(ii) Cultured OSE gives rise to "oocyte-like" cells
Following the deduced existence of mitotic germ cells in the OSE (above), Bukovsky
et al.
[
8] and Virant-Klun
et al.
[
9] endeavoured to culture OSE derivatives, and subsequently reported the production of "oocyte-like" cells
in vitro. Two major limitations are common to both studies.
(a) The criteria used to denote an "oocyte-like" phenotype [
8,
9] are morphological, namely: cells with large and rounded morphology in which a large or no nucleus is visible, and which may be surrounded by a structure resembling a zona pellucida (ZP). However, the photomicrographs presented may instead depict those general features of cells undergoing apoptosis, necrosis or - especially - oncosis [
46], namely: cell swelling, plasma membrane breakdown, and swollen or lysed nuclei. Structures described as "developing zona pellucida" [
8,
9] may reflect cellular swelling, membrane rupture and lysis, and spillage of cytoplasm [
46]; the "germinal vesicle" [
8,
9], nuclear swelling [
46]; and "germinal vesicle breakdown" [
8,
9], karyolysis [
46]. These considerations underline the importance of validating putative oocytes by immunocytochemical and molecular techniques, rather than by morphological criteria. The attempt by Bukovsky
et al.
[
8] to detect ZP-antigenicity in these cells by immunofluorescence is marred throughout by a high background of staining of the cytoskeleton, which is probably an artefact of desiccation arising from the unconventional step of air-drying cells overnight, prior to fixation. Desiccation and cell death occur extremely rapidly under these conditions [
47,
48], with interim activation of survival and death pathways [
49]. Regarding the deduced ZP-antigenicity of OSE-derived "germ-like" cells as detected using PS1 antibody [
8], it should be noted that Skinner and Dunbar [
50] considered their antibody to be non-specific for ZP proteins as it recognises a carbohydrate moiety present on the apical surface of the OSE.
(b) It is immediately apparent that the culture systems of Bukovsky
et al.
[
8] and Virant-Klun
et al.
[
9] are relatively very simple, without addition of the growth factors, cytokines or feeder-cell support that usually are essential to the growth of pluripotent germline cells or ES cells. In fact, the growth of embryonic or germline stem cells under these conditions would be unprecedented. What cells, therefore, could constitute the proliferating populations in these studies?
As cultures were obtained by the conventional technique of scraping of the OSE, the heterogeneity of cells should be considered: an estimated 98% of cells obtained in this way are ovarian epithelial cells [
51], and contaminants include extraovarian mesothelial cells, endothelial cells, ovarian somatic and mesenchymal cells, and immune cells [
52]. Moreover, cultured OSE demonstrates an epitheliomesenchymal phenotype with contractile functions, and the capacity to differentiate into stroma, granulosa cells or Müllerian epithelia, reflecting its role
in vivo as a dynamic tissue involved in post-ovulatory tissue repair and remodelling [
52]. Granulosa cells express
Oct4 and are multipotent, differentiating into neurons, chondrocytes and osteoblasts [
53]. Therefore, in the absence of data from clonal cell analysis, and of unambiguous validation by stem cell-specific markers (see below), the claims of Bukovsky
et al.
[
8] and Virant-Klun
et al.
[
9] for spontaneous
in vitro differentiation of germline stem cells into cells of mixed phenotype should be regarded with caution.
The cell types cultured by Virant-Klun
et al.
[
9] from OSE scrapings from postmenopausal women, termed "putative stem cells", "oocyte-like", or "embryonic", may be re-identified from information in the literature. "Putative stem cells" were identified morphologically as round cells, 2-4 μm in diameter, located below or above the OSE [
9]. However, the possibility arises that these are small immune cells, e.g. lymphocytes or plasma cells, which are seen located above and below the OSE in ovarian sections [
54]. After enrichment by differential centrifugation, these "putative stem cells" proliferated in culture [
9]. Plasma cells, also, can be cultured easily in simple media [
55], but the presence of this cell type as a culture contaminant was not considered [
9]. Virant-Klun
et al.
[
9] stated that the proliferating "putative stem cells" generated adherent oocyte-like cells, 20-95 μm in diameter, with ZP-like, germinal vesicle-like and polar body-like structures that were ascribed to an oocyte nature. However as stated above, these structures could arise from oncosis in any of the cell types being cultured, causing cell swelling, karyolysis and cytoplasmic leakage. In their cultures, Virant-Klun and colleagues [
9] also describe the formation of "embryoid body-like" and "blastocyst-like" structures, interpreted as products of parthenogenetic activation of oocyte-like cells. However, they are far less convincing in appearance than the (parthenogenetic) embryos demonstrated by Hübner
et al.
[
56] to arise from ES cell differentiation into oocytes. Could there be an alternative explanation for the structures produced by Virant-Klun
et al.
[
9]? The aggregates of cells termed "embryoid-body like" could arise from any cell type, rather than being diagnostic of embryoid bodies proper with their complex internal differentiation. And the vesicles formed by these aggregates with continued culture could arise from a contaminating epithelial cell type, such as OSE [
52], which has the capacity to polarise and form impermeable junctions. The propensity to form vesicles in culture is a common property of epithelial cells from epithelial linings [
57]; and the increased tendency of OSE to line clefts and inclusion cysts in the ovary, with increasing age, may be relevant here [
52]. Further clues to the identity of the cells can be gleaned from patterns of transcription: "putative stem cells" expressed
OCT4,
SOX-2,
NANOG and
C-KIT, and "blastocyst-like" structures expressed
OCT4,
SOX-2 and
NANOG, from which an embryonic nature of the putative stem cells was inferred by Virant-Klun
et al
[
9]. However, a recent study by Song
et al.
[
58] first showed that the trio of stem cell regulatory genes,
Oct4,
Sox-2 and
Nanog, constitute markers for epithelial stem cells, whose function is vital to regeneration and tissue homeostasis: they are expressed during the regeneration of rat tracheal epithelium
in vitro, specifically by epithelial stem cells in the G
0 phase. Expression of
Oct4 is associated also with a variety of types of epithelial stem cells, but not their differentiated derivatives [
59]. Moreover, human epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines and the multilayered structures, or spheroids, they form in suspension culture are known to highly express stem cell-specific genes, including
OCT4,
NANOG and
NESTIN
[
60,
61]. It is therefore inferred that the OSE-derivative cultures of Virant-Klun
et al.
[
9] comprise epithelial stem cells, which are responsible normally for maintaining the integrity of the OSE - a property that may be especially important in ovaries of post-menopausal women [
54], used here. This inherent regenerative potential may be manifest in culture. Another feature is consistent with the presence of OSE in these cultures - the expression of
C-KIT
[
51]. In fact, both
C-KIT and
KIT LIGAND are expressed by human, normal OSE [
62].
The importance of critically evaluating claims for the validation of cell lines as female (or ovarian) germline stem cells is further illustrated by the recent study of Pacchiarotti
et al.
[
11]. These authors reported the isolation and characterisation of germline stem-cell lines from ovaries of neonatal mice of the TgOG2 strain. (These mice carry an
Oct4-GFP transgene where
GFP expression is controlled by an
Oct4 promoter sequence. They are considered in more detail in section
2.
(iv).) Their main conclusions are as follows:
(a) Germline stem cells were identified at the ovarian surface, on the basis of their small size (10-15 μm) and expression of Oct4-GFP, Mvh, c-kit and SSEA-1. These cells were purported to transition into germ cells of intermediate size (20-30 μm), and subsequently into growing oocytes.
(b) Cell populations containing the putative stem cells were isolated from disaggregated suspensions of whole ovaries by fluorescence-activated cell sorting for Oct4-GFP expression, and propagated using a feeder-based culture system. It was deduced that the derived lines consisted of ovarian germline stem cells from their expression of germ-cell and stem-cell markers (namely, Gcna1, c-kit, Oct4, Nanog and GFR-α1).
(c) Further evidence for the status of these cells as germline stem cells was presented from the formation of "embryoid bodies" containing differentiated derivatives of the three germ layers, mesoderm (denoted by expression of Bmp-4 and troponin), ectoderm (Sox-1, Ncam, nestin) and endoderm (FoxA2, Gata-4); and the production of early stage oocytes during culture.
However, many of these assumed marker specificities are incorrect and the above conclusions are therefore unwarranted, as discussed in detail below. Rather, it is proposed that the cultures consisted of monolayers of OSE, together with a proportion of early oocytes and/or oogonia. That is, a complex co-culture system is envisaged containing both somatic and germ-cell types. It is notable that the culture medium used by Pacchiarotti
et al.
[
11] was optimised for spermatogonial stem cells (SSC) [
63], as was that employed by Zou
et al.
[
10] for FGSC. These media are considered further in section
2.
(v), as potentially being mitogenic for growth-arrested oogonia.
(a) Rather than providing direct evidence for germline stem cells, the localisation of small cells (≤15 μm) expressing Oct4, Mvh and SSEA-1, and subtending the OSE, is compatible with residual oogonia [
64‐
66]. In fact, the authors acknowledged the likely existence of oogonia in these neonatal ovaries.
(b) These putative germline stem cell lines show a striking resemblance in morphology and growth characteristics (with a low mitotic rate) to previously established mouse and human OSE cell lines [
67‐
69], growing in monolayers as epithelial colonies with cobblestone appearance, with a tendency towards multilayering at the centre. (Compare, for example, the cellular morphology in Figure three 'N' of Pacchiarotti
et al.
[
11] with that of mouse OSE in Figure two 'A' of Roby
et al.
[
67] and in Figure four 'B' of Szotek
et al.
[
69].) Like established lines of mouse OSE cells at low passage [
67], these putative stem cells lacked tumorigenicity in mouse xenograft systems. Furthermore, markers reportedly expressed by these cultures are not germline specific: GFR-α1 is expressed by OSE [
70]; and co-expression of
c-kit,
Oct4 and
Nanog was discussed in section
2.
(ii), in the context of the OSE as a regenerative epithelium.
(c) Concerning the structures described as "embryoid bodies", patterns of gene expression were entirely consistent with OSE, as a mesoderm-derived, multipotent epithelium with stromal characteristics. For example, nestin [
60] and Gata-4 [
69] are markers for OSE stem cells. FoxA2 is known to be expressed in uterine glands [
71], and expression in this culture system may therefore be indicative of OSE cells undergoing Müllerian-type differentiation towards endometrioid cells [
72]. In short, the structures described resemble those spheroids that are formed by both normal OSE [
68,
73] and ovarian cancer-derived cell lines [
60].
Detection of Gcna-1 in these cell lines requires further comment, as this antigen is considered specific to the nuclei of germ cells in the neonatal and foetal gonad, from zygotene through pachytene stages of meiotic prophase. It is relevant that Alton and Taketo [
74] observed immunocytochemical staining for Gcna1 in a large number of cells either in, or protruding from, the OSE in foetal mouse ovaries at 18.5 d.p.c., which was attributed to oocytes in the process of exfoliation. However, that those cells did not express Mvh [
74] is incompatible with their identification as oocytes. It is therefore suggested that Gcna-1 may be expressed by OSE, especially during the neonatal period or in culture. Another germ cell-specific gene,
VASA, is expressed by ovarian epithelial cancers, which arise from transformation of the OSE [
75]. Now that candidate stem cells for OSE have been identified by Szotek
et al.
[
69], it will be of interest to determine if genes involved in germ-cell specification also are involved in normal epithelial regeneration, or differentiation. As well as increasing understanding of the etiology of ovarian epithelial cancers, this information will help clarify the origin of cell lines claimed to represent ovarian germline stem cells [
8,
9,
11] on the basis of expression of germ-cell markers.