Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Die Chirurgie 5/2022

15.03.2022 | Pankreaskarzinom | Leitthema

Pathologische Aufbereitung beim duktalen Adenokarzinom des Pankreas – was gibt es Neues?

verfasst von: Dr. Johanna Munding, Andrea Tannapfel

Erschienen in: Die Chirurgie | Ausgabe 5/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Die makroskopische und mikroskopische Begutachtung onkologischer Resektate von Pankreaskarzinomen gehört zum Standardrepertoire eines pathologischen Instituts. In den letzten Jahren wurden sowohl bezüglich der makroskopischen als auch der mikroskopischen Beurteilung Standards erarbeitet, die in internationalen und nationalen Leitlinien und Klassifikationen festgelegt sind und regelmäßig aktualisiert werden. Dadurch werden die Befunderstellung und auch die interdisziplinäre Kommunikation erleichtert. Beeinflusst werden diese Klassifikationen und Leitlinien durch aktuelle Studien, die Daten dazu liefern, welche pathohistologischen Faktoren besonders prognose- und therapierelevant sind. Durch den zunehmenden Einsatz einer neoadjuvanten Therapie gewinnt auch die Beurteilung der Tumorregression im pathohistologischen Präparat an Bedeutung. Zuletzt sind auch mittlerweile für das Pankreaskarzinom einzelne zielgerichtete Therapien verfügbar, die eine weiterführende molekularpathologische Diagnostik erfordern.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM (2014) Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res 74(11):2913–2921CrossRef Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM (2014) Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res 74(11):2913–2921CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Verbeke CA‑O, Webster F, Brosens L, Campbell F, Del Chiaro M, Esposito I et al (2021) Dataset for the reporting of carcinoma of the exocrine pancreas: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) (1365-2559 (Electronic)) Verbeke CA‑O, Webster F, Brosens L, Campbell F, Del Chiaro M, Esposito I et al (2021) Dataset for the reporting of carcinoma of the exocrine pancreas: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) (1365-2559 (Electronic))
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wittekind C (2020) TNM Klassifikation maligner Tumoren. 8. ed: Wiley-VCH; 2020. Wittekind C (2020) TNM Klassifikation maligner Tumoren. 8. ed: Wiley-VCH; 2020.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat IAfRoC (2019) WHO classification of tumours—digestive system tumours, 5. Aufl. WHO, Lyon IAfRoC (2019) WHO classification of tumours—digestive system tumours, 5. Aufl. WHO, Lyon
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Moffitt RA, Marayati R, Flate EL, Volmar KE, Loeza SG, Hoadley KA et al (2015) Virtual microdissection identifies distinct tumor- and stroma-specific subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Nat Genet 47(10):1168–1178CrossRef Moffitt RA, Marayati R, Flate EL, Volmar KE, Loeza SG, Hoadley KA et al (2015) Virtual microdissection identifies distinct tumor- and stroma-specific subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Nat Genet 47(10):1168–1178CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Aung KL, Fischer SE, Denroche RE, Jang GH, Dodd A, Creighton S et al (2018) Genomics-driven precision medicine for advanced pancreatic cancer: early results from the COMPASS trial. Clin Cancer Res 24(6):1344–1354CrossRef Aung KL, Fischer SE, Denroche RE, Jang GH, Dodd A, Creighton S et al (2018) Genomics-driven precision medicine for advanced pancreatic cancer: early results from the COMPASS trial. Clin Cancer Res 24(6):1344–1354CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen PJ, Kuk D, Castillo CF, Basturk O, Wolfgang CL, Cameron JL et al (2017) Multi-institutional validation study of the American joint commission on cancer (8th edition) changes for T and N staging in patients with pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 265(1):185–191CrossRef Allen PJ, Kuk D, Castillo CF, Basturk O, Wolfgang CL, Cameron JL et al (2017) Multi-institutional validation study of the American joint commission on cancer (8th edition) changes for T and N staging in patients with pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 265(1):185–191CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwon W, He J, Higuchi R, Son D, Lee SY, Kim J et al (2018) Multinational validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition pancreatic cancer staging system in a pancreas head cancer cohort. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25(9):418–427CrossRef Kwon W, He J, Higuchi R, Son D, Lee SY, Kim J et al (2018) Multinational validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition pancreatic cancer staging system in a pancreas head cancer cohort. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25(9):418–427CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat van Roessel S, Kasumova GG, Verheij J, Najarian RM, Maggino L, de Pastena M et al (2018) International validation of the eighth edition of the American joint committee on cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. JAMA Surg 153(12):e183617CrossRef van Roessel S, Kasumova GG, Verheij J, Najarian RM, Maggino L, de Pastena M et al (2018) International validation of the eighth edition of the American joint committee on cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. JAMA Surg 153(12):e183617CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Costello E, Greenhalf W, Neoptolemos JP (2012) New biomarkers and targets in pancreatic cancer and their application to treatment. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9(8):435–444CrossRef Costello E, Greenhalf W, Neoptolemos JP (2012) New biomarkers and targets in pancreatic cancer and their application to treatment. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9(8):435–444CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat La Torre M, Cavallini M, Ramacciato G, Cosenza G, Rossi Del Monte S, Nigri G et al (2011) Role of the lymph node ratio in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Impact on patient stratification and prognosis. J Surg Oncol 104(6):629–633CrossRef La Torre M, Cavallini M, Ramacciato G, Cosenza G, Rossi Del Monte S, Nigri G et al (2011) Role of the lymph node ratio in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Impact on patient stratification and prognosis. J Surg Oncol 104(6):629–633CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Elshaer M, Gravante G, Kosmin M, Riaz A, Al-Bahrani A (2017) A systematic review of the prognostic value of lymph node ratio, number of positive nodes and total nodes examined in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 99(2):101–106CrossRef Elshaer M, Gravante G, Kosmin M, Riaz A, Al-Bahrani A (2017) A systematic review of the prognostic value of lymph node ratio, number of positive nodes and total nodes examined in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 99(2):101–106CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Takaori K, Bassi C, Biankin A, Brunner TB, Cataldo I, Campbell F et al (2016) International Association of Pancreatology (IAP)/European Pancreatic Club (EPC) consensus review of guidelines for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology 16(1):14–27CrossRef Takaori K, Bassi C, Biankin A, Brunner TB, Cataldo I, Campbell F et al (2016) International Association of Pancreatology (IAP)/European Pancreatic Club (EPC) consensus review of guidelines for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology 16(1):14–27CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Nitta T, Nakamura T, Mitsuhashi T, Asano T, Okamura K, Tsuchikawa T et al (2017) The impact of margin status determined by the one-millimeter rule on tumor recurrence and survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Surg Today 47(4):490–497CrossRef Nitta T, Nakamura T, Mitsuhashi T, Asano T, Okamura K, Tsuchikawa T et al (2017) The impact of margin status determined by the one-millimeter rule on tumor recurrence and survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Surg Today 47(4):490–497CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Demir IE, Jäger C, Schlitter AM, Konukiewitz B, Stecher L, Schorn S et al (2018) R0 versus R1 resection matters after pancreaticoduodenectomy, and less after distal or total pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 268(6):1058–1068CrossRef Demir IE, Jäger C, Schlitter AM, Konukiewitz B, Stecher L, Schorn S et al (2018) R0 versus R1 resection matters after pancreaticoduodenectomy, and less after distal or total pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 268(6):1058–1068CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaedcke J, Gunawan B, Grade M, Szöke R, Liersch T, Becker H et al (2010) The mesopancreas is the primary site for R1 resection in pancreatic head cancer: relevance for clinical trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395(4):451–458CrossRef Gaedcke J, Gunawan B, Grade M, Szöke R, Liersch T, Becker H et al (2010) The mesopancreas is the primary site for R1 resection in pancreatic head cancer: relevance for clinical trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395(4):451–458CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghaneh P, Palmer DH, Cicconi S, Halloran C, Psarelli EE, Rawcliffe CL et al (2020) ESPAC-5F: Four-arm, prospective, multicenter, international randomized phase II trial of immediate surgery compared with neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEMCAP) or FOLFIRINOX or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 38(15_suppl):4505CrossRef Ghaneh P, Palmer DH, Cicconi S, Halloran C, Psarelli EE, Rawcliffe CL et al (2020) ESPAC-5F: Four-arm, prospective, multicenter, international randomized phase II trial of immediate surgery compared with neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEMCAP) or FOLFIRINOX or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 38(15_suppl):4505CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Versteijne E, Suker M, Groothuis K, Akkermans-Vogelaar JM, Besselink MG, Bonsing BA et al (2020) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy versus immediate surgery for Resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: results of the Dutch randomized phase III PREOPANC trial. J Clin Oncol 38(16):1763–1773CrossRef Versteijne E, Suker M, Groothuis K, Akkermans-Vogelaar JM, Besselink MG, Bonsing BA et al (2020) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy versus immediate surgery for Resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: results of the Dutch randomized phase III PREOPANC trial. J Clin Oncol 38(16):1763–1773CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Chatterjee D, Katz MH, Rashid A, Varadhachary GR, Wolff RA, Wang H et al (2012) Histologic grading of the extent of residual carcinoma following neoadjuvant chemoradiation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a predictor for patient outcome. Cancer 118(12):3182–3190CrossRef Chatterjee D, Katz MH, Rashid A, Varadhachary GR, Wolff RA, Wang H et al (2012) Histologic grading of the extent of residual carcinoma following neoadjuvant chemoradiation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a predictor for patient outcome. Cancer 118(12):3182–3190CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Janssen BV, Tutucu F, van Roessel S, Adsay V, Basturk O, Campbell F et al (2021) Amsterdam International Consensus Meeting: tumor response scoring in the pathology assessment of resected pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. Mod Pathol 34(1):4–12CrossRef Janssen BV, Tutucu F, van Roessel S, Adsay V, Basturk O, Campbell F et al (2021) Amsterdam International Consensus Meeting: tumor response scoring in the pathology assessment of resected pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. Mod Pathol 34(1):4–12CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kakar S, Shi C, Berho M, Driman D, Fitzgibbons P, Frankel W et al (2017) Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with primary carcinoma of the colon and rectum. College of American Pathologists (CAP), Kakar S, Shi C, Berho M, Driman D, Fitzgibbons P, Frankel W et al (2017) Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with primary carcinoma of the colon and rectum. College of American Pathologists (CAP),
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Pishvaian MJ, Bender RJ, Halverson D, Rahib L, Hendifar AE, Mikhail S et al (2018) Molecular profiling of patients with pancreatic cancer: initial results from the know your tumor initiative. Clin Cancer Res 24(20):5018–5027CrossRef Pishvaian MJ, Bender RJ, Halverson D, Rahib L, Hendifar AE, Mikhail S et al (2018) Molecular profiling of patients with pancreatic cancer: initial results from the know your tumor initiative. Clin Cancer Res 24(20):5018–5027CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Pishvaian MJ, Blais EM, Brody JR, Lyons E, DeArbeloa P, Hendifar A et al (2020) Overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer receiving matched therapies following molecular profiling: a retrospective analysis of the Know Your Tumor registry trial. Lancet Oncol 21(4):508–518CrossRef Pishvaian MJ, Blais EM, Brody JR, Lyons E, DeArbeloa P, Hendifar A et al (2020) Overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer receiving matched therapies following molecular profiling: a retrospective analysis of the Know Your Tumor registry trial. Lancet Oncol 21(4):508–518CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Golan T, Hammel P, Reni M, Van Cutsem E, Macarulla T, Hall MJ et al (2019) Maintenance olaparib for germline BRCA-mutated metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 381(4):317–327CrossRef Golan T, Hammel P, Reni M, Van Cutsem E, Macarulla T, Hall MJ et al (2019) Maintenance olaparib for germline BRCA-mutated metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 381(4):317–327CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Holter S, Borgida A, Dodd A, Grant R, Semotiuk K, Hedley D et al (2015) Germline BRCA mutations in a large clinic-based cohort of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 33(28):3124–3129CrossRef Holter S, Borgida A, Dodd A, Grant R, Semotiuk K, Hedley D et al (2015) Germline BRCA mutations in a large clinic-based cohort of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 33(28):3124–3129CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Waddell N, Pajic M, Patch A‑M, Chang DK, Kassahn KS, Bailey P et al (2015) Whole genomes redefine the mutational landscape of pancreatic cancer. Nature 518:495–501CrossRef Waddell N, Pajic M, Patch A‑M, Chang DK, Kassahn KS, Bailey P et al (2015) Whole genomes redefine the mutational landscape of pancreatic cancer. Nature 518:495–501CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Murai J, S‑yN H, Das BB, Renaud A, Zhang Y, Doroshow JH et al (2012) Trapping of PARP1 and PARP2 by clinical PARP inhibitors. Cancer Res 72(21):5588–5599CrossRef Murai J, S‑yN H, Das BB, Renaud A, Zhang Y, Doroshow JH et al (2012) Trapping of PARP1 and PARP2 by clinical PARP inhibitors. Cancer Res 72(21):5588–5599CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat McCabe N, Turner NC, Lord CJ, Kluzek K, Bialkowska A, Swift S et al (2006) Deficiency in the repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination and sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition. Cancer Res 66(16):8109–8115CrossRef McCabe N, Turner NC, Lord CJ, Kluzek K, Bialkowska A, Swift S et al (2006) Deficiency in the repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination and sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition. Cancer Res 66(16):8109–8115CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Moschetta M, George A, Kaye SB, Banerjee S (2016) BRCA somatic mutations and epigenetic BRCA modifications in serous ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 27(8):1449–1455CrossRef Moschetta M, George A, Kaye SB, Banerjee S (2016) BRCA somatic mutations and epigenetic BRCA modifications in serous ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 27(8):1449–1455CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Andrea AD (2010) Susceptibility pathways in Fanconi’s anemia and breast cancer. N Engl J Med 362(20):1909–1919CrossRef D’Andrea AD (2010) Susceptibility pathways in Fanconi’s anemia and breast cancer. N Engl J Med 362(20):1909–1919CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen A (2011) PARP inhibitors: its role in treatment of cancer. Chin J Cancer 30(7):463–471CrossRef Chen A (2011) PARP inhibitors: its role in treatment of cancer. Chin J Cancer 30(7):463–471CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Melisi D, Ossovskaya V, Zhu C, Rosa R, Ling J, Dougherty PM et al (2009) Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase‑1 inhibitor BSI-401 has antitumor activity and synergizes with oxaliplatin against pancreatic cancer, preventing acute neurotoxicity. Clin Cancer Res 15(20):6367–6377CrossRef Melisi D, Ossovskaya V, Zhu C, Rosa R, Ling J, Dougherty PM et al (2009) Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase‑1 inhibitor BSI-401 has antitumor activity and synergizes with oxaliplatin against pancreatic cancer, preventing acute neurotoxicity. Clin Cancer Res 15(20):6367–6377CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Pathologische Aufbereitung beim duktalen Adenokarzinom des Pankreas – was gibt es Neues?
verfasst von
Dr. Johanna Munding
Andrea Tannapfel
Publikationsdatum
15.03.2022
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Die Chirurgie / Ausgabe 5/2022
Print ISSN: 2731-6971
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-698X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-022-01615-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2022

Die Chirurgie 5/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Anzeige: Webinare zu Leitlinien in der Chirurgie

S3-Leitlinie „Adulte Weichgewebesarkome“

Passend zum Thema

ANZEIGE

AGO-Leitlinie 2024: Update zu CDK4 & 6 Inhibitoren

Die Kommission Mamma der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) hat am 02. März 2024 ihre aktualisierten Empfehlungen präsentiert.[1,2] Welchen Stellenwert CDK4 & 6 Inhibitoren in der Therapie des Hormonrezeptor-positiven (HR+), HER2-negativen (HER2-) Mammakarzinoms haben, erfahren Sie hier im Update.

ANZEIGE

Finale OS-Analyse der MONARCH-3-Studie vorgestellt

In der MONARCH-3-Studie erhielten Patientinnen mit fortgeschrittenem HR+, HER2- Brustkrebs Abemaciclib [1,a] in Kombination mit nicht-steroidalem Aromatasehemmer (nsAI). Die finalen Daten bestätigen den in früheren Analysen beobachteten Unterschied zugunsten der Kombinationstherapie. [2] Details dazu vom SABCS 2023.

ANZEIGE

Die Bedeutung der CDK4 & 6 Inhibition beim HR+, HER2- Mammakarzinom

Es erwarten Sie praxisrelevante Patientenfälle, kompakte Studiendarstellungen, informative Experteninterviews sowie weitere spannende Inhalte rund um das HR+, HER2- Mammakarzinom.