Introduction
Anatomy of the respiratory muscles
Techniques and views
Diaphragm
Intercostal approach: thickness and thickening fraction
Setting | Parameter | Patient position | Reference values | Abnormal values/values related to outcome | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICU | Thickness (mm) | – | 2.4 ± 0.8 | [9] | |
Semi-recum | 2.4 (2.0–2.9) | [75] | |||
Semi-recum | < 1.7 | [60] | |||
Semi-recum | 1.9 ± 0.4 | [76] | |||
TFdi | Semi-recum | < 30% | [60] | ||
TFdi(max) | Semi-recum | < 36% | [59] | ||
TFdi | Semi-recum | < 34% | [52] | ||
Tidal excursion (mm) | Supine | < 11 (organ exc.) | [77] | ||
Semi-recum | Right < 14 | [51] | |||
Maximal breath (mm) | Semi-recum | Left < 12 | [52] | ||
Semi-recum | < 10 | [53] | |||
< 25 | |||||
General population | Thickness (mm) | Sitting | 1.7 ± 0.2 | [78] | |
Standing | 2.8 ± 0.4 | < 1.9 | [10] | ||
Supine | 3.3 ± 1.0 | < 1.4 | [6] | ||
Supine | 1.6 ± 0.4 | < 1.5 | [7] | ||
Men: 1.9 ± 0.4 | < 1.7 | ||||
Women: 1.4 ± 0.3 | < 1.3 | ||||
TFdi(max) | Standing | 37 ± 9% | < 20% | [10] | |
Supine | 80 ± 50% | < 20% | [6] | ||
Tidal excursion (mm) | Standing | Men: 18 ± 3 | Men: < 10 | [17] | |
Women: 16 ± 3 | Women: < 9 | ||||
Sniff test (mm) | Standing | Men: 29 ± 6 | Men: < 18 | ||
Women: 26 ± 5 | Women: < 16 | ||||
Maximal breath (mm) | Standing | Men: 70 ± 11 | Men: < 47 | ||
Women: 57 ± 10 | Women: < 37 |
Subcostal approach: excursion
Extra-diaphragmatic inspiratory muscles
Abdominal wall expiratory muscles
Clinical applications of respiratory muscle ultrasound (Table 2)
Role of respiratory muscle ultrasound in acute respiratory failure
Setting | Indication | Role of respiratory muscle ultrasound | Diagnostic performance | Limitations |
---|---|---|---|---|
ICU | Difficult weaning | Excursion and TFdi detect DD | Excursion poor to moderate TFdi moderate Better during SBT Combined with clinical parameters better performance | A significant portion of patients diagnosed with DD can be successfully extubated |
Titrate ventilator support | Detection of underuse/overuse using TFdi | Needs further validation | ||
Patient–ventilator interaction | Excursion and/or TFdi (compared to ventilator waveforms) can detect different types of asynchrony | Good/easy repeatable | Variability of the effectiveness between subjects Not suitable for continuous monitoring | |
Estimating work of breathing | TFdi | Large range of effort at certain TFdi | Needs further validation | |
Clinical suspicion of iatrogenic n. phrenicus lesion (e.g., postoperative) | Excursion can detect (unilateral) paralysis/weakness | Good | None | |
ED | Dyspnea of unknown origin | Excursion/TFdi can detect weakness/paralysis | High sens and spec | None |
AECOPD | Excursion/TFdi predict NIV-failure | Moderate | Needs further validation | |
Both | Unilateral diaphragm relaxation on chest X-ray | Excursion/TFdi/left to right ratio | Good | None |
Diagnosing and monitoring of diaphragmatic weakness/paralysis | Good, no technical failures | |||
Stroke with respiratory impairment | Good detection of diaphragm involvement | None | ||
Neuromuscular disorders Cervical spine lesions | May help predict need for mechanical ventilation |