nach oben

European Radiology

Erschienen in:

01.04.2015 | Musculoskeletal

Characterization of the collagen component of cartilage repair tissue of the talus with quantitative MRI: comparison of T2 relaxation time measurements with a diffusion-weighted double-echo steady-state sequence (dwDESS)

verfasst von: M. Kretzschmar, O. Bieri, M. Miska, M. Wiewiorski, N. Hainc, V. Valderrabano, U. Studler

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 4/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to characterize the collagen component of repair tissue (RT) of the talus after autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) using quantitative T2 and diffusion-weighted imaging.

Methods

Mean T2 values and diffusion coefficients of AMIC-RT and normal cartilage of the talus of 25 patients with posttraumatic osteochondral lesions and AMIC repair were compared in a cross-sectional design using partially spoiled steady-state free precession (pSSFP) for T2 quantification, and diffusion-weighted double-echo steady-state (dwDESS) for diffusion measurement. RT and cartilage were graded with modified Noyes and MOCART scores on morphological sequences. An association between follow-up interval and quantitative MRI measures was assessed using multivariate regression, after stratifying the cohort according to time interval between surgery and MRI.

Results

Mean T2 of the AMIC-RT and cartilage were 43.1 ms and 39.1 ms, respectively (p = 0.26). Mean diffusivity of the RT (1.76 μm²/ms) was significantly higher compared to normal cartilage (1.46 μm²/ms) (p = 0.0092). No correlation was found between morphological and quantitative parameters. RT diffusivity was lowest in the subgroup with follow-up >28 months (p = 0.027).

Conclusions

Compared to T2-mapping, dwDESS demonstrated greater sensitivity in detecting differences in the collagen matrix between AMIC-RT and cartilage. Decreased diffusivity in patients with longer follow-up times may indicate an increased matrix organization of RT.

Key Points

• MRI is used to assess morphology of the repair tissue during follow-up.

• Quantitative MRI allows an estimation of biochemical properties of the repair tissue.

• Differences between repair tissue and cartilage were more significant with dwDESS than T2 mapping.

O'Loughlin PF, Heyworth BE, Kennedy JG (2010) Current concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle. Am J Sports Med 38:392–404CrossRefPubMed

Brittberg M (2008) Autologous chondrocyte implantation–technique and long-term follow-up. Injury 39(Suppl 1):S40–S49CrossRefPubMed

Benthien JP, Behrens P (2011) The treatment of chondral and osteochondral defects of the knee with autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC): method description and recent developments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1316–1319CrossRefPubMed

Wiewiorski M, Leumann A, Buettner O, Pagenstert G et al (2011) Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis aided reconstruction of a large focal osteochondral lesion of the talus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:293–296CrossRefPubMed

Gille J, Schuseil E, Wimmer J, Gellissen J et al (2010) Mid-term results of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis for treatment of focal cartilage defects in the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1456–1464CrossRefPubMed

Gille J, Meisner U, Ehlers EM, Müller A et al (2005) Migration pattern, morphology and viability of cells suspended in or sealed with fibrin glue: a histomorphologic study. Tissue Cell 37:339–348CrossRefPubMed

Breinan HA, Martin SD, Hsu HP, Spector M (2000) Healing of canine articular cartilage defects treated with microfracture, a type-II collagen matrix, or cultured autologous chondrocytes. J Orthop Res 18:781–789CrossRefPubMed

David-Vaudey E, Ghosh S, Ries M, Majumdar S (2004) T2 relaxation time measurements in osteoarthritis. Magn Reson Imaging 22:673–682CrossRefPubMed

Borthakur A, Shapiro EM, Beers J, Kudchodkar S et al (2000) Sensitivity of MRI to proteoglycan depletion in cartilage: comparison of sodium and proton MRI. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 8:288–293CrossRefPubMed

10.

Mlynárik V, Trattnig S, Huber M, Zembsch A, Imhof H (1999) The role of relaxation times in monitoring proteoglycan depletion in articular cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:497–502CrossRefPubMed

11.

Dunn TC, Lu Y, Jin H, Ries MD, Majumdar S (2004) T2 relaxation time of cartilage at MR imaging: comparison with severity of knee osteoarthritis. Radiology 232:592–598CrossRefPubMed

12.

Stahl R, Blumenkrantz G, Carballido-Gamio J, Zhao S et al (2007) MRI-derived T2 relaxation times and cartilage morphometry of the tibio-femoral joint in subjects with and without osteoarthritis during a 1-year follow-up. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 15:1225–1234CrossRefPubMed

13.

Li X, Benjamin Ma C, Link TM, Castillo DD et al (2007) In vivo T(1rho) and T(2) mapping of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee using 3 T MRI. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 15:789–797CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

14.

Blumenkrantz G, Lindsey CT, Dunn TC, Jin H et al (2004) A pilot, two-year longitudinal study of the interrelationship between trabecular bone and articular cartilage in the osteoarthritic knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 12:997–1005CrossRefPubMed

15.

Domayer SE, Kutscha-Lissberg F, Welsch G, Dorotka R et al (2008) T2 mapping in the knee after microfracture at 3.0 T: correlation of global T2 values and clinical outcome—preliminary results. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 16:903–908CrossRefPubMed

16.

Welsch GH, Mamisch TC, Domayer SE, Dorotka R et al (2008) Cartilage T2 assessment at 3-T MR imaging: in vivo differentiation of normal hyaline cartilage from reparative tissue after two cartilage repair procedures—initial experience. Radiology 247:154–161CrossRefPubMed

17.

Pearle AD, Warren RF, Rodeo SA (2005) Basic science of articular cartilage and osteoarthritis. Clin Sports Med 24:1–12CrossRefPubMed

18.

He B, Wu JP, Kirk TB, Carrino JA et al (2014) High-resolution measurements of the multilayer ultra-structure of articular cartilage and their translational potential. Arthritis Res Ther 16:205CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

19.

Miller KL, Hargreaves BA, Gold GE, Pauly JM (2004) Steady-state diffusion-weighted imaging of in vivo knee cartilage. Magn Reson Med 51:394–398CrossRefPubMed

20.

Burstein D, Gray ML, Hartman AL, Gipe R, Foy BD (1993) Diffusion of small solutes in cartilage as measured by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and imaging. J Orthop Res 11:465–478CrossRefPubMed

21.

Mlynárik V, Sulzbacher I, Bittšanský M, Fuiko R, Trattnig S (2003) Investigation of apparent diffusion constant as an indicator of early degenerative disease in articular cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging 17:440–444CrossRefPubMed

22.

Friedrich KM, Mamisch TC, Plank C, Langs G et al (2010) Diffusion-weighted imaging for the follow-up of patients after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Eur J Radiol 73:622–628CrossRefPubMed

23.

Bieri O, Scheffler K, Welsch GH, Trattnig S et al (2011) Quantitative mapping of T2 using partial spoiling. Magn Reson Med 66:410–418CrossRefPubMed

24.

Bieri O, Ganter C, Scheffler K (2012) Quantitative in vivo diffusion imaging of cartilage using double echo steady-state free precession. Magn Reson Med 68:720–729CrossRefPubMed

25.

Marlovits S, Striessnig G, Resinger CT, Aldrian SM et al (2004) Definition of pertinent parameters for the evaluation of articular cartilage repair tissue with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 52:310–319CrossRefPubMed

26.

Duc SR, Pfirrmann CW, Koch PP, Zanetti M, Hodler J (2008) Internal knee derangement assessed with 3-minute three-dimensional isovoxel true FISP MR sequence: preliminary study. Radiology 246:526–535CrossRefPubMed

27.

Shepherd DE, Seedhom BB (1999) Thickness of human articular cartilage in joints of the lower limb. Ann Rheum Dis 58:27–34CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

28.

Quirbach S, Trattnig S, Marlovits S, Zimmermann V et al (2009) Initial results of in vivo high-resolution morphological and biochemical cartilage imaging of patients after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) of the ankle. Skelet Radiol 38:751–760CrossRef

29.

Marik W, Apprich S, Welsch GH, Mamisch TC, Trattnig S (2012) Biochemical evaluation of articular cartilage in patients with osteochondrosis dissecans by means of quantitative T2- and T2-mapping at 3 T MRI: a feasibility study. Eur J Radiol 81:923–927CrossRefPubMed

30.

Apprich S, Trattnig S, Welsch GH, Noebauer-Huhmann IM et al (2012) Assessment of articular cartilage repair tissue after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation or the microfracture technique in the ankle joint using diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 Tesla. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 20:703–711CrossRefPubMed

31.

Zheng MH, Willers C, Kirilak L, Yates P et al (2007) Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI): biological and histological assessment. Tissue Eng 13:737–746CrossRefPubMed

32.

Knutsen G, Engebretsen L, Ludvigsen TC, Drogset JO et al (2004) Autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture in the knee. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:455–464PubMed

Titel: Characterization of the collagen component of cartilage repair tissue of the talus with quantitative MRI: comparison of T2 relaxation time measurements with a diffusion-weighted double-echo steady-state sequence (dwDESS)
verfasst von: M. Kretzschmar
O. Bieri
M. Miska
M. Wiewiorski
N. Hainc
V. Valderrabano
U. Studler
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2015
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Radiology / Ausgabe 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3490-5

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Characterization of the collagen component of cartilage repair tissue of the talus with quantitative MRI: comparison of T2 relaxation time measurements with a diffusion-weighted double-echo steady-state sequence (dwDESS)

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Key Points

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

Update Radiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Key Points

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

Magnetic resonance-imaging of the effect of targeted antiangiogenic gene delivery in a melanoma tumour model

Radiofrequency ablation of chondroblastoma: long-term clinical and imaging outcomes

First metatarsophalangeal joint- MRI findings in asymptomatic volunteers

Comparison of diagnostic performance between single- and multiphasic contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic computed tomography in patients admitted to the emergency department with abdominal pain: potential radiation dose reduction

Coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve measurements – initial experience with a novel physician-driven algorithm

Characterizing the contrast of white matter and grey matter in high-resolution phase difference enhanced imaging of human brain at 3.0 T

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

Update Radiologie