the escape index of patients from the Center-North is often (87.2%) directed towards other regions in the same area (proximity mobility). On the contrary, patients from the South tend to move mainly towards regions in the Center-North (85.9%).
The entity of this mobility is even greater considering the ‘high complexity’ hospitalizations: it occurs, indeed, in 21.3% of cases in the South regions, of which 87.8% involves the Center-North.
Therefore, patients living in the South recourse much more to the interregional healthcare mobility (especially for high complexity pathologies), with a particular propensity to the healthcare facilities of the Center-North, even if geographically distant. This mobility highlights the need for an expansion/improvement of services related to pediatric care in the South. However, it should also be noted that there are good healthcare facilities in the South, and, with a patients’ correct information, many transfers (especially those not of high complexity) could be reduced.
Greater attention needs to be given to children and young people living in the South regions, who are known to be at greater risk than those born in the Center-North as they have a higher poverty index and a higher infant mortality rate [13, 15].
In addition, regions in the South registered a lower public health expenditure pro-capita than regions in the Center-North in the last 20 years [16, 17], in part due to the Recovery Plans of economic deficits that have led to a significant reduction in funding for healthcare [18]. In fact, as of March 2021, six of the seven regions subject to the discipline of the deficit Recovery Plans are in the South [19].
The healthcare mobility of children determines profound suffering due to the detachment from their place of origin, economic problems for families due to the overall cost of the transfer and work difficulties for parents. In addition, the South regions, for this healthcare mobility, are forced to reimburse, through the mechanism of compensation between regions, the healthcare services provided to their own citizens in other regions [11]. This cost, which was more than € 90 million in 2019, could instead partially be invested locally to improve healthcare assistance.
The high level of passive mobility from Southern regions to hospitals in Center-North stems, at least in part, from the lack of highly specialized hospitals in the South. However, high complexity hospitalizations represent only about 2.5% of the total. Therefore, in order to reduce passive mobility, it would be necessary on the one hand to treat locally non-high complexity diseases by promoting an improvement in the quality of hospitals in the southern regions impacted by budget cuts in recent years, and on the other hand to create collaborations, including through innovative digital tools (e.g., telemedicine), with hospitals in Center-North Italy, to ensure quality healthcare for the management of patients with high complexity diseases.

Conclusions

The funds provided by the Next Generation EU represent a unique and perhaps unrepeatable opportunity for the restart of our country [20]. It is essential to correct the serious gap between the regions and improve the organization of the healthcare system and the education system, starting from the almost non-existent kindergartens in the South regions to the universities.
Only by contrasting economic and educational poverty and the difficult healthcare situation in the South, Italy will be able to break down the profound inequalities that afflict the country. The investment in childhood is the most effective, the most lasting and the best contribution to economic recovery and to the development of a society.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Declarations

Not applicable.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors confirm that they have no conflicts of interest or competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferre F, de Belvis AGI, Valerio L, Longhi S, Lazzari A, Fattore G, et al. Italy: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2014;16(4):1–168.PubMed Ferre F, de Belvis AGI, Valerio L, Longhi S, Lazzari A, Fattore G, et al. Italy: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2014;16(4):1–168.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Decreto del presidente del consiglio dei ministri 29 novembre 2001. Definizione dei livelli essenziali di assistenza; 2001. p. 1–12. Decreto del presidente del consiglio dei ministri 29 novembre 2001. Definizione dei livelli essenziali di assistenza; 2001. p. 1–12.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Decreto del presidente del consiglio dei ministri 12 gennaio 2017. Definizione e aggiornamento dei livelli essenziali di assistenza, di cui all’articolo 1, comma 7, del decreto legislativo 30 dicembre 1992, n. 502. (17A02015). 2017. Decreto del presidente del consiglio dei ministri 12 gennaio 2017. Definizione e aggiornamento dei livelli essenziali di assistenza, di cui all’articolo 1, comma 7, del decreto legislativo 30 dicembre 1992, n. 502. (17A02015). 2017.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ministero della Salute. Rapporto annuale sull’attività di ricovero ospedaliero. Dati SDO 2019. 2020. Ministero della Salute. Rapporto annuale sull’attività di ricovero ospedaliero. Dati SDO 2019. 2020.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Agenzia nazionale per i servizi sanitari regionali (AGENAS). La mobilità sanitaria. 2012. Agenzia nazionale per i servizi sanitari regionali (AGENAS). La mobilità sanitaria. 2012.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Conferenza delle Regioni e delle Province Autonome. Accordo interregionale per la compensazione della mobilità sanitaria aggiornato all’anno 2019 - Regole tecniche. 2020. Conferenza delle Regioni e delle Province Autonome. Accordo interregionale per la compensazione della mobilità sanitaria aggiornato all’anno 2019 - Regole tecniche. 2020.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bortolan F. Mobilità sanitaria: la chiave di lettura dell’Agenzia; 2020. Bortolan F. Mobilità sanitaria: la chiave di lettura dell’Agenzia; 2020.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT). Rapporto BES 2020. Il benessere equo e sostenibile in Italia; 2020. p. 1–240. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT). Rapporto BES 2020. Il benessere equo e sostenibile in Italia; 2020. p. 1–240.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Simeoni S, Frova L, De Curtis M. Inequalities in infant mortality in Italy. Ital J Pediatr. 2019;45(1):1–7.CrossRef Simeoni S, Frova L, De Curtis M. Inequalities in infant mortality in Italy. Ital J Pediatr. 2019;45(1):1–7.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rapporto Osservasalute 2019 – Stato di salute e qualità dell’assistenza nelle regioni italiane. Rome; 2020. p. 389–403. ISBN: 9788898870608. Rapporto Osservasalute 2019 – Stato di salute e qualità dell’assistenza nelle regioni italiane. Rome; 2020. p. 389–403. ISBN: 9788898870608.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ministero della Salute. Disposizioni per la formazione del bilancio annuale e pluriennale dello Stato. 2005. Ministero della Salute. Disposizioni per la formazione del bilancio annuale e pluriennale dello Stato. 2005.
Metadaten
Titel
Pediatric interregional healthcare mobility in Italy
verfasst von
Mario De Curtis
Francesco Bortolan
Davide Diliberto
Leonardo Villani
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2021
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Italian Journal of Pediatrics / Ausgabe 1/2021
Elektronische ISSN: 1824-7288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-021-01091-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Italian Journal of Pediatrics 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Ähnliche Überlebensraten nach Reanimation während des Transports bzw. vor Ort

29.05.2024 Reanimation im Kindesalter Nachrichten

Laut einer Studie aus den USA und Kanada scheint es bei der Reanimation von Kindern außerhalb einer Klinik keinen Unterschied für das Überleben zu machen, ob die Wiederbelebungsmaßnahmen während des Transports in die Klinik stattfinden oder vor Ort ausgeführt werden. Jedoch gibt es dabei einige Einschränkungen und eine wichtige Ausnahme.

Alter der Mutter beeinflusst Risiko für kongenitale Anomalie

28.05.2024 Kinder- und Jugendgynäkologie Nachrichten

Welchen Einfluss das Alter ihrer Mutter auf das Risiko hat, dass Kinder mit nicht chromosomal bedingter Malformation zur Welt kommen, hat eine ungarische Studie untersucht. Sie zeigt: Nicht nur fortgeschrittenes Alter ist riskant.

Begünstigt Bettruhe der Mutter doch das fetale Wachstum?

Ob ungeborene Kinder, die kleiner als die meisten Gleichaltrigen sind, schneller wachsen, wenn die Mutter sich mehr ausruht, wird diskutiert. Die Ergebnisse einer US-Studie sprechen dafür.

Bei Amblyopie früher abkleben als bisher empfohlen?

22.05.2024 Fehlsichtigkeit Nachrichten

Bei Amblyopie ist das frühzeitige Abkleben des kontralateralen Auges in den meisten Fällen wohl effektiver als der Therapiestandard mit zunächst mehrmonatigem Brilletragen.

Update Pädiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.