Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Critical Care 1/2020

Open Access 01.12.2020 | COVID-19 | Research Letter

Glucocorticoid therapy does not delay viral clearance in COVID-19 patients

verfasst von: Jingjing Ji, Jinxia Zhang, Ziyun Shao, Qifeng Xie, Li Zhong, Zhifeng Liu

Erschienen in: Critical Care | Ausgabe 1/2020

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
Hinweise
Jingjing Ji, Jinxia Zhang, Ziyun Shao and Qifeng Xie contributed equally to this work.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Dear Editor,
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has been a severe challenge worldwide. Accumulating evidence reveals that in COVID-19 patients, inflammatory cell infiltration and cytokine storm are key factors leading to acute lung injury and poor prognosis [1]. Glucocorticoid (GC) was one of the anti-inflammatory medications widely used in critically ill patients. Numerous clinical studies have reported the efficacy of GC in the treatment of coronavirus pneumonia; however, the use of GC in the treatment of critical COVID-19 cases is still controversial [2, 3]. The main concern is that GC treatment may delay the clearance of virus. The current cohort study aimed to determine whether GC therapy would prolong the duration of SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding and SARS-CoV-2 clearance.
This cohort study analyzed clinical data from 684 adult patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections confirmed through RT-PCR on throat swab samples collected between January and March 2020 from two hospitals in Wuhan, China. All patients received standard treatment including antiviral and oxygen therapy, and symptomatic support. The demographic, laboratory data at admission and discharge, GC treatment, and prognosis of the patients were collected. During the treatment, the throat swab and/or sputum and/or lower respiratory tract samples from confirmed patients were collected and tested by RT-PCR every 2 to 3 days. For the severe and critical patients, the interval between two tests was 4 to 5 days. To avoid false negative results, only patients with three continuously negative tests were considered that they have viral RNA clearance. Therefore, for the patients with negative RT-PCR result, two more samples were collected in the following 2 days, respectively. Among the 684 cases, 202 (29.5%) cases had viral RNA clearance within 14 days after illness onset and 210 (30.7%) cases had viral RNA clearance between 14 and 28 days, and 272 (39.8%) cases had viral RNA clearance over 28 days. There were no differences on the age, gender, and underlying diseases between different groups. The degree of decrease in CD4 T cell and B cell counts on admission was related with the prolonged viral RNA clearance (Table 1).
Table 1
Demographics and laboratory data at admission of patients infected with COVID-19 according to the time to SARS-CoV-2 RNA clearance
 
Overall (N = 684)
≤ 14 days (N = 202)
14–28 days (N = 210)
> 28 days (N = 272)
p value
Demographics, clinical characteristics
 Age (years)
61.0 [49.0, 70.0]
62.0 [48.0, 71.0]
60.5 [49.3, 70.0]
61.5 [51.0, 70.3]
0.733
 Gender (%)
0.841
  Male
328 (48.0)
98 (48.5)
103 (49.3)
127 (46.7)
 
  Female
355 (52.0)
104 (51.5)
106 (50.7)
145 (53.3)
 
 Clinical type (%)
0.009
  Mild
26 (3.9)
16 (8.0)
7 (3.4)
3 (1.1)
 
  General
464 (69.3)
140 (70.0)
141 (69.1)
183 (68.8)
 
  Severe
145 (21.6)
36 (18.0)
44 (21.6)
65 (24.4)
 
  Critical
35 (5.2)
8 (4.0)
12 (5.9)
15 (5.6)
 
 Hypertension (%)
235 (35.0)
67 (34.0)
70 (33.8)
98 (36.6)
0.778
 CHD (%)
75 (11.2)
22 (11.2)
25 (12.1)
28 (10.4)
0.855
 CRF (%)
16 (2.4)
3 (1.5)
7 (3.4)
6 (2.2)
0.467
 DM (%)
111 (16.5)
30 (15.2)
36 (17.5)
45 (16.8)
0.824
 COPD (%)
13 (1.9)
3 (1.5)
3 (1.4)
7 (2.6)
0.588
 Cirrhosis (%)
3 (0.4)
0 (0.0)
1 (0.5)
2 (0.7)
0.492
 Stroke (%)
45 (6.7)
14 (7.1)
14 (6.8)
17 (6.3)
0.943
 Tumor (%)
23 (3.4)
5 (2.6)
5 (2.4)
13 (4.9)
0.257
Inflammatory response, median (IQR)
 CRP (mg/L)
7.39 [0.50, 28.25]
8.63 [1.04, 16.33]
5.79 [0.50, 28.80]
5.13 [0.50, 62.39]
0.968
 IL-6 (pg/mL)
6.00 [2.25, 21.00]
6.00 [3.00, 19.50]
7.50 [2.00, 26.25]
6.00 [3.00, 20.50]
0.943
 Fib (g/L)
4.82 [3.68, 11.90]
4.46 [3.58, 11.72]
5.50 [3.65, 11.98]
6.71 [4.08, 13.60]
0.19
 WBC (109/L)
5.59 [4.46, 7.06]
5.60 [4.47, 6.79]
5.51 [4.52, 7.12]
5.33 [4.38, 7.83]
0.962
 Neutrophil (109/L)
3.33 [2.44, 4.76]
3.33 [2.49, 4.51]
3.31 [2.42, 4.85]
3.67 [2.41, 5.83]
0.618
 Monocyte (109/L)
0.46 [0.34, 0.60]
0.45 [0.35, 0.59]
0.46 [0.34, 0.61]
0.47 [0.35, 0.58]
0.970
 Lymphocyte (109/L)
1.27 [0.88, 1.81]
1.29 [0.94, 1.86]
1.29 [0.95, 1.73]
1.00 [0.72, 1.67]
0.204
 PLT (109/L)
203 [158, 249]
209 [156, 267]
196 [158, 241]
189 [148, 244]
0.209
 Hb (g/L)
121 [108, 133]
123 [109, 133]
121 [110, 131]
121 [103, 131]
0.609
 CD3 (count/μL)
8905 [474, 1212]
916 [586, 1220]
705 [423, 1224]
497 [364, 684]
0.115
 CD4 (count/μL)
478 [269, 672]
554 [319, 733]
324 [190, 588]
275 [154, 404]
0.048
 CD8 (count/μL)
248 [150, 374]
291 [174, 400]
229 [142, 367]
167 [123, 211]
0.112
 NK (count/μL)
167 [103, 259]
142 [91.0, 231]
206 [141, 332]
154 [91.8, 215]
0.115
 B cell (count/μL)
175 [104, 281]
195 [131, 296]
187 [91.0, 279]
94.0 [72.8, 126]
0.030
Organ function measurement, median (IQR)
 ALT (U/L)
27.0 [18.0, 41.0]
26.0 [18.0, 40.5]
29.0 [19.0, 43.0]
27.0 [18.3, 38.3]
0.679
 AST (U/L)
22.0 [16.0, 36.5]
20.0 [15.0, 36.0]
23.0 [17.0, 37.0]
23.0 [19.0, 39.0]
0.314
 TBIL (μmol/L)
11.2 [8.40, 14.0]
11.3 [8.7, 14.0]
11.0 [8.30, 13.0]
11.1 [8.53, 15.8]
0.731
 DBIL (μmol/L)
2.80 [2.10, 3.70]
2.70 [2.20, 3.60]
3.00 [1.92, 3.68]
2.90 [1.90, 4.40]
0.935
 Creatinine (μmol/L)
61.0 [50.0, 75.0]
61.0 [50.0, 78.5]
60.0 [50.2, 74.7]
60.0 [50.2, 72.5]
0.694
 BUN (mmol/L)
4.60 [3.60, 5.80]
4.40 [3.50, 5.80]
4.60 [3.70, 5.50]
4.50 [3.70, 5.80]
0.794
 Lactate (mmol/L)
1.10 [1.00, 1.35]
1.00 [0.90, 1.30]
1.10 [1.00, 1.30]
1.10 [1.00, 1.60]
0.395
 Glucose (mmol/L)
5.60 [5.00, 6.62]
5.55 [5.00, 6.32]
5.60 [5.03, 7.62]
5.30 [4.90, 6.95]
0.431
 INR
1.10 [1.00, 1.20]
1.10 [1.00, 1.20]
1.10 [1.00, 1.20]
1.10 [1.10, 1.20]
0.075
 CK (U/L)
66.5 [25.3, 110.5]
67.0 [24.0, 107.5]
62.0 [39.0, 135.0]
63.0 [22.5, 105.5]
0.530
 BNP (pg/mL)
67.9 [28.0, 152.3]
67.9 [28.0, 243.0]
62.0 [27.0, 126.0]
97.0 [41.5, 128.8]
0.490
 NT-proBNP (pg/mL)
745 [88.0, 1899]
109 [67.0, 2679]
1118 [769.5, 2237]
745 [382, 859]
0.532
GC treatment (%)
103 (15.1)
24 (11.9)
32 (15.2)
47 (17.3)
0.266
 Methylprednisolone (%)
96 (14.0)
24 (11.9)
30 (14.3)
42 (15.4)
0.540
 Dexamethasone (%)
12 (1.8)
2 (1.0)
3 (1.4)
7 (2.6)
0.392
 Hydrocortisone (%)
1 (0.1)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
1 (0.4)
0.468
Outcome
 Hospital stay (days)
25.0 [16.0, 38.0]
21.0 [14.0, 28.0]
24.0 [18.0, 32.0]
37.0 [21.0, 47.0]
< 0.001
 Total course (days)
45.0 [33.0, 59.3]
30.0 [19.5, 39.5]
41.0 [32.0, 54.0]
57.0 [47.0, 67.0]
< 0.001
 Outcome (%)
0.414
  Survival
643 (96.8)
191 (97.0)
194 (95.6)
258 (97.7)
 
  Death
21 (3.2)
6 (3.0)
9 (4.4)
6 (2.3)
 
Since GC therapy was usually employed in critically ill patients, we analyzed the effect of GC therapy separately for patients with different severity. Patients were diagnosed as mild type, general type, severe type, and critical type according to the Chinese Recommendations for Diagnosis and Treatment of Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Infection (Trial 7th version) [4]. For the mild and general type patients, 30 (6.1%) cases received GC treatment and 460 (93.1%) cases did not. For the severe and critical type patients, 72 (40%) cases were in the GC group and 108 (60%) cases were in the non-GC group (Table 1). In this study, methylprednisolone was the most used glucocorticoid (Table 1) in a dose of 1–2 mg/(kg·day) for 3 to 5 days according to the disease severity [4]. The results show that GC therapy increased hospital stay days but had no effect on the virus clearance time (Table 2). For the severe and critical patients, the median viral RNA clearance time in the GC group was 26 days (IQR 17–42 days), while the viral RNA clearance time in the non-GC group was 25.5 days (IQR 13–39 days). In addition, the GC treatment had no effect on the peripheral lymphocyte counts, including CD4 T cells, CD8 T cells, NK cells, and B cells (Table 2).
Table 2
Effect of glucocorticoid on the outcome and inflammatory response on discharge of COVID-19 patients
Variables
Mild and general group
Severe and critical group
Non-GC group
GC group
p value
Non-GC group
GC group
p value
N
460
30
 
108
72
 
Hospital stay (days)
23.00 [16.00, 33.00]
32.50 [23.25, 38.00]
0.002
29.00 [17.00, 44.00]
40.50 [31.75, 52.50]
< 0.001
Viral RNA clearance (days)
22.00 [11.00, 35.00]
23.50 [14.00, 34.25]
0.737
25.50 [13.00, 39.00]
26.00 [17.00, 42.00]
0.471
Total course (days)
43.00 [29.00, 57.00]
41.00 [31.50, 47.75]
0.816
49.00 [37.50, 63.50]
49.00 [43.00, 63.00]
0.341
Outcome (%)
  
1
  
0.555
 Survival
446 (99.8)
30 (100.0)
 
92 (90.2)
62 (86.1)
 
 Death
1 (0.2)
0 (0.0)
 
10 (9.8)
10 (13.9)
 
Inflammatory response, median (IQR)
 CRP (mg/L)
2.93 [0.90, 10.00]
4.15 [2.04, 10.50]
0.378
3.19 [0.77, 21.20]
4.59 [1.16, 13.15]
0.457
 IL-6 (pg/mL)
3.00 [2.00, 7.00]
5.00 [2.00, 12.50]
0.253
16.00 [4.75, 36.00]
9.50 [7.25, 32.00]
0.986
 Fib (g/L)
3.58 [2.78, 4.84]
3.96 [3.58, 11.43]
0.227
3.53 [2.84, 14.39]
3.90 [3.60, 10.90]
0.275
 WBC (109/L)
5.55 [4.40, 6.55]
5.20 [4.25, 6.08]
0.568
5.93 [5.00, 7.50]
6.80 [4.90, 8.55]
0.485
 Neutrophil (109/L)
3.17 [2.49, 4.04]
3.05 [2.25, 3.98]
0.641
3.76 [2.85, 5.20]
4.79 [3.09, 6.80]
0.178
 Monocyte (109/L)
0.46 [0.36, 0.57]
0.49 [0.41, 0.66]
0.177
0.43 [0.35, 0.66]
0.51 [0.40, 0.63]
0.311
 Lymphocyte (109/L)
1.56 [1.25, 1.91]
1.47 [1.23, 1.88]
0.801
1.21 [0.97, 1.79]
1.10 [0.85, 1.55]
0.207
 PLT (109/L)
209.0 [173.0, 258.0]
212.0 [183.8, 266.5]
0.923
212.0 [151.0, 236.0]
183.0 [144.0, 250.0]
0.615
 Hb (g/L)
128.5 [117.25, 138.8]
133.0 [127.0, 137.0]
0.667
117.5 [102.5, 129.0]
119.0 [100.0, 125.0]
0.669
 CD3 (count/μL)
1144 [861, 1293]
1002 [793, 1282]
0.791
509 [162.0, 1026]
683.5 [478.8, 1112]
0.508
 CD4 (count/μL)
625.0 [514.0, 831.5]
498.0 [385.0, 801.0]
0.442
306.0 [65.3, 585.5]
338.5 [257.5, 547.0]
0.449
 CD8 (count/μL)
357.0 [246.0, 454.0]
364.0 [248.5, 478.5]
0.845
133.0 [72.3, 341.5]
257.0 [190.3, 389.3]
0.257
 NK (count/μL)
201.0 [128.0, 271.5]
90.0 [55.0, 132.0]
0.008
52.5 [40.0, 124.00]
93.50 [62.5, 117.3]
0.257
 B cell (count/μL)
171.0 [132.5, 265.0]
248.0 [146.0, 328.5]
0.493
68.5 [58.5, 126.8]
115.0 [94.3, 156.0]
0.299
The current multicenter cohort study demonstrates that GC therapy does not change viral clearance and peripheral lymphocyte counts in COVID-19 patients. However, well-designed and large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to further confirm the results derived from this observational study.

Acknowledgements

We thank the help from Zheying Liu and Conglin Wang during the data collection, and thank Jie Fan (University of Pittsburgh, USA) for revising the manuscript.
The study was approved by the Research Ethics Commission of General Hospital of Southern Theater Command of PLA. The requirement for informed consent was waived by the Ethics Commission.
All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang W, Zhao Y, Zhang F, Wang Q, Li T, Liu Z, et al. The use of anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of people with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): the perspectives of clinical immunologists from China. Clin Immunol. 2020;214:108393.CrossRef Zhang W, Zhao Y, Zhang F, Wang Q, Li T, Liu Z, et al. The use of anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of people with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): the perspectives of clinical immunologists from China. Clin Immunol. 2020;214:108393.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fang X, Mei Q, Yang T, Li L, Wang Y, Tong F, et al. Low-dose corticosteroid therapy does not delay viral clearance in patients with COVID-19. J Infect. 2020;81(1):1472020;133(9):1039–78. Fang X, Mei Q, Yang T, Li L, Wang Y, Tong F, et al. Low-dose corticosteroid therapy does not delay viral clearance in patients with COVID-19. J Infect. 2020;81(1):1472020;133(9):1039–78.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ling Y, Xu S-B, Lin Y-X, Tian D, Zhu Z-Q, Dai F-H, et al. Persistence and clearance of viral RNA in 2019 novel coronavirus disease rehabilitation patients. Chin Med J. 2020;133(9):1039–43. Ling Y, Xu S-B, Lin Y-X, Tian D, Zhu Z-Q, Dai F-H, et al. Persistence and clearance of viral RNA in 2019 novel coronavirus disease rehabilitation patients. Chin Med J. 2020;133(9):1039–43.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Chinese recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of novel coronavirus (SARSCoV2) infection (Trial 7th version). 2020. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Chinese recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of novel coronavirus (SARSCoV2) infection (Trial 7th version). 2020.
Metadaten
Titel
Glucocorticoid therapy does not delay viral clearance in COVID-19 patients
verfasst von
Jingjing Ji
Jinxia Zhang
Ziyun Shao
Qifeng Xie
Li Zhong
Zhifeng Liu
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2020
Verlag
BioMed Central
Schlagwort
COVID-19
Erschienen in
Critical Care / Ausgabe 1/2020
Elektronische ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03287-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Critical Care 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Delir bei kritisch Kranken – Antipsychotika versus Placebo

16.05.2024 Delir Nachrichten

Um die Langzeitfolgen eines Delirs bei kritisch Kranken zu mildern, wird vielerorts auf eine Akuttherapie mit Antipsychotika gesetzt. Eine US-amerikanische Forschungsgruppe äußert jetzt erhebliche Vorbehalte gegen dieses Vorgehen. Denn es gibt neue Daten zum Langzeiteffekt von Haloperidol bzw. Ziprasidon versus Placebo.

Eingreifen von Umstehenden rettet vor Erstickungstod

15.05.2024 Fremdkörperaspiration Nachrichten

Wer sich an einem Essensrest verschluckt und um Luft ringt, benötigt vor allem rasche Hilfe. Dass Umstehende nur in jedem zweiten Erstickungsnotfall bereit waren, diese zu leisten, ist das ernüchternde Ergebnis einer Beobachtungsstudie aus Japan. Doch es gibt auch eine gute Nachricht.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.