Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Digital Imaging 2/2007

01.06.2007

Comparison of Color LCD and Medical-grade Monochrome LCD Displays in Diagnostic Radiology

verfasst von: Håkan Geijer, Mats Geijer, Lillemor Forsberg, Susanne Kheddache, Patrik Sund

Erschienen in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Ausgabe 2/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

In diagnostic radiology, medical-grade monochrome displays are usually recommended because of their higher luminance. Standard color displays can be used as a less expensive alternative, but have a lower luminance. The aim of the present study was to compare image quality for these two types of displays. Images of a CDRAD contrast-detail phantom were read by four radiologists using a 2-megapixel (MP) color display (143 cd/m2 maximum luminance) as well as 2-MP (295 cd/m2) and 3-MP monochrome displays. Thirty lumbar spine radiographs were also read by four radiologists using the color and the 2-MP monochrome display in a visual grading analysis (VGA). Very small differences were found between the displays when reading the CDRAD images. The VGA scores were −0.28 for the color and −0.25 for the monochrome display (p = 0.24; NS). It thus seems possible to use color displays in diagnostic radiology provided that grayscale adjustment is used.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Reiner B, Siegel E, Hooper F, Ghebrekidan H, Warner J, Briscoe B, Protopapas Z, Pomerantz S: Variation of monitor luminance on radiologist productivity in the interpretation of skeletal radiographs using a picture archiving and communication system. J Digit Imaging 10:176, 1997PubMed Reiner B, Siegel E, Hooper F, Ghebrekidan H, Warner J, Briscoe B, Protopapas Z, Pomerantz S: Variation of monitor luminance on radiologist productivity in the interpretation of skeletal radiographs using a picture archiving and communication system. J Digit Imaging 10:176, 1997PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Krupinski EA, Johnson J, Roehrig H, Nafziger J, Fan J, Lubin J: Use of a human visual system model to predict observer performance with CRT vs LCD display of images. J Digit Imaging 17:258–263, 2004PubMedCrossRef Krupinski EA, Johnson J, Roehrig H, Nafziger J, Fan J, Lubin J: Use of a human visual system model to predict observer performance with CRT vs LCD display of images. J Digit Imaging 17:258–263, 2004PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Langer S, Bartholmai B, Fetterly K, Harmsen S, Ryan W, Erickson B, Andriole K, Carrino J: SCAR R&D Symposium 2003: comparing the efficacy of 5-MP CRT versus 3-MP LCD in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease. J Digit Imaging 17:149–157, 2004PubMedCrossRef Langer S, Bartholmai B, Fetterly K, Harmsen S, Ryan W, Erickson B, Andriole K, Carrino J: SCAR R&D Symposium 2003: comparing the efficacy of 5-MP CRT versus 3-MP LCD in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease. J Digit Imaging 17:149–157, 2004PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Commission of the European Communities: European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images, EUR 16260, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1996 Commission of the European Communities: European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images, EUR 16260, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1996
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pärtan G, Mayrhofer R, Urban M, Wassipaul M, Pichler L, Hruby W: Diagnostic performance of liquid crystal and cathode-ray-tube monitors in brain computed tomography. Eur Radiol 13:2397–2401, 2003PubMedCrossRef Pärtan G, Mayrhofer R, Urban M, Wassipaul M, Pichler L, Hruby W: Diagnostic performance of liquid crystal and cathode-ray-tube monitors in brain computed tomography. Eur Radiol 13:2397–2401, 2003PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sim L, Manthey P, Esdaile P, Benson M: Comparison of computer display monitors for computed radiography diagnostic application in a radiology PACS. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 27:148–150, 2004PubMedCrossRef Sim L, Manthey P, Esdaile P, Benson M: Comparison of computer display monitors for computed radiography diagnostic application in a radiology PACS. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 27:148–150, 2004PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Doyle AJ, Le Fevre J, Anderson GD: Personal computer versus workstation display: observer performance in detection of wrist fractures on digital radiographs. Radiology 237:872–877, 2005PubMedCrossRef Doyle AJ, Le Fevre J, Anderson GD: Personal computer versus workstation display: observer performance in detection of wrist fractures on digital radiographs. Radiology 237:872–877, 2005PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Doyle AJ, Gunn ML, Gamble GD, Zhang M: Personal computer-based PACS display system: comparison with a dedicated PACS workstation for review of computed radiographic images in rheumatoid arthritis. Acad Radiol 9:646–653, 2002PubMedCrossRef Doyle AJ, Gunn ML, Gamble GD, Zhang M: Personal computer-based PACS display system: comparison with a dedicated PACS workstation for review of computed radiographic images in rheumatoid arthritis. Acad Radiol 9:646–653, 2002PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Langer S, Fetterly K, Mandrekar J, Harmsen S, Bartholmai B, Patton C, Bishop A, McCannel C: ROC study of four LCD displays under typical medical center lighting conditions. J Digit Imaging 19:30–40, 2006PubMedCrossRef Langer S, Fetterly K, Mandrekar J, Harmsen S, Bartholmai B, Patton C, Bishop A, McCannel C: ROC study of four LCD displays under typical medical center lighting conditions. J Digit Imaging 19:30–40, 2006PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Goo JM, Choi JY, Im JG, Lee HJ, Chung MJ, Han D, Park SH, Kim JH, Nam SH: Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs. Radiology 232:762–766, 2004PubMedCrossRef Goo JM, Choi JY, Im JG, Lee HJ, Chung MJ, Han D, Park SH, Kim JH, Nam SH: Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs. Radiology 232:762–766, 2004PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Samei E, Badano A, Chakraborty D, Compton K, Cornelius C, Corrigan K, Flynn MJ, Hemminger B, Hangiandreou N, Johnson J, Moxley M, Pavlicek W, Roehrig H, Rutz L, Shepard J, Uzenoff R, Wang J, Willis C: Assessment of Display Performance for Medical Imaging Systems, Report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 18. AAPM online report No. 03. April, Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI, 2005 Samei E, Badano A, Chakraborty D, Compton K, Cornelius C, Corrigan K, Flynn MJ, Hemminger B, Hangiandreou N, Johnson J, Moxley M, Pavlicek W, Roehrig H, Rutz L, Shepard J, Uzenoff R, Wang J, Willis C: Assessment of Display Performance for Medical Imaging Systems, Report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 18. AAPM online report No. 03. April, Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI, 2005
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Krupinski E, Roehrig H, Furukawa T: Influence of film and monitor display luminance on observer performance and visual search. Acad Radiol 6:411–418, 1999PubMedCrossRef Krupinski E, Roehrig H, Furukawa T: Influence of film and monitor display luminance on observer performance and visual search. Acad Radiol 6:411–418, 1999PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Krupinski EA, Roehrig H: Pulmonary nodule detection and visual search: P45 and P104 monochrome versus color monitor displays. Acad Radiol 9:638–645, 2002PubMedCrossRef Krupinski EA, Roehrig H: Pulmonary nodule detection and visual search: P45 and P104 monochrome versus color monitor displays. Acad Radiol 9:638–645, 2002PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Geijer H, Beckman K-W, Andersson T, Persliden J: Image quality vs radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study. Eur Radiol 11:1704–1709, 2001PubMedCrossRef Geijer H, Beckman K-W, Andersson T, Persliden J: Image quality vs radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study. Eur Radiol 11:1704–1709, 2001PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chakrabarti K, Kaczmarek RV, Thomas JA, Romanyukha A: Effect of room illuminance on monitor black level luminance and monitor calibration. J Digit Imaging 16:350–355, 2003PubMedCrossRef Chakrabarti K, Kaczmarek RV, Thomas JA, Romanyukha A: Effect of room illuminance on monitor black level luminance and monitor calibration. J Digit Imaging 16:350–355, 2003PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikeda M, Ishigaki T, Shimamoto K, Kodera Y, Koyama S, Usami H, Kato K: Influence of monitor luminance change on observer performance for detection of abnormalities depicted on chest radiographs. Invest Radiol 38:57–63, 2003PubMedCrossRef Ikeda M, Ishigaki T, Shimamoto K, Kodera Y, Koyama S, Usami H, Kato K: Influence of monitor luminance change on observer performance for detection of abnormalities depicted on chest radiographs. Invest Radiol 38:57–63, 2003PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang J, Compton K, Peng Q: Proposal of a quality-index or metric for soft copy display systems: contrast sensitivity study. J Digit Imaging 16:185–202, 2003PubMedCrossRef Wang J, Compton K, Peng Q: Proposal of a quality-index or metric for soft copy display systems: contrast sensitivity study. J Digit Imaging 16:185–202, 2003PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Peer S, Giacomuzzi SM, Peer R, Gassner E, Steingruber I, Jaschke W: Resolution requirements for monitor viewing of digital flat-panel detector radiographs: a contrast detail analysis. Eur Radiol 13:413–417, 2003PubMed Peer S, Giacomuzzi SM, Peer R, Gassner E, Steingruber I, Jaschke W: Resolution requirements for monitor viewing of digital flat-panel detector radiographs: a contrast detail analysis. Eur Radiol 13:413–417, 2003PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hangiandreou NJ, Fetterly KA, Felmlee JP: Optimization of a contrast-detail-based method for electronic image display quality evaluation. J Digit Imaging 12:60–67, 1999PubMedCrossRef Hangiandreou NJ, Fetterly KA, Felmlee JP: Optimization of a contrast-detail-based method for electronic image display quality evaluation. J Digit Imaging 12:60–67, 1999PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Metter R, Zhao BS, Kohm K: The sensitivity of visual targets for display quality assessment. Proc SPIE 3658:254–268, 1999CrossRef Van Metter R, Zhao BS, Kohm K: The sensitivity of visual targets for display quality assessment. Proc SPIE 3658:254–268, 1999CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of Color LCD and Medical-grade Monochrome LCD Displays in Diagnostic Radiology
verfasst von
Håkan Geijer
Mats Geijer
Lillemor Forsberg
Susanne Kheddache
Patrik Sund
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Ausgabe 2/2007
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Elektronische ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-007-9028-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2007

Journal of Digital Imaging 2/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.