Background
Artemin, a member of the glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor family, is involved in a variety of neuronal functions such as development, regeneration and regulation of gene expression and neural activity. Artemin binds to the GFRα3/RET receptor complex and then activates several intracellular signaling pathways [
1]. Among several neurotrophic factors working in nociceptive pathways, artemin has been the subject of attention due to its unique characteristics that were recently reported. One important characteristic is that the receptor of artemin, GFRα3, is selectively expressed in adults to a subpopulation of nociceptive sensory and sympathetic neurons. This is also colocalized with the transient receptor potential (TRP) ion channel family proteins [
2,
3].
TRPV1/TRPA1 is a member of TRP family of cation channels [
4] and is expressed by a subset of small-sized DRG or trigeminal ganglia neurons [
5-
7]. In addition to the established effect of TRPV1 on noxious heat transduction, there have been many reports on the role of TRPA1; various kinds of noxious compounds activate TRPA1 through covalent modification of cysteines [
5,
8-
13], and TRPA1 is also activated by an endogenous aldehyde, 4-hydroxynonenal, bradykinin, intracellular pH and CO
2 [
8,
14-
16]. Several papers have indicated that TRPA1 is an important component of the transduction machinery through which noxious irritants and endogenous proalgesic molecules depolarize nociceptors to elicit inflammatory pain [
17,
18]. Therefore, there has been interest in the study of TRPA1 as it is crucial in pathological pain transduction, and the regulatory mechanisms of TRPA1 in persistent pain condition require further studies.
It has been reported that artemin has bi-directional results in the modulation in neuropathic and inflammatory pain. For example, administration of artemin prevented changes in the nociceptive pathway after peripheral nerve injury [
19-
22], and reversed nerve injury-induced pain behaviors [
20]. Conversely, artemin is reported to have a pronociceptive role in peripheral inflammation or nerve injury. The overexpression of artemin increased the expression of TRP channels in primary afferents and subsequent hyperalgesia [
23], and artemin administration induced a significant potentiation of TRPV1 function
in vitro and thermal hyperalgesia
in vivo [
24]. Further, artemin may have different effects on TRPV1 and TRPA1, namely an inhibitory effect on TRPA1 activity [
25], and a pronociceptive role on TRPV1 function [
24]. Therefore, we intended to examine in detail the long-term effects of artemin on pain behaviors and on the expression of TRP family channels using
in vivo and cultured DRG neurons. We observed an increase in artemin expression in the epidermis of inflamed skin and also peripheral nerves distal to a nerve injury. Increased artemin at peripheral sites was shown to affect the gene expression of TRPA1/V1 in primary afferents both
in vivo and
in vitro. All findings in the present study suggest the pivotal role of peripheral tissue-derived artemin in the regulation of TRPA1/V1 expression in primary afferents.
Discussion
In recent years, there has been interest in the study of artemin, a GDNF family member, because it has shown a very wide variety of effects, including bi-directional results in the modulation in neuropathic and inflammatory pain. Previous studies suggested a possible role of artemin as a survival factor of sensory and sympathetic neurons
in vitro and
in vivo. Systemic or intrathecal administration of artemin was shown to prevent the alteration of the nervous system that occurs after peripheral nerve injury [
19-
22]. Nerve injury-induced pain behaviors were also dose-dependently reversed by these treatments [
20]. In contrast, artemin is known to have a pivotal role in pain hypersensitivity after peripheral inflammation or nerve injury. For example, the important paper by Elitt et al. [
2] reported that the overexpression of artemin increased the expression of TRPV1 and TRPA1 in primary afferents and subsequent hyperalgesia, and increased neuronal activity. The application of artemin induced a significant potentiation of TRPV1 function
in vitro and thermal hyperalgesia [
24]. These bi-directional effects have been reported with another well-known neurotrophic factor, nerve growth factor (NGF). NGF is known to have an important role in the positive regulation of many pronociceptive molecules in primary afferents and also to increase pain behaviors. However, NGF has been found to reverse hyperalgesia in a neuropathic pain model when it was applied to a nerve injury site [
28,
29]. Bi-directional effects of artemin in persistent pain models clearly require further study.
Another interesting point is that artemin may have different effects on TRPV1 and TRPA1. We reported that short-term application of artemin inhibits TRPA1 channel activity and subsequent pain behaviors [
25]. However, acute application of artemin was reported to induce potentiation of TRPV1 and produce acute thermal hyperalgesia [
24]. Overall, these findings suggest that acute administration changes the expression of TRPA1 and TRPV1 differentially, and also that acute and long-term exposure to artemin has different effects on the activity of TRP channels. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of long-term or repeated application of artemin on pain behaviors and on the expression of TRP family channels using
in vivo and cultured DRG neurons. In the behavioral analysis in the present study, we confirmed that the repeated or continuous injection of artemin into the rat plantar surface induced mechanical and heat hyperalgesia. This is consistent with previous papers, in which artemin was injected peripherally into the mouse hindpaw [
24,
30], and anti-artemin partially reversed CFA-induced mechanical hyperalgesia [
31].
In the present study, we found that artemin mRNA was increased in the epidermis after CFA injection. Previous papers showed an artemin increase in the skin after CFA-induced peripheral inflammation [
24,
30] but lacked a morphological analysis of the skin. The cells expressing increased artemin mRNA have not been precisely identified but is presumed that they were keratinocytes. Artemin overexpression in mice, where the artemin gene was inserted after the K14 keratin promoter, produced a similar pattern of phenotypic changes of TRP channel expression in primary afferents, as well as behavioral changes, as found in the present study [
2,
23]. The
in situ hybridization signals showing artemin mRNA apparently increased in the epidermis 1d after CFA injection (Figure
1O, R) suggesting that keratinocytes express increased artemin mRNA. A paper examining human atopic dermatitis patients’ skin showed that fibroblasts, which accumulated in the lesion, expressed increased artemin [
32]. Therefore, the precise cellular origin of increased artemin in the inflamed epidermis/dermis is not clear at this point. In the dermis or hypodermis, there were a number of cells showing intensified signals of artemin mRNA after CFA injection. Eosin-labeled immune cells in the dermis also expressed increased artemin mRNA (Figure
1S); however, the detailed classification of the cells was not determined due to methodological limitations. In addition, smooth muscle-like cells in the blood vessels in the dermis expressed increased NGF mRNA after CFA injection (Figure
1K). An interesting point on NGF/artemin expression in the skin after CFA-induced inflammation is that it was much longer than that of NGF; the NGF increase terminated 1d after CFA injection. In contrast, the artemin increase started at 1d and continued for a few days. The long-term effects of artemin on pain may be more important than those of NGF, at least in the skin.
In the present study we found that artemin mRNA increased in the sciatic nerve distal to the nerve injury site. The sciatic nerve tissue was examined by RT-PCR, and in situ hybridization did not include the injury site, indicating the changes observed in the present study may not be a direct result of changes at the nerve injury site but may involve changes in the distal nerve, such as via Wallerian degeneration. Compared to NGF, artemin mRNA showed large and long-lasting upregulation after nerve injury. The increase was first detectable 7d after injury and continued for at least 3 weeks. These data also indicate that artemin has the characteristics of a long-lasting trophic factor in primary afferents.
In terms of regulatory effects of artemin on gene expression in primary afferents, most studies suggested a positive role of artemin on TRP channel expression [
23,
24,
32]. For example, TRPA1/V1 increases with artemin overexpression in mice and artemin and TRPA1/V1 increases
in situ in inflamed tissue. In the present study, we confirmed the direct regulatory effect of artemin on TRPA1/V1 expression in the primary afferent in two ways. Firstly, mRNA analysis of DRG tissue was done by RT-PCR and
in situ hybridization after artemin injection into the rat hindpaw
in vivo (Figure
3). Secondly, TRPA1/V1 mRNAs were measured using cultured rat DRG neurons (Figure
6). We could clearly show that artemin administration significantly up-regulated the expression of TRPA1/V1 in small to medium-sized DRG neurons, and we believe that these data are the first demonstration of direct effects of artemin on TRP channel expression in DRG neurons.
The time-course of the up-regulation of artemin and NGF after peripheral inflammation by CFA is intriguing (Figure
1). NGF produced a rapid and transient increase in mRNA, in contrast to artemin which had a more robust and long-lasting upregulation in the skin after CFA injection. This is consistent with data from mouse skin after CFA injection [
24]. Also the double-labeling experiments in the present study (Figure
4) indicate a higher colocalization between TRPA1/V1 and the artemin receptor, GFRα3, compared to that between TRPA1/V1 and the NGF receptor, TrkA. These data also support the pivotal role of periphery-derived artemin as a regulator of TRP channels in primary afferents. Considering that the injection of the rat plantar surface with artemin induces a significant increase of TRPV1/A1 expression in small to medium-sized L4-5 DRG neurons, the regulatory role of artemin on TRP channel expression and nociception is likely to be distinct and potent, like with NGF.
The p38 MAPK pathway has an important modulatory role of TRPV1 [
26,
27,
33] and TRPA1 [
34-
36]. Ji et al., [
26] found that activation of p38 in the DRG by periphery-derived NGF increases TRPV1 levels in nociceptor peripheral terminals and contributes to the maintenance of inflammatory pain. Therefore, we examined whether artemin regulates TRP channels in the DRG through the p38 MAPK pathway, and found the up-regulation of p-p38 and colocalization of p-p38 and TRPA1/V1 in the DRG
in vivo after artemin treatment. However, we demonstrated that the p38 inhibitor SB203580 significantly suppressed artemin-induced upregulation of TRPV1 in a DRG culture, and did not affect on TRPA1 expression. As previous papers suggested that p38 activation in small to medium-sized DRG neurons might have a very important role in the expression of TRPV1 or other pain related molecules [
26,
27,
33], the present finding that artemin-induced p38 has a pivotal role in TRPV1 channel expression is not surprising. Our data suggest that TRPA1 upregulation by peripherally increased artemin is mediated through different signaling cascades from p38 MAPK pathway, and the precise mechanism how artemin regulates TRPA1 expression in primary afferent neurons should be clarified. NGF has been long recognized as the only regulator of pain-related molecules in nociceptive neurons of primary afferents. However, we found increased artemin synthesis in the peripheral tissue after inflammation or nerve injury, which may have an important role in the regulation of TRP channel expression, as is the case with NGF.
Methods
Animals
All animal experiments conformed to the regulations of the Hyogo College of Medicine Committee on Animal Research and were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health on animal care. Male Sprague Dawley rats, aged 4 weeks for the DRG primary culture neurons and calcium imaging study, and those weighing 200–250 g for the other studies, were used. Plantar injection was performed under ether anesthesia, and surgical procedures were performed under sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg, i.p.) anesthesia. Additional doses of the anesthetics were given as needed. 50% Complete Freund’s adjuvant saline (CFA, 100 μl) was injected into the plantar surface of the left hind paw. Recombinant mouse artemin (R & D systems, 20 μg/ml, 100 μl) was injected into the plantar surface. DMSO was used as a vehicle control for the models using p38 inhibitor with the DRG primary culture neurons. L5 spinal nerve ligation was performed with some modifications to the original SPNL model [
37]. After anesthetizing the rats, the hair of the lower back was shaved and the skin was sterilized with 0.5% chlorhexidine. Using sterilized operating instruments, the left L5 spinal nerve was isolated and tightly ligated with 3–0 silk thread (L5 SPNL). Thereafter, the ligated spinal nerve was cut on the distal side to the ligated part. The right side was not subjected to any surgery. The wound was washed with distilled saline and sutured with 3–0 silk thread.
In situ hybridization histochemistry
Rats were perfused transcardially with 1% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB, pH 7.4) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PB. The bilateral L4-5 DRG neurons and sciatic nerve (1 cm length) 2 cm distal to the ligation were removed, and postfixed in the same fixative at 4°C overnight, followed by immersion in 20% sucrose in 0.1 m phosphate buffer at 4°C for 2 d. Thereafter, they were rapidly frozen in powdered dry ice, and cut on a cryostat at a thickness of 8 μm. For plantar skin samples, rats were sacrificed by decapitation under deep ether anesthesia. The plantar skin surface was removed, rapidly frozen, and cut on a cryostat at a thickness of 5 μm. Sections were thaw-mounted onto MAS-coated glass slides (Matsunami, Osaka, Japan). The details of the dual ISHH procedure have been described in our previous study [
6]. For autoradiography, the sections were coated with NTB emulsion (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) diluted 3:2 with distilled water at 45°C and exposed for 1–2 weeks in light-tight boxes at 4°C. After development in D-19 (Eastman Kodak) and fixation in 24% sodium thiosulfate, the sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, cleared in xylene, and coverslipped [
6].
For the co-expression study of the two different mRNAs on DRG neurons in naive rats, we used 35S-labeled RNA probes for TRPV1 (GenBank accession number AF029310, nucleotides 149–505), TRPA1 (GenBank accession number AY496961, nucleotides 302–788), and DIG-labeled probes for TrkA (GenBank accession number X05137, nucleotides 560–979) and GFRα3 (GenBank accession number AF184920, nucleotides 164–604) in the same sections.
Immunohistochemistry
The protocol for immunohistochemistry was based on the published ABC (Vectastain Elite ABC kit, Vector, CA, USA) method [
38]. The DRG sections on the MAS-coated glass were preincubated in TBS containing 10% normal goat serum (NGS) for 1 hour, then incubated in primary antibody for p-p38 (1:500, Cell Signaling Technology) in the same solution for 48 hours at 4°C. The sections were washed in TBS and then incubated in biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG (1:200; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) in TBS containing 5% NGS for 2 hours at 4°C, followed by incubation in avidin-biotin–peroxidase complex (Vectastain Elite ABC kit, Vector, CA, USA) for 1 hour at room temperature. The horseradish peroxidase reaction was developed in 0.1 M Tris-buffered saline, pH 7.4, containing 0.05% 3,39-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany), and 0.01% hydrogen peroxidase. Sections were then washed in TBS, mounted on slides, dried, and cover-slipped.
Image analysis
The statistical analyses of ISHH have been previously described in detail [
38-
40]. At least 3,000 neuronal profiles from four rats were quantified for each antisense probe in the single ISHH study. Measurements of the density of silver grains over randomly selected tissue profiles were performed using a computerized image analysis system (NIH Image, version 1.61), in which only neuronal profiles that contained nuclei were used for quantification. At a magnification of 200x and with brightfield illumination, upper and lower thresholds of gray level density were set such that only silver grains were accurately discriminated from the background in the outlined cell or tissue profile and were read by the computer, pixel by pixel. Subsequently, the area of discriminated pixels was measured and divided by the area of the outlined neuronal profile, giving a grain density (%) for each cell. To reduce the risk of biased sampling of the data because of varying emulsion thickness, we used a signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio for each cell in each tissue. The S/N ratio of an individual neuron and its cross-sectioned area, which was computed from the outlined profile, was plotted. Based on this scattergram, neurons with a grain density 5-fold that of the background level or higher (5 S/N ratio) were considered positively labeled for TRPA1, TRPV1 and GFRα3 mRNAs. To distinguish cell size-specific changes, we characterized the DRG neurons as small (<600 μm
2), medium (600-1200 μm
2) and large (>1200 μm
2), according to their cross-sectional area. Since a stereological approach was not used in this study, quantification of the data may represent a biased estimate of the actual numbers of neurons. The number of positively labeled DRG neurons was divided by the number of neuronal profiles counted in each DRG. Data are expressed throughout as mean ± SEM (%). The level of statistically significant difference was taken to be a probability of less than 5% (p < 0.05) [
40].
Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
For the CFA plantar injection model, the rats were sacrificed by decapitation under deep ether anesthesia at 3 h, 9 h, 12 h, 1d, 3d and 7d after CFA injection (n = 4 at each time point). The plantar skin was removed bilaterally. The SNL model rats were sacrificed by decapitation under deep ether anesthesia at 1d, 3d, 5d, 7d, 14d and 21d after the operation (n = 4 at each time point). The bilateral 1 cm long sciatic nerves were removed 2 cm away from the ligation. The samples were removed and rapidly frozen with powdered dry ice. They were stored at −80°C until use. Skin samples were cut on a cryostat at 40 μm thickness and collected in a 2.0 ml collection tube. Extraction of total RNA was carried out using the RNA extraction reagent ISOGEN (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan). For the DRG primary culture neurons, the incubated culture was washed with TBS and collected with 1 ml of ISOGEN. All samples were homogenized in 1 ml of ISOGEN regent, mixed with 200 μl of chloroform, and centrifuged for 15 minutes at 4°C and 12,000 g. The supernatant was mixed with 500 μl of isopropyl alcohol and centrifuged again under the same conditions.
For purification of total RNA from these samples, a PureLink
® RNA Micro Kit (Invitrogen, CA, USA) was used. RNA extraction was quantified by measurement of optical density at 260 nm. Samples of 3 μg of total RNA were mixed with 25 μl RT mixture to a final concentration 200 units of M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI), 20 units of RNase inhibitor (Promega), 0.8 μM dNTP, and 1 μg oligo dT primer in 1 x reaction buffer (pH 7.5; Promega). RT was carried out at 37°C for 60 minutes, following inactivation at 70°C for 10 minutes. The forward and reverse primers specific for rat NGF, artemin, TRPV1, TRPA1, GFRα3 and GAPDH were designed as shown in Table
1. The PCR reaction was performed in 10 μl of Taq PCR master mix kit (QIAGEN, CA, USA) and cDNA with a pair of 10-pmol primers for each gene on a DNA Thermal Cycler (GeneAmp PCR System 9700, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The PCR conditions for temperature cycles were different for each gene. The resulting PCR products were electrophoresed through a 1.25% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide and visualized with UV illumination. Each pair of forward and reverse primers presented a single band with the expected size.
Table 1
Sequence locations of primers used in this study
NGF | M36589 | 652-671 | 1016-997 |
Artemin | NM053397 | 852-871 | 1252-1233 |
TRPV1 | AF029310 | 149-168 | 505-486 |
TRPA1 | AY496961 | 302-321 | 788-769 |
GFRα3 | AF184920 | 164-183 | 604-585 |
GAPDH | M17701 | 80-99 | 350-331 |
Behavioral studies
Adult male Sprague–Dawley rats (200-250 g) were used for the behavioral analyses. Room temperature and lightning were kept stable for all testing. Rats were sufficiently habituated in the environment and tested for basal pain hypersensitivity. Thereafter, rats were administered 100 μl of artemin or PBS into the left hindpaw. One day after the administration, mechanical and thermal behavioral tests were started with a Dynamic Plantar Aesthesiometer (Ugo Basile, Italy) and the Hargreaves radiant heat apparatus, respectively. The Dynamic Plantar Aesthesiometer was used as the automated von Frey hair system. The threshold was taken as the force applied to the plantar surface at which the rats withdrew from it. For the 5-consecutive-day injection model, testing was performed just before injection. The first value for each test was removed from the data, and the averages from the subsequent three values were taken as the thermal and mechanical thresholds.
DRG primary culture neurons
DRG neurons were removed from 4-week Sprague–Dawley rats with a sterile technique, and were put into ice-cold Earle’s balanced salt solution (EBSS, Sigma). In order to remove the adhered fat and connective tissue, the DRG neurons were placed in 2 ml of EBSS with 1.25 mg/ml of collagenase P (Sigma) for 2 hours at 37°C. After incubation, the cell suspension was centrifuged for 5 minutes at 1000 rpm and the cell pellet was re-suspended in EBSS. The DRG neurons were mechanically dissociated with a Pasteur pipette in Neurobasal medium, 10% FCS, D-MEM, 2% B27 supplement plus (Miltenyi Biotec Inc, CA, USA), SMPCG and L-Glu. After dissociation, the cell suspension was filtered, plated onto poly-L-lysine coated plates, and incubated with the medium for 2 days. In order to exclude the effect of other growth factors, Neurobasal with 2% of B27 supplement plus, SMPCG and L-glu were used. For the artemin group, recombinant mouse artemin (100 ng/ml) was added to the medium. In the experiment with p38 MAPK inhibitor, SB203580 [4-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-(4-methylsulfinylphenyl)-5-(4-pyridyl)-1H-imidazole] (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA, USA) dissolved with DMSO was administered to the medium with artemin at the same time. SB203580 were used with two different dose: 2 μM and 20 μM. After an 18-hour incubation period, the DRG neurons were removed with a cell scraper and put into 1 ml of ISOGEN (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan).
Ca2+ imaging study
Ratiometric calcium imaging was performed using an Olympus fluorescence microscope equipped with a variable filter wheel (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA, USA) and a cooled digital CCD camera (Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan). Dual images (340 and 380 nm excitation, 510 nm emission) were collected and pseudo-color ratiometric images were monitored every 2 seconds during the experiment using an Axon Imaging Workbench 5.0 (INDEC BioSystems, Inc, Mountain View, CA, USA) [
41]. The DRG neurons were removed from 4-week Sprague–Dawley rats. After dissociation of the DRG neurons, the cell suspension was placed onto coverslips coated with poly-L-lysine and cultured for 18 to 24 hours with the same method as above (see DRG primary culture neurons in the Methods section). They were loaded with 4μM Fura-2 acetoxymethyl ester (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) for 40 minutes at 37°C. After the incubation, the coverslips were placed in a chamber connected to a gravity flow system to deliver various chemicals. One microscopic field on the coverslip, which contained 20 to 30 neurons, was randomly selected and measured. The data were collected from a total of 20 fields in each group (n = 4 each group). The system was loaded with a standard bath solution containing 140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl
2, 2 mM CaCl
2, 10 mM HEPES and 10 mM glucose pH7.4 (adjusted with NaOH). A standard bath solution was first applied to the cells for 20 seconds, followed by KCl (50 mM) for 20 seconds, and the cells were then washed with the standard bath solution for 5 minutes. For the TRPV1 study, capsaicin (200nM) was applied for 20 seconds and it was washed out again with the standard bath solution for 3 minutes. For the TRPA1 study, AITC (100 μM) was applied for 20 seconds and it was washed out for 3 minutes. Thereafter, capsaicin (1 μM) was perfused for 20 seconds. The number of agonist-responding neurons relative to KCl-responding neurons in each selected microscopic field was calculated and summed.
Quantification and Statistics
All results are expressed as mean ± SEM. An unpaired t-test was used for RT-PCR of DRG primary culture neurons and the calcium imaging data to compare the groups. A one-way ANOVA was used for the RT-PCR of CFA plantar injected skin and DRG primary culture with the p-p38 inhibitor. For all behavioral testing, a two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni posttests was used. Differences were accepted as significant if the probability was less than 5% (p < 0.05). All emulsion-coated slides were digitized with a Nikon DIAPHOT-300 microscope connected to a Nikon DXM1200 digital camera. We used Adobe Photoshop Element 10.0 (Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA, USA) to optimize the images and prepare all figures.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
YIM carried out all experiments and drafted the manuscript. HYM, KK and MO joined in the RT-PCR, in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, pain behavior and in the quantification of the data. HYG, SW and YD performed the DRG culture experiment and Ca imaging study. KK, HYM, MH conceived of the project, designed and joined the discussion. KN supervised the project and edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to data interpretation, have read and approved the final manuscript.