Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2018

16.02.2018 | Original Article

Perioperative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy with mini-laparotomy versus open hysterectomy for uterus weighing more than 250 g

verfasst von: Natasha Gupta, Shanti Mohling, Rebecca Mckendrick, Rayan Elkattah, Jenny Holcombe, Robert S. Furr, Todd Boren, Stephen DePasquale

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

To compare perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic hysterectomy and extraction of specimen via mini-laparotomy (RHML) versus open hysterectomy (OH) when uterus weighs more than 250 g. To study the factors determining the length of hospital stay in 2 groups. A retrospective analysis of all hysterectomies performed for uterus weighing more than 250 g from the year 2012 to 2015 was conducted. A total of 140 patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of surgery; RHML (n = 82) and OH (n = 58). Mini-laparotomy consisted of a customised incision connecting 2 left lateral port sites for specimen extraction after completing the hysterectomy robotically. Patient factors and perioperative outcomes were compared using Student’s t tests and Chi-square analysis. Mean length of stay (RHML = 1.4 days; OH = 3.4 days), estimated blood loss (EBL) (RHML = 119.9 ml; OH = 547.5 ml) and operative time (RHML = 191.5 min; OH = 162.8 min) were significantly different. No significant differences were noted for patient BMI, age, comorbidities, intraoperative complications, pathology of uterus and uterus weight. Postoperative complications were significantly different between two groups (RHML = 6.0%; OH = 15.5%; p = .021). None of the patients stayed less than 24 h in OH group compared to 59.8% patients in RHML group. Type of procedure (p = .004) and EBL (p = .002) significantly predicted the length of stay. Patients undergoing RHML have significantly shorter length of stay, EBL and postoperative complications than OH. The operative time for RHML was longer than OH, but the overall decreased length of stay overcomes this disadvantage. RHML approach retains the benefits of da Vinci, while simultaneously preserving the specimen.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Boggess JF et al (2009) Perioperative outcomes of robotically assisted hysterectomy for benign cases with complex pathology. Obstet Gynecol 114(3):585–593CrossRef Boggess JF et al (2009) Perioperative outcomes of robotically assisted hysterectomy for benign cases with complex pathology. Obstet Gynecol 114(3):585–593CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Visco AG, Advincula AP (2008) Robotic gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 112(6):1369–1384CrossRef Visco AG, Advincula AP (2008) Robotic gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 112(6):1369–1384CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Holloway RW, Patel SD, Ahmad S (2009) Robotic surgery in gynecology. Scand J Surg 98(2):96–109CrossRef Holloway RW, Patel SD, Ahmad S (2009) Robotic surgery in gynecology. Scand J Surg 98(2):96–109CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Payne TN, Dauterive FR (2008) A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(3):286–291CrossRef Payne TN, Dauterive FR (2008) A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(3):286–291CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat ElSahwi KS et al (2012) Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 124(2):260–264CrossRef ElSahwi KS et al (2012) Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 124(2):260–264CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen CC, Falcone T (2009) Robotic gynecologic surgery: past, present, and future. Clin Obstet Gynecol 52(3):335–343CrossRef Chen CC, Falcone T (2009) Robotic gynecologic surgery: past, present, and future. Clin Obstet Gynecol 52(3):335–343CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Advincula AP, Wang K (2009) Evolving role and current state of robotics in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16(3):291–301CrossRef Advincula AP, Wang K (2009) Evolving role and current state of robotics in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16(3):291–301CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Reza M et al (2010) Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery. Br J Surg 97(12):1772–1783CrossRef Reza M et al (2010) Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery. Br J Surg 97(12):1772–1783CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylan E et al (2017) Contained morcellation: review of current methods and future directions. Front Surg 4:15CrossRef Taylan E et al (2017) Contained morcellation: review of current methods and future directions. Front Surg 4:15CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) (2014) UPDATED Laparoscopic uterine power morcellation in hysterectomy and myomectomy: FDA safety communication, USFDA Administration, Editor US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) (2014) UPDATED Laparoscopic uterine power morcellation in hysterectomy and myomectomy: FDA safety communication, USFDA Administration, Editor
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kho KA, Anderson TL, Nezhat CH (2014) Intracorporeal electromechanical tissue morcellation: a critical review and recommendations for clinical practice. Obstet Gynecol 124(4):787–793CrossRef Kho KA, Anderson TL, Nezhat CH (2014) Intracorporeal electromechanical tissue morcellation: a critical review and recommendations for clinical practice. Obstet Gynecol 124(4):787–793CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Brolmann HA et al (2016) Laparoscopic power morcellation of presumed fibroids. Minerva Ginecol 68(3):352–363PubMed Brolmann HA et al (2016) Laparoscopic power morcellation of presumed fibroids. Minerva Ginecol 68(3):352–363PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Barron KI et al (2015) Association of the US Food and Drug Administration morcellation warning with rates of minimally invasive hysterectomy and myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol 126(6):1174–1180CrossRef Barron KI et al (2015) Association of the US Food and Drug Administration morcellation warning with rates of minimally invasive hysterectomy and myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol 126(6):1174–1180CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Srouji SS, Kaser DJ, Gargiulo AR (2015) Techniques for contained morcellation in gynecologic surgery. Fertil Steril 103(4):e34CrossRef Srouji SS, Kaser DJ, Gargiulo AR (2015) Techniques for contained morcellation in gynecologic surgery. Fertil Steril 103(4):e34CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Stine JE, Clarke-Pearson DL, Gehrig PA (2014) Uterine morcellation at the time of hysterectomy: techniques, risks, and recommendations. Obstet Gynecol Surv 69(7):415–425CrossRef Stine JE, Clarke-Pearson DL, Gehrig PA (2014) Uterine morcellation at the time of hysterectomy: techniques, risks, and recommendations. Obstet Gynecol Surv 69(7):415–425CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kho KA, Brown DN (2016) Surgical treatment of uterine fibroids within a containment system and without power morcellation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 59(1):85–92CrossRef Kho KA, Brown DN (2016) Surgical treatment of uterine fibroids within a containment system and without power morcellation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 59(1):85–92CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Falcone T, Walters MD (2008) Hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol 111(3):753–767CrossRef Falcone T, Walters MD (2008) Hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol 111(3):753–767CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kovac SR (2000) Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications. Obstet Gynecol 95(6 Pt 1):787–793PubMed Kovac SR (2000) Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications. Obstet Gynecol 95(6 Pt 1):787–793PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kovac SR, Cruikshank SH (1996) Guidelines to determine the route of oophorectomy with hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(6):1483–1488CrossRef Kovac SR, Cruikshank SH (1996) Guidelines to determine the route of oophorectomy with hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(6):1483–1488CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright JD et al (2016) Trends in use and outcomes of women undergoing hysterectomy with electric power morcellation. JAMA 316(8):877–878CrossRef Wright JD et al (2016) Trends in use and outcomes of women undergoing hysterectomy with electric power morcellation. JAMA 316(8):877–878CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Benedetti-Panici P et al (1996) Surgery by minilaparotomy in benign gynecologic disease. Obstet Gynecol 87(3):456–459CrossRef Benedetti-Panici P et al (1996) Surgery by minilaparotomy in benign gynecologic disease. Obstet Gynecol 87(3):456–459CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Muzii L et al (2007) Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus minilaparotomy hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(5):610–615CrossRef Muzii L et al (2007) Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus minilaparotomy hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(5):610–615CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Glasser MH (2005) Minilaparotomy myomectomy: a minimally invasive alternative for the large fibroid uterus. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12(3):275–283CrossRef Glasser MH (2005) Minilaparotomy myomectomy: a minimally invasive alternative for the large fibroid uterus. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12(3):275–283CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorsey JH et al (1996) Costs and charges associated with three alternative techniques of hysterectomy. N Engl J Med 335(7):476–482CrossRef Dorsey JH et al (1996) Costs and charges associated with three alternative techniques of hysterectomy. N Engl J Med 335(7):476–482CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Pasic RP et al (2010) Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(6):730–738CrossRef Pasic RP et al (2010) Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(6):730–738CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Perioperative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy with mini-laparotomy versus open hysterectomy for uterus weighing more than 250 g
verfasst von
Natasha Gupta
Shanti Mohling
Rebecca Mckendrick
Rayan Elkattah
Jenny Holcombe
Robert S. Furr
Todd Boren
Stephen DePasquale
Publikationsdatum
16.02.2018
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0792-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.