Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 6/2019

27.03.2019 | Reflections

Ultrasound assessment of the inferior vena cava for fluid responsiveness: easy, fun, but unlikely to be helpful

verfasst von: Scott J. Millington, MD

Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Ausgabe 6/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

For medical disciplines responsible for the care of severely ill patients, arguably nothing is more desperately needed than a practical and accurate tool to predict fluid responsiveness (FR). Defined as the physiologic state where the administration of an intravenous fluid bolus will cause an increase in stroke volume1, it is crucial to understand FR for four reasons:
1)
Intravenous fluids are, appropriately, the mainstay of early resuscitation because of their availability, low cost, ease of administration, and potential to improve oxygen delivery;
 
2)
After the very initial stages of resuscitation, critically ill patients consistently have a near 50% probability of being in an FR state,2,3 indicating that clinicians are typically operating in a zone of perfect uncertainty;
 
3)
Inadequate fluid administration is generally felt to be harmful4,5;
 
4)
Overzealous fluid administration is associated with increased mortality.6,7
 
…
Literatur
1.
Marik PE, Lemson J. Fluid responsiveness: an evolution of our understanding. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112: 617-20.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Vignon P, Repesse X, Begot E, et al. Comparison of echocardiographic indices used to predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195: 1022-32.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients : a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121: 2000-8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1368-77.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 2017; 43: 304-77.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada TA, Walley KR, Russell A. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med 2011; 39: 259-65.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Alsous F, Khamiees M, DeGirolamo A, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Manthous CA. Negative fluid balance predicts survival in patients with septic shock: a retrospective pilot study. Chest 2000; 117: 1749-54.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Gao F, Melody T, Daniels DF, Giles S, Fox S. The impact of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis bundles on hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective observational study. Crit Care 2005; 9: R764-70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Bentzer P, Griesdale D, Boyd J, MacLean K, Sirounis D, Ayas NT. Will this hemodynamically unstable patient respond to a bolus of intravenous fluids? JAMA 2016; 316: 1298-309.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Marik PE, Cavallazzi R. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med 2013; 41: 1774-81.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Marano C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 1475-83.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2642-7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Wetterslev M, Møller-Sørensen H, Johansen RR, Perner A. Systematic review of cardiac output measurements by echocardiography vs. thermodilution: the techniques are not interchangeable. Intensive Care Med 2016; 42: 1223-33.
14.
Kupersztych-Hagege E, Teboul JL, Artigas A, et al. Bioreactance is not reliable for estimating cardiac output and the effects of passive leg raising in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 2013; 111: 961-6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Saraceni E, Rossi S, Persona P, et al. Comparison of two methods for cardiac output measurement in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 690-4.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Mahjoub Y, Lejeune V, Muller L. Evaluation of pulse pressure variation validity criteria in critically ill patients: a prospective observational multicentre point-prevalence study. Br J Anaesth 2014; 11: 681-5.CrossRef
17.
Barbier C, Loubieres Y, Schmit C, et al. Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 1740-6.PubMed
18.
Feissel M, Michard F, Faller JP, Teboul JL. The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 1834-7.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Denault AY, Langevin S, Lessard MR, Courval JF, Desjardins G. Transthoracic echocardiographic evaluation of the heart and great vessels. Can J Anesth 2018; 65: 449-72.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Lang RM, Badano IP, Mor-Avi V. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 16: 233-70.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Mintz GS, Kotler MN, Parry WR, Iskandrian AS, Kane SA. Real-time inferior vena caval ultrasonography: normal and abnormal findings and its use in assessing right heart function. Circulation 1981; 64: 1018-25.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Blehar DJ, Resop D, Chin B, Dayno M, Gaspari R. Inferior vena cava displacement during respirophasic ultrasound imaging. Crit Ultrasound J 2012; 4: 18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Duwat A, Zogheib E, Guinot PG, et al. The gray zone of the qualitative assessment of respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter in ICU patients. Crit Care 2014; 18: R14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Bowra J, Uwagboe V, Goudie A, Reid C, Gillett M. Interrater agreement between expert and novice in measuring inferior vena cava diameter and collapsibility index. Emerg Med Australas 2015; 27: 295-9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Akkaya A, Yesilaras M, Aksay E, Sever M, Atilla OD. The interrater reliability of ultrasound imaging of the inferior vena cava performed by emergency residents. Am J Emerg Med 2013; 31: 1509-13.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Vieillard-Baron A, Evrard B, Repesse X, et al. Limited value of end-expiratory inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness impact of intra-abdominal pressure. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44: 197-203.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Malbrain M, Chiumello D, Pelosi P, et al. Prevalence of intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients: a multicentre epidemiological study. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 822-9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Brun C, Zieleskiewicz L, Textoris J, et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in severe preeclamptic patients with oliguria. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39: 593-600.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Byon HJ, Lim CW, Lee JH, et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children undergoing neurosurgery. Br J Anaesth 2013; 110: 586-91.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Williams K, Ablordeppey E, Theodoro D, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of inferior vena cava collapsibility versus passive leg raise testing in determining volume responsiveness in emergency department patients with shock. Proceedings of the 40th Critical Care Congress, Society of Critical Care Congress. Crit Care Med 2011; 39: 8.
31.
Corl K, Napoli AM, Gardiner F. Bedside sonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava caval index is a poor predictor of fluid responsiveness in emergency department patients. Emerg Med Australas 2012; 24: 534-9.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Airapetian A, Maizel J, Alyamani O, et al. Does inferior vena cava respiratory variability predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients? Crit Care 2015; 19: 400.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Muller L, Bobbia X, Toumi M, et al. Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with acute circulatory failure: need for a cautious use. Crit Care 2012; 16: R188.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
de Valk S, Olgers TJ, Holman M, Ismael F, Ligtenberg JJ, Ter Maaten JC. The caval index: a adequate non-invasive ultrasound parameter to predict fluid responsiveness in the emergency department? BMC Anesthesiol 2014; 14: 114.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Preau S, Bortolotti P, Colling D, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the inferior vena cava collapsibility to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with sepsis and acute circulatory failure. Crit Care Med 2017; 45: e290-7.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Corl KA, George NR, Romanoff J, et al. Inferior vena cava collapsibility detects fluid responsiveness among spontaneously breathing critically-ill patients. J Crit Care 2017; 41: 130-7.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Vos JJ, Poterman M, Salm PP, et al. Noninvasive pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness at multiple thresholds: a prospective observational study. Can J Anesth 2015; 62: 1153-60.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Cannesson M. The, “grey zone” or how to avoid the binary constraint of decision-making. Can J Anesth 2015; 62: 1139-42.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Coste J, Pouchot J. A grey zone for quantitative diagnostic and screening tests. Int J Epidemiol 2003; 32: 304-13.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Sobczyk D, Nycz K, Andruszkiewicz P, Wierzbicki K, Stapor M. Ultrasonographic caval indices do not significantly contribute to predicting fluid responsiveness immediately after coronary artery bypass grafting when compared to passive leg raising. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2016; 14: 23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Charbonneau H, Riu B, Faron M, et al. Predicting preload responsiveness using simultaneous recordings of inferior and superior vena cavae diameters. Crit Care 2014; 18: 473.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Theerawit P, Morasert T, Sutherasan Y. Inferior vena cava diameter variation compared with pulse pressure variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis. J Crit Care 2016; 36: 246-51.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Moretti R, Pizzi B. Inferior vena cava distensibility as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2010; 13: 3-9.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Machare-Delgado E, Decaro M, Marik PE. Inferior vena cava variation compared to pulse contour analysis as predictors of fluid responsiveness: a prospective cohort study. J Intensive Care Med 2011; 26: 116-24.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Lu N, Xi X, Jiang L, Yang D, Yin K. Exploring the best predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock. Am J Emerg Med 2017; 35: 1258-61.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Millington SJ. Cardiac ultrasound is a competency of critical care medicine. Crit Care Med 2017; 45: 1555-7.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zhang Z, Xu X, Ye S, Xu L. Ultrasonographic measurement of the respiratory variation in the inferior vena cava diameter is predictive of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2014; 40: 845-53.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Huang H, Shen Q, Liu Y, Xu H, Fang Y. Value of variation index of inferior vena cava diameter in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients with circulatory shock receiving mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2018; 22: 204.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Long E, Oakley E, Duke T, Babl FE; Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT). Does respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter predict fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Shock 2017; 47: 550-9.
50.
Orso D, Paoli I, Piani T, Cilenti FL, Cristiani L, Guglielmo N. Accuracy of ultrasonographic measurements of inferior vena cava to determine fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Intensive Care Med 2018; DOI: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​0885066617752308​.
Metadaten
Titel
Ultrasound assessment of the inferior vena cava for fluid responsiveness: easy, fun, but unlikely to be helpful
verfasst von
Scott J. Millington, MD
Publikationsdatum
27.03.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Ausgabe 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Elektronische ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-019-01357-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2019

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 6/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Editorials

Reflections: new content for the Journal’s readers

Editorials

Blind intubation using supraglottic devices: why should we even try?

Correspondence

Unusual spinal needle defect: projecting stylet

Reports of Original Investigations

The effect of neck extension on success rate of blind intubation through Ambu® AuraGain™ laryngeal mask: a randomized clinical trial

Correspondence

Cadaveric findings of the effect of rib fractures on spread of serratus plane injections

Reports of Original Investigations

Enhanced myocardial protection in cardiac donation after circulatory death using Intralipid® postconditioning in a porcine model

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

25.04.2024 Allergien und Intoleranzreaktionen Nachrichten

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren
Bildnachweise