Background
Methods
Inclusion criteria | |
About ACP as a process | |
Normative aspects of ACP as a major topic | |
Abstract includes at least one goal of ACP or reflects upon goals or barriers of ACP | |
Publication ≥1990 | |
Language: English, German or Dutch | |
Full text available via the library of our institution (VU and VUmc) | |
Exclusion criteria | |
About children or adolescents | |
About psychiatric disorders |
Type of article | Main focus |
---|---|
1. Empirical studies including focus groups and interviews | A. Not specified |
2. Reviews, both narrative and systematic | B. Culture including ethnic and religious minorities |
3. Contemplative articles, for instance ethical literature, commentaries, letters to the editor | C. Disease or setting such as nursing home or operating room |
Results
First round (37 articles, 20%) | Category | Article type | Study characteristics |
---|---|---|---|
1 Kolarik 2002 [10] | Contemplative, focus not specified | Conceptual paper | List of objectives for ACP: patient objectives, family or surrogate objectives, health care provider objectives, desirable characteristics of the process. |
2 Hackler 2004 [11] | Idem | Ethical paper | Exploration of two kinds of justifications for advance directives, with two case descriptions. |
3 Rietjens 2016 [12] | Idem | Editorial | Editorial for special issue about ACP. |
4 Aitken 1999 [13] | Idem | Overview | Overview article about ACP for family physicians. |
5 Hammes 2001 [14] | Idem | Editorial | Editorial. |
6 Perkins 2007 [15] | Idem | Perspective | Perspective on the role of advance directives. |
7 Schicktanz 2009 [16] | Idem | Ethical paper | Ethical considerations of the interplay between personal and cultural identity in interpreting advance directives. |
8 Sudore 2010 [17] | Idem | Perspective | Perspective on the objective of ACP. |
9 Robins-Browne 2014 [18] | Idem | Ethical paper | Ethical considerations about the complexities of ACP. |
10 Johnson 2017 [19] | Idem | Ethical paper | Ethical considerations about the role of ACP in end-of-life care. |
11 Van Delden 2017 [20] | Idem | Commentary | Commentary on the PREPARE-trial. |
12 Vogel 2011 [21] | Idem | News item | News about the Canadian framework for ACP. |
13 Wheatley 2015 [22] | Idem | Ethical paper | Ethical issues in palliative care, including ACP. |
14 Song 2016 [23] | Empirical, culture-focused | RCT | ACP intervention ‘SPIRIT’ vs. usual care. Subjects: 210 dyads of patients on dialysis and their surrogates; subgroup analysis of African Americans vs. whites. Outcome measures: dyad congruence on goals of care, surrogate decision-making confidence, patient decisional conflict, surrogate anxiety, surrogate depression, surrogate post-traumatic distress symptoms. |
15 Asai 1997 [24] | Idem | Focus group | Focus group on life-sustaining treatments for terminally ill patients and attitudes towards advance directives and possible barriers to using them in the clinical setting. Subjects: 7 specialists in internal medicine from Japan. |
16 Perkins 2002 [25] | Idem | Interview study | Interviews about cultural attitudes influcancing decisions whether to perform ACP. Subjects: a purposive sample of 26 Mexican-American, 18 Euro-American, and 14 African-American inpatients in Texas, USA. |
17 Ko 2012 [26] | Idem | Focus groups | Focus group and interview study to explore knowledge, attitudes, and behavior about advance directives in Korean Americans. Subjects: 23 Korean Americans. |
18 Wicher 2012 [27] | Review, culture-focused | Systematic review | Systematic review of 46 studies examining African American preferences related to end-of-life care and decision making. |
19 Singer 1998 [28] | Empirical, focus not specified | Interview study | Interviews about the purpose of ACP. Subjects: 48 patients on hemodialysis. |
20 Robinson 2011 [29] | Idem | Interview study | Interviews about the applicability and usefulness of an ACP intervention and the ACP process. Subjects: 9 dyads of patients with advanced lung cancer and a family member, who participated in an ACP intervention. |
21 Jeong 2012 [30] | Idem | Interview study | Interviews based on the ‘Values Clarification Worksheet’. Subjects: 3 residents living in an residential aged care facility in Australia, 11 family members, and 13 registered nurses. |
22 Sudore 2017 [31] | Idem | Delphi study | Delphi study on the definition of ACP. |
23 Rhee 2013 [32] | Idem | Interview study | Interviews on the impact of ACP on interpersonal relationships. Subjects: 17 general practitioners in Australia. |
24 Michael 2017 [33] | Idem | Focus groups | Focus groups exploring awareness, attitudes, and experiences of ACP. Subjects: 15 community dwelling older people and 27 unrelated offspring/caregivers of older people. |
25 Martin 1999 [34] | Empirical, disease-focused | Interview study | Interviews about experiences with and opinions about ACP. Subjects: 140 patients with HIV/AIDS who had participated in an ACP trial. |
26 Johnson 2017 [35] | Idem | Interview study | Interviews about patient autonomy and ACP. Subjects: 11 consultant oncologists and 7 palliative medicine doctors. |
27 Loggers 2014 [36] | Idem | Mixed methods study with survey (quantitative) and interview (qualitative) part | Survey and interview about experiences with ACP. Subjects: 18 patients after hematopoietic cell transplants and 11 bereaved caregivers of patients who had died after hematopoietic cell transplant. Outcome measures (quantitative): having a living will; having a formally designated proxy; having discussed some aspect of ACP with family/friend prior to transplant; perceptions of the value of ACP; having discussed mortality risk with the medical team pre transplantation; hope; medical team’s commitment. |
28 Thoresen 2016 [37] | Idem | Participant observation and interviews | Participant observation of ACP conversations, followed by interviews. Subjects: 7 nursing home patients in 7 different nursing homes in Norway and the relatives who joined the ACP conversation. |
29 Sellars 2017 [38] | Idem | Interview study | Interviews about patient and caregiver perspectives on ACP. Subjects: 24 patients with end stage renal disease and their caregivers (n = 15). |
30 Johnson 2016 [39] | Review, disease-focused | Systematic review with thematic analysis | Systematic review of perceptions and experiences on ACP of cancer patients, their families, and health care providers. Thematic analysis was performed on the included studies: 19 quantitative studies, 17 qualitative studies, 4 mixed methods studies. |
31 Mehlis 2016 [40] | Review, focus not specified | Ethical and legal perspective | Ethical and legal perspective on self-determination and the risk of overtreatment, with a focus on ACP. |
32 Llewellyn 2017 [41] | Idem | Interview study | Interviews about death and dying and reflections on the effect of these conversations. Subjects: 21 healthy adults 54–65 years old. |
33 Sanchez-Gonzalez 1997 [42] | Contemplative, culture-focused | Medical history perspective | Historical perspective on the emergence of advance directives in the USA, as compared to Europe. Focus on cultural differences. |
34 Schmidt 2017 [43] | Contemplative, disease-focused | Overview | Overview article about incorporating ACP on hemodialysis units. |
35 Holley 2005 [44] | Idem | Perspective | Perspective on the timing, purpose, and effect of ACP in patients with end-stage renal disease. |
36 Gastmans 2010 [45] | Idem | Ethical perspective | Ethical perspective on euthanasia and advance euthanasia directives for patients with severe dementia. |
37 Holley 2012 [46] | Idem | Overview | Overview article on the role and timing of ACP for patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. |
Second round (18 articles, 10%) | Category | Article type | Study characteristics |
38 Schwartz 2002 [47] | Empirical, focus not specified | Randomized controlled trial (pilot study) | Pilot randomized controlled trial of an ACP intervention. Subjects: 61 ambulatory geriatric patients. Intervention: ACP discussion with a trained nurse facilitator and documentation of patient goals and preferences. Control: Massachusetts Health Care Proxy form. Outcome measures: knowledge of ACP; treatment preferences (and congruence between patient and health care agents; response shifts in values; quality of life. |
39 Seymour 2004 [48] | Idem | Focus groups | Focus groups on advance care statements. Subjects: 32 older people or their representatives. |
40 Cornally 2015 [49] | Idem | Focus groups | Focus groups on the implementation of the ‘Let me decide’ ACP program. Subjects: 15 clinical nurse managers and 2 directors of nursing in long term care facilities where the ‘Let me decide’ ACP program had been implemented. |
41 Stanford 2013 [50] | Empirical, culture-focused | Focus groups | Focus group study on the perceived relevance of ACP in Knysna, South Africa. Subjects: 51 participants including pastors, hospice staff, teachers, and community caregivers in Knysna, South Africa. |
42 Lee 2016 [51] | Idem | Interview study | Interview study on signing one’s own do-not-resuscitate directive among older nursing home residents in Taiwan. Subjects: 11 older nursing home residents from Taiwan. |
43 Zientek 2006 [52] | Contemplative, culture-focused | Ethical perspective | Ethical considerations regarding end-of-life care and the role of advance directives in Texas, and their impact on Roman Catholic health care providers. |
44 Prendergast 2001 [53] | Contemplative, disease-focused | Overview, historical perspective | Historical overview of the development of ACP in the first decade since the Patient Self-Determination Act, with a focus on its importance for intensive care units. |
45 Kuhlmann 2016 [54] | Idem | Overview, historical perspective | Overview of the development and importance of ACP for patients with end-stage renal disease. |
46 Drought 2002 [55] | Review, focus not specified | Review and ethnographic study | Literature review on the role of choice in end-of-life decision making, followed by an ethnographic study. Subjects: 88 terminally ill patients with solid tumor cancer or AIDS who were followed longitudinally, together with 1–3 of their family members or friends, and 2 of their outpatient clinic providers. |
47 Robertson 1991 [56] | Contemplative, focus not specified | Opinion | Opinion article on the role of advance directives. |
48 Levinsky 1996 [57] | Idem | Opinion | Opinion article on the purpose of advance medical planning. |
49 Darr 1996 [58] | Idem | Overview | Overview article on the use of advance directives. |
50 Davis 2002 [59] | Idem | Ethical perspective | Ethical perspective on the concept of precedent autonomy in advance directives. |
51 Edwards 2011 [60] | Idem | Ethical perspective | Ethical perspective on the concept of precedent autonomy and the theory of ‘the other self’ in relation to advance directives. |
52 Ahluwalia 2012 [61] | Idem | Letter to the editor | Comment stating that an earlier article wrongfully used a too narrow definition of ACP. |
53 Wolff 2012 [62] | Idem | Ethical perspective | Ethical perspective on the role of autonomy, quality of life, and advance directives in end-of-life decision making for patients with dementia. |
54 Davison 2006 [63] | Empirical, disease-focused | Interview study | Interviews on the role of hope in the context of ACP. Subjects: 19 patients with end-stage renal disease. |
55 Piers 2013 [64] | Idem | Interview study | Interviews on the views of older people on ACP. Subjects: 38 older people (71–104 years old) with limited prognosis due to malignancy, organ failure, or frailty. |
Underlying goals of ACP
Respecting individual patient autonomy
‘Advance care planning is generally championed as a means by which competent patients can extend their involvement in and control of decisions regarding their own health care beyond the point at which they lose capacity as a result of illness or injury.’ [art.30] [39].
‘ACP may also provide the health care provider proof against angry, distant relatives about what the patient really wanted.’ [art. 1] [10].
‘ACP should clarify whether decisions are to be made by consensus of the family or by one person only, and the amount of leeway they have when interpreting preferences.’[art. 1] [10].
Similarly, one may argue that an advance directive should be honored because what the patient earlier said she wanted is what she truly wants now even though she is too incapacitated to know what she wants now. [art. 50] [59].
Improving quality of care
Preparing patients for such decisions shifts the focus away from premature treatment decisions based on incomplete or hypothetical information and ensures that complex health care decisions are based on a more comprehensive set of considerations, including the current clinical context, shifting and evolving goals, and patients’ and surrogates’ needs. [art. 8] [17].
‘The outcomes will, of course, often still be sad and painful, but the process will ensure that the key values relevant to the context have been adequately considered.’ [art. 9] [18].
‘ACP assists clinicians challenged by treatment cessation decisions, particularly in OP [older persons] where extended life expectancies may be associated with co-morbidities and increasing frailty.’ [art. 24] [33].
‘A “good death” contributes to organizational maintenance, while ‘bad’ deaths drain resources and create emotional distress in staff and families. ACP, therefore, may benefit not only patients with terminal illness but also the healthcare institution by systematizing and encouraging “dying well”.’ [art. 26] [35].
‘Staff felt they were now in a position to provide care that was largely based on the wishes of residents. For many this created a sense of “knowing how to care”.’ [art. 40] [49].
Strengthening relationships
‘Patients recognize that they cannot anticipate all the possible circumstances of dying. However, they can direct the people who have cared for them in their lives to continue to care for them as they die.’ [art. 44] [53].
‘Patients also used the interview to acknowledge the closeness and importance of the relationship with their participating family members.’ [art. 20] [29].
‘The participants appreciated the positive impacts that ACP could have on interpersonal relationships, such as enhancing patient-family relationships, helping resolve conflicts between families and health professionals and improving trust and understanding between patients and health professionals.’ [art. 23] [32].
Preparing for end-of-life
‘ACP facilitated the old person to continue to realise ‘the essence of their being’, to experience ‘gerotranscendence’ in end-of-life moments, and to die in a way consistent with ‘the essence of their being’, as they wished.’ [art. 21] [30].
‘One participant commented on the way in which ACP helped him to consider the manner of his death and the way in which that would affect his children. He concluded that confronting and planning for his death were important steps in helping him and his children cope.’ [art. 25] [34].
‘Most older persons in this study wanted to plan for or control the end-of-life stage, but only for those issues made important to them in their own experiences or fears.’ [art. 55] [64].
Reducing overtreatment
‘It is clear that attempting CPR [cardiopulmonary resuscitation] would be physiologically futile for some patients. It might also cause psychological distress to others, lead to an undignified death and deflect the cardiac arrest team away from other patients.’ [art. 13] [22].
‘A further concern may be that financial resources not be squandered in prolonging a life of very low quality. ( … ) Decisions to forgo costly treatment that has little benefit at the end of life should be easier if the patient has specifically declined it.’ [art. 2] [11].
‘Even when the purpose is not cost containment, there may be a philosophical emphasis on limiting, rather than maintaining, treatment. For example, one physician described advance planning as a method to “avoid excessive and undesired interventions in the final years of life.”’ [art. 48] [57].
‘Patients who had discussions with their physicians about end-of-life planning, received less aggressive medical care at the end of life and were transferred to hospice care earlier.’ [‘Die Patienten, die Gespräche mit ihren Ärzten über die Planung der letzten Lebensphase geführt hatten, erhielten weniger aggressive medizinische Behandlung vor dem Tod und wurden früher ins Hospiz verlegt.’] [art. 31] [40].
Objections
‘However, broad values statements, such as wanting to maintain dignity or be free from pain, are often too general to inform individual treatment decisions. Even specific treatment preferences may be difficult to extrapolate to specific clinical situations.’ [art. 8] [17].
‘Perhaps the greatest problem with the choice model is that it assumes that we can accept and choose our death long before the inevitability and reality of our dying becomes apparent. In other words, it proposes that rational and cognitive ways of knowing can subordinate our emotional, psychological, and embodied experiences.’ [art. 46] [55].
‘It is claimed by some that involvement in ACP has already come to be seen as a ‘moral imperative’. Such an understanding of ACP would make it difficult for those who do not wish to participate to resist doing so.’ [art. 9] [18].
‘“Sometimes I think it’s just to make us ourselves feel better, that we’ve ticked all the boxes, that we’ve made it very clear to the patient where things are at, so that, you know, ( … ) if the family or the patient does, I mean, deteriorate and they seem to be taken by surprise by it we can, sort of, feel like we’ve almost as if we’ve said, well, I told you so.’” [art. 26] [35].
The underlying goal of strengthening relationships has been criticized for serving the needs of family members more than patients’ needs and individual patient autonomy. Some older people fear that their children might take control too early or financially abuse their parents. Thus, if the underlying goal of ACP is strengthening relationships, one should be aware that the patient might be overlooked.
‘( … ) ACP can be beneficial for residents’ relatives, as it may ease their decision making. Whereas relatives’ wellbeing and confidence in their role as surrogate decision maker may be important outcomes of ACP, the patient’s values and preferences should be central.’ [art. 3] [12].
‘Likewise, another review of the elements of EOLC [end-of-life care] that patients ranked as being important showed that quality EOLC is not simply a matter of preference expression or control over decision-making, but a complex amalgamation of: effective communication; shared decision-making; expert care; respect and compassion; trust and confidence in clinicians; an adequate environment for care; and strategies that minimise the burden on families.’ [art. 10] [19].
‘Some patients and caregivers, including those who had completed ACP, had initially interpreted ACP to signify death and defeat, and some became “disturbed” by ACP because they believed it was being used as a mechanism “to knock patients off.”’ [art. 29] [38].
‘Pressure to transform clinicians from knowledgeable advisors to advocates for the limitation of care threatens to undermine the ethical validity of advance planning.’ [art. 48] [57].
‘If a right to die becomes a duty to die, the living will and its progeny, the natural death act declaration, will have become a Frankenstein monster.’ [art. 49] [58].
Underlying goal | Objections |
---|---|
Respecting individual patient autonomy | Promises more control than is possible; ignores current interests of the patient; denies that decision making is engaged and emotional |
Improving quality of care | Risk of ACP to be regarded as moral imperative |
Strengthening relationships | Shifts focus away from the patient; risk that children take over too early |
Preparing for end-of-life | Risk of ACP to be regarded as panacea |
Reducing overtreatment | Pressure to refuse treatment; distrust of the health care system; against nature |