Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2022

20.10.2021 | Review Article

Prophylactic Mesh for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia Following End Colostomy: an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

verfasst von: Tyler McKechnie, MD, Jay Lee, BSc, Yung Lee, MD, Aristithes Doumouras, MD MPH, Nalin Amin, MD, Dennis Hong, MD MSc, Cagla Eskicioglu, MD MSc

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic mesh placement during end colostomy formation at reducing rates of parastomal hernia using the most recently available data.

Background

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have uniformly concluded that the use of prophylactic surgical mesh when fashioning an end colostomy reduces the risk of parastomal hernia. However, recent RCTs have failed to corroborate these findings. This study was designed to provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy of prophylactic mesh placement during end colostomy formation.

Methods

A search of Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL was performed. Articles were included if they were RCTs that compared the use of prophylactic mesh to no prophylactic mesh during construction of an end colostomy following colorectal resection for benign or malignant disease. The primary outcome was parastomal hernia rate. A pairwise meta-analysis was performed using inverse variance random effects.

Results

From 1,089 citations, 12 RCTs with 581 patients having prophylactic mesh placement and 671 patients not having prophylactic mesh placement met inclusion criteria. Incidence of parastomal hernia was significantly reduced in patients receiving prophylactic mesh (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.80, p = 0.0003, I2 = 74%). Results were no longer significantly different when only studies conducted in the last 5 years were analyzed (p = 0.10). There was no significant difference in postoperative morbidity, postoperative mortality, colostomy-specific morbidity, or length of stay between groups.

Conclusions

There remains a significant reduction in the risk of parastomal hernia with the use of prophylactic mesh at the time of end colostomy formation, despite recent evidence suggesting no difference. Further contemporary trials with the application of modern surgical technology are required.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat [1] Perry WB, Connaughton JC. Abdominoperineal resection: How is it done and what are the results? Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2007;20:213–220.CrossRef [1] Perry WB, Connaughton JC. Abdominoperineal resection: How is it done and what are the results? Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2007;20:213–220.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat [2] Carne PWG, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA. Parastomal hernia. British Journal of Surgery. 2003;90:784–793.CrossRef [2] Carne PWG, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA. Parastomal hernia. British Journal of Surgery. 2003;90:784–793.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat [3] Moreno-Matias J, Serra-Aracil X, Darnell-Martin A, Bombardo-Junca J, Mora-Lopez L, Alcantara-Moral M, et al. The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification. Colorectal Disease. 2009;11(2):173–177.CrossRef [3] Moreno-Matias J, Serra-Aracil X, Darnell-Martin A, Bombardo-Junca J, Mora-Lopez L, Alcantara-Moral M, et al. The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification. Colorectal Disease. 2009;11(2):173–177.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat [4] Śmietański M, Szczepkowski M, Alexandre JA, Berger D, Bury K, Conze J, et al. European Hernia Society classification of parastomal hernias. Hernia. 2014;18(1):1–6.CrossRef [4] Śmietański M, Szczepkowski M, Alexandre JA, Berger D, Bury K, Conze J, et al. European Hernia Society classification of parastomal hernias. Hernia. 2014;18(1):1–6.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat [5] Jones HG, Rees M, Aboumarzouk OM, Brown J, Cragg J, Billings P, et al. Prosthetic mesh placement for the prevention of parastomal herniation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018;7(7):1-54. [5] Jones HG, Rees M, Aboumarzouk OM, Brown J, Cragg J, Billings P, et al. Prosthetic mesh placement for the prevention of parastomal herniation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018;7(7):1-54.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat [6] Aquina CT, Iannuzzi JC, Probst CP, Kelly KN, Noyes K, Fleming FJ, et al. Parastomal hernia: A growing problem with new solutions. Digestive Surgery. 2014;31:366–376.CrossRef [6] Aquina CT, Iannuzzi JC, Probst CP, Kelly KN, Noyes K, Fleming FJ, et al. Parastomal hernia: A growing problem with new solutions. Digestive Surgery. 2014;31:366–376.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat [7] Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ, Matthews JB. Parastomal Hernia Is Stoma Relocation Superior to Fascial Repair? Archives of Surgery. 1994;129(4):413–419.CrossRef [7] Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ, Matthews JB. Parastomal Hernia Is Stoma Relocation Superior to Fascial Repair? Archives of Surgery. 1994;129(4):413–419.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat [8] López-Cano M, Serra-Aracil X, Mora L, Sánchez-Garcia JL, Jiménez-Gómez LM, Marti M, et al. Preventing parastomal hernia using a modified sugarbaker technique with composite mesh during laparoscopic: Abdominoperineal resection a randomized controlled trial. Annals of Surgery. 2016;264(6):923–928.CrossRef [8] López-Cano M, Serra-Aracil X, Mora L, Sánchez-Garcia JL, Jiménez-Gómez LM, Marti M, et al. Preventing parastomal hernia using a modified sugarbaker technique with composite mesh during laparoscopic: Abdominoperineal resection a randomized controlled trial. Annals of Surgery. 2016;264(6):923–928.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat [9] López-Cano M, Lozoya-Trujillo R, Quiroga S, Sánchez JL, Vallribera F, Martí M, et al. Use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia during laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: A randomized controlled trial. Hernia. 2012;16(6):661–667.CrossRef [9] López-Cano M, Lozoya-Trujillo R, Quiroga S, Sánchez JL, Vallribera F, Martí M, et al. Use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia during laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: A randomized controlled trial. Hernia. 2012;16(6):661–667.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat [10] Serra-Aracil X, Bombardo-Junca J, Moreno-Matias J, Darnell A, Mora-Lopez L, Alcantara-Moral M, et al. Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Annals of Surgery. 2009;249(4):583–587.CrossRef [10] Serra-Aracil X, Bombardo-Junca J, Moreno-Matias J, Darnell A, Mora-Lopez L, Alcantara-Moral M, et al. Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Annals of Surgery. 2009;249(4):583–587.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat [11] Cross AJ, Buchwald PL, Frizelle FA, Eglinton TW. Meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. British Journal of Surgery. 2017;104:179-186.CrossRef [11] Cross AJ, Buchwald PL, Frizelle FA, Eglinton TW. Meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. British Journal of Surgery. 2017;104:179-186.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat [12] Chapman SJ, Wood B, Drake TM, Young N, Jayne DG. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prophylactic Mesh during Primary Stoma Formation to Prevent Parastomal Hernia. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2017;60:107–115.CrossRef [12] Chapman SJ, Wood B, Drake TM, Young N, Jayne DG. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prophylactic Mesh during Primary Stoma Formation to Prevent Parastomal Hernia. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2017;60:107–115.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat [13] Odensten C, Strigård K, Rutegård J, Dahlberg M, Ståhle U, Gunnarsson U, et al. Use of Prophylactic Mesh When Creating a Colostomy Does Not Prevent Parastomal Hernia: A Randomized Controlled Trial - STOMAMESH. Annals of Surgery. 2019;269(3):427–431.CrossRef [13] Odensten C, Strigård K, Rutegård J, Dahlberg M, Ståhle U, Gunnarsson U, et al. Use of Prophylactic Mesh When Creating a Colostomy Does Not Prevent Parastomal Hernia: A Randomized Controlled Trial - STOMAMESH. Annals of Surgery. 2019;269(3):427–431.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat [15] Correa Marinez A, Bock D, Erestam S, Engström A, Kälebo P, Nielsen YW, et al. Methods of Colostomy Construction: No Effect on Parastomal Hernia Rate: Results from Stoma-const-A Randomized Controlled Trial. Annals of Surgery. 2021;273(4):640–647.CrossRef [15] Correa Marinez A, Bock D, Erestam S, Engström A, Kälebo P, Nielsen YW, et al. Methods of Colostomy Construction: No Effect on Parastomal Hernia Rate: Results from Stoma-const-A Randomized Controlled Trial. Annals of Surgery. 2021;273(4):640–647.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat [16] Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh: A 5-Year follow-up of a randomized study. World Journal of Surgery. 2009;33(1):118–121.CrossRef [16] Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh: A 5-Year follow-up of a randomized study. World Journal of Surgery. 2009;33(1):118–121.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat [17] Vierimaa M, Klintrup K, Biancari F, Victorzon M, Carpelan-Holmström M, Kössi J, et al. Prospective, Randomized Study on the Use of a Prosthetic Mesh for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia of Permanent Colostomy. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2015;58(10):943–949.CrossRef [17] Vierimaa M, Klintrup K, Biancari F, Victorzon M, Carpelan-Holmström M, Kössi J, et al. Prospective, Randomized Study on the Use of a Prosthetic Mesh for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia of Permanent Colostomy. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2015;58(10):943–949.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat [18] Brandsma HT, Hansson BME, Aufenacker TJ, van Geldere D, van Lammeren FM, Mahabier C, et al. Prophylactic mesh placement to prevent parastomal hernia, early results of a prospective multicentre randomized trial. Hernia. 2016;20(4):535–541.CrossRef [18] Brandsma HT, Hansson BME, Aufenacker TJ, van Geldere D, van Lammeren FM, Mahabier C, et al. Prophylactic mesh placement to prevent parastomal hernia, early results of a prospective multicentre randomized trial. Hernia. 2016;20(4):535–541.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat [19] Lambrecht JR, Larsen SG, Reiertsen O, Vaktskjold A, Julsrud L, Flatmark K. Prophylactic mesh at end-colostomy construction reduces parastomal hernia rate: A randomized trial. Colorectal Disease. 2015;17(10):O191–197.CrossRef [19] Lambrecht JR, Larsen SG, Reiertsen O, Vaktskjold A, Julsrud L, Flatmark K. Prophylactic mesh at end-colostomy construction reduces parastomal hernia rate: A randomized trial. Colorectal Disease. 2015;17(10):O191–197.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat CDC. Surgical Site Infection Event. National Healthcare Safety Network. 2021. CDC. Surgical Site Infection Event. National Healthcare Safety Network. 2021.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat [21] Murken DR, Bleier JIS. Ostomy-Related Complications. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2019;32(3):176–182.CrossRef [21] Murken DR, Bleier JIS. Ostomy-Related Complications. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2019;32(3):176–182.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JP, Savovic J, Page MJ, Sterne J. Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2019; Higgins JP, Savovic J, Page MJ, Sterne J. Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2019;
23.
Zurück zum Zitat [23] Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2014;14(1):135.CrossRef [23] Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2014;14(1):135.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat [24] Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557.CrossRef [24] Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat [25] Lan J. The case of the misleading funnel plot. BMJ. 2006;333:597–600.CrossRef [25] Lan J. The case of the misleading funnel plot. BMJ. 2006;333:597–600.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat [26] Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2008. 633.CrossRef [26] Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2008. 633.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleshman JW, Beck DE, Hyman N, Wexner SD, Bauer J, George V. A prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study of non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix fascial sublay for parastomal reinforcement in patients undergoing surgery for permanent abdominal wall ostomies. In: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2014:623–631. Fleshman JW, Beck DE, Hyman N, Wexner SD, Bauer J, George V. A prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study of non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix fascial sublay for parastomal reinforcement in patients undergoing surgery for permanent abdominal wall ostomies. In: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2014:623–631.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat [28] Târcoveanu E, Alin Mihai V, Lupascu C, Vlad N. Parastomal Hernias – Clinical Study of Therapeutic Strategies. Chirurgia-Bucharest. 2014;109(2):179-184. [28] Târcoveanu E, Alin Mihai V, Lupascu C, Vlad N. Parastomal Hernias – Clinical Study of Therapeutic Strategies. Chirurgia-Bucharest. 2014;109(2):179-184.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Garcia Alamino JM, Berger D, Berrevoet F, Brandsma HT, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias. Vol. 22, Hernia. Springer-Verlag France; 2018. p. 183–98. Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Garcia Alamino JM, Berger D, Berrevoet F, Brandsma HT, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias. Vol. 22, Hernia. Springer-Verlag France; 2018. p. 183–98.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Hellinger MD, al Haddad A. Minimally invasive stomas. Vol. 21, Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2008;21:53–61. Hellinger MD, al Haddad A. Minimally invasive stomas. Vol. 21, Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2008;21:53–61.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat [31] Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N, et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations: 2018. World Journal of Surgery. 2019;43:659–695.CrossRef [31] Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N, et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations: 2018. World Journal of Surgery. 2019;43:659–695.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat [32] Devereaux P, Chan M, Eisenach J, Schricker T, Sessler D. The Need for Large Clinical Studies in Perioperative Medicine. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(6):1169–1175.CrossRef [32] Devereaux P, Chan M, Eisenach J, Schricker T, Sessler D. The Need for Large Clinical Studies in Perioperative Medicine. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(6):1169–1175.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat [33] Geiger TM, Muldoon R. Complications following colon rectal surgery in the obese patient. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2011;24(4):274–282.CrossRef [33] Geiger TM, Muldoon R. Complications following colon rectal surgery in the obese patient. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2011;24(4):274–282.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Robinson TN, Wu DS, Stiegmann G v., Moss M. Frailty predicts increased hospital and six-month healthcare cost following colorectal surgery in older adults. American Journal of Surgery. 2011;202(5):511–514. Robinson TN, Wu DS, Stiegmann G v., Moss M. Frailty predicts increased hospital and six-month healthcare cost following colorectal surgery in older adults. American Journal of Surgery. 2011;202(5):511–514.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat [35] Musters GD, Buskens CJ, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ. Perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2014;57(9):1129–1139.CrossRef [35] Musters GD, Buskens CJ, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ. Perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2014;57(9):1129–1139.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat [36] Moghaddam AA, Woodward M, Huxley R. Obesity and risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 31 studies with 70,000 events. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2007;16(12):2533–2547.CrossRef [36] Moghaddam AA, Woodward M, Huxley R. Obesity and risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 31 studies with 70,000 events. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2007;16(12):2533–2547.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat [37] Larsson SC, Wolk A. Obesity and colon and rectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2007;86(3):556–565.CrossRef [37] Larsson SC, Wolk A. Obesity and colon and rectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2007;86(3):556–565.CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat [38] de Raet J, Delvaux G, Haentjens P, van Nieuwenhove Y. Waist circumference is an independent risk factor for the development of parastomal hernia after permanent colostomy. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2008;51(12):1806–1809.CrossRef [38] de Raet J, Delvaux G, Haentjens P, van Nieuwenhove Y. Waist circumference is an independent risk factor for the development of parastomal hernia after permanent colostomy. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2008;51(12):1806–1809.CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat [39] Gillern S, Bleier JIS. Parastomal hernia repair and reinforcement: The role of biologic and synthetic materials. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2014;27(4):162–171.CrossRef [39] Gillern S, Bleier JIS. Parastomal hernia repair and reinforcement: The role of biologic and synthetic materials. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2014;27(4):162–171.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat [40] Fitzgerald JF, Kumar AS. Biologic versus synthetic mesh reinforcement: What are the pros and cons? Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2014;27(4):140–148.CrossRef [40] Fitzgerald JF, Kumar AS. Biologic versus synthetic mesh reinforcement: What are the pros and cons? Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2014;27(4):140–148.CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins J, Green S. Identifying and measuring heterogeneity. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 5.1. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2011. Higgins J, Green S. Identifying and measuring heterogeneity. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 5.1. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2011.
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabusa H, Blazeby JM, Blencowe N, Callaway M, Daniels IR, Gunning A, et al. Protocol for the UK cohort study to investigate the prevention of parastomal hernia (the CIPHER study). Colorectal Disease. 2021 Mar 09; [Epub ahead of print]. Accessed on 06/14/2021. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.15621. Tabusa H, Blazeby JM, Blencowe N, Callaway M, Daniels IR, Gunning A, et al. Protocol for the UK cohort study to investigate the prevention of parastomal hernia (the CIPHER study). Colorectal Disease. 2021 Mar 09; [Epub ahead of print]. Accessed on 06/14/2021. Available at: https://​onlinelibrary.​wiley.​com/​doi/​https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​codi.​15621.
Metadaten
Titel
Prophylactic Mesh for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia Following End Colostomy: an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
verfasst von
Tyler McKechnie, MD
Jay Lee, BSc
Yung Lee, MD
Aristithes Doumouras, MD MPH
Nalin Amin, MD
Dennis Hong, MD MSc
Cagla Eskicioglu, MD MSc
Publikationsdatum
20.10.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05174-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.