nach oben

Erschienen in:

30.04.2021 | Review Article

The current status of CZT SPECT myocardial blood flow and reserve assessment: Tips and tricks

verfasst von: Konstantin V. Zavadovsky, Andrew V. Mochula, Alina N. Maltseva, Vladimir V. Shipulin, Svetlana I. Sazonova, Marina O. Gulya, Ricardo Liga, Alessia Gimelli

Erschienen in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | Ausgabe 6/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Cardiac PET-derived measurements of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) are proven robust indexes of the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). They facilitate the diagnosis of diffuse epicardial and microvascular disease and are also of prognostic significance. However, low availability and high cost have limited their wide clinical implementation. Over the last 15 years, cadmium zinc telluride (CZT)-based detectors have been implemented into SPECT imaging devices. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy can be performed faster and with less radiation exposure as compared with standard gamma cameras. Rapid dynamic SPECT studies with higher count rates can be performed. This technological breakthrough has renewed the interest in SPECT MBF assessment in patients with CAD. Currently, two cardiac-centered CZT gamma cameras are available commercially—Discovery NM530c and D-SPECT. They differ in parameters such as collimator design, number of detectors, sensitivity, spatial resolution and image reconstruction. A number of publications have focused on the feasibility of dynamic CZT SPECT and on the correlation with cardiac PET and invasive coronary angiography measurements of fractional flow reserve. Current study reviews the present status of MBF and MFR assessment with CZT SPECT. It also aims to provide an overview of specific issues related to acquisition, processing and interpretation of quantitative studies in patients with CAD.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Driessen RS, Raijmakers PG, Stuijfzand WJ, Knaapen P. Myocardial perfusion imaging with PET. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;33:1021-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1084-4.CrossRef

Gullberg GT, Di Bella EV, Sinusas AJ. Estimation of coronary flow reserve: Can SPECT compete with other modalities? J Nucl Cardiol 2001;8:620-5. https://doi.org/10.1067/mnc.2001.118121.CrossRef

Iida H, Eberl S, Kim K, Tamura Y, Ono Y, Nakazawa M, et al. Absolute quantitation of myocardial blood flow with ²⁰¹Tl and dynamic SPECT in canine: Optimisation and validation of kinetic modelling. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008;35:896-905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-007-0654-4.CrossRef

Hsu B, Hu LH, Yang BH, Chen LC, Chen YK, Ting CH, et al. SPECT myocardial blood flow quantitation toward clinical use: A comparative study with ⁽¹³⁾N-Ammonia PET myocardial blood flow quantitation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017;44:117-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3491-5.CrossRef

Sugihara H, Yonekura Y, Kataoka K, Fukai D, Kitamura N, Taniguchi Y. Estimation of coronary flow reserve with the use of dynamic planar and SPECT images of Tc-99m tetrofosmin. J Nucl Cardiol 2001;8:575-9. https://doi.org/10.1067/mnc.2001.115934.CrossRef

Klein R, Hung GU, Wu TC, Huang WS, Li D, de Kemp RA, et al. Feasibility and operator variability of myocardial blood flow and reserve measurements with ^99mTc-Sestamibi quantitative dynamic SPECT/CT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2014;21:1075-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-014-9971-8.CrossRef

Winant CD, Aparici CM, Zelnik YR, Reutter BW, Sitek A, Bacharach SL, et al. Investigation of dynamic SPECT measurements of the arterial input function in human subjects using simulation, phantom and human studies. Phys Med Biol 2012;57:375-93. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/57/2/375.CrossRef

Shrestha U, Sciammarella M, Alhassen F, Yeghiazarians Y, Ellin J, Verdin E, et al. Measurement of absolute myocardial blood flow in humans using dynamic cardiac SPECT and ^99mTc-tetrofosmin: Method and validation. J Nucl Cardiol 2017;24:268-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0320-3.CrossRef

Hsu B, Chen FC, Wu TC, Huang WS, Hou PN, Chen CC, et al. Quantitation of myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve with ^99mTc-Sestamibi dynamic SPECT/CT to enhance detection of coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2014;41:2294-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2881-9.CrossRef

10.

Ma R, Wang L, Wu D, Wang M, Sun X, Hsu B, et al. Myocardial blood flow quantitation in patients with congestive heart failure: Head-to-head comparison between rapid-rotating gantry SPECT and CZT SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01621-2.CrossRef

11.

Imbert L, Poussier S, Franken PR, Songy B, Verger A, Morel O, et al. Compared performance of high-sensitivity cameras dedicated to myocardial perfusion SPECT: A comprehensive analysis of phantom and human images. J Nucl Med 2012;53:1897-903. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.107417.CrossRef

12.

Hyafil F, Gimelli A, Slart RHJA, Georgoulias P, Rischpler C, Lubberink M, et al. EANM procedural guidelines for myocardial perfusion scintigraphy using cardiac-centered gamma cameras. Eur J Hybrid Imaging 2019;3:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-019-0058-2.CrossRef

13.

Erlandsson K, Kacperski K, Van Gramberg D, Hutton BF. Performance evaluation of D-SPECT: A novel SPECT system for nuclear cardiology. Phys Med Biol 2009;54:2635-49.CrossRef

14.

Gambhir SS, Berman DS, Ziffer J, Nagler M, Sandler M, Patton J, et al. A novel high-sensitivity rapid acquisition single-photon cardiac imaging camera. J Nucl Med 2009;50:635-43. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.060020.CrossRef

15.

Bocher M, Blevis IM, Tsukerman L, Shrem Y, Kovalski G, Volokh L. A fast cardiac gamma camera with dynamic SPECT capabilities: Design, system validation and future potential. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;37:1887-902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1488-z.CrossRef

16.

Zavadovsky KV, Mochula AV, Boshchenko AA, Vrublevsky AV, Baev AE, Krylov AL, et al. Absolute myocardial blood flows derived by dynamic CZT scan vs invasive fractional flow reserve: Correlation and accuracy. J Nucl Cardiol 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01678-z.CrossRef

17.

Dorbala S, Ananthasubramaniam K, Armstrong IS, Chareonthaitawee P, DePuey EG, Einstein AJ, et al. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging guidelines: Instrumentation, acquisition, processing, and interpretation. J Nucl Cardiol 2018;25:1784-846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-1283-y.CrossRef

18.

Danad I, Uusitalo V, Kero T, Saraste A, Raijmakers PG, Lammertsma AA, et al. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion in the detection of significant coronary artery disease: Cutoff values and diagnostic accuracy of quantitative [⁽¹⁵⁾O]H₂O PET imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:1464-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.069.CrossRef

19.

Joutsiniemi E, Saraste A, Pietila M, Maki M, Kajander S, Ukkonen H, et al. Absolute flow or myocardial flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary artery disease? Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15:659-65. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jet274.CrossRef

20.

Wells RG, Timmins R, Klein R, Lockwood J, Marvin B, deKemp RA, et al. SPECT measurement of absolute myocardial blood flow in a porcine model. J Nucl Med 2014;55:1685-91. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.139782.CrossRef

21.

Leppo JA, Meerdink DJ. Comparison of the myocardial uptake of a technetium-labeled isonitrile analogue and thallium. Circ Res 1989;65:632-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.65.3.632.CrossRef

22.

Lortie M, Beanlands RS, Yoshinaga K, Klein R, Dasilva JN, DeKemp RA. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ⁸²Rb dynamic PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34:1765-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-007-0478-2.CrossRef

23.

Yoshida K, Mullani N, Gould KL. Coronary flow and flow reserve by PET simplified for clinical applications using rubidium-82 or nitrogen-13-ammonia. J Nucl Med 1996;37:170-212.

24.

Coxson PG, Huesman RH, Borland L. Consequences of using a simplified kinetic model for dynamic PET data. J Nucl Med 1997;38:660-7.

25.

Wells RG, Marvin B, Poirier M, Renaud J, deKemp RA, Ruddy TD. Optimization of SPECT measurement of myocardial blood flow with corrections for attenuation, motion, and blood binding compared with PET. J Nucl Med 2017;58:2013-19. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.191049.CrossRef

26.

Herrero P, Markham J, Shelton ME, Weinheimer CJ, Bergmann SR. Noninvasive quantification of regional myocardial perfusion with rubidium-82 and positron emission tomography: Exploration of a mathematical model. Circulation 1990;82:1377-86.CrossRef

27.

Renkin EM. Transport of potassium-42 from blood to tissue isolated mammalian skeletal muscles. Am J Physiol 1959;197:1205-10. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplegacy.1959.197.6.1205.CrossRef

28.

Crone C. The permeability of capillaries in various organs as determined by use of the ‘indicator diffusion’ method. Acta Physiol Scand 1963;58:292-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1963.tb02652.x.CrossRef

29.

Germino M, Ropchan J, Mulnix T, Fontaine K, Nabulsi N, Ackah E, et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ⁽⁸²⁾Rb: Validation with ⁽¹⁵⁾O-water using time-of-flight and point-spread-function modeling. EJNMMI 2016;6:68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-016-0215-6.CrossRef

30.

Giubbini R, Bertoli M, Durmo R, Bonacina M, Peli A, Faggiano I, et al. Comparison between N¹³NH₃-PET and ^99mTc-Tetrofosmin-CZT SPECT in the evaluation of absolute myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. J Nucl Cardiol 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01939-x.CrossRef

31.

Bailly M, Thibault F, Courtehoux M, Metrard G, Ribeiro MJ. Impact of attenuation correction for CZT-SPECT measurement of myocardial blood flow. J Nucl Cardiol 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02075-7.CrossRef

32.

Zavadovsky KV, Mochula AV, Maltseva AN, Boshchenko AA, Baev AE, Andreev SL, et al The diagnostic value of SPECT CZT quantitative myocardial blood flow in high-risk patients. J Nucl Cardiol 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02395-8.CrossRef

33.

Agostini D, Roule V, Nganoa C, Roth N, Baavour R, Parienti JJ, et al. First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic 99mTc-Sestamibi CZT-SPECT camera: Head to head comparison with 15O-water PET and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The WATERDAY study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018;45:1079-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-3958.CrossRef

34.

Vasquez AF, Johnson NP, Gould KL. Variation in quantitative myocardial perfusion due to arterial input selection. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:559-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.11.015.CrossRef

35.

Otaki Y, Manabe O, Miller RJH, Manrique A, Nganoa C, Roth N, et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow by CZT-SPECT with motion correction and comparison with ¹⁵O-water PET. J Nucl Cardiol 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01854-1.CrossRef

36.

Miyagawa M, Nishiyama Y, Uetani T, Ogimoto A, Ikeda S, Ishimura H, et al. Estimation of myocardial flow reserve utilizing an ultrafast cardiac SPECT: Comparison with coronary angiography, fractional flow reserve, and the SYNTAX score. Int J Cardiol 2017;244:347-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.012.CrossRef

37.

Han S, Kim YH, Ahn JM, Kang SJ, Oh JS, Shin E, et al. Feasibility of dynamic stress ²⁰¹Tl/rest ^99mTc-tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography for quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018;45:2173-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4057-5.CrossRef

38.

de Souza ACDAH, Gonçalves BKD, Tedeschi AL, Lima RSL. Quantification of myocardial flow reserve using a gamma camera with solid-state cadmium–zinc-telluride detectors: Relation to angiographic coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2019;3:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01775-z (Epub ahead of print).CrossRef

39.

Wells RG, Radonjic I, Clackdoyle D, Do J, Marvin B, Carey C, et al. Test–retest precision of myocardial blood flow measurements with ^99mTc-Tetrofosmin and solid-state detector single photon emission computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;13:e009769. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.009769.CrossRef

40.

Ben Bouallègue F, Roubille F, Lattuca B, Cung TT, Macia J-C, Gervasoni R, et al. SPECT myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with multivessel coronary disease: Correlation with angiographic findings and invasive fractional flow reserve measurements. J Nucl Med 2015;56:1712-17. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.143164.CrossRef

41.

Ben-Haim S, Murthy VL, Breault C, Allie R, Sitek A, Roth N, et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve using dynamic SPECT imaging in humans: A feasibility study. J Nucl Med 2013;54:873-9. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.109652.CrossRef

42.

Nudi F, Biondi-Zoccai G, Nudi A, Neri G, Procaccini E, Schilllaci O. Comparative analysis between myocardial perfusion reserve and maximal ischemia score at single photon emission computed tomography with new-generation cadmium–zinc-telluride cameras. J Nucl Cardiol 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01764-2.CrossRef

43.

Jaarsma C, Leiner T, Bekkers SC, Crijns HJ, Wildberger JE, Nagel E, et al. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1719-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.040.CrossRef

44.

Gimelli A, Liga R, Duce V, Kusch A, Clemente A, Marzullo P. Accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging in detecting multivessel coronary artery disease: A cardiac CZT study. J Nucl Cardiol 2017;24:687-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0360-8.CrossRef

45.

Underwood SR, Anagnostopoulos C, Cerqueira M, Ell PJ, Flint EJ, Harbinson M, et al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: The evidence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31:261-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1344-5.CrossRef

46.

Knuuti J, Ballo H, Juarez-Orozco LE, Saraste A, Kolh P, Rutjes AWS, et al. The performance of non-invasive tests to rule-in and rule-out significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable angina: A meta-analysis focused on post-test disease probability. Eur Heart J 2018;39:3322-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy267.CrossRef

47.

Iguchi N, Utanohara Y, Suzuki Y, Suzuki M, Hagiya K, Ryosuke Higuchi R, et al. Myocardial flow reserve derived by dynamic perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography reflects the severity of coronary atherosclerosis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;34:1493-501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1358-5.CrossRef

48.

Mark DB, Nelson CL, Calift RM, Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Jones RH, et al. Continuing evolution of therapy for coronary artery disease initial results from the era of coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1994;89:2015-25. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.89.5.2015.CrossRef

49.

Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, et al., ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.

50.

Serruys PW, Onuma Y, Garg S, Sarno G, van den Brand M, Kappetein AP, et al. Assessment of the SYNTAX score in the Syntax study. EuroIntervention 2009;5:50-6. https://doi.org/10.4244/eijv5i1a9.CrossRef

51.

Farooq V, Van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW, Meliga E, Vergouwe Y, Chieffo A, et al. Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: Development and validation of SYNTAX score II. Lancet 2013;381:639-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60108-7.CrossRef

52.

Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2816-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.096.CrossRef

53.

Lee JM, Layland J, Jung JH, Lee HJ, Echavarria-Pinto M, Watkins S, et al. Integrated physiologic assessment of ischemic heart disease in real world practice using index of microcirculatory resistance and fractional flow reserve: Insights from the International Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:e002857. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002857.CrossRef

54.

Gould KL. Does coronary flow trump coronary anatomy? J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging 2009;2:1009-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.06.004.CrossRef

55.

Di Carli M, Czernin J, Hoh CK, Gerbaudo VH, Brunken RC, Huang SC, et al. Relation among stenosis severity, myocardial blood flow, and flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 1995;91:1944-51. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.91.7.1944.CrossRef

56.

Berman DS, Kang X, Slomka PJ, Gerlach J, de Yang L, Hayes SW, et al. Underestimation of extent of ischemia by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left main coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:521-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.05.008.CrossRef

57.

Beller GA. Underestimation of coronary artery disease with SPECT perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2008;15:151-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2008.01.012.CrossRef

58.

Fiechter M, Ghadri JR, Gebhard C, Fuchs TA, Pazhenkottil AP, Nkoulou RN, et al. Diagnostic value of ¹³N-ammonia myocardial perfusion PET: Added value of myocardial flow reserve. J Nucl Med 2012;53:1230-4. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.111.101840.CrossRef

59.

Kajander SA, Joutsiniemi E, Saraste M, Pietilä M, Ukkonen H, Saraste A, et al. Clinical value of absolute quantification of myocardial perfusion with ¹⁵O-water in coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:678-84. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.110.960732.CrossRef

60.

Meuwissen M, Chamuleau SA, Siebes M, Schotborgh CE, Koch KT, De Winter RJ, et al. Role of variability in microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve and coronary blood flow velocity reserve in intermediate coronary lesions. Circulation 2001;103:184-7. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.103.2.184.CrossRef

61.

van de Hoef TP, van Lavieren MA, Damman P, Delewi R, Piek MA, Chamuleau SAJ, et al. Physiological basis and long-term clinical outcome of discordance between fractional flow reserve and coronary flow velocity reserve in coronary stenoses of intermediate severity. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:301-11. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.001049.CrossRef

62.

Lee JM, Jung JH, Hwang D, Park J, Fan Y, Na SH, et al. Coronary flow reserve and microcirculatory resistance in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:1158-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.053.CrossRef

63.

Ziadi MC. Myocardial flow reserve (MFR) with positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT): Clinical impact in diagnosis and prognosis. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2017;7:206-18. https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt.2017.04.10.CrossRef

64.

Camici PG, Rimoldi OE. The clinical value of myocardial blood flow measurement. J Nucl Med 2009. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.054478.CrossRef

65.

Bom MJ, van Diemen PA, Driessen RS, Everaars H, Schumacher SP, Wijmenga JT, et al. Prognostic value of [¹⁵O]H₂O positron emission tomography-derived global and regional myocardial perfusion. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jez258.CrossRef

66.

Gaudieri V, Acampa W, Rozza F, Nappi C, Zampella E, Assante R, et al. Coronary vascular function in patients with resistant hypertension and normal myocardial perfusion: A propensity score analysis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;20:949-58. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jez025.CrossRef

67.

Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, Gaber M, Hainer J, Klein J, et al. Association between coronary vascular dysfunction and cardiac mortality in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Circulation 2012;126:1858-68. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.120402.CrossRef

68.

Assante R, Acampa W, Zampella E, Arumugam P, Nappi C, Gaudieri V, et al. Coronary atherosclerotic burden vs. coronary vascular function in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with normal myocardial perfusion: A propensity score analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017;44:1129-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3671-y.CrossRef

69.

Pitkänen OP, Nuutila P, Raitakari OT, Porkka K, Iida H, Nuotio I, et al. Coronary flow reserve in young men with familial combined hyperlipidemia. Circulation 1999;99:1678-84. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.99.13.1678.CrossRef

70.

Kaufmann PA, Gnecchi-Ruscone T, Schafers KP, Luscher TF, Camici PG. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol and coronary microvascular dysfunction in hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:103-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00697-5.CrossRef

71.

Nkoulou R, Fuchs TA, Pazhenkottil AP, Kuest SM, Ghadri JR, Stehli J, et al. Absolute myocardial blood flow and flow reserve assessed by gated SPECT with cadmium–zinc-telluride detectors using ^99mTc-Tetrofosmin: Head-to-head comparison with ¹³N-Ammonia PET. J Nucl Med 2016;57:1887-92. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.165498.CrossRef

72.

Pichler BJ, Wehrl HF, Judenhofer MS. Latest advances in molecular imaging instrumentation. J Nucl Med 2008;49:5S-23S.CrossRef

Titel: The current status of CZT SPECT myocardial blood flow and reserve assessment: Tips and tricks
verfasst von: Konstantin V. Zavadovsky
Andrew V. Mochula
Alina N. Maltseva
Vladimir V. Shipulin
Svetlana I. Sazonova
Marina O. Gulya
Ricardo Liga
Alessia Gimelli
Publikationsdatum: 30.04.2021
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology / Ausgabe 6/2022
Print ISSN: 1071-3581
Elektronische ISSN: 1532-6551
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-021-02620-y

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

The current status of CZT SPECT myocardial blood flow and reserve assessment: Tips and tricks

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

Triglyzeridsenker schützt nicht nur Hochrisikopatienten

Gibt es eine Wende bei den bioresorbierbaren Gefäßstützen?

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Update Kardiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2022

Phase analysis for ventricular arrhythmia prediction: A retrospective monocentric cohort study

Statistical methods for validation of predictive models

Volumetric evaluation of 99mTc-pyrophosphate SPECT/CT for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: Methodology and correlation with cardiac functional parameters

Nuclear imaging in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: increasingly central to diagnosis and management

Can we “REFINE” the art of predicting ischemia on SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging?

Metabolic activity of the left and right atria are differentially altered in patients with atrial fibrillation and LV dysfunction

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

Triglyzeridsenker schützt nicht nur Hochrisikopatienten

Gibt es eine Wende bei den bioresorbierbaren Gefäßstützen?

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Update Kardiologie