Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2017

25.10.2016 | Original Article

Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for treatment of esophageal carcinoma

verfasst von: Philip W. Chiu, Anthony Y. Teoh, Vivien W. Wong, Hon Chi Yip, Shannon M. Chan, Simon K. Wong, Enders K. Ng

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is technically challenging. Da Vinci Robotic system could improve surgical dissection with additional degree of freedom from robotic arms. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of performing MIE using Da Vinci Robotic system among patients with esophageal cancers. From 2009 to 2013, consecutive patients with esophageal cancers who received robotic-assisted MIE were recruited. We excluded tumors with suspected invasion to adjacent organs. Preoperative staging included EUS, CT thorax and abdomen and bronchoscopy. We perform mobilization of thoracic esophagus with two-field lymphadenectomy using robotic system, followed by laparoscopic gastric mobilization and hand-sewn cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. A total of 20 patients were recruited (16 male and 4 female) with mean age of 64.2 ± 8.8 years. All patients were successfully treated with robotic-assisted MIE with mean operative time of 499.5 ± 70 min and blood loss of 355.7 ± 329.6 mls. There was no pulmonary complication, while three patients sustained anastomotic leakage and managed conservatively. The mean hospital stay was 13 ± 6 days. Five patients had stage I tumors, five had stage II, and nine had stage III disease. One patient had complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The number of lymph node dissection was 18.2 ± 13.2, and 2.8 ± 5.7 nodes involved. The follow-up period was 21 ± 9 months, and the overall survival was 75 %. Robotic-assisted MIE is feasible and safe for treatment of esophageal cancers. The surgical dissection can be enhanced by improved ergonomics from robotic arms and sense of depth from 3D images.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Brusselaers N, Mattsson F, Lagergren J (2014) Hospital and surgeon volume in relation to long-term survival after oesophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 63(9):1393–1400CrossRefPubMed Brusselaers N, Mattsson F, Lagergren J (2014) Hospital and surgeon volume in relation to long-term survival after oesophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 63(9):1393–1400CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H, Shibakita M, Tonomoto Y, Dhar DK, Nagasue N (2005) Clinical outcomes of extended esophagectomy with three field lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Surg 189:98–109CrossRefPubMed Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H, Shibakita M, Tonomoto Y, Dhar DK, Nagasue N (2005) Clinical outcomes of extended esophagectomy with three field lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Surg 189:98–109CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Peters JH, Chandrasoma P, DeMeester TR (2001) Curative resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma: analysis of 100 En Bloc Esophagectomies. Ann Surg 234(4):520–531CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Peters JH, Chandrasoma P, DeMeester TR (2001) Curative resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma: analysis of 100 En Bloc Esophagectomies. Ann Surg 234(4):520–531CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, De Boer AG, Wijnhoven BP, Tijssen JG, Fockens P, Stalmeier PF, Ten Kate FJ, van Dekken H, Obertop H, Tilanus HW, van Lanschot JJ (2002) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 347(21):1662–1669CrossRefPubMed Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, De Boer AG, Wijnhoven BP, Tijssen JG, Fockens P, Stalmeier PF, Ten Kate FJ, van Dekken H, Obertop H, Tilanus HW, van Lanschot JJ (2002) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 347(21):1662–1669CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJ (2001) Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 72:306–313CrossRefPubMed Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJ (2001) Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 72:306–313CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, Levy RM, Keeley S, Shende M, Christie NA, Weksler B, Landreneau RJ, Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Nason KS (2012) Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review over 1000 patients. Ann Surg 256:95–103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, Levy RM, Keeley S, Shende M, Christie NA, Weksler B, Landreneau RJ, Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Nason KS (2012) Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review over 1000 patients. Ann Surg 256:95–103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Law S, Wong J (2001) Two field dissection is enough for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 14:98–103CrossRefPubMed Law S, Wong J (2001) Two field dissection is enough for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 14:98–103CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Omloo JM, Lagarde SM, Hulscher JB, Reitsma JB, Forkens P, van Dekken H, ten Kate FJ, Obertop H, Tilanus HW, van Lanschot JJ (2007) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus. Ann Surg 246:992–1001CrossRefPubMed Omloo JM, Lagarde SM, Hulscher JB, Reitsma JB, Forkens P, van Dekken H, ten Kate FJ, Obertop H, Tilanus HW, van Lanschot JJ (2007) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus. Ann Surg 246:992–1001CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S (1992) Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R College Surg Edinb 37:7–11 Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S (1992) Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R College Surg Edinb 37:7–11
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, Thomas JM (2007) Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg 245(2):232–240CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, Thomas JM (2007) Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg 245(2):232–240CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunst CM, Swanstrom L (2010) Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 14(Suppl 1):S108–S114CrossRefPubMed Dunst CM, Swanstrom L (2010) Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 14(Suppl 1):S108–S114CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, Yakoub D, James D, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Moorthy K, Athanasiou T (2010) Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24:1621–1629CrossRefPubMed Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, Yakoub D, James D, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Moorthy K, Athanasiou T (2010) Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24:1621–1629CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lazzarino AI, Nagpal K, Bottle A, Faiz O, Moorthy K, Aylin P (2010) Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England. Ann Surg 252:292–298CrossRefPubMed Lazzarino AI, Nagpal K, Bottle A, Faiz O, Moorthy K, Aylin P (2010) Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England. Ann Surg 252:292–298CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, Takada N, Lee S, Ueno M, Tanaka Y, Fukuhara K, Hashimoto Y, Fujiwara Y, Kinoshita H (2003) Learning curve of video assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus and results. Surg Endosc 17:515–519CrossRefPubMed Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, Takada N, Lee S, Ueno M, Tanaka Y, Fukuhara K, Hashimoto Y, Fujiwara Y, Kinoshita H (2003) Learning curve of video assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus and results. Surg Endosc 17:515–519CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kernstine KH (2008) The first series of completely robotic esophagectomies with three-field lymphadenectomy: initial experience. Surg Endosc 22(9):2102CrossRefPubMed Kernstine KH (2008) The first series of completely robotic esophagectomies with three-field lymphadenectomy: initial experience. Surg Endosc 22(9):2102CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim DJ, Hyung WJ, Lee CY, Lee JG, Haam SJ, Park IK, Chung KY (2010) Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: feasibility and safety of robotic assistance in the prone position. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139(1):53–59CrossRefPubMed Kim DJ, Hyung WJ, Lee CY, Lee JG, Haam SJ, Park IK, Chung KY (2010) Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: feasibility and safety of robotic assistance in the prone position. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139(1):53–59CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Suda K, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y, Inaba K, Kanaya S, Teramukai S, Satoh S, Uyama I (2012) Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the prone position: technical report and short-term outcomes. World J Surg 36(7):1608–1616CrossRefPubMed Suda K, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y, Inaba K, Kanaya S, Teramukai S, Satoh S, Uyama I (2012) Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the prone position: technical report and short-term outcomes. World J Surg 36(7):1608–1616CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Hawn MT (2013) Technical aspects and early results of robotic esophagectomy with chest anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145(1):90–96CrossRefPubMed Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Hawn MT (2013) Technical aspects and early results of robotic esophagectomy with chest anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145(1):90–96CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for treatment of esophageal carcinoma
verfasst von
Philip W. Chiu
Anthony Y. Teoh
Vivien W. Wong
Hon Chi Yip
Shannon M. Chan
Simon K. Wong
Enders K. Ng
Publikationsdatum
25.10.2016
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0644-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Letter to the Editor

“Vesica Patavina” (lat.)

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.