Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology 9/2013

01.09.2013 | Original Article

Size-appropriate radiation doses in pediatric body CT: a study of regional community adoption in the United States

verfasst von: Katharine L. Hopkins, David R. Pettersson, Caroline W. Koudelka, Kristopher Spinning, Petra L. Vajtai, Brooke R. Beckett, Dianna M. E. Bardo

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 9/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

During the last decade, there has been a movement in the United States toward utilizing size-appropriate radiation doses for pediatric body CT, with smaller doses given to smaller patients.

Objective

This study assesses community adoption of size-appropriate pediatric CT techniques. Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric body scans are compared between community facilities and a university children’s hospital that tailors CT protocols to patient size as advocated by Image Gently.

Materials and methods

We compared 164 pediatric body scans done at community facilities (group X) with 466 children’s hospital scans. Children’s hospital scans were divided into two groups: A, 250 performed with established pediatric weight-based protocols and filtered back projection; B, 216 performed with addition of iterative reconstruction technique and a 60% reduction in volume CT dose index (CTDIvol). SSDE was calculated and differences among groups were compared by regression analysis.

Results

Mean SSDE was 1.6 and 3.9 times higher in group X than in groups A and B and 2.5 times higher for group A than group B. A model adjusting for confounders confirmed significant differences between group pairs.

Conclusions

Regional community hospitals and imaging centers have not universally adopted child-sized pediatric CT practices. More education and accountability may be necessary to achieve widespread implementation. Since even lower radiation doses are possible with iterative reconstruction technique than with filtered back projection alone, further exploration of the former is encouraged.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Pierce DA, Preston DL (2000) Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res 154:178–186PubMedCrossRef Pierce DA, Preston DL (2000) Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res 154:178–186PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296PubMedCrossRef Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Paterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF (2001) Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:297–301PubMedCrossRef Paterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF (2001) Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:297–301PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Slovis TL (2011) Where we were, what has changed, what needs doing: a decade of progress. Pediatr Radiol 41:S456–S460CrossRef Slovis TL (2011) Where we were, what has changed, what needs doing: a decade of progress. Pediatr Radiol 41:S456–S460CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahesh M (2011) Advances in CT technology and application to pediatric imaging. Pediatr Radiol 41:S493–S497CrossRef Mahesh M (2011) Advances in CT technology and application to pediatric imaging. Pediatr Radiol 41:S493–S497CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Townsend BA, Callahan MJ, Zurakowski D et al (2010) Has pediatric CT at children’s hospitals reached its peak? AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1194–1196PubMedCrossRef Townsend BA, Callahan MJ, Zurakowski D et al (2010) Has pediatric CT at children’s hospitals reached its peak? AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1194–1196PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Arch ME, Frush DP (2008) Pediatric body MDCT: a 5-year follow-up survey of scanning parameters used by pediatric radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:611–617PubMedCrossRef Arch ME, Frush DP (2008) Pediatric body MDCT: a 5-year follow-up survey of scanning parameters used by pediatric radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:611–617PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh S, Kalra MK, Moore MA et al (2009) Dose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studies. Radiology 252:200–208PubMedCrossRef Singh S, Kalra MK, Moore MA et al (2009) Dose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studies. Radiology 252:200–208PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM et al (2011) Increasing use of CT in children visiting emergency departments, 1995–2007. Radiology 258:164–173PubMedCrossRef Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM et al (2011) Increasing use of CT in children visiting emergency departments, 1995–2007. Radiology 258:164–173PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss KJ, Goske MJ (2011) Estimated pediatric radiation dose during CT. Pediatr Radiol 41:S472–S482CrossRef Strauss KJ, Goske MJ (2011) Estimated pediatric radiation dose during CT. Pediatr Radiol 41:S472–S482CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2011) Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations (Report No. 204). American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2011) Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations (Report No. 204). American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park
15.
Zurück zum Zitat McCollough C, Branham T, Herlihy V et al (2011) Diagnostic reference levels from the ACR Accreditation Program. Am J Cancer Res 8:795–803 McCollough C, Branham T, Herlihy V et al (2011) Diagnostic reference levels from the ACR Accreditation Program. Am J Cancer Res 8:795–803
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Goske MJ, Phillips RR, Mandel K et al (2010) Image Gently: a web-based practice quality improvement program in CT safety for children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1177–1182PubMedCrossRef Goske MJ, Phillips RR, Mandel K et al (2010) Image Gently: a web-based practice quality improvement program in CT safety for children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1177–1182PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Kaste SC et al (2010) Image Gently: ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT does for pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgehol 194:868–873CrossRef Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Kaste SC et al (2010) Image Gently: ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT does for pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgehol 194:868–873CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Size-appropriate radiation doses in pediatric body CT: a study of regional community adoption in the United States
verfasst von
Katharine L. Hopkins
David R. Pettersson
Caroline W. Koudelka
Kristopher Spinning
Petra L. Vajtai
Brooke R. Beckett
Dianna M. E. Bardo
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2013
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe 9/2013
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2680-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2013

Pediatric Radiology 9/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.