Erschienen in:
27.10.2021
Impact of laparoscopic gastrectomy on relapse-free survival for locally advanced gastric cancer patients with sarcopenia: a propensity score matching analysis
verfasst von:
Ryota Matsui, Noriyuki Inaki, Toshikatsu Tsuji
Erschienen in:
Surgical Endoscopy
|
Ausgabe 7/2022
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Background
Recent gastric cancer reports have shown that preoperative sarcopenia worsens long-term prognosis after gastrectomy. We investigated the impact of laparoscopic surgery on the long-term prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer patients with sarcopenia.
Methods
This retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for primary c-stage II or III advanced gastric cancer, between April 2008 and April 2017, with computed tomography records of skeletal muscle mass. The skeletal muscle mass index was calculated, and sarcopenia was defined when values were below the cut-off. The patients were divided into a laparoscopy group and open group, in which the background was adjusted using propensity score matching; the relapse-free survival and overall survival were compared between them. The prognostic factors for relapse-free survival and overall survival were investigated by multivariate analyses.
Results
This study included 141 patients with sarcopenia (laparoscopy group, n = 69 [48.9%]; open group, n = 72 [51.1%]). After matching, there were 50 patients in both groups, with no significant differences in patient background. The median follow-up period was 38 months. Relapse-free survival was worse in the open group (hazard ratio: 1.662, 95% confidence interval: 0.910–3.034; P = 0.098), but there was no difference in the overall survival (P = 0.181). Multivariate analysis concluded that open surgery is an independent prognostic factor of relapse-free survival (hazard ratio: 3.219, 95% confidence interval: 1.381–7.502; P = 0.007) but not of OS.
Conclusion
Compared with the open surgery group, the laparoscopy group had a better RFS, although the difference was not statistically significant.