Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery 3/2011

01.09.2011 | Original Article

Comparison of two models for predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastases in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients

verfasst von: Giovanni D’Eredita’, Vito Leopoldo Troilo, Fernando Fischetti, Giuseppe Rubini, Tommaso Berardi

Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Several models for the prediction of non-sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in SLN-positive breast cancer patients have been proposed. In this study, the authors evaluate the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram and an axilla scoring system from Tenon Hospital to predict the probability of having non-(SLN) involvement and to define their actual usefulness when applied to the subgroup of patients with micrometastasis in SLN. The study population consisted of 103 patients: 74 with macrometastasis and 29 with micrometastasis in the SLN. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn and the area under the curves (AUCs) was calculated to assess the discriminative power of the nomograms. Both the ROCs and relative AUCs were calculated for all the patients in the study and for the two subgroups. The AUC for the entire study population was 0.712 in the MSKCC nomogram and 0.759 in the Tenon score. In 74 patients with macrometastasis in SLN, the AUC was 0.760 in MSKCC nomogram and 0.707 in Tenon score. Micrometastasis in SLN was found in t29 patients: AUC was 0.577 in the MSKCC nomogram and 0.738 in the Tenon score. Several institutions have tested the MSKCC nomogram, with AUC ranging from 0.58 to 0.84. It was not validated by four studies, which did not recommend its use in patients with micrometastasis. In our results, the validation of the Tenon score confirmed its relevance even in patients with micrometastasis in SLN.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Giuliano AE, Haigh PI, Brennan MD et al (2000) Prospective observational study of sentinel lymphadenectomy without further axillary dissection in patients with sentinel node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:2553–2559PubMed Giuliano AE, Haigh PI, Brennan MD et al (2000) Prospective observational study of sentinel lymphadenectomy without further axillary dissection in patients with sentinel node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:2553–2559PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V et al (1997) Sentinel node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes. Lancet 349:1864–1867PubMedCrossRef Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V et al (1997) Sentinel node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes. Lancet 349:1864–1867PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bolster MJ, Peer PG, Bult P et al (2007) Risk factors for non-sentinel lymph node metastases in patients with breast cancer. The outcome of a multi-institutional study. Ann Surg Oncol 14:181–189PubMedCrossRef Bolster MJ, Peer PG, Bult P et al (2007) Risk factors for non-sentinel lymph node metastases in patients with breast cancer. The outcome of a multi-institutional study. Ann Surg Oncol 14:181–189PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Zavagno G, De Salvo GL, Bozza F et al (2004) Number of metastatic sentinel nodes as predictor of axillary involvement in patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 86:171–179PubMedCrossRef Zavagno G, De Salvo GL, Bozza F et al (2004) Number of metastatic sentinel nodes as predictor of axillary involvement in patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 86:171–179PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nos C, Harding C, Freneaux P et al (2003) Predicting of tumour in remaining axillary lymph nodes when the sentinel node in a woman with breast cancer contains metastases. Br J Surg 90 11:1354–1360CrossRef Nos C, Harding C, Freneaux P et al (2003) Predicting of tumour in remaining axillary lymph nodes when the sentinel node in a woman with breast cancer contains metastases. Br J Surg 90 11:1354–1360CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cady B (1997) Guest Editorial, case against axillary lymphadenectomy for most patients with infiltrating breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 66:7–10PubMedCrossRef Cady B (1997) Guest Editorial, case against axillary lymphadenectomy for most patients with infiltrating breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 66:7–10PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Changsri C, Prakash S, Sandweiss L et al (2004) Prediction of additional axillary metastasis of breast cancer following sentinel lymph node surgery. Breast J 10:392–397PubMedCrossRef Changsri C, Prakash S, Sandweiss L et al (2004) Prediction of additional axillary metastasis of breast cancer following sentinel lymph node surgery. Breast J 10:392–397PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cserni G (2001) Sentinel lymph-node biopsy-based prediction of further breast cancer metastases in the axilla. Eur J Surg Oncol 27:532–538PubMedCrossRef Cserni G (2001) Sentinel lymph-node biopsy-based prediction of further breast cancer metastases in the axilla. Eur J Surg Oncol 27:532–538PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Viale G, Maiorano E, Pruneri G et al (2005) Predicting the risk for additional axillary metastases in patients with breast carcinoma and positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg 241:319–325PubMedCrossRef Viale G, Maiorano E, Pruneri G et al (2005) Predicting the risk for additional axillary metastases in patients with breast carcinoma and positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg 241:319–325PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wada N, Imoto S, Yamauchi C et al (2006) Predictors of tumour involvement in remaining axillary lymph nodes of breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph node. Eur J Surg Oncol 32:29–33PubMedCrossRef Wada N, Imoto S, Yamauchi C et al (2006) Predictors of tumour involvement in remaining axillary lymph nodes of breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph node. Eur J Surg Oncol 32:29–33PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Farshid G, Pradhan M, Kollias J et al (2004) A decision aid for predicting non-sentinel node involvement in women with breast cancer and at least one positive sentinel node. The Breast 13:494–501PubMedCrossRef Farshid G, Pradhan M, Kollias J et al (2004) A decision aid for predicting non-sentinel node involvement in women with breast cancer and at least one positive sentinel node. The Breast 13:494–501PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan YY, Fan YG, Lu Y et al (2005) Ratio of positive to total number of sentinel nodes predicts non sentinel node status in breast cancer patients. Breast J 11:248–253PubMedCrossRef Tan YY, Fan YG, Lu Y et al (2005) Ratio of positive to total number of sentinel nodes predicts non sentinel node status in breast cancer patients. Breast J 11:248–253PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner RR, Chu KU, Qi K et al (2000) Pathologic features associated with non-sentinel lymph node metastases in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma in a sentinel lymph node. Cancer 89:574–581PubMedCrossRef Turner RR, Chu KU, Qi K et al (2000) Pathologic features associated with non-sentinel lymph node metastases in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma in a sentinel lymph node. Cancer 89:574–581PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong SL, Edwards MJ, Chao C et al (2001) Predicting the status of the non-sentinel axillary nodes. Arch Surg 136:563–568PubMedCrossRef Wong SL, Edwards MJ, Chao C et al (2001) Predicting the status of the non-sentinel axillary nodes. Arch Surg 136:563–568PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Guenther JM, Hansen NM, DeFronzo LA et al (2003) Axillary dissection is not required for all patients with breast cancer and positive nodes. Arch Surg 138:52–56PubMedCrossRef Guenther JM, Hansen NM, DeFronzo LA et al (2003) Axillary dissection is not required for all patients with breast cancer and positive nodes. Arch Surg 138:52–56PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Schrenk P, Konstantiniuk P, Wolfl S et al (2005) Prediction of non- sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer with a micrometastatic sentinel node. Br J Surg 92:707–713PubMedCrossRef Schrenk P, Konstantiniuk P, Wolfl S et al (2005) Prediction of non- sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer with a micrometastatic sentinel node. Br J Surg 92:707–713PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Zee KJ, Manasseh DM, Bevilacqua JL et al (2003) A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 10:1140–1151PubMedCrossRef Van Zee KJ, Manasseh DM, Bevilacqua JL et al (2003) A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 10:1140–1151PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Barranger E, Coutant C, Flahault A et al (2005) An axilla scoring system to predict non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node involvement. Breast Cancer Res Treat 91:113–119PubMedCrossRef Barranger E, Coutant C, Flahault A et al (2005) An axilla scoring system to predict non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node involvement. Breast Cancer Res Treat 91:113–119PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Pal A, Provenzano E, Duffy SW et al (2008) A model for predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastatic disease when the sentinel lymph node is positive. Br J Surg 95:302–309PubMedCrossRef Pal A, Provenzano E, Duffy SW et al (2008) A model for predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastatic disease when the sentinel lymph node is positive. Br J Surg 95:302–309PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kohrt HE, Olshen RA, Bermas HR et al (2008) New models and online calculator for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer 8:66PubMedCrossRef Kohrt HE, Olshen RA, Bermas HR et al (2008) New models and online calculator for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer 8:66PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Eredità G, Ferrarese F, Cecere V et al (2003) Subareolar injection may be more accurate than other techniques for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 10:942–947PubMedCrossRef D’Eredità G, Ferrarese F, Cecere V et al (2003) Subareolar injection may be more accurate than other techniques for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 10:942–947PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Eredità G, Giardina C, Guerrieri AM et al (2006) A further validation of subareolar injection technique for sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 13:701–707PubMedCrossRef D’Eredità G, Giardina C, Guerrieri AM et al (2006) A further validation of subareolar injection technique for sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 13:701–707PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Eredità G, Troilo VL, Giardina C et al (2006) L’iniezione subareolare per la biopsia del linfonodo sentinella nei tumori multipli della mammella. G Chir 27:436–441PubMed D’Eredità G, Troilo VL, Giardina C et al (2006) L’iniezione subareolare per la biopsia del linfonodo sentinella nei tumori multipli della mammella. G Chir 27:436–441PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kern KA (1999) Sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer using subareolar injection of blue dye. J Am Coll Surg 189:539–545PubMedCrossRef Kern KA (1999) Sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer using subareolar injection of blue dye. J Am Coll Surg 189:539–545PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Viale G, Maiorano E, Mazzarol G et al (2001) Histologic detection and clinical implications of micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes for patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer 92:1378–1384PubMedCrossRef Viale G, Maiorano E, Mazzarol G et al (2001) Histologic detection and clinical implications of micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes for patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer 92:1378–1384PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Coutant C, Rouzier R, Fondrinier E et al (2009) Validation of the Tenon breast cancer score for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastasis: a prospective multicenter study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 113:537–543PubMedCrossRef Coutant C, Rouzier R, Fondrinier E et al (2009) Validation of the Tenon breast cancer score for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastasis: a prospective multicenter study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 113:537–543PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiving operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839–843PubMed Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiving operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839–843PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Alran S, De Rycke Y, Fourchotte V et al (2007) Validation and limitations of use of a breast cancer nomogram predicting the likelihood of nonsentinel node involvement after positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 14:2195–2201PubMedCrossRef Alran S, De Rycke Y, Fourchotte V et al (2007) Validation and limitations of use of a breast cancer nomogram predicting the likelihood of nonsentinel node involvement after positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 14:2195–2201PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kocsis L, Svebis M, Boross G et al (2004) Use and limitations of a nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after a positive sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients. Am Surg 70:1019–1024PubMed Kocsis L, Svebis M, Boross G et al (2004) Use and limitations of a nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after a positive sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients. Am Surg 70:1019–1024PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Soni NK, Carmalt HL, Gillett DJ et al (2005) Evaluation of a breast cancer nomogram for prediction of non-sentinel lymph node positivity. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:958–964PubMedCrossRef Soni NK, Carmalt HL, Gillett DJ et al (2005) Evaluation of a breast cancer nomogram for prediction of non-sentinel lymph node positivity. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:958–964PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Smidt ML, Kuster DM, van der Wilt GJ et al (2005) Can the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram predict the likelihood of nonsentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients in the Netherlands? Ann Surg Oncol 12:1066–1072PubMedCrossRef Smidt ML, Kuster DM, van der Wilt GJ et al (2005) Can the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram predict the likelihood of nonsentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients in the Netherlands? Ann Surg Oncol 12:1066–1072PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Degnim AC, Reynolds C, Pantvaidya G et al (2005) Nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients: assessment of an existing and a new predictive nomogram. Am J Surg 190:543–550PubMedCrossRef Degnim AC, Reynolds C, Pantvaidya G et al (2005) Nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients: assessment of an existing and a new predictive nomogram. Am J Surg 190:543–550PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Lambert LA, Ayers GD, Hwang RF et al (2006) Validation of a breast cancer nomogram for predicting nonsentinel lymph node metastasis after a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 13:310–320PubMedCrossRef Lambert LA, Ayers GD, Hwang RF et al (2006) Validation of a breast cancer nomogram for predicting nonsentinel lymph node metastasis after a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 13:310–320PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Cripe MH, Beran LC, Liang WC et al (2006) The likelihood of additional nodal disease following a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients: validation of a nomogram. Am J Surg 192:484–487PubMedCrossRef Cripe MH, Beran LC, Liang WC et al (2006) The likelihood of additional nodal disease following a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients: validation of a nomogram. Am J Surg 192:484–487PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Dauphine CE, Haukoos JS, Vargas MP et al (2007) Evaluation of three scoring systems predicting non sentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1014–1019PubMedCrossRef Dauphine CE, Haukoos JS, Vargas MP et al (2007) Evaluation of three scoring systems predicting non sentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1014–1019PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Ponzone R, Maggiorotto F, Mariani L et al (2007) Comparison of two models for the prediction of nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer. Am J Surg 193:686–692PubMedCrossRef Ponzone R, Maggiorotto F, Mariani L et al (2007) Comparison of two models for the prediction of nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer. Am J Surg 193:686–692PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Bevilacqua JL, Kattan MW, Fey JV et al (2007) Doctor, what are my chances of having a positive sentinel node? A validated nomogram for risk estimation. J Clin Oncol 25:3670–3679PubMedCrossRef Bevilacqua JL, Kattan MW, Fey JV et al (2007) Doctor, what are my chances of having a positive sentinel node? A validated nomogram for risk estimation. J Clin Oncol 25:3670–3679PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat van la Parra RF, Ernst MF, Bevilacqua JL et al (2009)Validation of a nomogram to predict the risk of nonsentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy: validation of the MSKCC breast nomogram. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1128–1135 van la Parra RF, Ernst MF, Bevilacqua JL et al (2009)Validation of a nomogram to predict the risk of nonsentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy: validation of the MSKCC breast nomogram. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1128–1135
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Klar M, Jochmann A, Foeldi M, Stumpf M et al (2008) The MSKCC nomogram for prediction the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement in a German breast cancer population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 112:523–531PubMedCrossRef Klar M, Jochmann A, Foeldi M, Stumpf M et al (2008) The MSKCC nomogram for prediction the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement in a German breast cancer population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 112:523–531PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Gur AS, Unal B, Johnson R et al (2009) Predictive probability of four different breast cancer nomograms for nonsentinel axillary lymph node metastasis in positive sentinel node biopsy. J Am Coll Surg 208:229–235PubMedCrossRef Gur AS, Unal B, Johnson R et al (2009) Predictive probability of four different breast cancer nomograms for nonsentinel axillary lymph node metastasis in positive sentinel node biopsy. J Am Coll Surg 208:229–235PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang RF, Krishnamurthy S, Hunt KK et al (2003) Clinicopathologic factors predicting involvement of nonsentinel axillary nodes in women with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 10:248–254PubMedCrossRef Hwang RF, Krishnamurthy S, Hunt KK et al (2003) Clinicopathologic factors predicting involvement of nonsentinel axillary nodes in women with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 10:248–254PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Coutant C, Olivier C, Lambaudie E et al (2009) Comparison of models to predict nonsentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 27:2800–2808PubMedCrossRef Coutant C, Olivier C, Lambaudie E et al (2009) Comparison of models to predict nonsentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 27:2800–2808PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Eredità G, Troilo VL, Giardina C et al (2010) Sentinel lymph node micrometastasis and risk of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis: validation of two breast cancer nomograms. Clin Breast Cancer 10:445–451PubMedCrossRef D’Eredità G, Troilo VL, Giardina C et al (2010) Sentinel lymph node micrometastasis and risk of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis: validation of two breast cancer nomograms. Clin Breast Cancer 10:445–451PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Goyal A, Newcombe RG, Chhabra A et al (2006) Factors affecting failed localisation and false-negative rates of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer—results of the ALMANAC validation phase. Breast Cancer Res Treat 99:203–208PubMedCrossRef Goyal A, Newcombe RG, Chhabra A et al (2006) Factors affecting failed localisation and false-negative rates of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer—results of the ALMANAC validation phase. Breast Cancer Res Treat 99:203–208PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin RC, Chagpar A, Scoggins CR et al (2005) Clinicopathologic factors associated with false-negative sentinel lymph-node biopsy in breast cancer. Ann Surg 241:1005–1012PubMedCrossRef Martin RC, Chagpar A, Scoggins CR et al (2005) Clinicopathologic factors associated with false-negative sentinel lymph-node biopsy in breast cancer. Ann Surg 241:1005–1012PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong SL, Edwards MJ, Chao C et al (2001) Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: impact of the number of sentinel nodes removed on the false-negative rate. J Am Coll Surg 192:684–689PubMedCrossRef Wong SL, Edwards MJ, Chao C et al (2001) Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: impact of the number of sentinel nodes removed on the false-negative rate. J Am Coll Surg 192:684–689PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Reed J, Rosman M, Verbanac KM et al (2009) Prognostic implications of isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in sentinel nodes of patients with invasive breast cancer: 10-year analysis of patients enrolled in the prospective East Carolina University/AnnArundel Medical Center Sentinel Node Multicenter Study. J Am Coll Surg 208:333–340PubMedCrossRef Reed J, Rosman M, Verbanac KM et al (2009) Prognostic implications of isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in sentinel nodes of patients with invasive breast cancer: 10-year analysis of patients enrolled in the prospective East Carolina University/AnnArundel Medical Center Sentinel Node Multicenter Study. J Am Coll Surg 208:333–340PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Calhoun KE, Hansen NM, Turner RR et al (2005) Non sentinel node metastases in breast cancer patients with isolated tumor cells in the sentinel node: implications for completion axillary node dissection. Am J Surg 190:588–591PubMedCrossRef Calhoun KE, Hansen NM, Turner RR et al (2005) Non sentinel node metastases in breast cancer patients with isolated tumor cells in the sentinel node: implications for completion axillary node dissection. Am J Surg 190:588–591PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat van Rijk MC, Peterse JL, Nieweg OE et al (2006) Additional axillary metastases and stage migration in breast cancer patients with micrometastases or submicrometastases in sentinel lymph nodes. Cancer 107:467–471PubMedCrossRef van Rijk MC, Peterse JL, Nieweg OE et al (2006) Additional axillary metastases and stage migration in breast cancer patients with micrometastases or submicrometastases in sentinel lymph nodes. Cancer 107:467–471PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of two models for predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastases in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients
verfasst von
Giovanni D’Eredita’
Vito Leopoldo Troilo
Fernando Fischetti
Giuseppe Rubini
Tommaso Berardi
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2011
Verlag
Springer Milan
Erschienen in
Updates in Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Elektronische ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-011-0079-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

Updates in Surgery 3/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

21.05.2024 TAVI Nachrichten

Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.