Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Japanese Journal of Radiology 7/2017

20.05.2017 | Original Article

Changes in deviation of absorbed dose to water among users by chamber calibration shift

verfasst von: Tetsurou Katayose, Hidetoshi Saitoh, Mitsunobu Igari, Weishan Chang, Shimpei Hashimoto, Mie Morioka

Erschienen in: Japanese Journal of Radiology | Ausgabe 7/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The JSMP01 dosimetry protocol had adopted the provisional 60Co calibration coefficient \(N_{{{\text{D,w,Q}}_{ 0} }}^{{}}\), namely, the product of exposure calibration coefficient N C and conversion coefficient k D,X. After that, the absorbed dose to water D w standard was established, and the JSMP12 protocol adopted the \(N_{{{\text{D,w,Q}}_{ 0} }}^{{}}\) calibration. In this study, the influence of the calibration shift on the measurement of D w among users was analyzed.

Materials and methods

The intercomparison of the D w using an ionization chamber was annually performed by visiting related hospitals. Intercomparison results before and after the calibration shift were analyzed, the deviation of D w among users was re-evaluated, and the cause of deviation was estimated.

Results

As a result, the stability of LINAC, calibration of the thermometer and barometer, and collection method of ion recombination were confirmed. The statistical significance of standard deviation of D w was not observed, but that of difference of D w among users was observed between N C and \(N_{{{\text{D,w,Q}}_{ 0} }}^{{}}\) calibration.

Conclusion

Uncertainty due to chamber-to-chamber variation was reduced by the calibration shift, consequently reducing the uncertainty among users regarding D w. The result also pointed out uncertainty might be reduced by accurate and detailed instructions on the setup of an ionization chamber.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Papanikolaou N, Battista JJ, Boyer AL, Kappas C, Klein E, Mackie TR, et al. American association of physicists in medicine (AAPM) Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 65: Tissue inhomogeneity corrections for megavoltage photon beams: AAPM report No. 85. Madison: Medical Physics Publishing; 2004. Papanikolaou N, Battista JJ, Boyer AL, Kappas C, Klein E, Mackie TR, et al. American association of physicists in medicine (AAPM) Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 65: Tissue inhomogeneity corrections for megavoltage photon beams: AAPM report No. 85. Madison: Medical Physics Publishing; 2004.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Andreo P, Burns DT, Hohlfeld K, Huq, Knai T, Laitano F, et al. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water: TRS-398 V.12. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2006. Andreo P, Burns DT, Hohlfeld K, Huq, Knai T, Laitano F, et al. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water: TRS-398 V.12. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2006.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Almond PR, Biggs PJ, Coursey BM, Hanson WF, Huq MS, Nath R, et al. AAPM’s TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Med Phys. 1999;26(9):1847–70.CrossRefPubMed Almond PR, Biggs PJ, Coursey BM, Hanson WF, Huq MS, Nath R, et al. AAPM’s TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Med Phys. 1999;26(9):1847–70.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishidai T, editor. Standard dosimetry of absorbed dose in external beam radiotherapy. Tsusho Sangyo Kenkyu Sha: Tokyo; 2002. Nishidai T, editor. Standard dosimetry of absorbed dose in external beam radiotherapy. Tsusho Sangyo Kenkyu Sha: Tokyo; 2002.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Morishita Y, Kato M, Takata N, Kurosawa T, Tanaka T, Saito N. A standard for absorbed dose rate to water in a 60Co field using a graphite calorimeter at the National Metrology Institute of Japan. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2013;154(3):331–9.CrossRef Morishita Y, Kato M, Takata N, Kurosawa T, Tanaka T, Saito N. A standard for absorbed dose rate to water in a 60Co field using a graphite calorimeter at the National Metrology Institute of Japan. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2013;154(3):331–9.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Saitoh H, editor. Standard dosimetry of absorbed dose to water in external beam radiotherapy. Tsusho Sangyo Kenkyu Sha: Tokyo; 2012. Saitoh H, editor. Standard dosimetry of absorbed dose to water in external beam radiotherapy. Tsusho Sangyo Kenkyu Sha: Tokyo; 2012.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Okuyama H, Sakata S, Fukumura A, Mizuno H. The results of external dose audits for therapeutic high-energy X-rays by ANTM. Jpn J Med Phys. 2015;35(3):88. Okuyama H, Sakata S, Fukumura A, Mizuno H. The results of external dose audits for therapeutic high-energy X-rays by ANTM. Jpn J Med Phys. 2015;35(3):88.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakata S, Chiryoyou senryokei kousei no jisseki. In: Association for Nuclear Technology in Medicine (ed). Therapy-Level Dosimetry Calibration 4. Tokyo: Association for Nuclear Technology in Medicine; 2014. p. 16–23. Sakata S, Chiryoyou senryokei kousei no jisseki. In: Association for Nuclear Technology in Medicine (ed). Therapy-Level Dosimetry Calibration 4. Tokyo: Association for Nuclear Technology in Medicine; 2014. p. 16–23.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Das IJ, Cheng CW, Watts RJ, Ahnesjö A, Gibbons J, Li XA, et al. Accelerator beam data commissioning equipment and procedures: report of the TG-106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM. Med Phys. 2008;35(9):4186–215.CrossRef Das IJ, Cheng CW, Watts RJ, Ahnesjö A, Gibbons J, Li XA, et al. Accelerator beam data commissioning equipment and procedures: report of the TG-106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM. Med Phys. 2008;35(9):4186–215.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Muir BR, Rogers DWO. Monte Carlo calculations of k Q, the beam quality conversion factor. Med Phys. 2010;37(11):5939–50.CrossRef Muir BR, Rogers DWO. Monte Carlo calculations of k Q, the beam quality conversion factor. Med Phys. 2010;37(11):5939–50.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Yajima K, Suoh S, Katayose T, Yamashita W, Takase N, Fukumura A, et al. Comparison of absorbed dose to water calibration factors obtained from in air and in water calibration method. Jpn J Med Phys. 2013;33(3):117. Yajima K, Suoh S, Katayose T, Yamashita W, Takase N, Fukumura A, et al. Comparison of absorbed dose to water calibration factors obtained from in air and in water calibration method. Jpn J Med Phys. 2013;33(3):117.
Metadaten
Titel
Changes in deviation of absorbed dose to water among users by chamber calibration shift
verfasst von
Tetsurou Katayose
Hidetoshi Saitoh
Mitsunobu Igari
Weishan Chang
Shimpei Hashimoto
Mie Morioka
Publikationsdatum
20.05.2017
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Japanese Journal of Radiology / Ausgabe 7/2017
Print ISSN: 1867-1071
Elektronische ISSN: 1867-108X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-017-0644-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2017

Japanese Journal of Radiology 7/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.