Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Häufige urologisch-sexualmedizinische Themen in der Praxis sind das Thema des MMW-Webinars am 5. Juni von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. Konkret geht es um die Frage, wann bei Harnwegsinfektionen auf Antibiotika verzichtet werden kann, und um ein Update zur Therapie von Libido- und Potenzstörungen des Mannes. Der dritte Vortrag behandelt sexuell übertragbare Krankheiten. Stellen Sie Ihre Fragen an die Experten und sammeln Sie 2 CME-Punkte. Jetzt gleich anmelden!
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Erschienen in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine 5/2015

01.10.2015 | Original Article

Cardiovascular Management Self-efficacy: Psychometric Properties of a New Scale and Its Usefulness in a Rehabilitation Context

verfasst von: Patrizia Steca, Ph.D., Andrea Greco, Ph.D., Erika Cappelletti, M.Sc., Marco D’Addario, Ph.D., Dario Monzani, Ph.D., Luca Pancani, M.Sc., Giovanni Ferrari, MD, Alessandro Politi, MD, Roberta Gestra, MD, Gabriella Malfatto, MD, Gianfranco Parati, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine | Ausgabe 5/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Self-efficacy beliefs have been shown to affect various effective health-promoting behaviors in patients. Unfortunately, availability of reliable and valid measures of self-efficacy in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) is still very limited.

Purpose

The aims of this study were to present a new scale measuring self-efficacy beliefs in managing CVD and to examine its psychometric properties.

Methods

The study involved 172 patients (mean age = 66.4 years; SD = 9.99 years; 76.2 % men) undergoing cardiovascular rehabilitation. Various psychological factors and CVD severity indicators were collected.

Results

An Exploratory Structural Equation Model showed that the Cardiovascular Management Self-efficacy Scale has three factors: Cardiac Risk Factors, Adherence to Therapy, and Recognition of Symptoms. They all showed high internal consistency, and good convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity. Furthermore, these factors showed significant relations with CVD severity indicators.

Conclusions

The Cardiovascular Management Self-efficacy Scale could be a helpful instrument to monitor differences during interventions to improve good disease management.
Literatur
1.
Goldston K, Baillie AJ. Depression and coronary heart disease: A review of the epidemiological evidence, explanatory mechanisms and management approaches. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008; 28(2): 288-306.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Kuper H, Marmot M, Hemingway H. Systematic review of prospective cohort studies of psychosocial factors in the etiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease. Semin Vasc Med. 2002; 02(03): 267-314.CrossRef
3.
Rozanski A, Blumenthal JA, Davidson KW, et al. The epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of psychosocial risk factors in cardiac practice: The emerging field of behavioral cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45(5): 637-651.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Welin C, Lappas G, Wilhelmsen L. Independent importance of psychosocial factors for prognosis after myocardial infarction. J Intern Med. 2000; 247(6): 629-639.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Blumenthal JA, Burg MM, Barefoot J, et al. Social support, type a behavior, and coronary artery disease. Psychosom Med. 1987; 49: 331-340.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Brummett BH, Babyak MA, Barefoot JC, et al. Social support and hostility as predictors of depressive symptoms in cardiac patients one month following hospitalization: A prospective study. Psychosom Med. 1998; 60: 707-713.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Bosworth HB, Siegler IC, Olsen MK, et al. Social support and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. Qual Life Res. 2000; 9: 829-839.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Everson-Rose SA, Lewis TT. Psychosocial factors and cardiovascular diseases. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005; 26: 469-500.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Frasure-Smith N, Lespérance F, Ginette G, et al. Social support, depression, and mortality during the first year after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1919-1924.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Chida Y, Steptoe A. Positive psychological well-being and mortality: A quantitative review of prospective observational studies. Psychosom Med. 2008; 70: 741-756.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Giltay EJ, Geleijnse JM, Zitman FG, et al. Dispositional optimism and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a prospective cohort of elderly Dutch men and women. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004; 61: 1126-1135.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Maruta T, Colligan RC, Malinchoc M, et al. Optimists vs. pessimists: Survival rate among medical patients over a 30-year period. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000; 75: 140-143.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Scheier MF, Matthews KA, Owens JF, et al. Optimism and rehospitalization after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Arch Intern Med. 1999; 159: 829-835.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Tindle HA, Chang Y, Kuller LH, et al. Optimism, cynical hostility, and incident coronary heart disease and mortality in the Women’s Health Initiative. Circulation. 2009; 120: 656-662.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Artinian NT, Duggan C, Miller P. Age differences in patient recovery patterns following coronary artery bypass surgery. Am J Crit Care. 1993; 2: 453-461.PubMed
16.
Dantas RAS, Motzer SA, Ciol MA. The relationship between quality of life, sense of coherence and self-esteem in persons after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Int J Nurs Stud. 2002; 39: 745-755.CrossRefPubMed
17.
American Association of Cardiovascular & Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Guidelines for Cardia Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention Programs-5th. Carlton, Victoria, Australia: Human Kinetics; 2013.
18.
Graham I, Atar D, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: Executive summary Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (Constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J. 2007; 28(19): 2375-2414.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, et al. European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33(13): 1635-1701.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977; 84(2): 191.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY, US.: Freeman; 1997.
22.
Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized self-efficacy scale. Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. In: Weinman J, Wright S, & Johnston M, eds. England: NFER-NELSON; 1995:35–37.
23.
Schwarzer R. Self-Efficacy: Thought Control of Action. Washington, DC, US: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation; 1992.
24.
Schwarzer R. Social-cognitive factors in changing health-related behavior. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2001; 10: 47-51.CrossRef
25.
Bandura A. Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Understanding and changing health behaviour: From health beliefs to self-regulation. In: Norman P, Abraham CA, & Conner M, eds. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic; 2000:299–339.
26.
Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav. 2004; 31(2): 143-164.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Aljasem LI, Peyrot M, Wissow L, et al. The impact of barriers and self-efficacy on self-care behaviors in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2001; 27(3): 393-404.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Arnold R, Ranchor AV, DeJongste MJL, et al. The relationship between self-efficacy and self-reported physical functioning in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic heart failure. Behav Med. 2005; 31(3): 107-115.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Bernal H, Woolley S, Schensul JJ, et al. Correlates of self-efficacy in diabetes self-care among Hispanic adults with diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2000; 26(4): 673-680.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Clark NM, Dodge JA. Exploring self-efficacy as a predictor of disease management. Health Educ Behav. 1999; 26(1): 72-89.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Fleig L, Pomp S, Schwarzer R, et al. Promoting exercise maintenance: How interventions with booster sessions improve long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Rehabil Psychol. 2013; 58(4): 323-333.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Kavanagh DJ, Gooley S, Wilson PH. Prediction of adherence and control in diabetes. J Behav Med. 1993; 16(5): 509-522.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Luszczynska A, Sutton S. Physical activity after cardiac rehabilitation: Evidence that different types of self-efficacy are important in maintainers and relapsers. Rehabil Psychol. 2006; 51(4): 314.CrossRef
34.
Sniehotta FF, Gorski C, Araújo-Soares V. Adoption of community-based cardiac rehabilitation programs and physical activity following phase III cardiac rehabilitation in Scotland: A prospective and predictive study. Psychol Health. 2010; 25(7): 839-854.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Sniehotta FF, Scholz U, Schwarzer R. Bridging the intention-behaviour gap: Planning, self-efficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise. Psychol Health. 2005; 20(2): 143-160.CrossRef
36.
Carlson JJ, Norman GJ, Feltz DL, et al. Self-efficacy, psychosocial factors, and exercise behavior in traditional versus modified cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2001; 21(6): 363-373.CrossRef
37.
Izawa KP, Watanabe S, Omiya K, et al. Effect of the self-monitoring approach on exercise maintenance during cardiac rehabilitation: A randomized, controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 84(5): 313-321.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Sarkar U, Ali S, Whooley MA. Self-efficacy and health status in patients with coronary heart disease: Findings from the heart and soul study. Psychosom Med. 2007; 69(4): 306.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Gardner JK, McConnell TR, Klinger TA, et al. Quality of life and self-efficacy: Gender and diagnosis considerations from management during cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2003; 23(4): 299-306.CrossRef
40.
Sullivan MD, LaCroix AZ, Russo J, et al. Self-efficacy and self-reported functional status in coronary heart disease: A six-month prospective study. Psychosom Med. 1998; 60(4): 473-478.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Hickey ML, Owen SV, Froman RD. Instrument development: Cardiac diet and exercise self-efficacy. Nurs Res. 1992; 41(6): 347-351.PubMed
42.
Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, et al. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods. 1999; 4(3): 272-299.CrossRef
43.
Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. 2006;5:307–337.
44.
Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60: e44-e164.CrossRefPubMed
45.
McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, et al. ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33: 1787-1847.CrossRefPubMed
46.
47.
Riegel B. The Self-care Model for Chronic Stable Angina. Orlando, FL: American Heart Association Scientific Sessions; 2009.
48.
Friedman M, Rosenman RH. Association of specific overt behavior pattern with blood and cardiovascular findings: Blood cholesterol level, blood clotting time, incidence of arcussenilis, and clinical coronary artery disease. JAMA. 1959; 169(12): 1286-1296.CrossRef
49.
Caprara GV, Passerini S, Pastorelli C, et al. Instigating and measuring interpersonal aggression and hostility: A methodological contribution. Aggress Behav. 1986; 12(4): 237-247.CrossRef
50.
Katch H, Mead H. The role of self-efficacy in cardiovascular disease self-management: A review of effective programs. Patient Intell. 2010; 2: 33-44.CrossRef
51.
Lee C, Ashford SJ, Bobko P. The interactive effects of type A personality and perceived control on worker performance, job satisfaction, and somatic complaints. Acad Manag J. 1990; 33(4): 870-881.CrossRef
52.
Dehdari T, Heidarnia A, Ramezankhani A, et al. Anxiety, self efficacy expectation and social support in patients after coronary angioplasty and coronary bypass. Iran J Public Health. 2008; 37(4): 119-125.
53.
Lau-Walker M. Relationship between illness representation and self-efficacy. J Adv Nurs. 2004; 48(3): 216-225.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Lau-Walker M. Predicting self-efficacy using illness perception components: A patient survey. Br J Health Psychol. 2006; 11(4): 643-661.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Greco A, Steca P, Pozzi R, et al. Predicting depression from illness severity in cardiovascular disease patients: Self-efficacy beliefs, illness perception, and perceived social support as mediators. Int J Behav Med. 2014; 21(2): 221-229.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Kurlowicz LH. Perceived self-efficacy, functional ability, and depressive symptoms in older elective surgery patients. Nurs Res. 1998; 47(4): 219-226.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Sullivan MD, LaCroix AZ, Baum C, et al. Functional status in coronary artery disease: A one-year prospective study of the role of anxiety and depression. Am J Med. 1997; 103(5): 348-356.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Steca P, Greco A, Monzani D, et al. How does illness severity influence depression, health satisfaction and life satisfaction in patients with cardiovascular disease? The mediating role of illness perception and self-efficacy beliefs. Psychol Health. 2013; 28(7): 765-783.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Tsay SL, Chao YFC. Effects of perceived self-efficacy and functional status on depression in patients with chronic heart failure. J Nurs Res. 2002; 10(4): 271-278.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Shaw C. A framework for the study of coping, illness behaviour and outcomes. J Adv Nurs. 1999; 29(5): 1246-1255.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Wiles R. Patients’ perceptions of their heart attack and recovery: The influence of epidemiological evidence and personal experience. Soc Sci Med. 1998; 46(11): 1477-1486.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Petrie KJ, Weinman JA. Perceptions of Health and Illness. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1997.
63.
Schwarzer R, Fuchs R. Self-efficacy and health behaviour. Predicting health behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models. In: Conner M, & Norman P, eds. England: Open University Press; 1996:163–196.
64.
Paryad E, Hosseinzade T, Kazemnejad E, et al. A study of self-efficacy in patients with coronary artery disease and its predictors. QUMSJ. 2011; 7(2): 41-48.
65.
Greco A, Steca P, Pozzi R, et al. The influence of illness severity on health satisfaction in patients with cardiovascular disease: The mediating role of illness perception and self-efficacy beliefs. Behav Med. 2013. doi:10.​1080/​08964289.​2013.​855159.
66.
Sarkar U, Ali S, Whooley MA. Self-efficacy as a marker of cardiac function and predictor of heart failure hospitalization and mortality in patients with stable coronary heart disease: Findings from the Heart and Soul Study. Health Psychol. 2009; 28(2): 166-173.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
67.
Steca P, Greco A, D’Addario M, et al. Relationship of illness severity with health and life satisfaction in patients with cardiovascular disease: The mediating role of self-efficacy beliefs and illness perceptions. J Happiness Stud. 2013; 14(5): 1585-1599.CrossRef
68.
Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care. 1981; 19(8): 787–805.
69.
Bertolotti G, Vidotto G, Sommaruga M, et al. Il Sickness Impact Profile: Traduzione e adattamento italiano. Psicoterapia Cognitiva Comportamentale. 1999; 5(2): 109-121.
70.
Visser MC, Fletcher AE, Parr G, et al. A comparison of three quality of life instruments in subjects with angina pectoris: The sickness impact profile, the Nottingham health Profile, and the quality of well being scale. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994; 47(2): 157-163.CrossRefPubMed
71.
Visser MC, Koudstaal PJ, Erdman R, et al. Measuring quality of life in patients with myocardial infarction or stroke: a feasibility study of four questionnaires in The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995; 49(5): 513-517.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
72.
Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951; 16(3): 297-334.CrossRef
73.
Morisky DE, Green LW, Levine DM. Concurrent and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of medication adherence. Med Care. 1986; 24(1): 67-74.CrossRefPubMed
74.
Caprara GV, Barbaranelli C, Perugini M, et al. Indicatori della Condotta Aggressiva: Irritabilità e Ruminazione/Dissipazione. Firenze: OS: Organizzazioni Speciali; 1991.
75.
Zotti A, Bertolotti G, Michielin P, Sanavio E, Vidotto G. Linee guida per lo screening di tratti di personalità, cognizioni e comportamenti avversi alla salute. Manuale d’uso per il CBA forma Hospital. Adv Rehab/ Aggiorn Med Riabilitativa. 2000;8: 1–126.
76.
Zotti AM, Bertolotti G, Michielin P, Sanavio E, Vidotto G. CBA - 2.0. Cognitive Behavioural Assessment 2.0. Scale Primarie. Firenze, Italy: OS, OrganizzazioniSpeciali; 1997.
77.
Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, et al. The brief illness perception questionnaire. Psychosom Res. 2006; 60(6): 631-637.CrossRef
78.
Pain D, Miglioretti M, Angelino E. Sviluppo della versione italiana del Brief-IPQ, strumento psicometrico per lo studio delle rappresentazioni di malattia. Psicologiadella Salute. 2006; 2006(1): 81-89.
79.
Leventhal H, Nerenz DR, Steele DJ. Illness perceptions and coping with health threats. In: Baum AT, Taylor SE, Singer JE, eds. Handbook of Psychology and Health: Social Psychological Aspects of Health. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1984: 219-252.
80.
Clayton TC, Lubsen J, Pocock SJ, et al. Risk score for predicting death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in patients with stable angina, based on a large randomised trial cohort of patients. BMJ. 2005; 331(7521): 869.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
81.
Eichhorn EJ. Prognosis determination in heart failure. Am J Med. 2001; 110(7): 14-35.CrossRef
82.
Volpi A, De Vita C, Franzosi MG, et al. Determinants of 6-month mortality in survivors of myocardial infarction after thrombolysis. Results of the GISSI-2 data base. The Ad hoc Working Group of the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell’Infarto Miocardico (GISSI)-2 Data Base. Circulation. 1993; 88(2): 416-429.CrossRefPubMed
83.
Weir RAP, Martin TN, Murphy CA, et al. Comparison of serial measurements of infarct size and left ventricular ejection fraction by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and electrocardiographic QRS scoring in reperfused anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2010; 43(3): 230-236.CrossRefPubMed
84.
Moser DK, Riegel B. Cardiac Nursing: A Companion to Braunwald’s Heart Disease. Philadelphia, PA, US: Saunders/Elsevier; 2008.
85.
86.
Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User’s Guide. 6th ed. MuthénLos Angeles, CA: Muthén& 1998.
87.
West SG, Finch JF, Curran PJ. Structural Equation Models with Nonnormal Variables: Problems and Remedies. Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 1995: 56-75.
88.
Asparouhov T, Muthén B. Exploratory structural equation modeling. Struct Equ Model. 2009; 16(3): 397-438.CrossRef
89.
Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999; 6(1): 1-55.CrossRef
90.
Nunnally JC, Bernstein IJ. Teoríapsicométrica. Madrid: McGraw-Hill; 1995.
91.
Nunnally JC, Bernstein IJ. Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.) [Internet]. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
92.
Comrey AL, Lee HB. A First Course in Factor Analysis. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1992.
93.
Rasheed M, Nadeem M, Rasheed M, et al. Relationship of personality type and self efficacy among cardiac patients. IJHAS. 2012; 1(1): 17-21.
94.
Lee C, Gillen DJ. Relationship of Type A behavior pattern, self-efficacy perceptions on sales performance. J Organ Behav. 1989; 10(1): 75-81.CrossRef
95.
Michie S, Ashford S, Sniehotta FF, et al. A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: The CALO-RE taxonomy. Psychol Health. 2011; 26(11): 1479-1498.CrossRefPubMed
96.
Ashford S, Edmunds J, French DP. What is the best way to change self-efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Health Psychol. 2010; 15: 265-288.CrossRefPubMed
97.
Warner LM, Schüz B, Wolff JK, Parschau L, Wurm S, Schwarzer R. (2014, April 7). Sources of self-efficacy for physical activity. Health Psychol. Advance online publication. doi:10.​1037/​hea0000085.
98.
Williams S, French D. What are the most effective intervention techniques for changing physical activity self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour—and are they the same? Health Educ Res. 2011; 26: 308-322.CrossRefPubMed
99.
Petrie KJ, Cameron LD, Ellis CJ, et al. Changing illness perceptions after myocardial infarction: An early intervention randomized controlled trial. Psychosom Med. 2002; 64(4): 580-586.CrossRefPubMed
100.
Dusseldorp E, van Elderen T, Maes S, et al. A meta-analysis of psychoeducational programs for coronary heart disease patients. Health Psychol. 1999; 18(5): 506-519.CrossRefPubMed
101.
Ewart CK. The role of Physical self-efficacy in recovery from heart attack. In: Schwarzer R, ed. Self-Efficacy: Thought Control of Action. Washington, DC: Hemisphere; 1992: 287-304.
102.
Jeng C, Braun L. The influence of self-efficacy on exercise intensity, compliance rate and cardiac rehabilitation outcomes among coronary artery disease patients. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 1996; 12(1): 13-24.
103.
Linden W, Stossel C, Maurice J. Psychosocial interventions for patients with coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 1996; 156(7): 745-752.CrossRefPubMed
104.
105.
Janssen V, De Gucht V, van Exel H, et al. A self-regulation lifestyle program for post-cardiac rehabilitation patients has long-term effects on exercise adherence. J Behav Med. 2014; 37(2): 308-321.CrossRefPubMed
106.
Fleig L, Pomp S, Schwarzer R, et al. Promoting exercise maintenance: How interventions with booster sessions improve long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Rehabil Psychol. 2013; 58(4): 323-333. doi:10.​1037/​a0033885.CrossRefPubMed
107.
Schwarzer R. Modeling health-behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol. 2008; 57: 1-29.
108.
Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, et al. Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy: Decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1989; 4: 23-30.CrossRefPubMed
109.
110.
Vertinsky IB, Thompson WA, Uyeno D. Measuring consumer desire for participation in clinical decision making. Health Serv Res. 1974; 9: 121-134.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Cardiovascular Management Self-efficacy: Psychometric Properties of a New Scale and Its Usefulness in a Rehabilitation Context
verfasst von
Patrizia Steca, Ph.D.
Andrea Greco, Ph.D.
Erika Cappelletti, M.Sc.
Marco D’Addario, Ph.D.
Dario Monzani, Ph.D.
Luca Pancani, M.Sc.
Giovanni Ferrari, MD
Alessandro Politi, MD
Roberta Gestra, MD
Gabriella Malfatto, MD
Gianfranco Parati, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine / Ausgabe 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0883-6612
Elektronische ISSN: 1532-4796
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-015-9698-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2015

Annals of Behavioral Medicine 5/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

Predicting Avoidance of Skin Damage Feedback Among College Students

Original Article

Trajectories of Posttraumatic Growth and Associated Characteristics in Women with Breast Cancer

Original Article

Assessing Connections Between Behavior Change Theories Using Network Analysis

Erratum

Erratum to: The Strength of Family Ties: Perceptions of Network Relationship Quality and Levels of C-Reactive Proteins in the North Texas Heart Study

Brief Report

Illness Perception Profiles and Their Association with 10-Year Survival Following Cardiac Valve Replacement

Original Article

Which Images and Features in Graphic Cigarette Warnings Predict Their Perceived Effectiveness? Findings from an Online Survey of Residents in the UK

Neu in den Fachgebieten Neurologie und Psychiatrie

Blutdrucksenkung schon im Rettungswagen bei akutem Schlaganfall?

31.05.2024 Apoplex Nachrichten

Der optimale Ansatz für die Blutdruckkontrolle bei Patientinnen und Patienten mit akutem Schlaganfall ist noch nicht gefunden. Ob sich eine frühzeitige Therapie der Hypertonie noch während des Transports in die Klinik lohnt, hat jetzt eine Studie aus China untersucht.

Nicht Creutzfeldt Jakob, sondern Abführtee-Vergiftung

29.05.2024 Hyponatriämie Nachrichten

Eine ältere Frau trinkt regelmäßig Sennesblättertee gegen ihre Verstopfung. Der scheint plötzlich gut zu wirken. Auf Durchfall und Erbrechen folgt allerdings eine Hyponatriämie. Nach deren Korrektur kommt es plötzlich zu progredienten Kognitions- und Verhaltensstörungen.

Schutz der Synapsen bei Alzheimer

29.05.2024 Morbus Alzheimer Nachrichten

Mit einem Neurotrophin-Rezeptor-Modulator lässt sich möglicherweise eine bestehende Alzheimerdemenz etwas abschwächen: Erste Phase-2-Daten deuten auf einen verbesserten Synapsenschutz.

Hörschwäche erhöht Demenzrisiko unabhängig von Beta-Amyloid

29.05.2024 Hörstörungen Nachrichten

Hört jemand im Alter schlecht, nimmt das Hirn- und Hippocampusvolumen besonders schnell ab, was auch mit einem beschleunigten kognitiven Abbau einhergeht. Und diese Prozesse scheinen sich unabhängig von der Amyloidablagerung zu ereignen.

Bildnachweise