Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2016

07.10.2016 | Breast Oncology

Surgeon Volume, Patient Age, and Tumor-Related Factors Influence the Need for Re-Excision After Breast-Conserving Surgery

verfasst von: L. Hughes, BSc, J. Hamm, MSc, C. McGahan, MSc, C. Baliski, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Sonderheft 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is the preferred surgical approach for the majority of patients with early-stage breast cancer. There are frequent issues regarding pathologic margin status, requiring margin re-excision, and, in the literature, there is significant variability in re-excision rates, suggesting this is a potential quality-of-care issue. Understanding the patient-, disease-, and physician-related factors influencing reoperation rates is of importance in an effort to minimize this occurrence.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of all patients referred to our cancer center over a 3-year period (1 January 2011–31 December 2013) was performed. Surgeon volume, and patient- and tumor-related factors were assessed for their impact on re-excision rates. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables of significance influencing reoperation rates after attempted BCS.

Results

Overall, 594 patients underwent initial BCS, with 159 (26.8%) patients requiring at least one re-excision to ensure negative pathologic margins. On multivariate analysis, low surgeon case volume, patient age (under 46 years of age), tumor size (>2 cm), and lobular carcinoma were associated with an increased re-excision rate.

Conclusion

Re-excisions are frequent after BCS and are influenced by surgeon volume, patient age, and tumor-related factors. These factors should be considered when counseling patients considering BCS, and also for quality assurance.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Esbona K, Li Z, Wilke LG. Intraoperative imprint cytology and frozen section pathology for margin assessment in breast conservation surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3236–3245.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Esbona K, Li Z, Wilke LG. Intraoperative imprint cytology and frozen section pathology for margin assessment in breast conservation surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3236–3245.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat de Camargo Cancela M, Comber H, Sharp L. Hospital and surgeon caseload are associated with risk of re-operation following breast-conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;140:535–544.CrossRef de Camargo Cancela M, Comber H, Sharp L. Hospital and surgeon caseload are associated with risk of re-operation following breast-conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;140:535–544.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilke LG, Czechura T, Wang C, Lapin B, Liederbach E, Winchester DP, et al. Repeat surgery after breast conservation for the treatment of stage 0 to II breast carcinoma: a report from the national cancer data base, 2004–2010. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:1296–1305.CrossRefPubMed Wilke LG, Czechura T, Wang C, Lapin B, Liederbach E, Winchester DP, et al. Repeat surgery after breast conservation for the treatment of stage 0 to II breast carcinoma: a report from the national cancer data base, 2004–2010. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:1296–1305.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Spilsbury K, Semmens JB, Saunders CM, Hall SE, Holman CD. Subsequent surgery after initial breast conserving surgery: a population based study. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75:260–264.CrossRefPubMed Spilsbury K, Semmens JB, Saunders CM, Hall SE, Holman CD. Subsequent surgery after initial breast conserving surgery: a population based study. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75:260–264.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Trivella M, Lawrence G, Kearins O, Pereira J, et al. Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics. BMJ. 2012;345:e4505.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Trivella M, Lawrence G, Kearins O, Pereira J, et al. Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics. BMJ. 2012;345:e4505.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Canadian Institute for Health Information. Breast cancer surgery in canada, 2007–2008 to 2009–2010. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2012. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Breast cancer surgery in canada, 2007–2008 to 2009–2010. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2012.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Vos EL, Jager A, Verhoef C, Voogd AC, Koppert LB. Overall survival in patients with a re-excision following breast conserving surgery compared to those without in a large population-based cohort. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:282–291.CrossRefPubMed Vos EL, Jager A, Verhoef C, Voogd AC, Koppert LB. Overall survival in patients with a re-excision following breast conserving surgery compared to those without in a large population-based cohort. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:282–291.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Xue DQ, Qian C, Yang L, Wang XF. Risk factors for surgical site infections after breast surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38:375–381.CrossRefPubMed Xue DQ, Qian C, Yang L, Wang XF. Risk factors for surgical site infections after breast surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38:375–381.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Parvez E, Cornacchi SD, Hodgson N, Thoma A, Kong I, Foster G, et al. A cosmesis outcome substudy in a prospective, randomized trial comparing radioguided seed localization with standard wire localization for nonpalpable, invasive, and in situ breast carcinomas. Am J Surg. 2014;208:711–718.CrossRefPubMed Parvez E, Cornacchi SD, Hodgson N, Thoma A, Kong I, Foster G, et al. A cosmesis outcome substudy in a prospective, randomized trial comparing radioguided seed localization with standard wire localization for nonpalpable, invasive, and in situ breast carcinomas. Am J Surg. 2014;208:711–718.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wazer DE, DiPetrillo T, Schmidt-Ullrich R, Weld L, Smith TJ, Marchant DJ, et al. Factors influencing cosmetic outcome and complication risk after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:356–363.PubMed Wazer DE, DiPetrillo T, Schmidt-Ullrich R, Weld L, Smith TJ, Marchant DJ, et al. Factors influencing cosmetic outcome and complication risk after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:356–363.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pataky R, Baliski C. Reoperation costs in attempted breast conserving surgery: a decision analysis. Curr Oncol. 2016;23(10) (in press). Pataky R, Baliski C. Reoperation costs in attempted breast conserving surgery: a decision analysis. Curr Oncol. 2016;23(10) (in press).
12.
Zurück zum Zitat McCahill LE, Privette A, James T, Sheehey-Jones J, Ratliff J, Majercik D, et al. Quality measures for breast cancer surgery: initial validation of feasibility and assessment of variation among surgeons. Arch Surg. 2009;144:455–62; discussion 462-3.CrossRefPubMed McCahill LE, Privette A, James T, Sheehey-Jones J, Ratliff J, Majercik D, et al. Quality measures for breast cancer surgery: initial validation of feasibility and assessment of variation among surgeons. Arch Surg. 2009;144:455–62; discussion 462-3.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Landercasper J, Attai D, Atisha D, Beitsch P, Bosserman L, Boughey J, et al. Toolbox to reduce lumpectomy reoperations and improve cosmetic outcome in breast cancer patients: the American Society of Breast Surgeons Consensus Conference. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3174–3183.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Landercasper J, Attai D, Atisha D, Beitsch P, Bosserman L, Boughey J, et al. Toolbox to reduce lumpectomy reoperations and improve cosmetic outcome in breast cancer patients: the American Society of Breast Surgeons Consensus Conference. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3174–3183.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Landercasper J, Tafra L. The relationship between quality and cost during the perioperative breast cancer episode of care. Breast. 2010;19:289–296.CrossRefPubMed Landercasper J, Tafra L. The relationship between quality and cost during the perioperative breast cancer episode of care. Breast. 2010;19:289–296.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kryh CG, Pietersen CA, Rahr HB, Christensen RD, Wamberg P, Lautrup MD. Re-resection rates and risk characteristics following breast conserving surgery for breast cancer and carcinoma in situ: a single-centre study of 1575 consecutive cases. Breast. 2014;23:784–789.CrossRefPubMed Kryh CG, Pietersen CA, Rahr HB, Christensen RD, Wamberg P, Lautrup MD. Re-resection rates and risk characteristics following breast conserving surgery for breast cancer and carcinoma in situ: a single-centre study of 1575 consecutive cases. Breast. 2014;23:784–789.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Landercasper J, Whitacre E, Degnim AC, Al-Hamadani M. Reasons for re-excision after lumpectomy for breast cancer: insight from the american society of breast surgeons mastery (SM) database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3185–3191.CrossRefPubMed Landercasper J, Whitacre E, Degnim AC, Al-Hamadani M. Reasons for re-excision after lumpectomy for breast cancer: insight from the american society of breast surgeons mastery (SM) database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3185–3191.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat McCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowles EJ, Feigelson HS, James TA, Barney T, et al. Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA. 2012;307:467–475.CrossRefPubMed McCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowles EJ, Feigelson HS, James TA, Barney T, et al. Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA. 2012;307:467–475.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Canadian cancer statistics. Canadian cancer statistics 2015; 25 Mar 2016. Canadian cancer statistics. Canadian cancer statistics 2015; 25 Mar 2016.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Del Turco MR, Ponti A, Bick U, Biganzoli L, Cserni G, Cutuli B, et al. Quality indicators in breast cancer care. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:2344–2356.CrossRefPubMed Del Turco MR, Ponti A, Bick U, Biganzoli L, Cserni G, Cutuli B, et al. Quality indicators in breast cancer care. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:2344–2356.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Chagpar AB, Killelea BK, Tsangaris TN, Butler M, Stavris K, Li F, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of cavity shave margins in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:503–510.CrossRefPubMed Chagpar AB, Killelea BK, Tsangaris TN, Butler M, Stavris K, Li F, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of cavity shave margins in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:503–510.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnabel F, Boolbol SK, Gittleman M, Karni T, Tafra L, Feldman S, et al. A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margin assessment with use of MarginProbe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1589–1595.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schnabel F, Boolbol SK, Gittleman M, Karni T, Tafra L, Feldman S, et al. A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margin assessment with use of MarginProbe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1589–1595.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, Harris JR, Khan SA, Horton J, et al.; Society of Surgical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncology. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1507–1515.CrossRefPubMed Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, Harris JR, Khan SA, Horton J, et al.; Society of Surgical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncology. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1507–1515.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Eberth JM, Xu Y, Smith GL, Shen Y, Jiang J, Buchholz TA, et al. Surgeon influence on use of needle biopsy in patients with breast cancer: a national medicare study. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:2206–2216.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eberth JM, Xu Y, Smith GL, Shen Y, Jiang J, Buchholz TA, et al. Surgeon influence on use of needle biopsy in patients with breast cancer: a national medicare study. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:2206–2216.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Smitt MC, Horst K. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1040–1044.CrossRefPubMed Smitt MC, Horst K. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1040–1044.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Lovrics PJ, Cornacchi SD, Farrokhyar F, Garnett A, Chen V, Franic S, et al. Technical factors, surgeon case volume and positive margin rates after breast conservation surgery for early-stage breast cancer. Can J Surg. 2010;53:305–312.PubMedPubMedCentral Lovrics PJ, Cornacchi SD, Farrokhyar F, Garnett A, Chen V, Franic S, et al. Technical factors, surgeon case volume and positive margin rates after breast conservation surgery for early-stage breast cancer. Can J Surg. 2010;53:305–312.PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Kulkarni GS, Urbach DR, Austin PC, Fleshner NE, Laupacis A. Higher surgeon and hospital volume improves long-term survival after radical cystectomy. Cancer. 2013;119(19):3546–54.CrossRefPubMed Kulkarni GS, Urbach DR, Austin PC, Fleshner NE, Laupacis A. Higher surgeon and hospital volume improves long-term survival after radical cystectomy. Cancer. 2013;119(19):3546–54.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM, Coffin LH, Morton JR, Maloney CT, et al. A regional prospective study of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. JAMA. 1991;266:803–809.CrossRefPubMed O’Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM, Coffin LH, Morton JR, Maloney CT, et al. A regional prospective study of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. JAMA. 1991;266:803–809.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Finley CJ, Schneider L, Shakeel S. Approaches to high risk, resource intensive surgical care in Canada. Canadian Partnership Against Cancer; 2015. Finley CJ, Schneider L, Shakeel S. Approaches to high risk, resource intensive surgical care in Canada. Canadian Partnership Against Cancer; 2015.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Albornoz CR, Cordeiro PG, Hishon L, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, McCarthy CM, et al. A nationwide analysis of the relationship between hospital volume and outcome for autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:192e–200e.CrossRefPubMed Albornoz CR, Cordeiro PG, Hishon L, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, McCarthy CM, et al. A nationwide analysis of the relationship between hospital volume and outcome for autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:192e–200e.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanna N, Clayton JL, Roostaeian J, Perry AD, Crisera CA. The volume-outcome relationship for immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:19–24.CrossRefPubMed Tanna N, Clayton JL, Roostaeian J, Perry AD, Crisera CA. The volume-outcome relationship for immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:19–24.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz T, Degnim AC, Landercasper J. Should re-excision lumpectomy rates be a quality measure in breast-conserving surgery? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3180–3183.CrossRefPubMed Schwartz T, Degnim AC, Landercasper J. Should re-excision lumpectomy rates be a quality measure in breast-conserving surgery? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3180–3183.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Gust C, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJ, Skinner JS. Hospital quality and the cost of inpatient surgery in the United States. Ann Surg. 2012;255:1–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Birkmeyer JD, Gust C, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJ, Skinner JS. Hospital quality and the cost of inpatient surgery in the United States. Ann Surg. 2012;255:1–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Camp MS, Greenup RA, Taghian A, Coopey SB, Specht M, Gadd M, et al. Application of ACOSOG Z0011 criteria reduces perioperative costs. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:836–841.CrossRefPubMed Camp MS, Greenup RA, Taghian A, Coopey SB, Specht M, Gadd M, et al. Application of ACOSOG Z0011 criteria reduces perioperative costs. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:836–841.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer JP, Fox JP, Nelson JA, Kovach SJ, Serletti JM. A longitudinal assessment of outcomes and healthcare resource utilization after immediate breast reconstruction-comparing implant- and autologous-based breast reconstruction. Ann Surg. 2015;262:692–699.CrossRefPubMed Fischer JP, Fox JP, Nelson JA, Kovach SJ, Serletti JM. A longitudinal assessment of outcomes and healthcare resource utilization after immediate breast reconstruction-comparing implant- and autologous-based breast reconstruction. Ann Surg. 2015;262:692–699.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Zork NM, Komenaka IK, Pennington RE Jr, Bowling MW, Norton LE, Clare SE, et al. The effect of dedicated breast surgeons on the short-term outcomes in breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2008;248:280–285.CrossRefPubMed Zork NM, Komenaka IK, Pennington RE Jr, Bowling MW, Norton LE, Clare SE, et al. The effect of dedicated breast surgeons on the short-term outcomes in breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2008;248:280–285.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Blair SL, O’Shea KE, Orr RK. Surgeon variability in treating nonpalpable breast cancer: Surgical oncology as a value-added specialty. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5:28–32.CrossRefPubMed Blair SL, O’Shea KE, Orr RK. Surgeon variability in treating nonpalpable breast cancer: Surgical oncology as a value-added specialty. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5:28–32.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Eng J, Baliski C. Uptake and impact of synoptic reporting on breast cancer operative reports in a community care setting. Can J Surg. 2015;48:S238. Eng J, Baliski C. Uptake and impact of synoptic reporting on breast cancer operative reports in a community care setting. Can J Surg. 2015;48:S238.
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Lovrics PJ, Gordon M, Cornacchi SD, Farrokhyar F, Ramsaroop A, Hodgson N, et al. Practice patterns and perceptions of margin status for breast conserving surgery for breast carcinoma: national survey of Canadian general surgeons. Breast. 2012;21:730–734.CrossRefPubMed Lovrics PJ, Gordon M, Cornacchi SD, Farrokhyar F, Ramsaroop A, Hodgson N, et al. Practice patterns and perceptions of margin status for breast conserving surgery for breast carcinoma: national survey of Canadian general surgeons. Breast. 2012;21:730–734.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Porter GA, McMulkin H, Lovrics PJ. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: Canadian practice patterns. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:255–260.CrossRefPubMed Porter GA, McMulkin H, Lovrics PJ. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: Canadian practice patterns. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:255–260.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Surgeon Volume, Patient Age, and Tumor-Related Factors Influence the Need for Re-Excision After Breast-Conserving Surgery
verfasst von
L. Hughes, BSc
J. Hamm, MSc
C. McGahan, MSc
C. Baliski, MD
Publikationsdatum
07.10.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe Sonderheft 5/2016
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5602-8

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 5/2016

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

21.05.2024 TAVI Nachrichten

Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.