nach oben

Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine

Erschienen in:

01.12.2012

Skull Stripping of Neonatal Brain MRI: Using Prior Shape Information with Graph Cuts

verfasst von: Dwarikanath Mahapatra

Erschienen in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Ausgabe 6/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a novel technique for skull stripping of infant (neonatal) brain magnetic resonance images using prior shape information within a graph cut framework. Skull stripping plays an important role in brain image analysis and is a major challenge for neonatal brain images. Popular methods like the brain surface extractor (BSE) and brain extraction tool (BET) do not produce satisfactory results for neonatal images due to poor tissue contrast, weak boundaries between brain and non-brain regions, and low spatial resolution. Inclusion of prior shape information helps in accurate identification of brain and non-brain tissues. Prior shape information is obtained from a set of labeled training images. The probability of a pixel belonging to the brain is obtained from the prior shape mask and included in the penalty term of the cost function. An extra smoothness term is based on gradient information that helps identify the weak boundaries between the brain and non-brain region. Experimental results on real neonatal brain images show that compared to BET, BSE, and other methods, our method achieves superior segmentation performance for neonatal brain images and comparable performance for adult brain images.

Shattuck, D., Sandor-Leahy, S., Schaper, K., Rottenberg, D., Leahy, R.: Magnetic resonance image tissue classification using a partial volume model. Neuroimage 13:856–876, 2001PubMedCrossRef

Hahn H, Peitgen H: The skull stripping problem in MRI solved by a single 3D watershed transform. In: MICCAI, 2000, pp 134–143

Smith S.: Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum. Brain Mapp. 17:143–155, 2002PubMedCrossRef

Zhuang, A., Valentino, D., Toga, A.: Skull stripping magnetic resonance brain images using a model-based level set. Neuroimage 32:79–92, 2006PubMedCrossRef

Huang A, Abugharbieh R, Ram R, Trabouslee A: MRI brain extraction with combined expectation maximization and geodesic active contours. In: IEEE Intl Symposium in Signal Processing and Information Technology, 2006

Segonne, F., Dale, A., Busa, E., Glesner, M., Salat, D., Hahn, H., Fischl, B.: A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in mri. Neuroimage 22:1060–1075, 2004PubMedCrossRef

Huppi, P., Warfield, S., Kikinis, R., Barnes, P., Zientara, G., FA, F.J., Tsuji, M., Volpe, J.: Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of brain development in premature and mature newborns. Ann. Neurol 43(2):224–235, 1998PubMedCrossRef

Shi, F., Fan, Y., Tang, S., Gilmore, J., Lin, W., Shen, D.: Neonatal brain image segmentation in longitudinal mri studies. Neuroimage 49:391–400, 2010PubMedCrossRef

Afni [online]. Available at: http://afni.nimh.nih.gov. Accessed 13 June 2011

10.

Freesurfer [online]. Available at: http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu. Accessed 15 June 2011

11.

Atkins, M., Mackiewich, B.: Fully automatic segmentation of the brain in mri. IEEE Trans Med Imag 417:98–107, 1998CrossRef

12.

Kapur, T., Grimson, W., Wells, W., Kikinis, R.: Segmentation of brain tissue from magnetic resonance images. Med Image Anal 1(2):109–127, 1996PubMedCrossRef

13.

Lemieux, L., Hag emann, G., Krakow, K., Woermann, F.: Fast, accurate and reproducible automatic segmentation of the brain in t1-weighted volume mri data. Magn.Reson. Med. 42:127–135, 1999PubMedCrossRef

14.

Sadananthan, S., Zheng, W., Chee, M., Zagorodnov, V.: Skull stripping using graph cuts. Neuroimage 49:225–239, 2010PubMedCrossRef

15.

Park, J., Keller, J.: Snakes on the watershed. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intelli. 23:1201–1205, 2001CrossRef

16.

Zeng, X., Staib, L., Schultz, R, Duncan, J.: Segmentation and measurement of the cortex from 3d mr images using coupled surfaces propagation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 18(10):100–111, 1999

17.

Rehm, K., Schaper, K., Anderson, J., Woods, R., Stoltzner, S., Rottenberg, D.: Putting our heads together a consensus approach to brain/non-brain segmentation in t1-weighted MR volumes. Neuroimage 22:1262–1270, 2004PubMedCrossRef

18.

Iglesias, J., Liu, C.Y., Thompson, P., Tu, Z.: Robust brain extraction across datasets and comparison with publicly available methods. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 30(9):1617–1634, 2011PubMedCrossRef

19.

Wels M, Carneiro G, Aplas A, Huber M, Hornegger J, Comaniciu D: A discriminative model-constrained graph cuts approach to fully automated pediatric brain tumor segmentation in 3-d MRI. In: MICCAI, 2008, pp 67–75

20.

Tu, Z., Zheng, S., Yuille, A., Reiss, A., Dutton, R., Lee, A., Galaburda, A., Dinov, I.Thompson, P., Toga, A.: Automated extraction of the cortical sulci based on a supervised learning approach. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 26(4):541–552, 2007PubMedCrossRef

21.

Shi, F., Yap, P.T., Fan, Y., Gilmore, J., Lin, W., Shen, D.: Construction of multi-regionmulti-reference atlases for neonatal brain mri segmentation. Neuroimage 51:684–693, 2010PubMedCrossRef

22.

Prastawa, M., Gilmore, J., Lin, W., Gerig, G.: Automatic segmentation of mr images of the developing newborn brain. Med. Image Anal. 9:457–466, 2005PubMedCrossRef

23.

Weisenfeld, N.,Warfield, S.: Automatic segmentation of newborn brain mri. Neuroimage 47:564–572, 2009PubMedCrossRef

24.

Boykov, Y., Veksler, O., Zabih, R.: Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 23(11):1222–1239, 2001CrossRef

25.

Bazin, P., Pham, D.: Topology-preserving tissue classification of magnetic resonance brain images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 26:487–496, 2007PubMedCrossRef

26.

Nishida, M., Makris, N., Kennedy, D., Vangel, M., Fischl, B., Krishnamoorthy, K., Caviness,V., Grant., P.: Detailed semiautomated mri based morphometry of the neonatal brain: preliminary results. NeuroImage 32:1041–1049, 2006PubMedCrossRef

27.

Pham, D., Prince, J.: An adaptive fuzzy c-means algorithmfor image segmentation in the presence of intensity inhomogeneities. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 20:57–68, 1999CrossRef

28.

Song Z, Awate S, Licht D, Gee J: Clinical neonatal brain mri segmentation using adaptive nonparametric data models and intensity-based markov priors. In: MICCAI, 2007, pp 883–890

29.

Xue, H., Srinivasan, L., Jiang, S., Rutherford, M., Edwards, A., Rueckert, D., Hajnal, J.: Automatic segmentation and reconstruction of the cortex from neonatal mri. Neuroimage 38:461–477, 2007PubMedCrossRef

30.

Freedman D, Zhang T: Interactive graph cut based segmentation with shape priors. In: CVPR, 2005, pp 755–762

31.

Slabaugh G, Unal G: Graph cuts segmentation using an elliptical shape prior. In: ICIP, 2005, pp 1222–1225

32.

Vu N, Manjunath B: Shape prior segmentation of multiple objects with graph cuts.In: CVPR, 2008

33.

Chittajallu D, Shah S, Kakadiaris I: A shape driven mrf model for the segmentation of organs in medical images. In: CVPR, 2010, pp 3233–3240

34.

Veksler O: Star shape prior for graph cut segmentation. In: ECCV, 2008, pp 454–467

35.

Chen, Y., Tagare, H., S. Thiruvenkadam, Huang, F., Wilson, D., Gopinath, K., Briggs, R., Geiser, E.: Using prior shapes in geometric active contours in a variational framework. Intl. J. Comp. Vis. 50(3):315–328, 2002CrossRef

36.

Diedrichsen, J., Balsters, J., Flavell, J., E, E.C., Ramnani, N.: A probabilistic mr atlas of the human cerebellum. NeuroImage 46(1):39–46, 2009PubMedCrossRef

37.

Chalana, V., Kim, Y.: A methodology for evaluation of boundary detection algorithms on medical images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 16(5):642–652, 1997PubMedCrossRef

38.

Huttenlocher, D., Klanderman, G., Rucklidge, W.: Comparing images using the hausdorff distance. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 15(9):850–863, 1993CrossRef

Titel: Skull Stripping of Neonatal Brain MRI: Using Prior Shape Information with Graph Cuts
verfasst von: Dwarikanath Mahapatra
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2012
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Ausgabe 6/2012
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Elektronische ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-012-9460-z

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Skull Stripping of Neonatal Brain MRI: Using Prior Shape Information with Graph Cuts

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Update Radiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2012

Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) as a Radiology Reporting Tool by Using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and Macro Program

Impact of a Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) System Integrated into a Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) on Reader Sensitivity and Efficiency for the Detection of Lung Nodules in Thoracic CT Exams

Interactive Visualization and Analysis of Multimodal Datasets for Surgical Applications

Using Analysis of Speech and Linguistics to Characterize Uncertainty in Radiology Reporting

A Study on Image Quality Management in PACS Used by Korean Hospitals

Content-Based Retrieval of Focal Liver Lesions Using Bag-of-Visual-Words Representations of Single- and Multiphase Contrast-Enhanced CT Images

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Update Radiologie