Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2023

09.02.2023 | Original Article

The short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy combining with different type of mesentericoportal vein resection and reconstruction for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: a Chinese multicenter retrospective cohort study

verfasst von: Guoqing Ouyang, Xiaosheng Zhong, Zhiwei Cai, Jianhua Liu, Shangyou Zheng, Defei Hong, Xinmin Yin, Jian Yu, Xueli Bai, Yahui Liu, Jun Liu, Xiaobing Huang, Yong Xiong, Jie Xu, Yunqiang Cai, Zhongyi Jiang, Rufu Chen, Bing Peng

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 6/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The results of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy combining with mesentericoportal vein resection and reconstruction (LPD-MPVRs) for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma are rarely reported. The aim of present study was to explore the short- and long-term outcomes of different type of LPD-MPVRs.

Methods

Patients who underwent LPD-MPVRs in 14 Chinese high-volume pancreatic centers between June 2014 and December 2020 were selected and compared.

Results

In total, 142 patients were included and were divided into primary closure (n = 56), end-end anastomosis (n = 43), or interposition graft (n = 43). Median overall survival (OS) and median progress-free survival (PFS) between primary closure and end-end anastomosis had no difference (both P > 0.05). As compared to primary closure and end-end anastomosis, interposition graft had the worst median OS (12 months versus 19 months versus 17 months, P = 0.001) and the worst median PFS (6 months versus 15 months versus 12 months, P < 0.000). As compared to primary closure, interposition graft had almost double risk in major morbidity (16.3 percent versus 8.9 percent) and about triple risk (10 percent versus 3.6 percent) in 90-day mortality, while End-end anastomosis had only one fourth major morbidity (2.3 percent versus 8.9 percent). Multivariate analysis revealed postoperation hospital stay, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, number of positive lymph nodes had negative impact on OS, while R0, R1 surgical margin had protective effect on OS. Postoperative hospital stay had negative impact on PFS, while primary closure, end-end anastomosis, short-term vascular patency, and short-term vascular stenosis positively related to PFS.

Conclusions

In LPD-MPVRs, interposition graft had the worst OS, the worst PFS, the highest rate of major morbidity, and the highest rate of 90-day mortality. While there were no differences in OS and PFS between primary closure and end-end anastomosis.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8(5):408–410PubMedCrossRef Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8(5):408–410PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Palanivelu C et al (2007) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 205(2):222–230PubMedCrossRef Palanivelu C et al (2007) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 205(2):222–230PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kendrick ML, Cusati D (2010) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg 145(1):19–23PubMedCrossRef Kendrick ML, Cusati D (2010) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg 145(1):19–23PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Strijker M et al (2019) Treatment and survival of resected and unresected distal cholangiocarcinoma: a nationwide study. Acta Oncol 58(7):1048–1055PubMedCrossRef Strijker M et al (2019) Treatment and survival of resected and unresected distal cholangiocarcinoma: a nationwide study. Acta Oncol 58(7):1048–1055PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tol JA et al (2014) Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 156(3):591–600PubMedCrossRef Tol JA et al (2014) Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 156(3):591–600PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang X et al (2020) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: outcomes and experience of 550 patients in a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol 27(11):4562–4573PubMedCrossRef Wang X et al (2020) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: outcomes and experience of 550 patients in a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol 27(11):4562–4573PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Han SH et al (2020) The Yonsei experience of 104 laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomies: a propensity score-matched analysis with open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 34(4):1658–1664PubMedCrossRef Han SH et al (2020) The Yonsei experience of 104 laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomies: a propensity score-matched analysis with open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 34(4):1658–1664PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Poves I et al (2018) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open approach for pancreatoduodenectomy: the padulap randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 268(5):731–739PubMedCrossRef Poves I et al (2018) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open approach for pancreatoduodenectomy: the padulap randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 268(5):731–739PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Khatkov I et al (2017) One hundred and forty five total laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomies: a single centre experience. Pancreatology 17(6):936–942PubMedCrossRef Khatkov I et al (2017) One hundred and forty five total laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomies: a single centre experience. Pancreatology 17(6):936–942PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA (2012) Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the accordion severity grading system. J Am Coll Surg 215(6):810–819PubMedCrossRef Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA (2012) Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the accordion severity grading system. J Am Coll Surg 215(6):810–819PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bockhorn M et al (2014) Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 155(6):977–988PubMedCrossRef Bockhorn M et al (2014) Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 155(6):977–988PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Machairas N et al (2021) The impact of neoadjuvant treatment on survival in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy with concomitant portomesenteric venous resection: an international multicenter analysis. Ann Surg 274(5):721–728PubMedCrossRef Machairas N et al (2021) The impact of neoadjuvant treatment on survival in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy with concomitant portomesenteric venous resection: an international multicenter analysis. Ann Surg 274(5):721–728PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Groen JV et al (2021) Venous wedge and segment resection during pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: impact on short- and long-term outcomes in a nationwide cohort analysis. Br J Surg 109(1):96–104PubMedCrossRef Groen JV et al (2021) Venous wedge and segment resection during pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: impact on short- and long-term outcomes in a nationwide cohort analysis. Br J Surg 109(1):96–104PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ravikumar R et al (2017) Impact of portal vein infiltration and type of venous reconstruction in surgery for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 104(11):1539–1548PubMedCrossRef Ravikumar R et al (2017) Impact of portal vein infiltration and type of venous reconstruction in surgery for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 104(11):1539–1548PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang X et al (2019) Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy combined with portal-superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction with interposition graft: case series. Medicine (Baltimore) 98(3):e14204PubMedCrossRef Wang X et al (2019) Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy combined with portal-superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction with interposition graft: case series. Medicine (Baltimore) 98(3):e14204PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Khatkov IE et al (2017) Superior mesenteric-portal vein resection during laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 31(3):1488–1495PubMedCrossRef Khatkov IE et al (2017) Superior mesenteric-portal vein resection during laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 31(3):1488–1495PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Croome KP et al (2015) Pancreaticoduodenectomy with major vascular resection: a comparison of laparoscopic versus open approaches. J Gastrointest Surg 19(1):189–94PubMedCrossRef Croome KP et al (2015) Pancreaticoduodenectomy with major vascular resection: a comparison of laparoscopic versus open approaches. J Gastrointest Surg 19(1):189–94PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang M et al (2021) Practice patterns and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in China: a retrospective multicenter analysis of 1029 patients. Ann Surg 273(1):145–53PubMedCrossRef Wang M et al (2021) Practice patterns and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in China: a retrospective multicenter analysis of 1029 patients. Ann Surg 273(1):145–53PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tempero MA et al (2021) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2021, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 19(4):439–457PubMedCrossRef Tempero MA et al (2021) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2021, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 19(4):439–457PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Declaration of Helsinki (1967) Recommendations guiding doctors in clinical research adopted by the World Medical Association in 1964. Wis Med J 66(1):25–6 Declaration of Helsinki (1967) Recommendations guiding doctors in clinical research adopted by the World Medical Association in 1964. Wis Med J 66(1):25–6
24.
Zurück zum Zitat von Elm E et al (2007) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370(9596):1453–1457CrossRef von Elm E et al (2007) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370(9596):1453–1457CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Liao X, Zhang D (2021) The 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer: a review and update. Arch Pathol Lab Med 145(5):543–553PubMedCrossRef Liao X, Zhang D (2021) The 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer: a review and update. Arch Pathol Lab Med 145(5):543–553PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142(5):761–768PubMedCrossRef Wente MN et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142(5):761–768PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery 161(3):584–591PubMedCrossRef Bassi C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery 161(3):584–591PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142(1):20–25PubMedCrossRef Wente MN et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142(1):20–25PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Koch M et al (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149(5):680–688PubMedCrossRef Koch M et al (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149(5):680–688PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Besselink MG et al (2017) Definition and classification of chyle leak after pancreatic operation: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery. Surgery 161(2):365–372PubMedCrossRef Besselink MG et al (2017) Definition and classification of chyle leak after pancreatic operation: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery. Surgery 161(2):365–372PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D et al (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Dindo D et al (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Terasaki F et al (2019) Comparison of end-to-end anastomosis and interposition graft during pancreatoduodenectomy with portal vein reconstruction for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 404(2):191–201PubMedCrossRef Terasaki F et al (2019) Comparison of end-to-end anastomosis and interposition graft during pancreatoduodenectomy with portal vein reconstruction for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 404(2):191–201PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Kantor O et al (2018) The extent of vascular resection is associated with perioperative outcome in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) 20(2):140–146PubMedCrossRef Kantor O et al (2018) The extent of vascular resection is associated with perioperative outcome in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) 20(2):140–146PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Han S et al (2021) Long-term outcomes following en bloc resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the head with portomesenteric venous invasion. Asian J Surg 44(1):313–320PubMedCrossRef Han S et al (2021) Long-term outcomes following en bloc resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the head with portomesenteric venous invasion. Asian J Surg 44(1):313–320PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Snyder RA et al (2018) Vein resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Patency rates and outcomes associated with thrombosis. J Surg Oncol 117(8):1648–1654PubMedCrossRef Snyder RA et al (2018) Vein resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Patency rates and outcomes associated with thrombosis. J Surg Oncol 117(8):1648–1654PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Gao W et al (2016) Comparison of patency rates and clinical impact of different reconstruction methods following portal/superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreatectomy. Pancreatology 16(6):1113–1123PubMedCrossRef Gao W et al (2016) Comparison of patency rates and clinical impact of different reconstruction methods following portal/superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreatectomy. Pancreatology 16(6):1113–1123PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Labori KJ et al (2021) Graft type for superior mesenteric and portal vein reconstruction in pancreatic surgery - a systematic review. HPB (Oxford) 23(4):483–494PubMedCrossRef Labori KJ et al (2021) Graft type for superior mesenteric and portal vein reconstruction in pancreatic surgery - a systematic review. HPB (Oxford) 23(4):483–494PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Glebova NO et al (2015) Technical risk factors for portal vein reconstruction thrombosis in pancreatic resection. J Vasc Surg 62(2):424–433PubMedCrossRef Glebova NO et al (2015) Technical risk factors for portal vein reconstruction thrombosis in pancreatic resection. J Vasc Surg 62(2):424–433PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Groen JV et al (2021) Resection of the portal-superior mesenteric vein in pancreatic cancer: pathological assessment and recurrence patterns. Pancreas 50(8):1218–1229PubMedCrossRef Groen JV et al (2021) Resection of the portal-superior mesenteric vein in pancreatic cancer: pathological assessment and recurrence patterns. Pancreas 50(8):1218–1229PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Al Farai A et al (2019) International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery type 3 and 4 venous resections in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma:the Paoli-Calmettes Institute experience. Eur J Surg Oncol 45(10):1912–1918PubMedCrossRef Al Farai A et al (2019) International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery type 3 and 4 venous resections in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma:the Paoli-Calmettes Institute experience. Eur J Surg Oncol 45(10):1912–1918PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Strobel O et al (2017) Pancreatic cancer surgery: the new R-status counts. Ann Surg 265(3):565–573PubMedCrossRef Strobel O et al (2017) Pancreatic cancer surgery: the new R-status counts. Ann Surg 265(3):565–573PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Bell R et al (2017) Meta-analysis and cost effective analysis of portal-superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreatoduodenectomy: Impact on margin status and survival. Surg Oncol 26(1):53–62PubMedCrossRef Bell R et al (2017) Meta-analysis and cost effective analysis of portal-superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreatoduodenectomy: Impact on margin status and survival. Surg Oncol 26(1):53–62PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Tewari M (2016) Significance of pathological positive superior mesenteric/portal venous invasion in pancreatic cancer. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 15(6):572–578PubMedCrossRef Tewari M (2016) Significance of pathological positive superior mesenteric/portal venous invasion in pancreatic cancer. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 15(6):572–578PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramacciato G et al (2016) Pancreatectomy with mesenteric and portal vein resection for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: multicenter study of 406 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 23(6):2028–2037PubMedCrossRef Ramacciato G et al (2016) Pancreatectomy with mesenteric and portal vein resection for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: multicenter study of 406 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 23(6):2028–2037PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Mierke F et al (2016) Impact of portal vein involvement from pancreatic cancer on metastatic pattern after surgical resection. Ann Surg Oncol 23(Suppl 5):730–736PubMedCrossRef Mierke F et al (2016) Impact of portal vein involvement from pancreatic cancer on metastatic pattern after surgical resection. Ann Surg Oncol 23(Suppl 5):730–736PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyu S et al (2021) Long-term survival in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma after pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with portal vein system resection and reconstruction. Langenbecks Arch Surg 406(6):1917–1924PubMedCrossRef Lyu S et al (2021) Long-term survival in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma after pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with portal vein system resection and reconstruction. Langenbecks Arch Surg 406(6):1917–1924PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Geers J et al (2020) 3D-laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with superior mesenteric or portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer. Surg Endosc 34(12):5616–5624PubMedCrossRef Geers J et al (2020) 3D-laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with superior mesenteric or portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer. Surg Endosc 34(12):5616–5624PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Roch AM et al (2016) Significance of portal vein invasion and extent of invasion in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 20(3):479–87PubMedCrossRef Roch AM et al (2016) Significance of portal vein invasion and extent of invasion in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 20(3):479–87PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Kleive D et al (2020) Pancreatoduodenectomy with venous resection for ductal adenocarcinoma rarely achieves complete (R0) resection. HPB (Oxford) 22(1):50–57PubMedCrossRef Kleive D et al (2020) Pancreatoduodenectomy with venous resection for ductal adenocarcinoma rarely achieves complete (R0) resection. HPB (Oxford) 22(1):50–57PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Hristov B et al (2010) Outcomes of adjuvant chemoradiation after pancreaticoduodenectomy with mesenterico-portal vein resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76(1):176–180PubMedCrossRef Hristov B et al (2010) Outcomes of adjuvant chemoradiation after pancreaticoduodenectomy with mesenterico-portal vein resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76(1):176–180PubMedCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Murakami Y et al (2013) Benefit of portal or superior mesenteric vein resection with adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic head carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 107(4):414–421PubMedCrossRef Murakami Y et al (2013) Benefit of portal or superior mesenteric vein resection with adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic head carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 107(4):414–421PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Maeda S et al (2020) Impact of resection margin status on survival in pancreatic cancer patients after neoadjuvant treatment and pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery 167(5):803–811PubMedCrossRef Maeda S et al (2020) Impact of resection margin status on survival in pancreatic cancer patients after neoadjuvant treatment and pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery 167(5):803–811PubMedCrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Chandrasegaram MD et al (2014) Anticoagulation policy after venous resection with a pancreatectomy: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford) 16(8):691–698PubMedCrossRef Chandrasegaram MD et al (2014) Anticoagulation policy after venous resection with a pancreatectomy: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford) 16(8):691–698PubMedCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Ouaissi M et al (2008) Therapeutic anticoagulant does not modify thromboses rate vein after venous reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2008:896320PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ouaissi M et al (2008) Therapeutic anticoagulant does not modify thromboses rate vein after venous reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2008:896320PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Hashimoto D et al (2017) Efficacy and safety of postoperative anticoagulation prophylaxis with enoxaparin in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery: a prospective trial and literature review. Pancreatology 17(3):464–470PubMedCrossRef Hashimoto D et al (2017) Efficacy and safety of postoperative anticoagulation prophylaxis with enoxaparin in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery: a prospective trial and literature review. Pancreatology 17(3):464–470PubMedCrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Chu CK et al (2010) Prosthetic graft reconstruction after portal vein resection in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a multicenter analysis. J Am Coll Surg 211(3):316–324PubMedCrossRef Chu CK et al (2010) Prosthetic graft reconstruction after portal vein resection in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a multicenter analysis. J Am Coll Surg 211(3):316–324PubMedCrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Stauffer JA et al (2009) Interposition graft with polytetrafluoroethylene for mesenteric and portal vein reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 96(3):247–252PubMedCrossRef Stauffer JA et al (2009) Interposition graft with polytetrafluoroethylene for mesenteric and portal vein reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 96(3):247–252PubMedCrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Kleive D et al (2018) Portal vein reconstruction using primary anastomosis or venous interposition allograft in pancreatic surgery. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 6(1):66–74PubMedCrossRef Kleive D et al (2018) Portal vein reconstruction using primary anastomosis or venous interposition allograft in pancreatic surgery. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 6(1):66–74PubMedCrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai Y et al (2018) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with major venous resection and reconstruction: anterior superior mesenteric artery first approach. Surg Endosc 32(10):4209–4215PubMedCrossRef Cai Y et al (2018) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with major venous resection and reconstruction: anterior superior mesenteric artery first approach. Surg Endosc 32(10):4209–4215PubMedCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Lapshyn H et al (2021) Postoperative outcomes of tangential versus segmental resection and end-to-end reconstruction of the superior mesenterico-portal vein during pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a single-center experience. Anticancer Res 41(10):5123–5130PubMedCrossRef Lapshyn H et al (2021) Postoperative outcomes of tangential versus segmental resection and end-to-end reconstruction of the superior mesenterico-portal vein during pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a single-center experience. Anticancer Res 41(10):5123–5130PubMedCrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan KS et al (2020) Comparison between long and short-term venous patencies after pancreatoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy with portal/superior mesenteric vein resection stratified by reconstruction type. PLoS ONE 15(11):e0240737PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chan KS et al (2020) Comparison between long and short-term venous patencies after pancreatoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy with portal/superior mesenteric vein resection stratified by reconstruction type. PLoS ONE 15(11):e0240737PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Beane JD et al (2017) Pancreatoduodenectomy with venous or arterial resection: a NSQIP propensity score analysis. HPB (Oxford) 19(3):254–263PubMedCrossRef Beane JD et al (2017) Pancreatoduodenectomy with venous or arterial resection: a NSQIP propensity score analysis. HPB (Oxford) 19(3):254–263PubMedCrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Kleespies A et al (2009) Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy minimizes severe complications after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg 96(7):741–750PubMedCrossRef Kleespies A et al (2009) Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy minimizes severe complications after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg 96(7):741–750PubMedCrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen XP et al (2014) Chen’s U-suture technique for end-to-end invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 21(13):4336–4341PubMedCrossRef Chen XP et al (2014) Chen’s U-suture technique for end-to-end invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 21(13):4336–4341PubMedCrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai Y et al (2019) A novel technique of pancreaticojejunostomy for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 33(5):1572–1577PubMedCrossRef Cai Y et al (2019) A novel technique of pancreaticojejunostomy for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 33(5):1572–1577PubMedCrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong DF et al (2017) The role of Hong’s single-stitch duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 55(2):136–140PubMed Hong DF et al (2017) The role of Hong’s single-stitch duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 55(2):136–140PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy combining with different type of mesentericoportal vein resection and reconstruction for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: a Chinese multicenter retrospective cohort study
verfasst von
Guoqing Ouyang
Xiaosheng Zhong
Zhiwei Cai
Jianhua Liu
Shangyou Zheng
Defei Hong
Xinmin Yin
Jian Yu
Xueli Bai
Yahui Liu
Jun Liu
Xiaobing Huang
Yong Xiong
Jie Xu
Yunqiang Cai
Zhongyi Jiang
Rufu Chen
Bing Peng
Publikationsdatum
09.02.2023
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 6/2023
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-09901-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2023

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Traumatologische Notfälle Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

21.05.2024 TAVI Nachrichten

Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.