Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Surgical Endoscopy
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2013

01.01.2013 | Guidelines

SAGES evidence-based guidelines for the laparoscopic resection of curable colon and rectal cancer

verfasst von: Marc Zerey, Lisa Martin Hawver, Ziad Awad, Dimitrios Stefanidis, William Richardson, Robert D. Fanelli, Members of the SAGES Guidelines Committee

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

The following recommendations regarding the safe performance of laparoscopic resection for curable colon and rectal cancer are intended for surgeons experienced in both minimally invasive surgery and the surgical treatment of patients with colon and rectal cancer. This document does not address the endoscopic screening or surveillance for colorectal cancer. The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) previously published a joint statement regarding the credentialing process [1]. SAGES also has published guidelines that specifically address credentialing surgeons for laparoscopic procedures in general [2]. …
Literatur
1.
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (1994) Approved statement on laparoscopic colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:8–12
2.
3.
4.
Berends FJ et al (1994) Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy. Lancet 344(8914):58PubMedCrossRef
5.
Tseng LN et al (1998) Port-site metastases. Impact of local tissue trauma and gas leakage. Surg Endosc 12(12):1377–1380PubMedCrossRef
6.
Guyatt GH et al (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336(7650):924–926PubMedCrossRef
7.
Simmang CL et al (1999) Practice parameters for detection of colorectal neoplasms. The Standards Committee, The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 42(9):1123–1129PubMedCrossRef
8.
Winawer S et al (2003) Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale—update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 124(2):544–560PubMedCrossRef
9.
Otchy D et al (2004) Practice parameters for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 47(8):1269–1284PubMedCrossRef
10.
Cho YB et al (2007) Tumor localization for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Surg 31(7):1491–1495PubMedCrossRef
11.
Larach SW et al (1997) Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Analysis and comparison of early vs. latter experience. Dis Colon Rectum 40(5):592–596PubMedCrossRef
12.
Wexner SD et al (1995) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery—are we being honest with our patients? Dis Colon Rectum 38(7):723–727PubMedCrossRef
13.
Piscatelli N, Hyman N, Osler T (2005) Localizing colorectal cancer by colonoscopy. Arch Surg 140(10):932–935PubMedCrossRef
14.
Vaziri K, Choxi SC, Orkin BA (2010) Accuracy of colonoscopic localization. Surg Endosc 24(10):2502–2505PubMedCrossRef
15.
Feingold DL et al (2004) Safety and reliability of tattooing colorectal neoplasms prior to laparoscopic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 8(5):543–546PubMedCrossRef
16.
Arteaga-Gonzalez I et al (2006) The use of preoperative endoscopic tattooing in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery for endoscopically advanced tumors: a prospective comparative clinical study. World J Surg 30(4):605–611PubMedCrossRef
17.
Park JW et al (2008) The usefulness of preoperative colonoscopic tattooing using a saline test injection method with prepackaged sterile India ink for localization in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 22(2):501–505PubMedCrossRef
18.
Johnson CD et al (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 359(12):1207–1217PubMedCrossRef
19.
Yeung JM, Maxwell-Armstrong C, Acheson AG (2009) Colonic tattooing in laparoscopic surgery—making the mark? Colorectal Dis 11(5):527–530PubMedCrossRef
20.
Ward J et al (1999) Hepatic lesion detection: comparison of MR imaging after the administration of superparamagnetic iron oxide with dual-phase CT by using alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic analysis. Radiology 210(2):459–466PubMed
21.
Frazee RC et al (1992) Prospective, randomized trial of inpatient vs. outpatient bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 35(3):223–226PubMedCrossRef
22.
Lee EC et al (1996) Inpatient vs. outpatient bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 39(4):369–373PubMedCrossRef
23.
Monson JR et al (2012) Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum (in press)
24.
Baum ML et al (1981) A survey of clinical trials of antibiotic prophylaxis in colon surgery: evidence against further use of no-treatment controls. N Engl J Med 305(14):795–799PubMedCrossRef
25.
Chung M, Steinmetz OK, Gordon PH (1993) Perioperative blood transfusion and outcome after resection for colorectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 80(4):427–432PubMedCrossRef
26.
Busch OR et al (1993) Blood transfusions and prognosis in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 328(19):1372–1376PubMedCrossRef
27.
Stahl TJ et al (2006) Practice parameters for the prevention of venous thrombosis. Dis Colon Rectum 49(10):1477–1483PubMedCrossRef
28.
Slim K et al (2009) Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on the role of mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 249(2):203–209PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zhu QD et al (2010) Efficacy of mechanical bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol in prevention of postoperative complications in elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 25(2):267–275PubMedCrossRef
30.
Brownson P, Jenkins SA, Nott D et al (1992) Mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery: results of a prospective, randomized trial. Br J Surg 79:461–462
31.
Contant CM et al (2007) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 370(9605):2112–2117PubMedCrossRef
32.
Fa-Si-Oen P et al (2005) Mechanical bowel preparation or not? Outcome of a multicenter, randomized trial in elective open colon surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48(8):1509–1516PubMedCrossRef
33.
Miettinen RP et al (2000) Bowel preparation with oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution vs. no preparation in elective open colorectal surgery: prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 43(5):669–675; discussion 675–677PubMedCrossRef
34.
Lanthaler M et al (2008) Intraoperative colonoscopy for anastomosis assessment in laparoscopically assisted left-sided colon resection: is it worthwhile? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18(1):27–31PubMedCrossRef
35.
Li VK et al (2009) Use of routine intraoperative endoscopy in elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery: can it further avoid anastomotic failure? Surg Endosc 23(11):2459–2465PubMedCrossRef
36.
Ishihara S, Watanabe T, Nagawa H (2008) Intraoperative colonoscopy for stapled anastomosis in colorectal surgery. Surg Today 38(11):1063–1065PubMedCrossRef
37.
Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef
38.
Nelson H et al (2001) Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(8):583–596PubMedCrossRef
39.
Lacy AM et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359(9325):2224–2229PubMedCrossRef
40.
Hewett PJ et al (2008) Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 248(5):728–738PubMedCrossRef
41.
Guillou PJ et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726PubMedCrossRef
42.
Veldkamp R et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484PubMedCrossRef
43.
Kawamura YJ et al (2000) Effect of high ligation on the long-term result of patients with operable colon cancer, particularly those with limited nodal involvement. Eur J Surg 166(10):803–807PubMedCrossRef
44.
Wiggers T et al (1988) No-touch isolation technique in colon cancer: a controlled prospective trial. Br J Surg 75(5):409–415PubMedCrossRef
45.
Rouffet F et al (1994) Curative resection for left colonic carcinoma: hemicolectomy vs. segmental colectomy. A prospective, controlled, multicenter trial. French Association for Surgical Research. Dis Colon Rectum 37(7):651–659PubMedCrossRef
46.
Poon JT et al (2009) Impact of the standardized medial-to-lateral approach on outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection. World J Surg 33(10):2177–2182PubMedCrossRef
47.
Liang JT et al (2003) Comparison of medial-to-lateral versus traditional lateral-to-medial laparoscopic dissection sequences for resection of rectosigmoid cancers: randomized controlled clinical trial. World J Surg 27(2):190–196PubMedCrossRef
48.
Senagore AJ et al (2003) Results of a standardized technique and postoperative care plan for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a 30-month experience. Dis Colon Rectum 46(4):503–509PubMedCrossRef
49.
Slanetz CA Jr (1984) The effect of inadvertent intraoperative perforation on survival and recurrence in colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 27(12):792–797PubMedCrossRef
50.
Kwok SP et al (1996) Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted large bowel excision for cancer. Ann Surg 223(2):170–176PubMedCrossRef
51.
Chang GJ et al (2012) Practice parameters for the management of colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 55(8):831–843
52.
Beck DE et al (2011) The ASCRS textbook of colon and rectal surgery, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
53.
Tjandra JJ et al (2005) Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 48(3):411–423PubMedCrossRef
54.
Morino M et al (2003) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a consecutive series of 100 patients. Ann Surg 237(3):335–342PubMed
55.
Cheung HY et al (2009) Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery with and without neoadjuvant chemo-irradiation: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 23(1):147–152PubMedCrossRef
56.
Hasegawa H et al (2007) Short- and midterm outcomes of laparoscopic surgery compared for 131 patients with rectal and rectosigmoid cancer. Surg Endosc 21(6):920–924PubMedCrossRef
57.
Miyajima N et al (2009) Results of a multicenter study of 1,057 cases of rectal cancer treated by laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23(1):113–118PubMedCrossRef
58.
Ng KH et al (2009) Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancers: lessons learned from 579 cases. Ann Surg 249(1):82–86PubMedCrossRef
59.
Jayne DG et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25(21):3061–3068PubMedCrossRef
60.
Jayne DG et al (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASSIC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97(11):1638–1645PubMedCrossRef
61.
Jayne DG et al (2005) Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 92(9):1124–1132PubMedCrossRef
62.
Kang SB et al (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11(7):637–645PubMedCrossRef
63.
Buunen M et al (2009) COLOR II. A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. Dan Med Bull 56(2):89–91PubMed
64.
Kitano S et al (2005) Randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Jpn J Clin Oncol 35(8):475–477PubMedCrossRef
65.
Nandakumar G, Fleshman JW (2010) Laparoscopy for rectal cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 19(4):793–802PubMedCrossRef
66.
Lim SB et al (2008) Optimal surgery time after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancers. Ann Surg 248(2):243–251PubMedCrossRef
67.
Francois Y et al (1999) Influence of the interval between preoperative radiation therapy and surgery on downstaging and on the rate of sphincter-sparing surgery for rectal cancer: the Lyon R90–01 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 17(8):2396PubMed
68.
Horn A, Morild I, Dahl O (1990) Tumour shrinkage and down staging after preoperative radiation of rectal adenocarcinomas. Radiother Oncol 18(1):19–28PubMedCrossRef
69.
Sugarbaker PH, Corlew S (1982) Influence of surgical techniques on survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 25(6):545–557PubMedCrossRef
70.
Bonfanti G et al (1982) Results of extended surgery for cancer of the rectum and sigmoid. Br J Surg 69(6):305–307PubMedCrossRef
71.
Curley SA et al (1992) Extended resection for locally advanced colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 163(6):553–559PubMedCrossRef
72.
Veldkamp R et al (2004) Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18(8):1163–1185PubMedCrossRef
73.
Smithers BM et al (1986) Emergency right hemicolectomy in colon carcinoma: a prospective study. Aust N Z J Surg 56(10):749–752PubMedCrossRef
74.
Runkel NS et al (1998) Improved outcome after emergency surgery for cancer of the large intestine. Br J Surg 85(9):1260–1265PubMedCrossRef
75.
Ng SS et al (2008) Emergency laparoscopic-assisted versus open right hemicolectomy for obstructing right-sided colonic carcinoma: a comparative study of short-term clinical outcomes. World J Surg 32(3):454–458PubMedCrossRef
76.
Ng SS et al (2006) Emergency laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy for obstructing right-sided colon carcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16(4):350–354PubMedCrossRef
77.
Lopez-Kostner F, Hool GR, Lavery IC (1997) Management and causes of acute large-bowel obstruction. Surg Clin North Am 77(6):1265–1290PubMedCrossRef
78.
The SCOTIA Study Group (1995) Single-stage treatment for malignant left-sided colonic obstruction: a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing subtotal colectomy with segmental resection following intraoperative irrigation. The SCOTIA Study Group. Subtotal Colectomy versus On-table Irrigation and Anastomosis. Br J Surg 82(12):1622–1627
79.
Cheung HY et al (2009) Endolaparoscopic approach vs conventional open surgery in the treatment of obstructing left-sided colon cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 144(12):1127–1132PubMedCrossRef
80.
Johnstone PA et al (1996) Port site recurrences after laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures in malignancy. J Clin Oncol 14(6):1950–1956PubMed
81.
Kirman I et al (2004) Depletion of circulating insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 after open surgery is associated with high interleukin-6 levels. Dis Colon Rectum 47(6):11–17; discussion 917–918CrossRef
82.
Lee SW et al (2003) Peritoneal macrophage and blood monocyte functions after open and laparoscopic-assisted cecectomy in rats. Surg Endosc 17(12):1996–2002PubMedCrossRef
83.
Carter JJ et al (2003) Laparoscopic-assisted cecectomy is associated with decreased formation of postoperative pulmonary metastases compared with open cecectomy in a murine model. Surgery 134(3):432–436PubMedCrossRef
84.
Whelan RL et al (2003) Postoperative cell mediated immune response is better preserved after laparoscopic vs open colorectal resection in humans. Surg Endosc 17(6):972–978PubMedCrossRef
85.
Lee SW et al (2002) Higher colon cancer tumor proliferative index and lower tumor cell death rate in mice undergoing laparotomy versus insufflation. Surg Endosc 16(1):36–39PubMedCrossRef
86.
Carter JJ et al (2006) Perioperative immunomodulation with Flt3 kinase ligand or a whole tumor cell vaccine is associated with a reduction in lung metastasis formation after laparotomy in mice. Surg Innov 13(1):41–47PubMedCrossRef
87.
Carter JJ et al (2005) Significant reduction of laparotomy-associated lung metastases and subcutaneous tumors after perioperative immunomodulation with flt3 ligand in mice. Surg Innov 12(4):319–325PubMedCrossRef
88.
Kirman I et al (2002) Combined whole tumor cell and monophosphoryl lipid A vaccine improved by encapsulation in murine colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 16(4):654–658PubMedCrossRef
89.
Carter JJ, Whelan RL (2001) The immunologic consequences of laparoscopy in oncology. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 10(3):655–677PubMed
90.
Allendorf JD et al (1999) Increased tumor establishment and growth after open vs laparoscopic surgery in mice may be related to differences in postoperative T-cell function. Surg Endosc 13(3):233–235PubMedCrossRef
91.
Wittich P et al (2000) Port-site metastases after CO(2) laparoscopy. Is aerosolization of tumor cells a pivotal factor? Surg Endosc 14(2):189–192PubMedCrossRef
92.
Stocchi L, Nelson H (1998) Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: trial update. J Surg Oncol 68(4):255–267PubMedCrossRef
93.
Fleshman J et al (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246(4):655–662; discussion 662–664PubMedCrossRef
94.
Lacy AM et al (2008) The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg 248(1):1–7PubMedCrossRef
95.
Reilly WT et al (1996) Wound recurrence following conventional treatment of colorectal cancer. A rare but perhaps underestimated problem. Dis Colon Rectum 39(2):200–207PubMedCrossRef
96.
Braumann C et al (2000) Influence of intraperitoneal and systemic application of taurolidine and taurolidine/heparin during laparoscopy on intraperitoneal and subcutaneous tumour growth in rats. Clin Exp Metastasis 18(7):547–552PubMedCrossRef
97.
Iwanaka T, Arya G, Ziegler MM (1998) Mechanism and prevention of port-site tumor recurrence after laparoscopy in a murine model. J Pediatr Surg 33(3):457–461PubMedCrossRef
98.
Jacobi CA et al (1999) Influence of different gases and intraperitoneal instillation of antiadherent or cytotoxic agents on peritoneal tumor cell growth and implantation with laparoscopic surgery in a rat model. Surg Endosc 13(10):1021–1025PubMedCrossRef
99.
Neuhaus SJ et al (1999) Influence of cytotoxic agents on intraperitoneal tumor implantation after laparoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 42(1):10–15PubMedCrossRef
100.
Neuhaus SJ et al (1999) Experimental study of the effect of intraperitoneal heparin on tumour implantation following laparoscopy. Br J Surg 86(3):400–404PubMedCrossRef
101.
Lee SW et al (1999) Peritoneal irrigation with povidone-iodine solution after laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy significantly decreases port-tumor recurrence in a murine model. Dis Colon Rectum 42(3):319–326PubMedCrossRef
102.
Pigazzi A et al (2010) Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1614–1620PubMedCrossRef
103.
Koh, Tsang CB, Kim SH (2011) A new application of the four-arm standard da Vinci(R) surgical system: totally robotic-assisted left-sided colon or rectal resection. Surg Endosc 25(6):1945–1952PubMedCrossRef
104.
DeNoto G, Rubach, Ravikumar TS (2006) A standardized technique for robotically performed sigmoid colectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16(6):551–556PubMedCrossRef
105.
D’Annibale A et al (2010) Robotic right colon resection: evaluation of first 50 consecutive cases for malignant disease. Ann Surg Oncol 17(11):2856–2862PubMedCrossRef
106.
deSouza AL et al (2010) Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role? Dis Colon Rectum 53(7):1000–1006PubMedCrossRef
107.
Zimmern A et al (2010) Robotic colon and rectal surgery: a series of 131 cases. World J Surg 34(8):1954–1958PubMedCrossRef
108.
Ceccarelli G et al (2010) Laparoscopic resection with intracorporeal anastomosis for colon carcinoma located in the splenic flexure. Surg Endosc 24(7):1784–1788PubMedCrossRef
109.
Patriti A et al (2009) Laparoscopic and robot-assisted one-stage resection of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: a pilot study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16(4):450–457PubMedCrossRef
110.
Luca F et al (2009) Full robotic left colon and rectal cancer resection: technique and early outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 16(5):1274–1278PubMedCrossRef
111.
Spinoglio G et al (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum 51(11):1627–1632PubMedCrossRef
112.
Rawlings AL et al (2007) Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 21(10):1701–1708PubMedCrossRef
113.
Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Crawford DL (2006) Telerobotic surgery for right and sigmoid colectomies: 30 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 20(11):1713–1718PubMedCrossRef
114.
Kang J et al (2012) Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure. Ann Surg Oncol 19(1):154–155PubMedCrossRef
115.
Luca F et al (2011) Surgical and pathological outcomes after right hemicolectomy: case-matched study comparing robotic and open surgery. Int J Med Robot. doi:10.​1002/​rcs.​398 PubMed
116.
Park IJ et al (2009) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: lessons from 1,000 cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 23(4):839–846PubMedCrossRef
117.
Li JC et al (2009) The learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy: experience of a surgical fellow in an university colorectal unit. Surg Endosc 23(7):1603–1608PubMedCrossRef
118.
Akiyoshi T et al (2011) Learning curve for standardized laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer under supervision: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 25(5):1409–1414PubMedCrossRef
119.
Miskovic D et al (2010) Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 252(6):943–951PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
SAGES evidence-based guidelines for the laparoscopic resection of curable colon and rectal cancer
verfasst von
Marc Zerey
Lisa Martin Hawver
Ziad Awad
Dimitrios Stefanidis
William Richardson
Robert D. Fanelli
Members of the SAGES Guidelines Committee
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2592-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Dynamic Manuscript

Progression from laparoscopic-assisted to totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: comparison of circular stapler (i-DST) and linear stapler (BBT) for intracorporeal anastomosis

OriginalPaper

Safety and feasibility of sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese patients following liver transplantation

OriginalPaper

Transanal rectosigmoid resection via natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with total mesorectal excision in a large human cadaver series

OriginalPaper

Wait only to resuscitate: early surgery for acutely presenting paraesophageal hernias yields better outcomes

OriginalPaper

Management of benign ovarian cysts by a novel, gasless, single-incision laparoscopic technique: keyless abdominal rope-lifting surgery (KARS)

OriginalPaper

Preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery via laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy performed for diverticular disease: real benefit or technical challenge: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Recycling im OP – möglich, aber teuer

02.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Auch wenn sich Krankenhäuser nachhaltig und grün geben – sie tragen aktuell erheblich zu den CO2-Emissionen bei und produzieren jede Menge Müll. Ein Pilotprojekt aus Bonn zeigt, dass viele Op.-Abfälle wiederverwertet werden können.

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Gegen postoperative Darmmotilitätsstörung: Erster Kaffee schon im Aufwachraum

30.04.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Nach einer Operation kann es zu einer vorübergehenden Störung der Darmmotilität kommen, ohne dass es eine mechanische Ursache gibt. Auf eine postoperative Darmmotilitätsstörung weist besonders hin, wenn Nahrung oral nicht toleriert wird.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.
Bildnachweise