Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
Erschienen in: Current Allergy and Asthma Reports 2/2014

01.02.2014 | OCCUPATIONAL ALLERGIES (JA POOLE, SECTION EDITOR)

Occupational Skin Allergies: Testing and Treatment (The Case of Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis)

verfasst von: D. Linn Holness

Erschienen in: Current Allergy and Asthma Reports | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Occupational contact dermatitis, including occupational allergic contact dermatitis, is one of the most common occupational diseases. Making a timely and accurate diagnosis is important to improving the outcome. Taking a work history and patch testing are essential elements in the diagnostic process. Management, based on an accurate diagnosis, must include both medical treatment to address the disease and workplace modifications as appropriate to reduce exposure the causative agents.
Literatur
1.
Diepgen TL, Kanverva L. Occupational skin diseases. Eur J Dermatol. 2006;16:324–30.PubMed
2.
Cahill J, Keegel T, Nixon R. The prognosis of occupational contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2004;51:219–26.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Lau MY, Burgess JA, Nixon R, Dharmage SC, Matheson MC. A review of the impact of occupational contact dermatitis on quality of life. J Allergy. 2011;2011:964509.CrossRef
4.
Holness DL. Workers with occupational contact dermatitis: work outcomes and return to work process in the first six months following diagnosis. J Allergy. 2011;2011:170693.CrossRef
5.
Holness DL, Harniman E, DeKoven J, Skotnicki Grant S, Beaton D, Nixon R, et al. Hand function in workers with hand dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2013;24:131–6.PubMed
6.
Diepgen TL. The costs of skin disease. Eur J Dermatol. 2006;16:456–60.PubMed
7.
Keegel T, Moyle M, Dharmage S, Frowen K, Nixon R. The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis (1990-2007): a systematic review. Int J Dermatol. 2009;48:571–8.PubMedCrossRef
8.••
Ibler KS, Jemec GBE, Flyvholm M-A, et al. Hand eczema: prevalence and risk factors of hand eczema in a population of 2274 healthcare workers. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;67:200–7. up to date information on prevalence of and risk factors for hand eczema in health care workers.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Luk N-MT, Lee H-CS, Luk C-KD, et al. Hand eczema among Hong Kong nurses: a self-report questionnaire survey conducted in a regional hospital. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;65(6):329–35.PubMedCrossRef
10.••
Lysdal SH, Sosted H, Johansen JD. Do hairdressers in Denmark have their hand eczema reported as an occupational disease? Results from a register-based questionnaire study. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66:72–8. up to date information on prevalence of hand eczema in hairdressers and information on reporting.PubMedCrossRef
11.••
Schnuch A, Geier J, Lessman R, et al. Surveillance of contact allergies: methods and results of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK). Allergy. 2012;67:847–67. demonstrates use of group data to follow trends.PubMedCrossRef
12.••
Geier J, Krautheim A, Uter W, et al. Occupational contact allergy in the building trade in Germany: influence of preventive measures and changing exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011;84:403–11. demonstrates use of group data to follow trends and specifically changes in the building trades.PubMedCrossRef
13.••
Uter W, Gefeller O, Geier J, Schnuch A. Methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone contact sensitization: diverging trends in subgroups of IVDK patients in a period of 19 years. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;67:125–9. demonstrates use of group data to follow trends and documents the increase in positive reactions to methylisothiazoline.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Arrandale VH, Liss GM, Tarlo SM, et al. Occupational contact allergens. Are they also associated with occupational asthma? Am J Ind Med. 2012;55:353–60.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Nicholson PJ, Llewellyn D, English JS. Evidence-based guidelines for the prevention, identification and management of occupational contact dermatitis and urticaria. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;63:177–86.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Smedley J. on behalf of the OHCEU and BOHRF Dermatitis guideline development groups. Concise guidance: diagnosis, management and prevention of occupational contact dermatitis. Clin Med. 2010;5:487–90.CrossRef
17.••
Adisesh A, Robinson E, Nicholson PJ, Sen S, Wilkinson M, on behalf of the standards of Care Working Group. U.K. standards of care for occupational contact dermatitis and contact urticaria. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168:1167–75. current standards of care of occupational contact dermatitis.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
Bourke J, Coulson I, English J. Guidelines for the management of contact dermatitis: an update. Br J Dermatol. 2009;160:946–54.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Holness DL. Health care services used by workers with work-related contact dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2004;15:18–24.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Adisesh A, Meyer JD, Cherry NM. Prognosis and work absence due to contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2002;46:273–9.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Cahill J, Keegel T, Dharmage S, Nugriaty D, Nixon R. Prognosis of contact dermatitis in epoxy resin workers. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;52:147–53.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Johnansen JD, Hald M, Andersen BL, et al. Classification of hand eczema: clinical and aetiological types. Based on the guidelines of the Danish Contact Dermatitis Group. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;65(1):13–21.CrossRef
23.
Goulden V, Wilkinson SM. Evaluation of a contact allergy clinic. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2000;25:67–70.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Wilkinson DS, Fregert S, Magnusson B, et al. Terminology of contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh). 1970;50:287–92.
25.••
Lachapelle J-M, Maibach HI. Patch testing and prick testing. A practical guide. Official publication of te ICDRG. 3rd ed. Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. a good short book about patch testing.CrossRef
26.
Johnston GA. Standardization of patch tests and the doctors who read them. Br J Dermatol. 2009;161:493–5.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Uter W, Schwitulla J, Thyssen JP, Frosch PJ, Statham B, Schnuch A. The ‘overall yield’ with the baseline series – a useful addition to the array of MOAHLFA factors describing departmental characteristics of patch test patients. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;65:322–8.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Geier J, Lessman H, Dickel H, et al. Patch test results with the metalworking fluid series of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG). Contact Dermatitis. 2004;51:118–30.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Geier J, Lessman H, Becker D, et al. Patch testing with components of water-based metalworking fluids: results of a multicentre study with a second series. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;55:322–9.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Holness DL, Nethercott JR. Results of patch testing with a specialized collection of plastic and glue allergens. Am J Contact Dermatitis. 1997;8:121–4.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Holness DL, Nethercott JR. Results of patch testing with a special series of rubber allergens. Contact Dermatitis. 1997;36:207–11.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Wang MZ, Farmer SA, Richardson DM, Davis MD. Patch-testing with hairdressing chemicals. Dermatitis. 2011;22:16–26.PubMed
33.
Aalto-Korte K, Suuronen K, Kuuliala O, et al. Occupational contact allergy to monomeric isocyanates. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;67(2):78–88.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Geier J, Uter W, Lessmann H, Frosch PJ. Patch testing with metalworking fluids from the patient’s workplace. Contact Dermatitis. 2004;51:172–9.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Houle M-C, Holness DL, DeKoven J, Skotnicki S. Additive value of patch testing custom epoxy materials from the workplace at the Occupational Disease Specialty Clinic in Toronto. Dermatitis. 2012;23:214–9.PubMed
36.
Slodowink D, Williams J, Frowen K, Palmer A, Matheson M, Nixon R. The additive value of patch testing with patients’ own products at an occupational dermatology clinic. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;61:231–5.CrossRef
37.
Saary J, Qureshi R, Palda V, et al. A systematic review of contact dermatitis treatment and prevention. J Am Acad Derm. 2005;53:845–55.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Diepgen TL, Elsner P, Schliemann S, Fartasch M, Kollner A, Skudlik C, John SM, Worm M. Guideline on the management of hand eczema ICD-10 Code: L20. L23. L24. L30. JDDG. 2009;Suppl 3.
39.
John SM, Skudlik C, Wulfhorst B, et al. An integrated inpatient/outpatient rehabilitation program – the German approach. Dermatitis. 2011;22(5):301–2.
40.••
Weisshaar E, Skudlik C, Scheidt R, et al. Multicentre study ‘rehabilitation of occupational skin diseases – optimization and quality assurance of impatient management (ROQ)’ – results from 12-month follow-up. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;68:169–74. demonstrates the value of a multidisciplinary, multi-faceted program for rehabilitation of workers with occupational contact dermatitis.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Van Gils RF, Boot CRL, Knol DL, et al. The effectiveness of integrated care for patients with hand eczema results of a randomized, controlled trial. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66(4):197–204.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Van Gils RF, Groenewoud K, Boot CRL, et al. Process evaluation of an integrated multidisciplinary intervention programme for hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66(5):254–63.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Gomez P, Kudla I, Wozniak G, et al. The impact of a multidisciplinary team and a dedicated return-to-work coordinator for workers with work-related skin disease. Dermatitis. 2011;22(3):176.
44.
Holness DL. Return-to-work issues for workers with contact dermatitis: results of a stakeholder survey. Contact Dermatitis. 2003;49:273–5.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Occupational Skin Allergies: Testing and Treatment (The Case of Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis)
verfasst von
D. Linn Holness
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 1529-7322
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-6315
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-013-0410-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Current Allergy and Asthma Reports 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe

OTITIS (DP SKONER, SECTION EDITOR)

Genetic Contributors to Otitis Media: Agnostic Discovery Approaches

RHINITIS (JJ OPPENHEIMER AND J CORREN, SECTION EDITORS)

Indications for Surgery in Refractory Rhinitis

RHINITIS (JJ OPPENHEIMER AND J CORREN, SECTION EDITORS)

Preventing Progression of Allergic Rhinitis to Asthma

AUTOIMMUNITY (TK TARRANT, SECTION EDITOR)

Targeting the Molecular and Cellular Interactions of the Bone Marrow Niche in Immunologic Disease

RHINOSINUSITIS (J MULLOL, SECTION EDITOR)

The Common Cold: Potential for Future Prevention or Cure

RHINOSINUSITIS (J MULLOL, SECTION EDITOR)

MicroRNA in Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Allergic Rhinitis

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

25.04.2024 Allergien und Intoleranzreaktionen Nachrichten

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

16.04.2024 HNO-Chirurgie Nachrichten

Mit Blick auf das Risiko für Komplikationen nach elektiven Eingriffen im HNO-Bereich scheint das Alter der Patienten kein ausschlaggebender Faktor zu sein. Entscheidend ist offenbar, wie fit die Betroffenen tatsächlich sind.

Intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie gewinnt an Boden

16.04.2024 Tonsillektomie Nachrichten

Gegenüber der vollständigen Entfernung der Gaumenmandeln hat die intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie einige Vorteile, wie HNO-Fachleute aus den USA hervorheben. Sie haben die aktuelle Literatur zu dem Verfahren gesichtet.

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise