nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.05.2013

Routine Use of Simultaneous Laparoendoscopic Approach in Patients with Confirmed Gallbladder and Bile Duct Stones: Fit for Laparoscopy Fit for “Rendezvous”

verfasst von: Cinzia Tommasi, Lapo Bencini, Marco Bernini, Riccardo Naspetti, Giulia Cavallina, Roberto Manetti, Luca Talamucci, Marco Farsi

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The aim of the present work was to determine the feasibility and efficacy, in terms of equipment coordination and timing, of the laparoendoscopic intraoperative rendezvous technique (RVT) for the treatment of gallbladder and common bile duct stones (CBDS).

Methods

The procedure was considered in 269 unselected patients with a suspicion or preoperative imaging demonstration of CBDS who were fit for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Common bile duct stones were confirmed by intraoperative laparoscopic cholangiography (IOC) in only 113 of these patients (42 %). In 17 (15 %) patients the planned procedure was aborted because of organizational problems, mainly the unavailability of endoscopists in the urgent setting. The remaining 96 patients (84 %) underwent a formal attempt at RVT. Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) was performed, during LC, by means of a guidewire that reached the duodenum through the cystic duct.

Results

In 18 patients (19 %) the complete procedure failed, either because of difficulty in passing the guidewire through the papilla or because of other technical difficulties that required conversion to laparotomy. An intraoperative ERC was completed in six patients in the classical way (no guidewire) without conversion. No mortality and few complications were recorded (3 % overall: 1 perforation and 2 cholangitis). Retained stones were successively detected in 6 patients (6 %) and successfully retreated by a further ERC. Globally, the one-stage procedure (with and without the guidewire) was possible in 84 of 96 patients (87 %).

Conclusions

The RVT appears to be effective and safe as it was performed at our institution, with an overall percentage of definitive success (passed guide wire and no further ERC) of 81 %. The RVT should be considered as a good option for the treatment of simultaneous gallstones and CBDS.

Ko CW, Lee SP (2002) Epidemiology and natural history of common bile duct stones and prediction of disease. The NIH State-of-the-Science Conference: ERCP for diagnosis and therapy. Gastrointest Endosc 56:165–169CrossRef

NIH Consensus Conference (1993) Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA 269:1018–1024CrossRef

Sain AH (1996) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the current “gold standard” for the treatment of gallstone disease. Ann Surg 224:689–690PubMedCrossRef

Williams EJ, Green J, Beckingham I et al (2008) Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut 57:1004–1021PubMedCrossRef

Wills VL, Gibson K, Karihaloot C et al (2002) Complications of biliary T-tubes after choledochotomy. ANZJ Surg 72:177–180CrossRef

Parra-Membrives P, Díaz-Gómez D, Vilegas-Portero R et al (2010) Appropriate management of common bile duct stones: a RAND Corporation/UCLA Appropriateness Method statistical analysis. Surg Endosc 24:1187–1194PubMedCrossRef

Clayton E, Connor S, Alexakis N et al (2006) Metaanalysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ. Br J Surg 93:1185–1191PubMedCrossRef

Poulose B, Arbogast P, Holzman M (2006) National analysis of in-hospital resource utilization in choledocholithiasis management using propensity scores. Surg Endosc 20:186–190PubMedCrossRef

Gholipour C, Shalchi RA, Abassi M (2007) Efficacy and safety of early laparoscopic common bile duct exploration as primary procedure in acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 17:634–638CrossRef

10.

Vila JJ, Artifon EL, Otoch JP (2012) Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography complications: how can they be avoided? World J Gastrointest Endosc 16:241–246CrossRef

11.

Prat F, Edery J, Meduri B et al (2001) Early EUS of the bile duct before endoscopic sphincterotomy for acute biliary pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 54:724–729PubMedCrossRef

12.

Liu CL, Lo CM, Chan JK et al (2001) Detection of choledocholithiasis by EUS in acutepancreatitis: a prospective evaluation in 100 consecutive patients. Gastrointest Endosc 54:325–330PubMedCrossRef

13.

Makary MA, Duncan MD, Harmon J et al (2005) The role of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of patients with gallstone pancreatitis. Ann Surg 241:119–124PubMed

14.

Berthou JCh, Dron B, Charbonneau P et al (2007) Evaluation of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones in a prospective series of 505 patients: indications and results. Surg Endosc 21:1970–1974PubMedCrossRef

15.

Bahram M, Gaballa G (2010) The value of pre-operative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in management of patients with gall stones. Int J Surg 8:342–345PubMedCrossRef

16.

Yang MH, Chen TH, Wang SE et al (2008) Biochemical predictors for absence of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 22:1620–1624PubMedCrossRef

17.

Tekin A, Ogetman Z, Altunel E (2008) Laparoendoscopic “rendezvous” versus laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. Surgery 144:442–447PubMedCrossRef

18.

Borzellino G, Rodella L, Saladino E et al (2010) Treatment for retained common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The rendezvous technique. Arch Surg 145:1145–1149PubMedCrossRef

19.

Deslandres E, Gagner M, Pomp A et al (1993) Intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 39:54–58PubMedCrossRef

20.

Mayrhofer T, Schmiederer R, Razek P (1993) Intraoperative endoscopic papillotomy and stone removal. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1:144–149PubMed

21.

Feretis C, Kalliakmanis B, Benakis P et al (1994) Laparoscopic transcystic papillotomy under endoscopic control for bile duct stones. Endoscopy 26:697–700PubMedCrossRef

22.

Miscusi G, Gasparrini M, Petruzziello L et al (1997) Endolaparoscopic “Rendez-vous” in the treatment of cholecysto-choledochalcalculosis. G Chir 18:655–657PubMed

23.

Treckman J, Sauerland S, Frilling A et al (2006) Common bile duct stones—update 2006. In: Neugebauer E, Sauerland S, Fingerhut A et al (eds) EAES guidelines for endoscopic surgery—twelve years evidence-based surgery in Europe. Springer, Berlin, pp 329–333CrossRef

24.

Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003327

25.

Arata S, Takada T, Hirata K et al (2010) Post-ERCP pancreatitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17:70–78PubMedCrossRef

26.

Rogers SJ, Cello JP, Horn J et al (2010) Prospective randomized trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for common bile duct stone disease. Arch Surg 145:28–33PubMedCrossRef

27.

Bansal VK, Misra MC, Garg P et al (2010) A prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24:1986–1989PubMedCrossRef

28.

Morino M, Baracchi F, Miglietta C et al (2006) Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus laparoendoscopic rendezvous in patients with gallbladder and bile duct stones. Ann Surg 244:889–896PubMedCrossRef

29.

Costi R, Mazzeo A, Tartamella F et al (2010) Cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a case–control study comparing the short- and long-term outcomes for a “laparoscopy-first” attitude with the outcome for sequential treatment (systematic endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy). Surg Endosc 24:51–62PubMedCrossRef

30.

Hanif F, Ahmed Z, Samie MA et al (2010) Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct exploration: the treatment of first choice for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24:1552–1556PubMedCrossRef

31.

Duncan CB, Riall TS (2012) Evidence-based current surgical practice: calculous gallbladder disease. J Gastrointest Surg 16:2011–2025PubMedCrossRef

32.

Tringali A, Mutignani M, Milano A et al (2008) No difference between supine and prone position for ERCP in conscious sedated patients: a prospective randomized study. Endoscopy 40:93–97PubMedCrossRef

33.

Rábago LR, Chico I, Collado D et al (2012) Single-stage treatment with intraoperative ERCP: management of patients with possible choledocholithiasis and gallbladder in situ in a non-tertiary Spanish hospital. Surg Endosc 26:1028–1034PubMedCrossRef

34.

La Greca G, Barbagallo F, Di Blasi M et al (2008) Laparo-endoscopic “rendez-vous” to treat cholecysto-choledocholithiasis: effective, safe and simplifies the endoscopist’s work. World J Gastroenterol 14:2844–2850PubMedCrossRef

35.

Cemachovic I, Letard JC, Begin GF et al (2000) Intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy is a reasonable option for complete single-stage minimally invasive biliary stones treatment: short-term experience with 57 patients. Endoscopy 32:956–962PubMedCrossRef

36.

Wei Q, Wang JG, Li LB et al (2003) Management of choledocholithiasis: comparison between laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy. World J Gastroenterol 9:2856–2858PubMed

37.

Saccomani G, Durante V, Magnolia MR et al (2005) Combined endoscopic treatment for cholelithiasis associated with choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 19:910–914PubMedCrossRef

38.

La Greca G, Barbagallo F, Di Blasi M et al (2007) Rendezvous technique versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to treat bile duct stones reduces endoscopic time and pancreatic damage. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17:167–171PubMedCrossRef

39.

Hong DF, Xin Y, Chen DW (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct for cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 20:424–427PubMedCrossRef

40.

Topal B, Vromman K, Aerts R et al (2010) Hospital cost categories of one-stage versus two-stage management of common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24:413–416PubMedCrossRef

41.

Gurusamy K, Sahay SJ, Burroughs AK et al (2011) Systematic review and meta-analysis of intraoperative versus preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stones. Br J Surg 98:908–916PubMedCrossRef

42.

Sanjay P, Kulli C, Polignano FM et al (2010) Optimal surgical technique, use of intra-operative cholangiography (IOC), and management of acute gallbladder disease: the results of a nation-wide survey in the UK and Ireland. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92:302–306PubMedCrossRef

43.

Sajid MS, Leaver C, Haider Z et al (2012) Routine on-table cholangiography during cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 94:375–380PubMedCrossRef

44.

Rábago LR, Vicente C, Soler F et al (2006) Two-stage treatment with preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) compared with single-stage treatment with intraoperative ERCP for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis with possible choledocholithiasis. Endoscopy 38:779–786PubMedCrossRef

45.

Lu J, Cheng Y, Xiong XZ et al (2012) Two-stage vs single-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol 18:3156–3166PubMedCrossRef

46.

Enochsson L, Lindberg B, Swahn F et al (2004) Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to remove common bile duct stones during routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not prolong hospitalization. Surg Endosc 18:367–371PubMedCrossRef

47.

Lella F, Bagnolo F, Rebuffat C et al (2006) Use of the laparoscopic–endoscopic approach, the so-called “rendez-vous” technique, in cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 20:419–423PubMedCrossRef

48.

Tzovaras G, Baloyiannis I, Zachari E et al (2012) Laparoendoscopic rendezvous versus preoperative ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis: interim analysis of a controlled randomized trial. Ann Surg 255:435–439PubMedCrossRef

49.

La Greca G, Barbagallo F, Sofia M et al (2010) Simultaneous laparoendoscopic rendezvous for the treatment of cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 24:769–780CrossRef

50.

Tzovaras G, Baloyiannis I, Kapsoritakis A et al (2010) Laparoendoscopic rendezvous: an effective alternative to a failed preoperative ERCP in patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 24:2603–2606PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Routine Use of Simultaneous Laparoendoscopic Approach in Patients with Confirmed Gallbladder and Bile Duct Stones: Fit for Laparoscopy Fit for “Rendezvous”
verfasst von: Cinzia Tommasi
Lapo Bencini
Marco Bernini
Riccardo Naspetti
Giulia Cavallina
Roberto Manetti
Luca Talamucci
Marco Farsi
Publikationsdatum: 01.05.2013
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-1962-4

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

21.05.2024 TAVI Nachrichten

Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Routine Use of Simultaneous Laparoendoscopic Approach in Patients with Confirmed Gallbladder and Bile Duct Stones: Fit for Laparoscopy Fit for “Rendezvous”